Does human hair attract or deter potential ground nest predators?

Albrecht, T. & Klvaňa, P. 2004. Nest crypsis, reproductive value of a clutch and escape decisions in incubating female Mallards Anas platyrhynchos. – Ethology 110(8): 603–613. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.00992.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Andelt, W. F., Burnham, K. P. & Baker, D. L. 1994. Effectiveness of capsaicin and bitrex repellents for deterring browsing by captive Mule Deer. – Journal of Wildlife Management 58(2): 330–334. DOI: 10.2307/3809398Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Báldi, A. 1999. A fészekaljpredáció jelentősége, valamint kísérletes vizsgálatának előnyei, hátrányai és módszertana [The use of artificial nests for estimating rates of nest survival]. – Ornis Hungarica 8–9: 39–55. (in Hungarian)Search in Google Scholar

Bateman, P. W., Fleming, P. A. & Wolfe, A. K. 2017. A different kind of ecological modelling: the use of clay model organisms to explore predator-prey interactions in vertebrates. – Journal of Zoology 301(4): 251–262. DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12415Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bayne, E. M. & Hobson, K. A. 1999. Do clay eggs attract predators to artificial nests? – Journal of Field Ornithology 70(1): 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

Bayne, E. M., Hobson, K. A. & Fargey, P. 1997. Predation on artificial nests in relation to forest type: contrasting the use of quail and plasticine eggs. – Ecography 20(3): 233–239. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00366.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Belant, J. L., Seamans, T. W. & Tyson, L. A. 1998. Predator urines as chemical barriers to White-tailed Deer. – Proceedings of the Eighteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference 4. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpc18/410.5070/V418110042Search in Google Scholar

Berger-Geiger, B., Galizia, C. G. & Arroyo, B. 2019. Montagu’s Harrier breeding parameters in relation to weather, colony size and nest protection schemes: a long-term study in Extremadura, Spain. – Journal of Ornithology 160: 429–441. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-018-1618-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bocz, R., Szép, D., Witz, D., Ronczyk, L., Kurucz, K. & Purger, J. J. 2017. Human disturbances and predation on artificial ground nests across an urban gradient. – Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 40(2): 153–157. DOI: 10.32800/abc.2017.40.0153Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bolduc, F. & Guillemette, M. 2003. Human disturbance and nesting success of Common Eiders: interaction between visitors and gulls. – Biological Conservation 110(1): 77–83. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00178-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bu, H., Shen, X. & Li, S. 2019. Predation patterns on artificial nests of ground nesting pheasants in the montane forest, Southwest China. – Acta Ornithologica 54(1): 35–43. DOI: 10.3161/00016454AO2019.54.1.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clark, R. G. & Wobeser, B. K. 1997. Making sense of scents: effects of odour on survival of simulated duck nests. – Journal of Avian Biology 28(1): 31–37. DOI: 10.2307/3677091Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Collias, N. E. & Collias, E. C. 1984. Nest building and bird behavior. – Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey10.1515/9781400853625Search in Google Scholar

Cox, R., Baker, S. E., Macdonald, D. W. & Berdoy, M. 2004. Protecting egg prey from Carrion Crows: the potential of aversive conditioning. – Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87(3–4): 325–342. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Csete, S. & Purger, D. 2019. Élőhelyek és növényzet a Barcsi Ó-Dráva holtág területén [Habitats and vegetation in the area of Old-Drava oxbow near Barcs]. – In: Purger, D. & Purger, J. J. (eds.) A Barcsi Ó-Dráva holtág élőhelyei és élővilága [Habitats and wildlife of the Old-Drava oxbow near Barcs]. – BioRes, Pécs, pp. 23–46. (in Hungarian with English Summary)Search in Google Scholar

Curtis, P. D., Fargione, M. J. & Richmond, M. E. 1994. Preventing deer damage with barrier, electrical, and behavioral fencing systems. – Proceedings of the Sixteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference 15. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/vpc16/15Search in Google Scholar

