How tax policies create unexpected results when interest rates are low: A case study of Finnish housing company debt and private investor return1
13 lip 2022
O artykule
Kategoria artykułu: Article
Data publikacji: 13 lip 2022
Zakres stron: 45 - 57
Otrzymano: 10 lut 2021
Przyjęty: 08 lis 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ntaxj-2021-0007
Słowa kluczowe
© 2022 Eelis Paukku, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Different ways of handling charges_
Treated as capital. | Treated as income. | |
No effect until the funding is ended, and then all funded charges are taxed. | Treated as taxable income. | |
Not without ending the funding. | Yes. The only way to do so if the LLHC does not have other income sources. | |
Monthly fee, not tax-deductible. | Monthly fee, not tax-deductible. | |
Monthly fee, not tax-deductible. | Monthly fee, tax-deductible. | |
Funded charges are added to the acquisition cost of the flat, therefore decreasing taxable profit. | No effect. | |
Funded charges are added to the acquisition cost of the flat, therefore decreasing taxable profit. | No effect. |
Application of different tax laws in Finland_
Private and legal entities. | Natural and legal persons. | |
All incomes that are not taxed according to other business laws. | Business income. | |
Yes, if they have other than business income, ie income from owning shares of a listed company and if they are not an investment company. | Yes. | |
Yes. | Yes, if their way of earning is closer to active business than earning a wage or investing their savings. | |
In most cases, yes. | In cases where owning flats and property is actually an active business, which requires a significant number of flats ( |
|
Yes, some tax advantages are only applicable to private persons. | No. |
Different options_
Recognition | Yes | ||||
Recognition | No | ||||
Funded | Yes | ||||
Funded | No |