[Allen, A. P. & O’Conner, R. J. 2000. Hierarchical correlates of bird assemblage structure on Northeastern USA lakes. – Environmental Monitoring Assessment 62(1): 15–35. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006244932033]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bagyura, J., Fidlóczky, J., Schwartz, V. & Tóth, L. 2017. Interesting breeding cases of the Raven (Corvus corax) in Hungary. – Ornis Hungarica 25(1): 39–43. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-0003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bankovics, A. 2001. Status of wild Pigeons and Doves in Hungary. – Naturzale 16: 61–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bersier, L. F. & Meyer, D. R. 1994. Bird assemblages in mosaic forests – the relative importance of vegetation structure and floristic composition along the successional gradient. – Acta Oecologica 15: 561–576.10.3406/revec.1995.2154]Search in Google Scholar
[Bersier, L. F. & Meyer, D. R. 1995. Relationships between bird assemblages, vegetation structure, and floristic composition of mosaic patches in riparian forests. – Revue d’ Ecologie-la Terre et la Vie 50: 15–33.10.3406/revec.1995.2154]Search in Google Scholar
[Blair, R. B. 1999. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? – Ecological Applications 9(1): 164–170. DOI: 10.2307/2641176]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Blair, R. B. 2001. Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the United States: is urbanization creating a homogeneous fauna? – In: Lockwood, J. L. & McKinney, M. L. (eds.) Biotic Homogenization: The Loss of Diversity Through Invasion and Extinction. – Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. pp. 33–56.10.1007/978-1-4615-1261-5_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Caldwell, L. D. 1964. Dove production and nest site selection in Southern Michigan. – The Journal of Wildlife Management 28(4): 732–738. DOI: 10.2307/3798788]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chace, J. F. & Walsh, J. J. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. – Landscape and Urban Planning 74(1): 46–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Croci, S., Butet, A. & Clergeau, P. 2008. Does urbanization filter birds on the basis of their biological traits? – Condor 110(2): 223–240. DOI: 10.1525/cond.2008.8409]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Devictor, V., Julliard, R., Couvet, D., Lee, A. & Jiguet, F. 2007. Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. – Conservation Biology 21(3): 741–751. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00671.x17531052]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Emlen, J. T. 1974. An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. – Condor 76(2): 184–197. DOI: 10.2307/1366729]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Garaffa, P. I., Filloy, J. & Bellocq, M. I. 2009. Bird community responses along urban–rural gradients: Does the size of the urbanized area matter? – Landscape and Urban Planning 90(1–2): 33–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ives, C. D., Lentini, P. E., Threlfall, C. G., Ikin, K., Shanahan, D. F., Garrard, G. E., Bekessy, S. A., Fuller, R. A., Mumaw, L., Rayner, L., Rowe, R., Valentine, L. E. & Kendal, D. 2016. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. – Global Ecology and Biogeography 25(1): 117–126. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12404]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jokimäki, J. & Suhonen, J. 1993. Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison. – Ornis Fennica 70: 71–77.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jokimäki, J., Suhonen, J., Vuorisalo, T., Kövér, L. & Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M-L. 2017. Urbanization and nestsite selection of the Black-billed Magpie (Pica pica) populations in two Finnish cities: From a persecuted species to an urban exploiter. – Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 577–585. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.001.]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Juhász, L. 1990. A balkáni gerle állományának változása 1980–1990 között hazánk néhány mezőgazdasági régiójában [Population changes in the population on Eurasian Collared Doves between 1980–1990 in some of the agricultural lands of Hungary]. – Debreceni Agrártudományi Egyetem Tudományos Közleményei 1990: 153–169. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Kluza, D. A., Griffin, C. R. & DeGraaf, R. M. 2000. Housing developments in rural New England: effects on forest birds. – Animal Conservation 3(1): 15–26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00083.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kövér, L., Gyüre, P., Balogh, P., Huettmann, F., Lengyel, Sz. & Juhász, L. 2015. Recent colonization and nest site selection of the Hooded Crow (Corvus corone cornix L.) in an urban environment. – Landscape and Urban Planning 133: 78–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Marzluff, J. M., Bowman, R. & Donelly, R. 2001. A historical perspective on urban bird research: trend, term, and approaches. – In: Marzluff, J. M., Bowman, R. & Donelly, R. (eds.) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. – Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA. pp. 1–17.10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Máthé, O. & Batáry, P. 2015. Insectivorous and open-cup nester bird species suffer the most from urbanization. – Bird Study 62(1): 78–86. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2014.1000262]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McIvor, G. E. & Healy, S. D. 2017. Nest site selection and patterns of nest re-use in the Hooded Crow Corvus cornix. – Bird Study 64(3): 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2017.1364220]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Meffert, P. J. & Dziock, F. 2013. The influence of urbanisation on diversity and trait composition of birds. – Landscape Ecology 28: 943–957. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9867-z]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Meyrier, E., Jenni, L., Bötsch, Y., Strebel, S., Erne, B. & Tablado, Z. 2017. Happy to breed in the city? Urban food resources limit reproductive output in Western Jackdaws. – Ecology and Evolution 7(5): 1363–1374. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2733]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mills, G. S., Dunning, Jr., J. B. & Bates, J. M. 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern desert habitats. – Condor 91(2): 416–428. DOI: 10.2307/1368320]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Morelli, F., Benedetti, Y., Ibanez-Alamo, J. D., Jokimäki, J., Mänd, R., Tryjanowski, P. & Møller, A. P. 2016. Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. – Global Ecology and Biogeography 25(11): 1284-1293. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12486]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[O’Connell, T. J., Jackson, L. E. & Brooks, R. P. 2000. Bird guilds as indicators of ecological condition in the central Appalachians. – Ecological Applications 10(6): 1706–1721. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1706:BGAIOE]2.0.CO;2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Poague, K. L., Johnson, R. J. & Young, L. J. 2000. Bird use of rural and urban converted railroad rights-of-way in southeast Nebraska. – Wildlife Social Biology 28(4): 852–864. DOI: 10.2307/3783840]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pielowski, Z. 1969. Belt assessment as a reliable method of determining the numbers of Hares. – Acta Theriologica 14(9): 133–140.10.4098/AT.arch.69-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenberg, K. V., Terrill, S. B. & Rosenberg, G. H. 1987. Value of suburban habitats to desert riparian birds. – Wilson Bulletin 99(4): 642–654.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sakhvon, V. & Kövér, L. 2020. Distribution and habitat preferences of the urban Woodpigeon (Columba palumbus) in the north-eastern breeding range in Belarus. – Landscape and Urban Planning 201: 103846. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103846]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sol, D., González-Lagos, C., Moreira, D., Maspons, J. & Lapiedra, O. 2014. Urbanisation tolerance and the loss of avian diversity. – Ecology Letters 17(8): 942–950. DOI: 10.1111/ele.1229724835452]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Szűcs, E. 1978. A debreceni István gőzmalom története [History of ‘István’ steam mill in Debrecen]. – Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Levéltár Közleményei 12. (in Hungarian)]Search in Google Scholar
[Vignoli, L., Scirè, S. & Bologna, M. A. 2013. Rural-urban gradient and land use in a millenary metropolis: how urbanization affects avian functional groups and the role of old villas in bird assemblage patterning. – Web Ecology 13(1): 49–67. DOI: 10.5194/we-13-49-2013]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar