Otwarty dostęp

Digital Divide and the Use of Digital Public Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic


Zacytuj

Acheampong, T. Y. (2021). Impact of Covid-19 on e-Commerce in the European Union. ENTRENOVA-ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 7(1), 89–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54820/VPRD4547Search in Google Scholar

Al-Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M. M., Chatfield, A., & Migdadi, M. (2015). The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 189–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2015.06.025Search in Google Scholar

Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Investigating the impact of citizens’ trust toward the successful adoption of e-government: A multigroup analysis of gender, age, and internet experience. Information Systems Management, 35(2), 124–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1440730Search in Google Scholar

Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizens trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(2), 5–25. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.xSearch in Google Scholar

Chatzoglou, P., Chatzoudes, D., & Symeonidis, S. (2015). Factors affecting the intention to use e-Government Services. In Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., & Paprzycki, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems,ACSIS (pp. 1489–1498). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2015F171Search in Google Scholar

Crahay A., Di Giacomo D., Dussutour, C., Ennadif G., & Talpo, S. (2021). Report on Public Administrations’ Digital Response to COVID-19 in the EU. Directorate General for Informatics, European Commission, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

De R., Pandey, N., & Pal, A. (2020). Impact of digital surge during COVID-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102171, 1–6, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171Search in Google Scholar

DigitalEurope (2022). How to spend it: A digital investment plan for Europe. Retrieved from https://digital-europe-website-v1. s3.fr-par.scw.cloud/uploads/2020/10/DIGITALEUROPE_How-to-spend-it_A-digital-investment-plan-for-Europe.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2023). Digital public services and environments. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-public-services.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2021). eGovernment Benchmark 2021 – Entering a New Digital Government Era. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/egovernment-benchmark-2021.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2021a). 2030 Digital Compass: the European way for the Digital Decade. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions, COM(2021) 118 final, Brussels. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0118.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2021b). Public sector modernisation for EU recovery and resilience. Retrieved from https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-02/policy_brief_public_sector_modernisation_for_eu_recovery_and_ resilience_final_20210210.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022 – Thematic chapters. Retrieved from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi.Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2015). Bridging the digital divide in the EU. Briefing, December. Retrieved from https://www.europarl. europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/573884/EPRS_BRI(2015)573884_EN.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat (2022). E-government statistics. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index. php?title=Digital_economy_and_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals.Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2021). Digital economy and society statistics – households and individuals. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Digital_economy_and_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals.Search in Google Scholar

Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., Giannakin, M., & Dwivedi, Y.K. (2022). The effects of trust on behavioral intention and use behavior within e-government contexts. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102553. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102553Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, V., Mukerji, B., Butt, I., & Persaud, A. (2007). Factors for Successful e-Government Adoption: a Conceptual Framework. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 5(1), 63–76. Retrieved from https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejeg/article/view/464/427.Search in Google Scholar

Lai, J., & Widmar, N.O. (2021). Revisiting the digital divide in the COVID-19 era. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(1), 458–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13104Search in Google Scholar

Lator d.o.o. (2011). Razvoj širokopojasnog pristupa internetu na otocima: Metodologija i model projektiranja, ožujak, Zagreb: Hrvatska regulatorna agencija za mrežne djelatnosti. Retrieved from https://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/2011/vijesti_najave_rasprave/Studija_otoci.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J. B., & Porumbescu, G. A. (2019). Engendering inclusive e-government use through citizen IT training programs. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 69–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Li, F. (2022). Disconnected in a pandemic: COVID-19 outcomes and the digital divide in the United States. Health & Place, 77, 102867, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102867Search in Google Scholar

Mensah, I. K., & Mi, J. (2019). Computer self-efficacy and e-government service adoption: The moderating role of age as a demographic factor. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 158–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1405980Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Regional Development and EU Funds (2022). Otoci. Retrieved from https://razvoj.gov.hr/o-ministarstvu/djelokrug-1939/otoci-i-priobalje/3834.Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2007). Glossary of statistical terms, Digital divide. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=4719.Search in Google Scholar

Roseth, B., Reyes, A., & Yee, A.K. (2021). Public Services and Digital Government during the Pandemic: Perspectives of Citizens, Civil Servants, and Government Institutions. Inter-American Development Bank. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0003122Search in Google Scholar

Samsami, M., & Schøtt, T. (2022). Past, Present, and Intended Digitalization around the World: Leading, Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind. Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, 68 (3), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2022-0013Search in Google Scholar

Seifert, A., Cotten, S.R., & Xie, B. (2021). A Double Burden of Exclusion? Digital and Social Exclusion of Older Adults in Times of COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(3), e99–e103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa098Search in Google Scholar

van Zoonen, L. (2016). Privacy concerns in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 472–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.004Search in Google Scholar

Vishanth W., Irani, Z., Lee, H., Hindi, N. & Osman, I. (2016). Are U.K. Citizens Satisfied With E-Government Services? Identifying and Testing Antecedents of Satisfaction. Information Systems Management, 33(4), 331–343, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2016.1220216Search in Google Scholar