Otwarty dostęp

Plasma technology to remove NOx from off-gases

Andrzej Pawelec

Andrzej Pawelec

Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and TechnologyWarsaw, Poland
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Pawelec, Andrzej
, 
Andrzej G. Chmielewski

Andrzej G. Chmielewski

Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and TechnologyWarsaw, Poland
Profil Orcid
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Chmielewski, Andrzej G.
, 
Yongxia Sun

Yongxia Sun

Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and TechnologyWarsaw, Poland
Profil Orcid
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Sun, Yongxia
, 
Sylwester Bułka

Sylwester Bułka

Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and TechnologyWarsaw, Poland
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Bułka, Sylwester
, 
Toms Torims

Toms Torims

Riga Technical UniversityRiga, Latvia
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Torims, Toms
, 
Guntis Pikurs

Guntis Pikurs

Riga Technical UniversityRiga, Latvia
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Pikurs, Guntis
 oraz 
Gösta Mattausch

Gösta Mattausch

Fraunhofer Institute for Organic Electronics, Electron Beam and Plasma Technology, FEP DresdenGermany
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Mattausch, Gösta
  
25 lis 2021
Plasma technology to remove NOx from off-gases's Cover Image
O artykule
Poprzedni artykuł
Następny artykuł
Zacytuj
Pobierz okładkę
Kategoria artykułu: Technical Note
Data publikacji: 25 lis 2021
Zakres stron: 227 - 231
Otrzymano: 02 lis 2020
Przyjęty: 11 gru 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2021-0033
Słowa kluczowe
© 2021 Andrzej Pawelec et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1

The concept of hybrid EBFGT process.
The concept of hybrid EBFGT process.

Fig. 2

Comparison of process efficiencies between sole electron beam and hybrid electron beam process with simulated seawater and simulated seawater and NaClO2 addition with phosphate buffer [9].
Comparison of process efficiencies between sole electron beam and hybrid electron beam process with simulated seawater and simulated seawater and NaClO2 addition with phosphate buffer [9].

Fig. 3

Comparison of hybrid electron beam wet scrubber process with the addition of different oxidants in the seawater buffered with phosphate buffer solution [10].
Comparison of hybrid electron beam wet scrubber process with the addition of different oxidants in the seawater buffered with phosphate buffer solution [10].

Fig. 4

Photo of EBFGT pilot laboratory flow system. Wet scrubber (left) and process vessel (right) under ILU 6 electron accelerator scanning horn.
Photo of EBFGT pilot laboratory flow system. Wet scrubber (left) and process vessel (right) under ILU 6 electron accelerator scanning horn.

Fig. 5

NOx removal efficiency in hybrid electron beam wet scrubbing system with and without scrubbing solution spraying inside reaction chamber (3.5% NaCl-NaOH-10 mM NaClO2 as scrubbing solution SO2: 716 ppm; NOx: 2263 ppm).
NOx removal efficiency in hybrid electron beam wet scrubbing system with and without scrubbing solution spraying inside reaction chamber (3.5% NaCl-NaOH-10 mM NaClO2 as scrubbing solution SO2: 716 ppm; NOx: 2263 ppm).

Fig. 6

General scheme of pilot hybrid EBFGT plant. 1 – flue gas source, 2 – mobile accelerator, 3 – scrubber, 4 – seawater tank.
General scheme of pilot hybrid EBFGT plant. 1 – flue gas source, 2 – mobile accelerator, 3 – scrubber, 4 – seawater tank.

Fig. 7

Photo of EBFGT installation at Riga Shipyard. Mobile accelerator unit (right) and wet scrubber (left).
Photo of EBFGT installation at Riga Shipyard. Mobile accelerator unit (right) and wet scrubber (left).

Fig. 8

NO and NOx removal rates obtained during pilot plant tests.
NO and NOx removal rates obtained during pilot plant tests.
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Chemia, Chemia nuklearna, Fizyka, Astronomia i astrofizyka, Fizyka, inne
Kanał RSS czasopisma