Düttmann, H., Lettau, K. & Barkow, A. 2007. Can noxious odours effectively protect clutches of ground-nesting birds? – Ardea 95(2): 267–274. DOI: 10.5253/078.095.0209Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fitzwater, W. D. 1972. Barrier fencing in wildlife management. – Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Control Conference 5: 49–55.Search in Google Scholar

Fontaine, J. J. & Martin, T. E. 2006. Parent birds assess nest predation risk and adjust their reproductive strategies. – Ecology Letters 9(4): 428–434. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00892.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Götmark, F. 1992. The effects of investigator disturbance on nesting birds. – Current Ornithology 9: 63–104. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9921-7_3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Halupka, K. 2009. J-test. – http://zeb.uni.wroc.pl/halupka/Search in Google Scholar

Harriman, V. B., Pitt, J. A. & Larivière, S. 2007. Do repugnant scents increase survival of ground nests? A test with artificial and natural duck nests. – Canadian Field Naturalist 121(2): 150–154. DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v121i2.439Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Haskell, D. G. 1996. Do bright colors at nests incur a cost due to predation? – Evolutionary Ecology 10(3): 285–288. DOI: 10.1007/BF01237685Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hayward, M. W. & Kerley, G. I. H. 2009. Fencing for conservation: restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes? – Biological Conservation 142(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.022Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hockin, D., Ounsted, M., Gormant, M., Hillt, D., Kellert, V. & Barker, M. A. 1992. Examination of the effects of disturbance on birds with reference to its importance in ecological assessments. – Journal of Environmental Management 36(4): 253–286. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4797(08)80002-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Homberger, B., Duplain, J., Jenny, M. & Jenni, L. 2017. Agri-evironmental schemes and active nest protection can increase hatching success of a reintroduced farmland bird species. – Landscape and Urban Planning 161: 44–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hygnstrom, S. E. & Craven, S. R. 1988. Electric fences and commercial repellents for reducing deer damage in cornfields. – Wildlife Society Bulletin 16(3): 291–296.Search in Google Scholar

Ibáñez-Álamo, J. D., Magrath, R. D., Oteyza, J. C., Chalfoun, A. D., Haff, T. M., Schmidt, K. A., Thomson, R. L. & Martin, T. E. 2015. Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives. – Journal of Ornithology 156(Suppl.1): 247–262. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-015-1207-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Isaksson, D., Wallander, J. & Larsson, M. 2007. Managing predation on ground-nesting birds: The effectiveness of nest exclosures. – Biological Conservation 136(1): 136–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Johnson, D. H. 1979. Estimating nest success: the Mayfield method and an alternative. – Auk 96(4): 651–661. DOI: 10.1093/auk/96.4.651Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kurucz, K., Batáry, P., Frank, K. & Purger, J. J. 2015. Effects of daily nest monitoring on predation rate - an artificial nest experiment. – North-Western Journal of Zoology 11(2): 219–224. http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/content/v11n2/nwjz_141605_Kurucz.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Kurz, D. J., Straley, K. M. & DeGregorio, B. A. 2011. Out-foxing the Red Fox: how to best protect the nests of the endangered loggerhead Marine Turtle Caretta caretta from mammalian predation? – Oryx 46(2): 223–228. DOI: 10.1017/S0030605311000147Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LaManna, J. A., Hemenway, A. B., Boccadori, V. & Martin, T. E. 2015. Bird species turnover is related to changing predation risk along a vegetation gradient. – Ecology 96(6): 1670–1680. DOI: 10.1890/14-1333.1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Latham, M. C., Anderson, D. P., Norbury, G., Price, C. J., Banks, P. B. & Latham, A. D. M. 2019. Modeling habituation of introduced predators to unrewarding bird odors for conservation of ground-nesting shorebirds. – Ecological Applications 29(1): e01814. DOI: 10.1002/eap.181430312506Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lyons, T. P., Miller, J. R., Debinski, D. M. & Engle, D. M. 2015. Predator identity influences the effect of habitat management on nest predation. – Ecological Applications 25(6): 1596–1605. DOI: 10.1890/14-1641.126552267Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Macdonald, D. & Baker, S. E. 2004. Non-lethal control of fox predation: the potential of generalised aversion. – Animal Welfare 13(1): 77–85.10.1017/S0962728600026701Search in Google Scholar

