Simulated nuclear contamination scenario, solid cancer risk assessment, and support to decision

1. Lugar, R. G. (2005, June). The Lugar survey on proliferation threats and responses. Available from https://fas.org/irp/threat/lugar_survey.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. Reed, B. C. (2014). The history and science of the Manhattan project. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-40297-5Search in Google Scholar

3. Mian, Z., & Glaser, A. (2015). Nuclear weapons and fissile material stockpiles and production. In NPT Review Conference, 27 April – 22 May 2015. New York, USA: United Nations. Available from http://www.princeton.edu/~aglaser/IT050-Mian-Glaser-NPT-New-York.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bunn, M., & Wier, A. (2006). Terrorist nuclear weapon construction: How difficult? Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci., 607(1), 133–149.10.1177/0002716206290260Search in Google Scholar

5. Potter, W. C., & Mukhatzhanova, G. (2010). Forecasting nuclear proliferation in the 21st century (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503627420Search in Google Scholar

6. Reed, B. C. (2011). Fission fizzles: Estimating the yield of a predetonated nuclear weapon. Am. J. Phys., 79(7), 769–773.10.1119/1.3569575Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Marka, J. C. (1993). Explosive properties of reactor-grade plutonium. Science and Global Security, 4(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929889308426394.10.1080/08929889308426394Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Garwin, R. L., & von Hippel, N. (2006). A technical analysis: Deconstructing North Korea’s October 9 nuclear test. Arm Control Association. Available from https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2006_11/tech.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mazzetti, M. (2006, October 14). Preliminary samples hint at North Korean nuclear test. New York Times. Available from https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/14/world/asia/14nuke.html.Search in Google Scholar

10. Zhao, L. -F., Xie, X. -B., Wang, W. -M., & Yao, Z. -X. (2008). Regional seismic characteristics of the 9 October 2006 North Korean nuclear test. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 98(6), 2571–2589. doi: 10.1785/0120080128.10.1785/0120080128Search in Google Scholar

11. Poeton, R. W., Glines, W. M., & McBaugh, D. (2009). Planning for the worst in Washington State: initial response planning for improvised nuclear device explosions. Health Phys., 96(1), 19–26.10.1097/01.HP.0000326329.89953.5c19066483Search in Google Scholar

12. Florig, H. K., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individuals’ decisions affecting radiation exposure after a nuclear explosion. Health Phys., 92(5), 475–483.10.1097/01.HP.0000255660.33000.a617429306Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Meit, M., Redlener, I., Briggs, T. W., Kwanisai, M., Culp, D., & Abramson, D. M. (2011). Rural and suburban population surge following detonation of an improvised nuclear device: a new model to estimate impact. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep., 5(Suppl. 1), S143–S150. https://doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2011.20.10.1001/dmp.2011.2021402807Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Greenberg, M. R., & Lowrie, K. W. (2009). Risk analysis. Risk Anal., 29(3), 315–316.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01215.x19243533Search in Google Scholar

15. Thompson, D. E., Mabuchi, K., Ron, E., Soda, M., Tokunaga, M., Ochikubo, S., Sugimoto, S., Ikeda, T., Terasaki, M., Izumi, S., & Preston, D. L. (1994). Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958–1987. Radiat. Res., 137(2s), S17–S67.10.2307/3578892Search in Google Scholar

16. Ron, E., Preston, D. L., Mabuchi, K., Thompson, D. E., & Soda, M. (1994). Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part IV: Comparison of cancer incidence and mortality. Radiat. Res., 137(2s), S98–S112.10.2307/3578894Search in Google Scholar

17. Mabuchi, K., Soda, M., Ron, E., Tokunaga, M., Ochikubo, S., Sugimoto, S., Ikeda, T., Terasaki, M., Preston, D. L., & Thompson, D. E. (1994). Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part I: Use of the tumor registries in Hiroshima and Nagasaki for incidence studies. Radiat. Res., 137(2s), S1–S16.10.2307/3578891Search in Google Scholar

