Use of Concrete for Road Infrastructure: A SWOT Analysis Related to the three Catchwords Sustainability, Industrialisation and Digitalisation

1. Mehta P K, “Global concrete industry sustainability,” Concrete international, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 45-48, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

2. Pachauri R and Meyer L, “Climate change 2014 Synthesis Report-Summary for Policymakers,” ed: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014.Search in Google Scholar

3. Samferdselsdepartement, “Meld. St. 33 Nasjonal Transportplan 2018-2029 (in Norwegian) (National Transport Plan 2018-2029),” Oslo, Norway2017.Search in Google Scholar

4. Jahren P and Sui T, Concrete and sustainability. CRC Press, 2013.10.1201/b15160Search in Google Scholar

5. Jiang R, Mao C, Hou L, Wu C, and Tan J, “A SWOT analysis for promoting off-site construction under the backdrop of China’s new urbanisation,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 173, pp. 225-234, 2018/02/01/2018.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.147Search in Google Scholar

6. Yuan H, “A SWOT analysis of successful construction waste management,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 39, pp. 1-8, 2013/01/01/2013.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.016Search in Google Scholar

7. Brundtland G H, Our common future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. [Online]. Available.Search in Google Scholar

8. CEMBUREAU The European Cement Association. (2016, 17.03). Key figures. Available: https://cembureau.eu/cement-101/key-facts-figures/Search in Google Scholar

9. Scrivener K L, John V M, and Gartner E M, “Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 114, pp. 2-26, 2018/12/01/2018.10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015Search in Google Scholar

10. United Nations. (2017, 22.03). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. Available: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-populationprospects-the-2017-revision.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

11. Benhelal E, Zahedi G, Shamsaei E, and Bahadori A, “Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 51, pp. 142-161, 2013/07/15/2013.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.049Search in Google Scholar

12. Habert G, Denarié E, Šajna A, and Rossi P, “Lowering the global warming impact of bridge rehabilitations by using Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 38, pp. 1-11, 2013/04/01/2013.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.11.008Search in Google Scholar

13. Xuan D, Poon C S, and Zheng W, “Management and sustainable utilization of processing wastes from ready-mixed concrete plants in construction: A review,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 136, pp. 238-247, 2018/09/01/2018.10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.007Search in Google Scholar

14. Norwegian Public Road Administration, Håndbok N400 Bruprosjektering (in Norwegian) (Maunal N400 Bridge design). Oslo: Directorate of Public Roads, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

15. Norwegian Public Road Administration, Håndbok N500 Vegtunneler (in Norwegian) (Manual N500 Road Tunnel design). Oslo: Directorate of Public Roads, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

16. Russell H G and Graybeal B A, “Ultra-high performance concrete: A state-of-the-art report for the bridge community,” 2013.Search in Google Scholar

17. Thorstensen R, Larsen I, Heimdal A, and Hansen H, “LCC and carbon footprint of bridge made from locally produced UHPC, compared to standard concrete,” in Proceedings of HiPerMat 2016 4th International Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Concrete and High Performance Materials, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

18. National addition to Eurocode 2–Design of concrete structures: Specific rules for ultrahigh performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC), NF P18-710, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

19. Recommendation: Ultra High Fibre Reinforced Cement-Based composites (UHPFRC): Construction material, dimensioning and application, SIA 2052, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

20. Brühwiler E, “Structural UHPFRC”: Welcome to the post-concrete era,” in First International Interactive Symposium on UHPC, 2016.10.21838/uhpc.2016.keySearch in Google Scholar

21. Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures–part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, EN 1992-1-1:2004, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

22. Randl N, Steiner T, Ofner S, Baumgartner E, and Mészöly T, “Development of UHPC mixtures from an ecological point of view,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 67, pp. 373-378, 2014/09/30/2014.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.102Search in Google Scholar

23. Habert G, Arribe D, Dehove T, Espinasse L, and Le Roy R, “Reducing environmental impact by increasing the strength of concrete: quantification of the improvement to concrete bridges,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 35, pp. 250-262, 2012/11/01/2012.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.028Search in Google Scholar

24. Liew K M, Sojobi A O, and Zhang L W, “Green concrete: Prospects and challenges,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 156, pp. 1063-1095, 2017/12/15/2017.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.008Search in Google Scholar

25. Larsen I L, Aasbakken I G, O’Born R, Vertes K, and Thorstensen R T, “Determining the Environmental Benefits of Ultra High Performance Concrete as a Bridge Construction Material,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, vol. 245, no. 5, p. 052096: IOP Publishing.10.1088/1757-899X/245/5/052096Search in Google Scholar

26. Fidjestol P and Thorstensen R T, “Improving sustainability of concrete construction - the role of high strength high performance concrete,” presented at the 37th Conference on Our World in Concrete and Structures, Singapore, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

27. Larsen I L, Thorstensen R T, and Vertes K, “Lowering environmental impact from UHPC, utilizing industrial by-products,” in 12th fib International PhD-Symposium in Civil Engineering, Prague, 2018, pp. 93 - 101: Federation internationale du beton (fib).Search in Google Scholar

28. Bygg21, “Tenk nytt – bruk kjente løsninger (in Norwegian) (Think New - Use Known Solutions),” 2019, Available: https://www.bygg21.no/rapporter-og-veiledere/tenk-nyttbruk-kjente-losninger/.Search in Google Scholar

29. Thorstensen R T, Kalsaas B T, Skaar J, and Jensen S, “Last planner system innovation efforts on requirements for digital management system,” in Annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 2013, vol. 21.Search in Google Scholar

30. The American Institute of Architects (AIA National & AIA California Council), “Integrated Project Delivery: A guide,” 2007.Search in Google Scholar

31. Fédération internationale du béton (fib), Precast Concrete Bridges: State-of-the-art report. International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), 2004.Search in Google Scholar

32. Heimdal A, Larsen I L, and Norheim T, “Standardisering av brokonstruksjoner for nasjonale hovedveier (in Norwegian) (Standardization of bridge structures for national highways),” Engineering science, University of Agder, Grimstad, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

33. Bårseth E and Birkeland K, “Bestandighet og holdninger til flerspenns prefabrikkerte brokonstruksjoner (in Norwegian) (Durability and attitudes towards multi-span prefabricated bridge structures),” BSc thesis, University of Agder, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

34. Persson S, “«Brubjelkeprosjektet» (in Norwegian) (“The bridge beam project”),” presented at the Brukonferansen 2017, Oslo 2017. Available: https://www.vegvesen.no/_attachment/2069373/binary/1218553?fast_title=Betongelementer.+Stian+Persson+%285+MB%29.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

35. Amundsen I, “Vegen i landskapet, om vakre veger (in Norwegian) (The road in the landscape, about beautiful roads),” in “Norwegian Public Roads Administration reports,” No. 300, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

36. Sandvik C and Fougner F, “BIM as a tool for sustainable design,” in The International Federation for Structural Concrete 5th International fib Congress, Better - Smarter - Stronger, 7 – 11 October 2018, Melbourne, Australia, 2018, pp. 786-791: fib (Fédération internationale du béton).Search in Google Scholar

37. Azhar S, “Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 241-252, 2011.10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127Search in Google Scholar