Maier, T. J. & DeGraaf, R. M. 2001. Differences in depredation by small predators limit the use of plasticine and zebra finch eggs in artificial-nest studies. – The Condor 103: 180–183. DOI: 10.1093/condor/103.1.180Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mainwaring, M. C., Hartley, I. R., Lambrechts, M. M. & Deeming, D. C. 2014. The design and function of birds’ nests. – Ecology and Evolution 4(20): 3909–3928. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1054424257525505520Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Major, R. E. 1991. Identification of nest predators by photography, dummy eggs, and adhesive tape. – The Auk 108(1): 190–195. DOI: 10.1093/auk/108.1.190Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Major, R. E. & Kendal, C. E. 1996. The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions. – Ibis 138(2): 298–307. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb04342.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Martin, T. E. 1993 Nest predation and nest sites: new perspectives on old patterns. – BioScience 43(8): 523–532. DOI: 10.2307/1311947Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Martin, T. E. 1995. Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. – Ecological Monographs 65(1): 101–127. DOI: 10.2307/2937160Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mayfield, H. F. 1975. Suggestions for calculating nest success. – Wilson Bulletin 87: 456–466.Search in Google Scholar

Medeiros, R., Ramos, J. A., Paiva, V. H., Almeida, A., Pedro, P. & Antunes, S. 2007. Signage reduces the impact of human disturbance on little tern nesting success in Portugal. – Biological Conservation 135(1): 99–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Miller, E. A., Young, J. K., Stelting, S. & Kimball, B. A. 2014. Efficacy of Ropel® as a Coyote repellent. – Human-Wildlife Interactions 8(2): 271–278. DOI: 10.26077/vgqg-f189Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Milunas, M. C., Rhoads, A. F. & Mason, J. R. 1994. Effectiveness of odour repellents for protecting ornamental shrubs from browsing by White-tailed Deer. – Crop Protection 13(5): 393–397. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2012.684550Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Moore, R. P. & Robinson, W. D. 2004. Artificial bird nests, external validity, and bias in ecological field studies. – Ecology 85(6): 1562–1567. DOI: 10.1890/03-0088Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Moreno, J. 2012. Avian nests and nest-building as signals. – Avian Biology Research 5(4): 238–251. DOI: 10.3184/175815512X13534385822786Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Niehaus, A. C., Heard, S. B., Hendrix, S. D. & Hillis, S. L. 2003. Measuring edge effects on nest predation in forest fragments: do finch and quail eggs tell different stories? – The American Midland Naturalist 149(2): 335–343. DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2003)149[0335:MEEONP]2.0.CO;2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Purger, J. J. 2019. A Barcsi Ó-Dráva holtág és környékének emlősfaunája [Mammalian fauna of the Old-Drava oxbow near Barcs and its surroundings]. – In: Purger, D. & Purger, J. J. (eds.) A Barcsi Ó-Dráva holtág élőhelyei és élővilága [Habitats and wildlife of the Old-Drava oxbow near Barcs]. – BioRes, Pécs, pp. 189–202. (in Hungarian with English Summary)Search in Google Scholar

Purger, J. J. & Fenyősi, L. 2019. Madarak monitorozása és állománybecslése a Barcsi Ó-Dráva holtágon [Monitoring and population estimation of the avian fauna along the Old-Drava oxbow near Barcs]. – In: Purger, D. & Purger, J. J. (eds.) A Barcsi Ó-Dráva holtág élőhelyei és élővilága [Habitats and wildlife of the Old-Drava oxbow near Barcs]. – BioRes, Pécs, pp. 155–188. (in Hungarian with English Summary)Search in Google Scholar

Purger, J. J., Csuka, S. & Kurucz, K. 2008. Predation survival of ground nesting birds in grass and wheat fields: experiment with plasticine eggs and artificial nests. – Polish Journal of Ecology 56(3): 481–486.Search in Google Scholar

