Otwarty dostęp

On Roach’s Presuppositional Response to Licona’s New Historiographical Approach

Perichoresis's Cover Image
Perichoresis
Miscellaneous Theological Studies: Biblical, Apologetic, Historical, Patristic, Theodicean, and Systematic. Issue Editor: Corneliu C. Simuţ

Zacytuj

Casey M (2010) Jesus of Nazareth: An Independent Historian’s Account of His Life and Teaching. London: T&T Clark.10.5040/9780567691224 Search in Google Scholar

Craig WL (1989) Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press. Search in Google Scholar

Craig WL (2008) Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics. 3rd edition. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books. Search in Google Scholar

Douven I (2011) Abduction. In Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring 2011. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/-abduction/ [2016, April 29]. Search in Google Scholar

Evans CA (ed) (2004) The Historical Jesus. Volume 1. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Licona MR (2010) The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach. Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP Academic. Search in Google Scholar

Lipton P (2004) Inference to the Best Explanation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203470855 Search in Google Scholar

Meier JP (1991) A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Volume 1. New York: Doubleday. Search in Google Scholar

Mellor DH (2005) Probability: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Roach WC (2019) Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona’s New Historiographical Approach. Perichoresis 17(3):43–61.10.2478/perc-2019-0021 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2284-7308
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
3 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Theology and Religion, General Topics and Biblical Reception