[
Atkeson, L. R. (2003): Not all cues are created equal: the conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. Journal of Politics 65(4): 1040–1061.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
André, A. – Depauw, S. – Shugart, M. S. – Chytilek, R. (2017): Party nomination strategies in flexible-list systems: Do preference votes matter? Party Politics 23(5): 589–600.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balík, S. – Pink, M. – Voda, P. (2019): Parlament s lidskou tváří: Biografické aspekty české legislativní politiky. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury a Masarykova univerzita.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balík, S. – Hruška, J. (2022): When Preferential Voting Really Matters: Explaining the Surprising Results of Parties in Electoral Coalitions. Czech Journal of Political Science 29(3): 316–341.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernard, J. – Čermák, D. (2021): Vzestupné a sestupné politické dráhy českých poslanců a senátorů. Acta Politologica 1: 22–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bräuninger T. – Brunner M. – Däubler T. (2012): Personal vote-seeking in flexible list systems: How electoral incentives shape Belgian MPs’ bill initiation behaviour. European Journal of Political Research 51(5): 607–645.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brockington D. (2003). A Low Information Theory of Ballot Position Effect. Political Behavior 25(1): 1–27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campbell, R. – Cowley, P. (2014): What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment. Political Studies 62(4): 745–765.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cantor D.M. – Herrnson P. S. (1997): Party campaign activity and party unity in the US house of representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(3): 393–415.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caul, M. (1999): Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties. Party Politics 5(1): 79–98
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ceyhan S. (2018): Who Runs at the Top of Party Lists? Determinants of Parties’ List Ranking in the 2013 German Bundestag Election. German Politics 27(1): 66–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crisp, B.F. – Jensen, K.M. – Shomer, Y. (2007): Magnitude and vote-seeking. Electoral Studies 26: 727–734.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crisp, B. F. – Olivella, S. – Malecki, M. – Sher, M. (2013): Vote-earning strategies in flexible list systems: Seats at the price of unity. Electoral Studies 32(4): 658–669
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cutler, F. (2002): The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice. The Journal of Politics 64(2): 466–490.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czech statistical office (2021): Metody pro přepočet hlasů na mandáty. Available at: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/metody_pro_prepocet_hlasu_na_mandaty. (4 December, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Däubler T. (2020): Do more flexible lists increase the take-up of preference voting? Electoral Studies 68 (December)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Däubler, T. – Christensen, L. – Linek, L. (2018): Parliamentary activity, re-selection and the personal vote. Evidence from flexible-list systems. Parliamentary Affairs 71(4): 930–949.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dodeigne, J. – Pilet, J.B. (2021). Centralized or decentralized personalization? Measuring intra-party competition in open and flexible list PR systems. Party Politics 27(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819855710
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dovi, S. (2009): In Praise of Exclusion. The Journal of Politics 71(3): 1172–1186.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dovi, S. (2010). Measuring Representation: Rethinking the Role of Exclusion. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dvořák, P. – Pink, M. (2022): Nomination of Ministers According to the Areas of Electoral Support for Political Parties in Elections to the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic. Politics in Central Europe 18(3): 433–460.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dvořák, P. – Podmaník, M. – Pink, M. (2021): Srovnání geografické reprezentativity vlád České republiky a Slovenské republiky. Slovak Sociological Review 53(1): 26–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erzeel, S. – Caluwaerts, D. (2015): Is It Gender, Ideology or Resources? Individual-Level Determinants of Preferential Voting for Male or Female Candidates. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 25(3): 265–283.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fulton, S. A. (2014): When gender matters: Macro-dynamics and micro-mechanisms. Political Behavior 36(3): 605–630
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gherghina S. – Chiru, M. (2010): Practice and payment: Determinants of candidate list position in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics 11(4): 533–552.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodin, R.E. (2004): Representing Diversity. British Journal of Political Science 34(3): 453–468.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grossman, G.M. – Helpman, E. (2005): Party Discipline and Pork-Barrel Politics, July 2005: Harvard Institute for Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 2075.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hájek, L. (2016): Definice, příčiny a důsledky kumulace mandátů zákonodárci. Central European Political Studies Review 18(2–3): 141–170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hájek, L. (2017): The effect of multiple-office holding on the parliamentary activity of MPs in the Czech Republic. The Journal of Legislative Studies 23(44): 484–507.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hána, D. (2013): Porcování ministerského medvěda: Souvislost mezi poslaneckými a minister-skými dotacemi v Česku v období 2004–2012. Czech Political Science Review 19(2): 76–92.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haase-Formánková, Z. – Líbal, M. – Oreský, J. (2022): Who Favours Men in Flexible-List PR Systems? Czech Journal of Political Science 3: 342–361.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heidar K. (2006): Parliamentary party group unity: does the electoral system matter? Acta Politica 41(3): 249–266