Purger, J. J., Kurucz, K., Tóth, Á. & Batáry, P. 2012. Coating plasticine eggs can eliminate the overestimation of predation on artificial ground nests. – Bird Study 59(3): 350–352. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2012.684550Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rangen, S. A., Clarc, R. G. & Hobson, K. A. 1999. Influence of nest-site vegetation and predator community on the success of artificial songbird nests. – Canadian Journal of Zoology 77(11): 1676–1681. DOI: 10.1139/z99-141Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rangen, S. A., Clarc, R. G. & Hobson, K. A. 2000. Visual and olfactory attributes of artificial nests. – The Auk 117(1): 136–146. DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0136:VAOAOA]2.0.CO;2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ricklefs, R. E. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. – Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 9: 1–48. DOI: 10.5479/si.00810282.9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Roos, S., Smart, J., Gibbons, D. W. & Wilson, J. D. 2018. A review of predation as a limiting factor for bird populations in mesopredator-rich landscapes: a case study of the UK. – Biological Reviews 93(4): 1915–1937. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12426Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Roper, J. J. 1992. Nest predation experiments with quail eggs: too much to swallow? – Oikos 65(3): 528–530. DOI: 10.2307/3545570Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rosell, F. & Czech, A. 2000. Responses of foraging Eurasian Beavers Castor fiber to predator odours. – Wildlife Biology 6(4): 13–21. DOI: 10.2981/wlb.2000.033Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Santangeli, A., Arroyo, B., Millon, A. & Bretagnolle, V. 2015. Identifying effective actions to guide volunteer-based and nationwide conservation efforts for a groundnesting farmland bird. – Journal of Applied Ecology 52(4): 1082–1091. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12445Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sargeant, A. B., Greenwood, R. J. Sovada, M. A. & Shaffer, T. L. 1993. Distribution and abundance of predators that affect duck production - prairie pothole region. – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication 194: 1–96.Search in Google Scholar

Seibold, S., Hempel, A., Piehl, S., Bassler, S., Brandl, R., Rosner, S. & Müller, J. 2013. Forest vegetation structure has more influence on predation risk of artificial ground nests than human activities. – Basic and Applied Ecology 14(8): 687–693. DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2013.09.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Skagen, S. K., Stanley, T. R. & Dillon, M. B. 1999. Do mammalian nest predators follow human scent trails in the shortgrass prairie? – Wilson Bulletin 111(3): 415–420.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, R. K., Pullin, A. S., Stewart, G. B. & Sutherland, W. J. 2011. Is nest predator exclusion an effective strategy for enhancing bird populations? – Biological Conservation 144(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Storaas, T. 1988. A comparison of losses in artificial and naturally occurring Capercaillie nests. – The Journal of Wildlife Management 52(1): 123–126. DOI: 10.2307/3801071Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Vacca, M. M. & Handel, C. M. 1988. Factors influencing predation associated with visits to artificial goose nests. – Journal of Field Ornithology 59(3): 215–223.Search in Google Scholar

Vilardell, A., Capalleras, X., Budó, J., Molist, F. & Pons, P. 2008. Test of the efficacy of two chemical repellents in the control of Hermann’s Tortoise nest predation. – European Journal of Wildlife Research 54(4): 745–748. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-008-0176-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ward, J. S. & Williams, S. C. 2010. Effectiveness of deer repellents in Connecticut. – Human-Wildlife Interactions 4(1): 56–66. DOI: 10.26077/v0bn-9k23Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Whelan, C. J., Dilger, M. L., Robson, D., Hallyn, N. & Dilger, S. 1994. Effects of olfactory cues on artificial-nest experiments. – The Auk 111(4): 945–952. DOI: 10.2307/4088826Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wyatt, T. D. 2014. Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste, 2^nd ed. – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139030748Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zar, J. H. 2010. Biostatistical Analysis. 5^th ed. – Pearson, Prentice-Hall, HarlowSearch in Google Scholar