18. Homann, S. G. (2013). HotSpot Health Physics Codes Version 3.0 User’s Guide. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA.Search in Google Scholar

19. Jones, A., Thomson, D., Hort, M., & Devenish, B. (2007). The UK Met Office’s next-generation atmospheric dispersion model, Name III. In C. Borrego, & A. -L. Norman (Eds.), Air pollution modeling and its application XVII (pp. 580–589). Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-68854-1_62Search in Google Scholar

20. Shin, H., & Kim, J. (2009). Development of realistic RDD scenarios and their radiological consequence analyses. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 67(7/8), 1516–1520.10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.02.05419318261Search in Google Scholar

21. Saint Yves, T. L. A., Carbal, P. A. M., Brum, T., Rother, F. C., Alves, P. F. P. M., Lauria, D. C., & de Andrade E. R. (2012). Terrorist radiological dispersive device (RDD) scenario and cancer risk assessment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 18(5), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2012.707926.10.1080/10807039.2012.707926Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Onishchenko, G. G. (2007). Radiological and medical consequences of the Chernobyl atomic power station accident in the Russian Federation. Gig. Sanit., 4, 6–13 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar

23. Glasstone, S., & Dolan, P. J. (1977). The effects of nuclear weapons. Washington, DC: US Department of Defense.10.21236/ADA087568Search in Google Scholar

24. Hendee, W. R. (1992). Estimation of radiation risks. BEIR V and its significance for medicine. JAMA, 268(5), 620–624.10.1001/jama.1992.03490050068028Search in Google Scholar

25. Preston, D. L., Kusumi, S., Tomonaga, M., Izumi, S., Ron, S., Kuramoto, A., Kamada, N., Dohy, H., Matsui, T., Nonaka, H., Thompson, D. E., Soda, M., & Mabuchi, K. (1994). Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III. Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950–1987. Radiat. Res., 137(2s), S68–S97.10.2307/3578893Search in Google Scholar

26. Charles, M. (2001). UNSCEAR Report 2000: sources and effects of ionizing radiation, United Nations Scientific Comittee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. J. Radiol. Prot., 21(1), 83–86.10.1088/0952-4746/21/1/60911281539Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Socol, Y., & Dobrzynski, L. (2015). Atomic bomb survivors life-span study: Insufficient statistical power to select radiation carcinogenesis model. Dose-Response, 13(1), (17 pp.). DOI: 10.2203/doseresponse.14-034.Socol.10.2203/doseresponse.14-034.SocolOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Mettler, F. A. (2012). Medical effects and risks of exposure to ionising radiation. J. Radiol. Prot., 32(1), N9–N13.10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/N922395124Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. International Atomic Energy Agency. (1996). Methods for estimating the probability of cancer from occupational radiation exposure. Vienna: IAEA. (IAEA-TECDOC-870).Search in Google Scholar

30. National Research Council. (2006). Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2 (Vol. 7). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11340.10.17226/11340Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Kendall, G. M., Muirhead, C. R., MacGibbon, B. H., O’Hagan, J. A., Goodill, A. A., Butland, B. K., Fell, T. P., Jackson, D. A., & Webb, M. A. (1992). Mortality and occupational exposure to radiation: first analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. BMJ, 304(6821), 220–225.10.1136/bmj.304.6821.220Search in Google Scholar

32. Wolbarst, A. B., Wiley, A. L., Nemhauser, J. B., Christensen, D. M., & Hendee, W. R. (2010). Medical response to a major radiologic emergency: A primer for medical and public health practitioners. Radiology, 254(3), 660–677. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090330.10.1148/radiol.0909033020177084Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Andresz, S., Morgan, J., Croüail, P., & Vermeersch, F. (2018). Conclusions and recommendations from the 17th Workshop of the European ALARA Network ‘ALARA in emergency exposure situations’. J. Radiol. Prot., 38(1), 434–439.10.1088/1361-6498/aaa86b29339579Open DOISearch in Google Scholar