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holli, A. M. – Wass, H. (2010): Gender-based voting in the parliamentary elections of 2007 in Finland. European Journal of Political Research 49(5): 598–630.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chamber of Deputies Parliament of the Czech Republic (CHDPCZ). Chamber & Members. Available at: https://www.psp.cz/sqw/fsnem.sqw?zvo=1 (4 December, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheibub, J. A. – Sin, G. (2020): Preference vote and intra-party competition in open list PR systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 32(1): 70–95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiru, M. – Popescu, M. (2017): The Value of Legislative versus Electoral Experience and Gender in Explaining Candidate List Placement in Closed-List PR. Problems of Post-Communism 64(2): 65–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kam C. (2009): Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karvonen L. (2010): The Personalization of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Key, V. O. (1949): Southern politics in state and nation. Knoxville: Alfred A. Knopf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
King A. – Leigh A. (2009): Are Ballot Order Effects Heterogeneous? Social Science Quarterly 90(2009): 71–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kneblová, E. (2010): Využívání preferenčních hlasů, In Balík, S., ed., Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny v roce 2010, 159–184, Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kneblová, E. (2014): Využívání preferenčních hlasů, In Havlík, V., ed., Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2013, 239–258, Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Fakulta sociálních studií.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kopřiva, R. (2012): Analytické možnosti využití preferenčních hlasů při výzkumu volebního chování ve volbách zastupitelstev obcí. Acta Politologica 4(3): 315–333.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kouba K. – Filipec, O. – Nálepová, M. (2013). Proč jsou ženy v české politice podreprezentovány? Czech Journal of Political Science 4: 372–391.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krook, M.L. – O’Brien, D.Z. (2010): The Politics of Group Representation: Quotas for Women and Minorities Worldwide. Comparative Politics 42(3): 253–272.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kudrna, J. (2010): Preferenční hlasování ve volbách do Poslanecké sněmovny ČR. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica 56(2): 21–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kyloušek, J. (2006): Osobnostní rozměr parlamentních voleb (kandidátní listiny, preferenční hlasy a základní charakteristika zvolených poslanců). In Čaloud, D. et al, Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny v roce 2006, 108–122, Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latner, M. – McGann, A. (2005): Geographical representation under proportional representation: The cases of Israel and the Netherlands. Electoral studies 24(4): 709–734.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lebeda, T. (2004): Konečná podoba volebního systému pro Poslaneckou sněmovnu. Otazníky nad vynucenou úpravou z roku 2002, In M. Novák – T. Lebeda (eds.): Volební a stranické systémy. ČR v mezinárodním srovnání, Dobrá Voda, Aleš Čeněk, s. 231–252.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lebeda, T. (2007): Volební systémy a volební rozhování, In Lebeda, Tomáš, ed., Voliči a volby 2006, 16–36, Prague: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lebeda, T. (2009): Komunální volby klamou. Krátké zastavení nad problematickými aspekty volebního systému pro obecní zastupitelstva. Acta Politologica 1(3): 332–343.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mansbridge, J. (1999): Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”. The Journal of Politics 61(3): 628–657.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marien, S. – Schouteden, A. – Wauters, B. (2017): Voting for Women in Belgium’s Flexible List System. Politics & Gender 13(2): 305–335.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marsh, M. (1985): The Voters Decide?: Preferential Voting in European List Systems. European Journal of Political Research 13(4): 365–378.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meserve S.A. – Pemstein, D. – Bernhard, W.T. (2020): Gender, Incumbency and Party List Nominations. British Journal of Political Science 50(1): 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mikešová, R. – Kostelecký, T. (2016): Geografická reprezentativita poslanců zvolených do Poslanecké sněmovny českého parlamentu za první republiky (1918–1938) a po roce 1989. Středoevropské politické studie 18(4): 354–380.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millard, F. – Popescu, M. (2004): Preference voting in post-communist Europe. Available at: http://www.policy.hu/popescu/PREFERENCEVOTING1.pdf (4 April, 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, M.J. – Krosnick, A.J. (1998): The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly 62(3): 291–330.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morkes, J. (2007): Analýza preferenčního hlasování ve volbách do PSP ČR, BA Thesis, Brno, Masarykova univerzita.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Negri, M. (2018): Preferential votes and minority representation in open list proportional representation systems. Soc Choice Welf 50: 281–303.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Outlý, J. (2003): Strany a stát, volby a finance: vybrané aspekty primárních voleb a financování politických stran. Olomouc: Periplum, Studies and analyzes.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Outlý, J. – Prouza, J. (2013): Navrhování a výběr kandidátů: politické strany v ČR a ve střední Evropě. Olomouc: Civipolis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peskowitz, Z. (2019): Ideological signaling and incumbency advantage. British Journal of Political Science 49(2): 467–490
