This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117AhmedS.2004Affective economiesSocial Text222117139https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117Search in Google Scholar
Allan, S. (2010). Journalism and its publics: The Lippmann-Dewey debate. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (1st ed.) (pp. 60–70). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869468AllanS.2010Journalism and its publics: The Lippmann-Dewey debateInAllanS.(Ed.),The Routledge companion to news and journalism1st ed.6070Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869468Search in Google Scholar
*Almgren, S. M., & Olsson, T. (2016). Commenting, sharing and tweeting news. Nordicom Review, 37(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0018*AlmgrenS. M.OlssonT.2016Commenting, sharing and tweeting newsNordicom Review3726781https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0018Search in Google Scholar
*Ampuja, M., Koivisto, J., & Väliverronen, E. (2014). Strong and weak forms of mediatization theory: A critical review. Nordicom Review, 35(S1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0107*AmpujaM.KoivistoJ.VäliverronenE.2014Strong and weak forms of mediatization theory: A critical reviewNordicom Review35S1111124https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0107Search in Google Scholar
Andersen, J. G., & Hoff, J. (2001). Democracy and citizenship in Scandinavia. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230507968AndersenJ. G.HoffJ.2001Democracy and citizenship in ScandinaviaPalgrave Macmillanhttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230507968Search in Google Scholar
*Andreassen, R. (2016). Online kinship: Social media as a site for challenging notions of gender and family. MedieKultur, 32(61), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.22157*AndreassenR.2016Online kinship: Social media as a site for challenging notions of gender and familyMedieKultur32617692https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.22157Search in Google Scholar
*Andreassen, R., Kaun, A., & Nikunen, K. (2021). Fostering the data welfare state: A Nordic perspective on datafication. Nordicom Review, 42(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0051*AndreassenR.KaunA.NikunenK.2021Fostering the data welfare state: A Nordic perspective on dataficationNordicom Review422207223https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0051Search in Google Scholar
Asenbaum, H. (2021). Rethinking digital democracy: From the disembodied discursive self to new materialist corporealities. Communication Theory, 31(3), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz033AsenbaumH.2021Rethinking digital democracy: From the disembodied discursive self to new materialist corporealitiesCommunication Theory313360379https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz033Search in Google Scholar
Ashcraft, K. (2021). Communication as constitutive transmission? An encounter with affect. Communication Theory, 31(4), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz027AshcraftK.2021Communication as constitutive transmission? An encounter with affectCommunication Theory314571592https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz027Search in Google Scholar
*Askanius, T. (2021). “I just want to be the friendly face of national socialism”: The turn to civility in the cultural expressions of neo-Nazism in Sweden. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0004*AskaniusT.2021“I just want to be the friendly face of national socialism”: The turn to civility in the cultural expressions of neo-Nazism in SwedenNordicom Review42S11735https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0004Search in Google Scholar
*Askanius, T., & Hartley, J. M. (2019). Framing gender justice. Nordicom Review, 40(2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0022*AskaniusT.HartleyJ. M.2019Framing gender justiceNordicom Review4021936https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0022Search in Google Scholar
*Backholm, K., Ruohonen, H., & Strandberg, K. (2024). Online discussion threads as promotors of citizen democracy: Current opportunities and challenges for small- and medium-sized media organizations in Finland. Nordicon Review, 45(S1), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0012*BackholmK.RuohonenH.StrandbergK.2024Online discussion threads as promotors of citizen democracy: Current opportunities and challenges for small- and medium-sized media organizations in FinlandNordicon Review45S1173192https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0012Search in Google Scholar
*Baggesen, R. H. (2014). Augmenting the agora: Media and civic engagement in museums. MedieKultur, 30(56), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.8964*BaggesenR. H.2014Augmenting the agora: Media and civic engagement in museumsMedieKultur3056117131https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.8964Search in Google Scholar
Bakardjieva, M. (2012). Mundane citizenship: New media and civil society in Bulgaria. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(8), 1356–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.712247BakardjievaM.2012Mundane citizenship: New media and civil society in BulgariaEurope-Asia Studies64813561374https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.712247Search in Google Scholar
*Baltz, A. (2020). A longitudinal analysis of Swedish local governments on Facebook: A visualisation of communication. Nordicom Review, 41(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0020*BaltzA.2020A longitudinal analysis of Swedish local governments on Facebook: A visualisation of communicationNordicom Review412147162https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0020Search in Google Scholar
*Bechmann, A. (2019). Inequality in posting behaviour over time: A study of Danish Facebook users. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0012*BechmannA.2019Inequality in posting behaviour over time: A study of Danish Facebook usersNordicom Review4013149https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0012Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.BennettJ.2010Vibrant matter: A political ecology of thingsDuke University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661BennettW. L.SegerbergA.2012The logic of connective actionInformation, Communication & Society155739768https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661Search in Google Scholar
*Bhroin, N. N., Sand, S., & Rasmussen, T. (2021). Indigeneous journalism, media innovation, and social change: A review of previous research and a call for more critical approaches. Nordicom Review, 42(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0050*BhroinN. N.SandS.RasmussenT.2021Indigeneous journalism, media innovation, and social change: A review of previous research and a call for more critical approachesNordicom Review422185206https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0050Search in Google Scholar
*Blaagaard, B., & Roslyng, M. M. (2022). Rethinking digital activism: The deconstruction, inclusion, and expansion of the activist body. MedieKultur, 38(72), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.125721*BlaagaardB.RoslyngM. M.2022Rethinking digital activism: The deconstruction, inclusion, and expansion of the activist bodyMedieKultur38724564https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.125721Search in Google Scholar
Bodó, B. (2021). Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2668–2690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820939BodóB.2021Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediatorsNew Media & Society23926682690https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820939Search in Google Scholar
*Bolin, N., Grusell, M., & Nord, L. (2024). Second thoughts on digital first: Exploring the development of election campaigns among Swedish political parties, 2010–2022. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0006*BolinN.GrusellM.NordL.2024Second thoughts on digital first: Exploring the development of election campaigns among Swedish political parties, 2010–2022Nordicom Review4511535https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0006Search in Google Scholar
boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876527boydd.2010Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implicationsInPapacharissiZ.(Ed.),A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites3958Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876527Search in Google Scholar
*Brems, M. K. (2024). Who are the users of Danish alternative media? A survey study on the prevalence of alternative news use in Denmark and profiles of the users. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 81–113. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0014*BremsM. K.2024Who are the users of Danish alternative media? A survey study on the prevalence of alternative news use in Denmark and profiles of the usersNordicom Review45181113https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0014Search in Google Scholar
Bruns, A. (2023). From “the” public sphere to a network of publics: Towards an empirically founded model of contemporary public communication spaces. Communication Theory, 33(2-3), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad007BrunsA.2023From “the” public sphere to a network of publics: Towards an empirically founded model of contemporary public communication spacesCommunication Theory332-37081https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad007Search in Google Scholar
*Bruns, A., & Enli, G. (2018). The Norwegian Twittersphere: Structure and dynamics. Nordicom Review, 39(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0006*BrunsA.EnliG.2018The Norwegian Twittersphere: Structure and dynamicsNordicom Review391129148https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0006Search in Google Scholar
*Bruns, A., & Moon, B. (2019). One day in the life of a national Twittersphere. Nordicom Review, 40(S1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0011*BrunsA.MoonB.2019One day in the life of a national TwittersphereNordicom Review40S11130https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0011Search in Google Scholar
Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086BucherT.2017The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithmsInformation, Communication & Society2013044https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086Search in Google Scholar
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066BucherT.HelmondA.2018The affordances of social media platformsInBurgessJ.MarwickA.PoellT.(Eds.),The SAGE handbook of social media233253Sagehttps://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066Search in Google Scholar
*Cermak-Sassenrath, D. (2018). On political activism in digital games. MedieKultur, 34(64), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i64.96924*Cermak-SassenrathD.2018On political activism in digital gamesMedieKultur346487115https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i64.96924Search in Google Scholar
Chaput, C. (2010). Rhetorical circulation in late capitalism: Neoliberalism and the overdetermination of affective energy. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 43(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0001ChaputC.2010Rhetorical circulation in late capitalism: Neoliberalism and the overdetermination of affective energyPhilosophy and Rhetoric431125https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0001Search in Google Scholar
*Christensen-Strynø, M. B. (2016). Mainstreaming and misfitting: Exploring disability and its intersection with gender in online disability awareness-raising videos. MedieKultur, 32(61), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.22387*Christensen-StrynøM. B.2016Mainstreaming and misfitting: Exploring disability and its intersection with gender in online disability awareness-raising videosMedieKultur32615875https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.22387Search in Google Scholar
*Christiansen, L. B., & Heiselberg, M. H. (2022). When we shine, we shine together: A carnivalesque reading of affective solidarity among Danish fat-accepting Instagrammers. MedieKultur, 38(72), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.129079*ChristiansenL. B.HeiselbergM. H.2022When we shine, we shine together: A carnivalesque reading of affective solidarity among Danish fat-accepting InstagrammersMedieKultur38722844https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.129079Search in Google Scholar
Dahlberg, L. (2011). Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four “positions”. New Media & Society, 13(6), 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481038956DahlbergL.2011Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four “positions”New Media & Society136855872https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481038956Search in Google Scholar
Dahlgren, P. (2006). Doing citizenship: The cultural origins of civic agency in the public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549406066073DahlgrenP.2006Doing citizenship: The cultural origins of civic agency in the public sphereEuropean Journal of Cultural Studies93267286https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549406066073Search in Google Scholar
Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, knowledge, and trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of democracy. Javnost – the Public, 25(1-2), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819DahlgrenP.2018Media, knowledge, and trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of democracyJavnost – the Public251-22027https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819Search in Google Scholar
*Dahlgren, P. M. (2021). A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure. Nordicom Review, 42(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0002*DahlgrenP. M.2021A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposureNordicom Review4211533https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0002Search in Google Scholar
Dahlman, S., Gulbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2021). Algorithms as organizational figuration: The sociotechnical arrangements of a fintech start-up. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211026702DahlmanS.GulbrandsenI. T.JustS. N.2021Algorithms as organizational figuration: The sociotechnical arrangements of a fintech start-upBig Data & Society81115https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211026702Search in Google Scholar
*Dahlman, S., Just, S. N., Munk Petersen, L., Valiant Lantz, P. M., & Würtz Kristiansen, N. (2023). Datafied female health: Sociotechnical imaginaries of femtech in Danish public discourse. MedieKultur, 39(74), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.133900*DahlmanS.JustS. N.Munk PetersenL.Valiant LantzP. M.Würtz KristiansenN.2023Datafied female health: Sociotechnical imaginaries of femtech in Danish public discourseMedieKultur3974105126https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.133900Search in Google Scholar
*Damkjær, M. S., Gammelby, A. K., Johansen, S. L., & Mahnke, M. S. (2021). Struggling with technology: Perspectives on everyday life. Nordicom Review, 42(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0037*DamkjærM. S.GammelbyA. K.JohansenS. L.MahnkeM. S.2021Struggling with technology: Perspectives on everyday lifeNordicom Review42416https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0037Search in Google Scholar
Dean, J. (2003). Why the net is not a public sphere. Constellations, 10(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00315DeanJ.2003Why the net is not a public sphereConstellations10195112https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00315Search in Google Scholar
Dean, J. (2019). Communicative capitalism and revolutionary form. Millennium, 47(3), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829819840624DeanJ.2019Communicative capitalism and revolutionary formMillennium473326340https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829819840624Search in Google Scholar
Deseriis, M. (2021). Rethinking the digital democratic affordance and its impact on political representation: Toward a new framework. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2452–2473. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144482092967DeseriisM.2021Rethinking the digital democratic affordance and its impact on political representation: Toward a new frameworkNew Media & Society23824522473https://doi.org/10.1177/146144482092967Search in Google Scholar
*Dmitrow-Devold, K. (2017). Performing the self in the mainstream: Norwegian girls in blogging. Nordicom Review, 38(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0391*Dmitrow-DevoldK.2017Performing the self in the mainstream: Norwegian girls in bloggingNordicom Review3826578https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0391Search in Google Scholar
*Ekman, M. (2014). The dark side of online activism: Swedish right-wing extremist video activism on YouTube. MedieKultur, 30(56), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.8967*EkmanM.2014The dark side of online activism: Swedish right-wing extremist video activism on YouTubeMedieKultur30567999https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.8967Search in Google Scholar
*Ekman, M., & Widholm, A. (2024). Political communication as television news: Party-produced news of the Sweden Democrats during the 2022 election. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0008*EkmanM.WidholmA.2024Political communication as television news: Party-produced news of the Sweden Democrats during the 2022 electionNordicom Review4516691https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0008Search in Google Scholar
*Ekström, M. (2023). Authoritarianism in the discourse of online forums: A study of its articulation in the Swedish context. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0011*EkströmM.2023Authoritarianism in the discourse of online forums: A study of its articulation in the Swedish contextNordicom Review442194216https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0011Search in Google Scholar
*Elgesem, D. (2019). The meaning of links: On the interpretation of hyperlinks in the study of polarization in blogging about climate change. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0014*ElgesemD.2019The meaning of links: On the interpretation of hyperlinks in the study of polarization in blogging about climate changeNordicom Review4016578https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0014Search in Google Scholar
*Engebretsen, M. (2023). Communicating health advice on social media: A multimodal case study. MedieKultur, 39(74), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.134085*EngebretsenM.2023Communicating health advice on social media: A multimodal case studyMedieKultur3974164184https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.134085Search in Google Scholar
Ervasti, H., Fridberg, T., Hjerm, M., Ringdal, K., & Kangas, O. (2008). The Nordic model. In H. Ervasti, T. Fridberg, M. Hjerm, & K. Ringdal (Eds.), Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective (pp. 1–21). Edward Elgar.ErvastiH.FridbergT.HjermM.RingdalK.KangasO.2008The Nordic modelInErvastiH.FridbergT.HjermM.RingdalK.(Eds.),Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective121Edward ElgarSearch in Google Scholar
*Farjam, M., Bruhn, T., Gustofsson, N., & Segesten, A. D. (2024). The uses of the term polarisation in Swedish newspapers, 2010–2021. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0002*FarjamM.BruhnT.GustofssonN.SegestenA. D.2024The uses of the term polarisation in Swedish newspapers, 2010–2021Nordicom Review451134https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0002Search in Google Scholar
*Farkas, J., & Schousboe, S. (2024). Facts, values, and the epistemic authority of journalism: How journalists use and define the terms fake news, junk news, misinformation, and disinformation. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0016*FarkasJ.SchousboeS.2024Facts, values, and the epistemic authority of journalism: How journalists use and define the terms fake news, junk news, misinformation, and disinformationNordicom Review451137157https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0016Search in Google Scholar
*Farkas, J., & Schwartz, S. A. (2018). Please like, comment and share our campaign! How social media managers for Danish political parties perceive user-generated content. Nordicom Review, 39(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0008*FarkasJ.SchwartzS. A.2018Please like, comment and share our campaign! How social media managers for Danish political parties perceive user-generated contentNordicom Review3921933https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0008Search in Google Scholar
*Flensburg, S., & Lai, S. S., (2020a). Comparing digital communication systems: An empirical framework for analysing the political economy of digital infrastructures. Nordicom Review, 41(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0019*FlensburgS.LaiS. S.2020aComparing digital communication systems: An empirical framework for analysing the political economy of digital infrastructuresNordicom Review412127145https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0019Search in Google Scholar
Flensburg, S., & Lai, S. S. (2020b). Mapping digital communication systems: Infrastructures, markets, and policies as regulatory forces. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876533FlensburgS.LaiS. S.2020bMapping digital communication systems: Infrastructures, markets, and policies as regulatory forcesMedia, Culture & Society425692710https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876533Search in Google Scholar
*Friis, J. A. (2022). Mellem underholdende kedsomhed og bedøvende overstimulering: Affektive rytmer i oplevelsen af hashtag-fænomenet #ProudBoys på Twitter [Between entertaining boredom and numbing overstimulation: Affective rhythms and experiences of the hashtag phenomenon #ProudBoys on Twitter]. MedieKultur, 38(72), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.125739*FriisJ. A.2022Mellem underholdende kedsomhed og bedøvende overstimulering: Affektive rytmer i oplevelsen af hashtag-fænomenet #ProudBoys på Twitter [Between entertaining boredom and numbing overstimulation: Affective rhythms and experiences of the hashtag phenomenon #ProudBoys on Twitter]MedieKultur3872627https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.125739Search in Google Scholar
*Gelfgren, S. (2015). Why does the archbishop not tweet? Nordicom Review, 36(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0009*GelfgrenS.2015Why does the archbishop not tweet?Nordicom Review361109123https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0009Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (2015). The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press. (Original work published 1979)GibsonJ. J.2015The ecological approach to visual perceptionPsychology Press(Original work published 1979)Search in Google Scholar
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–193). The MIT Press.GillespieT.2014The relevance of algorithmsInGillespieT.BoczkowskiP. J.FootK. A.(Eds.),Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society167193The MIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderations, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.GillespieT.2018Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderations, and the hidden decisions that shape social mediaYale University PressSearch in Google Scholar
*Givskov, C., & Trenz, H.-J. (2014). Civic engagement through mainstream online newspapers: Possibilities and shortcomings. MedieKultur, 30(56), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.16969*GivskovC.TrenzH.-J.2014Civic engagement through mainstream online newspapers: Possibilities and shortcomingsMedieKultur30564460https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.16969Search in Google Scholar
*Grønning, A., & Sandberg, H. (2023). Introduction: The entanglements of media and health in everyday life. MedieKultur, 39(74), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.136096*GrønningA.SandbergH.2023Introduction: The entanglements of media and health in everyday lifeMedieKultur397419https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.136096Search in Google Scholar
*Guðmundsson, B. (2019). Logics of the Icelandic hybrid media system: Snapchat and media-use before the 2016 and 2017 Alting elections. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0001*GuðmundssonB.2019Logics of the Icelandic hybrid media system: Snapchat and media-use before the 2016 and 2017 Alting electionsNordicom Review4014359https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0001Search in Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2016). In the wake of new media: Connecting the who with the how of strategizing communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1150281GulbrandsenI. T.JustS. N.2016In the wake of new media: Connecting the who with the how of strategizing communicationInternational Journal of Strategic Communication104223237https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1150281Search in Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2020). Strategizing communication: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Samfundslitteratur.GulbrandsenI. T.JustS. N.2020Strategizing communication: Theory and practice2nd ed.SamfundslitteraturSearch in Google Scholar
Gunkel, D. (2019). The medium of truth: Media studies in the post-truth era. Review of Communication, 19(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2019.1667015GunkelD.2019The medium of truth: Media studies in the post-truth eraReview of Communication194309323https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2019.1667015Search in Google Scholar
*Haanshuus, B. P., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2021). Recontextualising the news. Nordicom Review, 42(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0005*HaanshuusB. P.IhlebækK. A.2021Recontextualising the newsNordicom Review4213750https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0005Search in Google Scholar
*Haastrup, H. K. (2018). Hermione’s feminist book club: Celebrity activism and cultural critique. MedieKultur, 34(65), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104842*HaastrupH. K.2018Hermione’s feminist book club: Celebrity activism and cultural critiqueMedieKultur346598116https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104842Search in Google Scholar
*Haastrup, H. K. (2022). Personalising climate change on Instagram: Self-presentation, authenticity, and emotion. MedieKultur, 38(72), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.129149*HaastrupH. K.2022Personalising climate change on Instagram: Self-presentation, authenticity, and emotionMedieKultur38726585https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i72.129149Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. The MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)HabermasJ.1989The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois societyThe MIT Press(Original work published 1962)Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Polity Press.HabermasJ.1998Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracyPolity PressSearch in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341HabermasJ.2022Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphereTheory, Culture & Society394145171https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341Search in Google Scholar
*Hansen, S. S. (2022). Public AI imaginaries: How the debate on artificial intelligence was covered in Danish newspapers and magazines 1956–2021. Nordicom Review, 43(1), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0004*HansenS. S.2022Public AI imaginaries: How the debate on artificial intelligence was covered in Danish newspapers and magazines 1956–2021Nordicom Review4315678https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0004Search in Google Scholar
Hartley, J. M., Bengtsson, M., Hansen, A. S., & Sivertsen, M. F. (2023). Researching publics in a datafied society: Insights from four approaches to the concept of ‘publics’ and a (hybrid) research agenda. New Media & Society, 25(7), 1668–1686. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211021045HartleyJ. M.BengtssonM.HansenA. S.SivertsenM. F.2023Researching publics in a datafied society: Insights from four approaches to the concept of ‘publics’ and a (hybrid) research agendaNew Media & Society25716681686https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211021045Search in Google Scholar
*Hartley, J. M., & Pedersen, L. H. (2019). Beyond the informed citizen? Narratives of news engagement and civic experiences among Danish news users. MedieKultur, 35(66), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v35i66.112626*HartleyJ. M.PedersenL. H.2019Beyond the informed citizen? Narratives of news engagement and civic experiences among Danish news usersMedieKultur35665574https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v35i66.112626Search in Google Scholar
*Hornmoen, H., Hågvar, Y., Hyde-Clarke, N., Fonn, B. K., & Stuedahl, D. (2022). Media narratives, agonistic deliberation, and Skam: An analysis of how young people communicate in digital spaces. Nordicom Review, 43(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0001*HornmoenH.HågvarY.Hyde-ClarkeN.FonnB. K.StuedahlD.2022Media narratives, agonistic deliberation, and Skam: An analysis of how young people communicate in digital spacesNordicom Review431118https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0001Search in Google Scholar
*Isaksson, M., & Jørgensen, P. E. F. (2018). Connecting with citizens: The emotional rhetoric of Norwegian and Danish municipal websites. Nordicom Review, 39(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0005*IsakssonM.JørgensenP. E. F.2018Connecting with citizens: The emotional rhetoric of Norwegian and Danish municipal websitesNordicom Review391111128https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0005Search in Google Scholar
*Jaakkola, M. (2018). Vernacular reviews as a form of co-consumption: The user-generated review videos on YouTube. MedieKultur, 34(65), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104485*JaakkolaM.2018Vernacular reviews as a form of co-consumption: The user-generated review videos on YouTubeMedieKultur34651030https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104485Search in Google Scholar
*Jangdal, L. (2019). Local democracy and the media. Nordicom Review, 40(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0027*JangdalL.2019Local democracy and the mediaNordicom Review4026983https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0027Search in Google Scholar
*Jensen, J. L. (2014). Online deliberation and beyond? A time-based and comparative study of Danish political debates online. MedieKultur, 30(56), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.16327*JensenJ. L.2014Online deliberation and beyond? A time-based and comparative study of Danish political debates onlineMedieKultur30562343https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.16327Search in Google Scholar
*Jensen, J. L., & Dalbøge, J. (2023). I deres egen verden: Danske journalisters interaktioner på Twitter [In their own world: Danish journalists’ interactions on Twitter]. MedieKultur, 39(75), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i75.134991*JensenJ. L.DalbøgeJ.2023I deres egen verden: Danske journalisters interaktioner på Twitter [In their own world: Danish journalists’ interactions on Twitter]MedieKultur3975136155https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i75.134991Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12014JensenK. B.2013Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatizationCommunication Theory233203222https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12014Search in Google Scholar
*Jensen, M., B., & Hvidtfeldt, K. (2023). Reconfigurations of illness and masculinity on Instagram. MedieKultur, 39(74), 73–104. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.133885*JensenM. B.HvidtfeldtK.2023Reconfigurations of illness and masculinity on InstagramMedieKultur397473104https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.133885Search in Google Scholar
*Johansen, S. L., Lundtofte, T. E., & Mortensen, C. H. (2023). Pandemedia: How Covid-19 has affected the role of media in society. MedieKultur, 38(73), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.134829*JohansenS. L.LundtofteT. E.MortensenC. H.2023Pandemedia: How Covid-19 has affected the role of media in societyMedieKultur387315https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.134829Search in Google Scholar
*Johansen, S. L., & Givskov, C. (2014). Media and civic engagement. MedieKultur, 30(56), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.17286*JohansenS. L.GivskovC.2014Media and civic engagementMedieKultur305614https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.17286Search in Google Scholar
Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2021). Disinformation and the structural transformations of the public arena: Addressing the actual to democracy. Social Media + Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988928JungherrA.SchroederR.2021Disinformation and the structural transformations of the public arena: Addressing the actual to democracySocial Media + Society71https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988928Search in Google Scholar
Just, S. N. (2016). This is not a pipe: Rationality and affect in European public debate. Communication and the Public, 1(3), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/205704731665581JustS. N.2016This is not a pipe: Rationality and affect in European public debateCommunication and the Public13276289https://doi.org/10.1177/205704731665581Search in Google Scholar
Just, S. N. (2019). An assemblage of avatars: Digital organization as affective intensification in the GamerGate controversy. Organization, 26(5), 716–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419842710JustS. N.2019An assemblage of avatars: Digital organization as affective intensification in the GamerGate controversyOrganization265716738https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419842710Search in Google Scholar
Just, S. N. (2024). Controversial encounters in the age of algorithms: How digital technologies are stifling public debate and what to do about it. Bristol University Press.JustS. N.2024Controversial encounters in the age of algorithms: How digital technologies are stifling public debate and what to do about itBristol University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Just, S. N., Christensen, J. F., & Schwarzkopf, S. (2025). Disconnective action: Online activism against a corporate sponsorship at WorldPride 2021. New Media & Society, 27(1), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231178775JustS. N.ChristensenJ. F.SchwarzkopfS.2025Disconnective action: Online activism against a corporate sponsorship at WorldPride 2021New Media & Society271502521https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231178775Search in Google Scholar
Jäger, A. (2024). Hyperpolitik. Informations Forlag.JägerA.2024HyperpolitikInformations ForlagSearch in Google Scholar
*Jørgensen, R. F. (2016). The right to privacy under pressure. Nordicom Review, 37(S1), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0030*JørgensenR. F.2016The right to privacy under pressureNordicom Review37S1165170https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0030Search in Google Scholar
*Jørgensen, R. F., & Zuleta, L. (2020). Private governance of freedom of expression on social media platforms: EU content regulation through the lens of human rights. Nordicom Review, 41(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0003*JørgensenR. F.ZuletaL.2020Private governance of freedom of expression on social media platforms: EU content regulation through the lens of human rightsNordicom Review4115167https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0003Search in Google Scholar
Kalsnes, B., Falasca, K., & Kammer, A. (2021). Scandinavian political journalism in a time of fake news and disinformation. In E. Skogerbø, Ø. Ihlen, N. N. Kristensen, & L. Nord (Eds.), Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries (pp. 283–304). Nordicom, University of Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-14KalsnesB.FalascaK.KammerA.2021Scandinavian political journalism in a time of fake news and disinformationInSkogerbøE.IhlenØ.KristensenN. N.NordL.(Eds.),Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries283304Nordicom, University of Gothenburghttps://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-14Search in Google Scholar
*Karlsson, M., Van Couvering, E. & Lindell, J. (2022). Publishing, sharing, and spreading online news: A case study of gatekeeping logics in the platform era. Nordicom Review, 43(2), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0012*KarlssonM.Van CouveringE.LindellJ.2022Publishing, sharing, and spreading online news: A case study of gatekeeping logics in the platform eraNordicom Review432190213https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0012Search in Google Scholar
*Kjær, K. M., Christiansen, L. B., & Heiselberg, M. H. (2022). Introduction digital activism and participation: Affect, feelings and politics. MedieKultur, 38(72), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v38i72.131969*KjærK. M.ChristiansenL. B.HeiselbergM. H.2022Introduction digital activism and participation: Affect, feelings and politicsMedieKultur387215https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v38i72.131969Search in Google Scholar
Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952KlingerU.SvenssonJ.2015The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approachNew Media & Society17812411257https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952Search in Google Scholar
Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2018). The end of media logics? On algorithms and agency. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4653–4670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818779750KlingerU.SvenssonJ.2018The end of media logics? On algorithms and agencyNew Media & Society201246534670https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818779750Search in Google Scholar
*Klitgård, I. (2020). “Critical parents against plaster”: The MMR vaccination drama as satirical parody. MedieKultur, 36(68), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i68.118571*KlitgårdI.2020“Critical parents against plaster”: The MMR vaccination drama as satirical parodyMedieKultur3668424https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i68.118571Search in Google Scholar
*Klug, D., Evans, M., & Kaufman, G. (2022). How TikTok served as a platform for young people to share and cope with lived COVID-19 experiences. MedieKultur, 38(73), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.128463*KlugD.EvansM.KaufmanG.2022How TikTok served as a platform for young people to share and cope with lived COVID-19 experiencesMedieKultur3873152170https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.128463Search in Google Scholar
*Knudsen, G. H., & Nielsen, M. V. (2019). Exploring the mediatization of organizational communication by religious communities in digital media. MedieKultur, 35(66), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v35i66.106274*KnudsenG. H.NielsenM. V.2019Exploring the mediatization of organizational communication by religious communities in digital mediaMedieKultur3566101121https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v35i66.106274Search in Google Scholar
Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and history: “Kranzberg’s laws”. Technology and Culture, 27(3), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105385KranzbergM.1986Technology and history: “Kranzberg’s laws”Technology and Culture273544560https://doi.org/10.2307/3105385Search in Google Scholar
*Kristensen, N. N., & From, U. (2018). Cultural journalists on social media. MedieKultur, 34(65), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104488*KristensenN. N.FromU.2018Cultural journalists on social mediaMedieKultur34657697https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104488Search in Google Scholar
*Kristensen, N. N., Haastrup, H. K., & Holdgaard, N. (2018). Cultural critique: Re-negotiating cultural authority in digital media culture. MedieKultur, 34(65), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.111265*KristensenN. N.HaastrupH. K.HoldgaardN.2018Cultural critique: Re-negotiating cultural authority in digital media cultureMedieKultur346539https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.111265Search in Google Scholar
*Krzyżanowski, M., Ekman, M., Nilsson, P.-E., Gardell, M., & Christensen, C. (2021). Uncivility, racism, and populism: Discourses and interactive practices in anti- and post-democratic communication. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0003*KrzyżanowskiM.EkmanM.NilssonP.-E.GardellM.ChristensenC.2021Uncivility, racism, and populism: Discourses and interactive practices in anti- and post-democratic communicationNordicom Review42S1315https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0003Search in Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2019). Democracy without shortcuts: A participatory conception of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.LafontC.2019Democracy without shortcuts: A participatory conception of deliberative democracyOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
*Lai, S. S., Pagh, J., & Zeng, F. H. (2019). Tracing communicative patterns: A comparative ethnography across platforms, media and contexts. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0019*LaiS. S.PaghJ.ZengF. H.2019Tracing communicative patterns: A comparative ethnography across platforms, media and contextsNordicom Review401141157https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0019Search in Google Scholar
*Larsson, A. O. (2014). Everyday elites, citizens, or extremists? Assessing the use and users of non-election political hashtags. MedieKultur, 30(56), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.8951*LarssonA. O.2014Everyday elites, citizens, or extremists? Assessing the use and users of non-election political hashtagsMedieKultur30566178https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.8951Search in Google Scholar
*Larsson, S. (2014). Battling mainstream media, commentators and organized debaters: Experiences from citizens’ online opinion writing in Sweden. Nordicom Review, 35(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0016*LarssonS.2014Battling mainstream media, commentators and organized debaters: Experiences from citizens’ online opinion writing in SwedenNordicom Review3527789https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0016Search in Google Scholar
*Lie, M. P. (2018). Local newspapers, Facebook and local civic engagement: A study of media use in two Norwegian communities. Nordicom Review, 39(2), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0011*LieM. P.2018Local newspapers, Facebook and local civic engagement: A study of media use in two Norwegian communitiesNordicom Review3924962https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2018-0011Search in Google Scholar
*Liminga, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2023). Undermining the legitimacy of news media: How Swedish members of parliament use Twitter to criticise the news media. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0015*LimingaA.StrömbäckJ.2023Undermining the legitimacy of news media: How Swedish members of parliament use Twitter to criticise the news mediaNordicom Review442279298https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0015Search in Google Scholar
Lomborg, S., & Kapsch, P. H. (2020), Decoding algorithms. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719855301LomborgS.KapschP. H.2020Decoding algorithmsMedia, Culture & Society425745761https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719855301Search in Google Scholar
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2023). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1Lorenz-SpreenP.OswaldL.LewandowskyS.HertwigR.2023A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracyNature Human Behaviour774101https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1Search in Google Scholar
*Maagaard, C., & Lundholt, M. W. (2018). Taking spoofs seriously: Spoofs as counter-narratives in volunteer discourse. MedieKultur, 34(64), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i64.24837*MaagaardC.LundholtM. W.2018Taking spoofs seriously: Spoofs as counter-narratives in volunteer discourseMedieKultur3464116137https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i64.24837Search in Google Scholar
*Magin, M., Larsson, A. O., Skogerbø, E., & Tønnesen, H. (2024). What makes the difference? Social media platforms and party characteristics as contextual factors for political parties’ use of populist political communication. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0007*MaginM.LarssonA. O.SkogerbøE.TønnesenH.2024What makes the difference? Social media platforms and party characteristics as contextual factors for political parties’ use of populist political communicationNordicom Review4513665https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0007Search in Google Scholar
*Mai, J.-E. (2016). Three models of privacy: New perspectives on informational privacy. Nordicom Review, 37(S1), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0031*MaiJ.-E.2016Three models of privacy: New perspectives on informational privacyNordicom Review37S1171175https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0031Search in Google Scholar
Marres, N. (2005). Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate. In B. Latour, & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 208–217). The MIT Press.MarresN.2005Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debateInLatourB.WeibelP.(Eds.),Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy208217The MIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
*Mathieu, D., & Jorge, A. (2020). The datafication of media (and) audiences: An introduction. MedieKultur, 36(69), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i69.122585*MathieuD.JorgeA.2020The datafication of media (and) audiences: An introductionMedieKultur3669110https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i69.122585Search in Google Scholar
*Mattus, M. (2014). The anyone-can-edit syndrome: Intercreation stories of three featured articles on Wikipedia. Nordicom Review, 35(1), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0112*MattusM.2014The anyone-can-edit syndrome: Intercreation stories of three featured articles on WikipediaNordicom Review351189204https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0112Search in Google Scholar
*Mayerhöffer, E., Kristensen, J. B., & Ramsland, T. (2024). Curators of digital counterpublics: Mapping alternative news environment in Sweden and Denmark. Nordicom Review, 45(S1), 92–119. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0009*MayerhöfferE.KristensenJ. B.RamslandT.2024Curators of digital counterpublics: Mapping alternative news environment in Sweden and DenmarkNordicom Review45S192119https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0009Search in Google Scholar
McMahon, L., Kleinman, Z., & Subramanian, C. (2025). Facebook and Instagram to get rid of fact checkers. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly74mpy8kloMcMahonL.KleinmanZ.SubramanianC.2025Facebook and Instagram to get rid of fact checkersBBChttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly74mpy8kloSearch in Google Scholar
Mejias, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2019). Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428MejiasU. A.CouldryN.2019DataficationInternet Policy Review84110https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428Search in Google Scholar
Ministry of Digital Affairs. (2024). Tech-giganternes rolle som digital infrastruktur [The role of the tech giants as digital infrastructure]. https://tinyurl.com/2jawmjfjMinistry of Digital Affairs2024Tech-giganternes rolle som digital infrastruktur [The role of the tech giants as digital infrastructure]https://tinyurl.com/2jawmjfjSearch in Google Scholar
*Moe, H., Lindtner, S., & Ytre-Arne, B. (2023). Polarisation and echo chambers? Making sense of the climate issue with social media in everyday life. Nordicom Review, 44(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0002*MoeH.LindtnerS.Ytre-ArneB.2023Polarisation and echo chambers? Making sense of the climate issue with social media in everyday lifeNordicom Review4412343https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0002Search in Google Scholar
Moyo, L. (2009). Digital democracy: Enhancing the public sphere. In G. Creeber, & R. Martin (Eds.), Digital cultures: Understanding new media (pp. 139–150). Open University Press.MoyoL.2009Digital democracy: Enhancing the public sphereInCreeberG.MartinR.(Eds.),Digital cultures: Understanding new media139150Open University PressSearch in Google Scholar
*Mozdeika, L. (2024). Between civic virtue and vice: Self-censorship of political views on social media among Norwegian young adults. Nordicom Review, 45(S1), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0011*MozdeikaL.2024Between civic virtue and vice: Self-censorship of political views on social media among Norwegian young adultsNordicom Review45S1152172https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0011Search in Google Scholar
*Møller, K., & Nordtug, M. (2022). Platformed bodies. MedieKultur, 37(71), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.128779*MøllerK.NordtugM.2022Platformed bodiesMedieKultur377118https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.128779Search in Google Scholar
Neuberger, C., Bartsch, A., Fröhlich, R., Hanitzsch, T., Reinemann, C., & Schindler, J. (2023). The digital transformation of knowledge order: A model for the analysis of the epistemic crisis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 47(2), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2169950NeubergerC.BartschA.FröhlichR.HanitzschT.ReinemannC.SchindlerJ.2023The digital transformation of knowledge order: A model for the analysis of the epistemic crisisAnnals of the International Communication Association472180201https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2169950Search in Google Scholar
*Nielsen, L. Y. (2018). PewDiePie som kulturkritisk aktør – metakritik og konstruktionen af ‘indie’ [PewDiePie as a culturally critical actor – metacriticism and the construction of ‘indie’]. MedieKultur, 34(65), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104552*NielsenL. Y.2018PewDiePie som kulturkritisk aktør – metakritik og konstruktionen af ‘indie’ [PewDiePie as a culturally critical actor – metacriticism and the construction of ‘indie’]MedieKultur34653153https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104552Search in Google Scholar
*Nielsen, L. Y., & Petersen, F. B. (2021). Regarding the mains of others: The spectacular bodies of mukbang videos. MedieKultur, 37(71), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125685*NielsenL. Y.PetersenF. B.2021Regarding the mains of others: The spectacular bodies of mukbang videosMedieKultur3771122144https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125685Search in Google Scholar
*Nielsen, R. K. (2014). Political communication research: New media, new challenges, and new opportunities. MedieKultur, 30(56), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.9712*NielsenR. K.2014Political communication research: New media, new challenges, and new opportunitiesMedieKultur3056522https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i56.9712Search in Google Scholar
*Nilsson, P.-E. (2021). “The new extreme right”: Uncivility, irony, and displacement in the French re-information sphere. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0008*NilssonP.-E.2021“The new extreme right”: Uncivility, irony, and displacement in the French re-information sphereNordicom Review42S189102https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0008Search in Google Scholar
Nordbrandt, M. (2023). Affective polarization in the digital age: Testing the direction of the relationship between social media and users’ feelings for out-group parties. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3392–3411. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211044393NordbrandtM.2023Affective polarization in the digital age: Testing the direction of the relationship between social media and users’ feelings for out-group partiesNew Media & Society251233923411https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211044393Search in Google Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers. (2023). A Nordic approach to democratic debate in the age of big tech: Recommendations from the Nordic think tank for tech and democracy. https://doi.org/10.6027/nord2023-004Nordic Council of Ministers2023A Nordic approach to democratic debate in the age of big tech: Recommendations from the Nordic think tank for tech and democracyhttps://doi.org/10.6027/nord2023-004Search in Google Scholar
*Nordtug, M. (2020). Creating opportunities for digital engagement and participation. MedieKultur, 36(68), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i68.114919*NordtugM.2020Creating opportunities for digital engagement and participationMedieKultur36682541https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i68.114919Search in Google Scholar
O’Hara, K., & Hall, W. (2018). Four internets: The geopolitics of digital governance. Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Paper%20no.206web.pdfO’HaraK.HallW.2018Four internets: The geopolitics of digital governanceCentre for International Governance Innovationhttps://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Paper%20no.206web.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
*Oh, D., Elayan, S., Sykora, M., & Downey, J. (2021). Unpacking uncivil society: Incivility and intolerance in the 2018 Irish abortion referendum discussions on Twitter. Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0009*OhD.ElayanS.SykoraM.DowneyJ.2021Unpacking uncivil society: Incivility and intolerance in the 2018 Irish abortion referendum discussions on TwitterNordicom Review42S1103118https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0009Search in Google Scholar
*Olesen, M. (2018). #walkouton77: football fan activism in Premier League. MedieKultur, 34(65), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104550*OlesenM.2018#walkouton77: football fan activism in Premier LeagueMedieKultur3465117137https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104550Search in Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226244PapacharissiZ.2002The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphereNew Media & Society41927https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226244Search in Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics. Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.PapacharissiZ.2015Affective publics. Sentiment, technology, and politicsOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
*Paulsen, I. H. (2023). Is mental health normalised in Norwegian news media? How mental health was framed in VG.no and NRK.no, 2018–2021. MedieKultur, 39(75), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i75.141485*PaulsenI. H.2023Is mental health normalised in Norwegian news media? How mental health was framed in VG.no and NRK.no, 2018–2021MedieKultur3975114135https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i75.141485Search in Google Scholar
Pfetsch, B. (2020). Democracy and digital dissonance: The co-occurrence of the transformation of political culture and communication infrastructure. Central European Journal of Communication, 13(25), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.13.1(25).7PfetschB.2020Democracy and digital dissonance: The co-occurrence of the transformation of political culture and communication infrastructureCentral European Journal of Communication132596110https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.13.1(25).7Search in Google Scholar
*Photiou, I., Papadopoulou, L., Eleftheriadou, A., & Maniou, T. A. (2019). Visual Infotainment in the political news: A cultural approach in the post-truth era. MedieKultur, 35(66), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v35i66.105281*PhotiouI.PapadopoulouL.EleftheriadouA.ManiouT. A.2019Visual Infotainment in the political news: A cultural approach in the post-truth eraMedieKultur356675100https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v35i66.105281Search in Google Scholar
Picone, I. Kleut, J., Pavlíčková, T., Romic, B., Hartley, J. M., & De Ridder, S. (2019). Small acts of engagement: Reconnecting productive audiences with everyday practices. New Media & Society, 21(9), 2010–2028. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481983756PiconeI.KleutJ.PavlíčkováT.RomicB.HartleyJ. M.De RidderS.2019Small acts of engagement: Reconnecting productive audiences with everyday practicesNew Media & Society21920102028https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481983756Search in Google Scholar
Pond, P., & Lewis, J. (2019). Riots and Twitter: Connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539PondP.LewisJ.2019Riots and Twitter: Connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphereInformation, Communication & Society222213231https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539Search in Google Scholar
*Rasmussen, P. K. B., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2022). Sexualized, platformed female bodies in male online practices: Negotiating boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning and intimacy. MedieKultur, 37(71), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125300*RasmussenP. K. B.SøndergaardD. M.2022Sexualized, platformed female bodies in male online practices: Negotiating boundaries of masculinity, gendered positioning and intimacyMedieKultur37717397https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125300Search in Google Scholar
*Raun, T., & Petersen, M. N. (2021). The mediatization of self-tracking: Knowledge production and community building in YouTube videos. Mediekultur, 37(71), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125250*RaunT.PetersenM. N.2021The mediatization of self-tracking: Knowledge production and community building in YouTube videosMediekultur3771161186https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.125250Search in Google Scholar
*Raun, T., Rudloff, M., Thorhauge, A. M., & Sandvik, K. (2016). Introduction to gender and media revisited. MedieKultur, 32(61), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.24788*RaunT.RudloffM.ThorhaugeA. M.SandvikK.2016Introduction to gender and media revisitedMedieKultur326115https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i61.24788Search in Google Scholar
*Reißmann, W., Siemon, M., Lünenborg, M., & Raetzsch, C. (2023). Making (female) health care work matter: The performative publics of #systemrelevant during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. MedieKultur, 38(73), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.128451*ReißmannW.SiemonM.LünenborgM.RaetzschC.2023Making (female) health care work matter: The performative publics of #systemrelevant during the COVID-19 pandemic in GermanyMedieKultur38737399https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.128451Search in Google Scholar
*Robinson, J. Y. (2024). American media, Scandinavian audiences: Contextual fragmentation and polarization among Swedes and Norwegians engaging in American politics. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 120–152. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0010*RobinsonJ. Y.2024American media, Scandinavian audiences: Contextual fragmentation and polarization among Swedes and Norwegians engaging in American politicsNordicom Review451120152https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0010Search in Google Scholar
*Ruzza, C. (2021). The institutionalisation of populist political discourse and conservative uncivil society in the European Union: From the margins to the mainstream? Nordicom Review, 42(S1), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0010*RuzzaC.2021The institutionalisation of populist political discourse and conservative uncivil society in the European Union: From the margins to the mainstream?Nordicom Review42S1119133https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0010Search in Google Scholar
*Sakariassen, H. (2020). A digital public sphere: Just in theory or a perceived reality for users of social network sites? MedieKultur, 36(68), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i68.118440*SakariassenH.2020A digital public sphere: Just in theory or a perceived reality for users of social network sites?MedieKultur3668126146https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i68.118440Search in Google Scholar
*Salonen, M., & Laaksonen, S.-M. (2023). Post-publication gatekeeping practices: Exploring conversational and individual gatekeeping in Finnish newspapers’ Instagram accounts. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0014*SalonenM.LaaksonenS.-M.2023Post-publication gatekeeping practices: Exploring conversational and individual gatekeeping in Finnish newspapers’ Instagram accountsNordicom Review442253278https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0014Search in Google Scholar
*Sandberg, L. A. C., Bjereld, U., Bunyik, K., Forsberg, M., & Johansson, R. (2019). Issue salience on Twitter during Swedish party leaders’ debates. Nordicom Review, 40(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0033*SandbergL. A. C.BjereldU.BunyikK.ForsbergM.JohanssonR.2019Issue salience on Twitter during Swedish party leaders’ debatesNordicom Review4024961https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0033Search in Google Scholar
*Schreiber, M. (2023). #strokesurvivor on Instagram: Conjunctive experiences of adapting to disability. MedieKultur, 39(74), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.132468*SchreiberM.2023#strokesurvivor on Instagram: Conjunctive experiences of adapting to disabilityMedieKultur39745072https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.132468Search in Google Scholar
*Segaard, S. B. (2015). Perceptions of social media. Nordicom Review, 36(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0017*SegaardS. B.2015Perceptions of social mediaNordicom Review3626578https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0017Search in Google Scholar
*Severin-Nielsen, M. K. (2023). Politicians’ social media usage in a hybrid media environment: A scoping review of the literature between 2008–2022. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0010*Severin-NielsenM. K.2023Politicians’ social media usage in a hybrid media environment: A scoping review of the literature between 2008–2022Nordicom Review442172193https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0010Search in Google Scholar
*Solverson, E. (2024). Active spectating in the digital public sphere: A qualitative exploration. Nordicom Review, 45(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0018*SolversonE.2024Active spectating in the digital public sphere: A qualitative explorationNordicom Review452170194https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0018Search in Google Scholar
Stark, D., & Vanden Broeck, P. (2024). Principles of algorithmic management. Organization Theory, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877241257213StarkD.Vanden BroeckP.2024Principles of algorithmic managementOrganization Theory52https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877241257213Search in Google Scholar
*Steinveg, B., & Bjørnå, H. (2023). Social media as an agenda-setting instrument in local politics. Nordicom Review, 44(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0016*SteinvegB.BjørnåH.2023Social media as an agenda-setting instrument in local politicsNordicom Review442299314https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2023-0016Search in Google Scholar
*Stenström, K., & Pargman, T. C. (2021). Existential vulnerability and transition: Struggling with involuntary childlessness on Instagram. Nordicom Review, 42(S4), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0048*StenströmK.PargmanT. C.2021Existential vulnerability and transition: Struggling with involuntary childlessness on InstagramNordicom Review42S4168184https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0048Search in Google Scholar
*Stenström, K., & Winter, K. (2022). Collective, unruly, and becoming: Bodies in and through TTC communication. MedieKultur, 37(71), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.122653*StenströmK.WinterK.2022Collective, unruly, and becoming: Bodies in and through TTC communicationMedieKultur37713153https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v37i71.122653Search in Google Scholar
*Storsul, T. (2014). Deliberation or self-presentation? Young people, politics and social media. Nordicom Review, 35(2), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0012*StorsulT.2014Deliberation or self-presentation? Young people, politics and social mediaNordicom Review3521728https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0012Search in Google Scholar
*Svendsen, E. (2018). Danske intellektuelle på Facebook - eksemplificeret ved Svend Brinkmann og Carsten Jensen [Danish intellectuals on Facebook – exemplified by Svend Brinkmann and Carsten Jensen]. MedieKultur, 34(65), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104886*SvendsenE.2018Danske intellektuelle på Facebook - eksemplificeret ved Svend Brinkmann og Carsten Jensen [Danish intellectuals on Facebook – exemplified by Svend Brinkmann and Carsten Jensen]MedieKultur34655475https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v34i65.104886Search in Google Scholar
*Sveningsson, M., Vestberg, A., & Hedström, J. (2022). “Not quite the struggle of normatives”: Belonging and entitlement in Swedish “body activism”. Nordicom Review, 43(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0003*SveningssonM.VestbergA.HedströmJ.2022“Not quite the struggle of normatives”: Belonging and entitlement in Swedish “body activism”Nordicom Review4313855https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0003Search in Google Scholar
*Svensson, E.-M., & Edström, M. (2016). Market-driven challenges to freedom of expression and the interaction between the state, the market, and the media. Nordicom Review, 37(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0013*SvenssonE.-M.EdströmM.2016Market-driven challenges to freedom of expression and the interaction between the state, the market, and the mediaNordicom Review372116https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0013Search in Google Scholar
Teorell, J., Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2007). Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm (Eds.), Citizenship and involvement in European democracies (pp. 334–357). Routledge.TeorellJ.TorcalM.MonteroJ. R.2007Political participation: Mapping the terrainInvan DethJ. W.MonteroJ. R.WestholmA.(Eds.),Citizenship and involvement in European democracies334357RoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Thomsen, M., Steinitz, S., Sivertsen, M. F., & Just, S. N. (2025). Digital community centers of the 21st century? A mixed-methods study of Facebook groups as fora for connective democracy. Social Media + Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251329063ThomsenM.SteinitzS.SivertsenM. F.JustS. N.2025Digital community centers of the 21st century? A mixed-methods study of Facebook groups as fora for connective democracySocial Media + Society111https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251329063Search in Google Scholar
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130TreemJ. W.LeonardiP. M.2013Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and associationAnnals of the International Communication Association361143189https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130Search in Google Scholar
*Tuomola, S. (2021). Who are you, the people? Nordicom Review, 42(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0006*TuomolaS.2021Who are you, the people?Nordicom Review4215165https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0006Search in Google Scholar
*Valtysson, B. (2015). After the performance. Nordicom Review, 36(2), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0016*ValtyssonB.2015After the performanceNordicom Review3626164https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0016Search in Google Scholar
van Dijk, J. (2000). Models of democracy and concepts of communication. In K. L. Hacker, & J. van Dijk (Eds.), Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice (pp. 30–53). Sage.van DijkJ.2000Models of democracy and concepts of communicationInHackerK. L.van DijkJ.(Eds.),Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice3053SageSearch in Google Scholar
Warner, M. (2002). Public and Counterpublics. Zone Books. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218891WarnerM.2002Public and CounterpublicsZone Bookshttps://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218891Search in Google Scholar
Whipple, M. (2005). The Dewey-Lippmann debate today: Communication distortions, reflective agency, and participatory democracy. Sociological Theory, 23(2), 156–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00248.xWhippleM.2005The Dewey-Lippmann debate today: Communication distortions, reflective agency, and participatory democracySociological Theory232156178https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00248.xSearch in Google Scholar
*Widholm, A., & Ekman, M. (2024). Democracy and digital disintegration: Platforms, actors, citizens. Nordicom Review, 45(S1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0005*WidholmA.EkmanM.2024Democracy and digital disintegration: Platforms, actors, citizensNordicom Review45S1114https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0005Search in Google Scholar
Winseck, D. (2002). Illusions of perfect information and fantasies of control in the information society. New Media & Society, 4(1), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226280WinseckD.2002Illusions of perfect information and fantasies of control in the information societyNew Media & Society4193122https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226280Search in Google Scholar
*Ytre-Arne, B. (2016). The social media experiences of long-term patients: Illness, identity, and participation. Nordicom Review, 37(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0002*Ytre-ArneB.2016The social media experiences of long-term patients: Illness, identity, and participationNordicom Review3715770https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0002Search in Google Scholar
*Zhao, J. (2017). Hong Kong protests: A quantitative and bottom-up account of resistance against Chinese social media (sina weibo) censorship. MedieKultur, 33(62), 72–99. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v33i62.24325*ZhaoJ.2017Hong Kong protests: A quantitative and bottom-up account of resistance against Chinese social media (sina weibo) censorshipMedieKultur33627299https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v33i62.24325Search in Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.ZuboffS.2019The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of powerPublicAffairsSearch in Google Scholar