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips, A. (1998): Democracy and Representation: Or, Why Should It Matter Who Your Representatives Are?. In Phillips, A., Feminism and Politics, 224–240, Oxford: Oxford University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pitkin, H. (1972): The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pedersen, H. H. – Rahat, G. (2021): Political personalization and personalized politics within and beyond the behavioural arena. Party Politics 27(2): 211–219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poláková, M. – Kostelecký, T. (2016): Povolání zvolených poslanců za první republiky a dnes. Central European Political Studies Review 18(1): 1–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Put, G.-J. – Maddens, B. (2013): The Selection of Candidates for Eligible Positions on PR Lists: The Belgian/Flemish Federal Elections 1999–2010. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 23(1): 49–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Put, G.-J. (2016): Determinants of Geographical Representation on Candidate Lists in Flexible-List Systems: Lessons from the Belgian Case. Politics 36(2): 180–196.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Put, G.-J. – Smulders, J. – Maddens, B. (2019): Party nomination strategies in flexible-list systems: Do preference votes matter for realistic list positions?. Party Politics 27(2): 376–382.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Put, G.-J. – Muytens, G.-J. – Maddens, B. (2021): The effect of candidate electoral experience on ballot placement in list proportional representation systems. West European Politics 44(4): 969–990.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rakušanová, P. (2006): Česká politika: ženy v labyrintu mužů? Prague: Fórum 50%.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahat, G. – Sheafer, T. (2007): The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication 24(1): 65–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reynolds, A. – Steenbergen, M. (2006): How the world votes: The political consequences of ballot design, innovation and manipulation. Electoral Studies 25(3): 570–598.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryšavý, D. (2016): Career politicians a dozen years after regionalisation of the Czech Republic (2000–13). The Journal of Legislative Studies 22(1): 54–82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sandberg, S. (2013): Cumul des mandats the Finnish Way. The Anatomy of Multiple-Office Holding among Members of the Finnish Eduskunta 2000–2012. XXII Norkom conference, November 21–22, Åbo, Finland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sapiro, V. (1981): When Are Interests Interesting? American Political Science Review 75(September): 701–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shugart, M. – Valdini, M.E. – Suominen, K. (2005) Looking for Locals: voter information demands and personal vote-earning attributes of legislators under proportional representation. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 437–449
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sieberer, U. (2010): Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems: deviating voting behavior of district and list MPs in the German Bundestag. Electoral Studies 29(3): 484–496.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smolková, A. – Balík, S. (2018): Personalizace na komunální úrovni: existuje a lze ji v českém prostředí zkoumat? Central Europe Political Studies 20(2): 204–221.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spáč, P. (2011): Ako (de)stabilizovať preferenčné hlasovanie. Středoevropské politické studie 4: 325–353.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spáč, P. (2016): The Role of Ballot Ranking: Preferential Voting in a Nationwide Constituency in Slovakia. East European Politics and Societies 30(3): 644–663.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Squires, J. (1996): Quotas for Women: Fair Representation? Parliamentary Affairs 49(1): 71–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smrek, M. (2023): Mavericks or Loyalists? Popular Ballot Jumpers and Party Discipline in the Flexible-List PR Context. Political Research Quarterly 76(1): 323–336.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tavits, M. (2009): The making of mavericks local loyalties and party defection. Comparative Political Studies 42(6): 793–815
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tavits M. (2010): Effect of local ties on electoral success and parliamentary behaviour. Party Politics 16(2): 215–235
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuček, M. (2019): Prestige of Occupations (2019). Public Opinion Research Centre, Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences. Available at: https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c2/a4986/f9/eu190724.pdf (4 December 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vartazaryan G. – Škultéty, O. (2022): Preferential Voting in the Elections to the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Political Science 3: 298–315.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vlada.cz. Government of the Czech Republic: 1993–2021 CR. Availlable at: https://www.vlada.cz/cz/clenove-vlady/historie-minulych-vlad/prehled-vlad-cr/1993-2007-cr/. (4December,2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voda, P. – Pink, M. (2009): Kandidáti v poslaneckých volbách. Analýza preferenčního hlasování ve volbách do PS PČR v roce 2006. Central Europe Political Studies 11(2–3): 163–180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voda, P. (2010): Efekt kandidáta. In Balík, S., ed., Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny v roce 2010, 187–207, Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voda P. (2012): Analýza preferenčního hlasování. In Balík, S., ed. Krajské volby 2012, 161–199, Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Fakulta sociálních studií.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voda, P. (2014): Efekt kandidáta ve volbách do Poslanecké sněmovny v roce 2013. In Havlík, V., ed., Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2013, 259–281, Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Fakulta sociálních studií.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Volby.cz. Chamber of Deputies, The Senate, Regional Councils, local Councils, European Parliament, Elections of Czehoslovakia. 1990–2021. Available at: https://volby.cz/ (4 December, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wildgen, J.K. (1985): Preference voting and intraparty competition in Italy: Some new evidence on the Communist-Christian Democrat stalemate. Journal of Politics 47(3): 947–957.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, M.S. (1998): Voice, trust, and memory: marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, I.M. (1990): Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
| 15 cze 2023