Zacytuj

[1] Birch, J. (2003). Benefit of legal metrology for the economy and society. A study for the International Committee of Legal Metrology.Search in Google Scholar

[2] International Organization of Legal Metrology. (2010). Alphabetical list of terms defined in OIML Recommendations and Documents. OIML G 18.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zeier, M., Allal, D., Judaschke, R. (2011). Guidelines on the evaluation of vector network analysers (VNA). EURAMET Calibration Guide No. 12. Braunschweig, Germany: EURAMET e.V.Search in Google Scholar

[4] EURAMET Technical Committee for Mass and Related Quantities. (2015). Guidelines on the Calibration of Non-Automatic Weighing Instruments. EURAMET Calibration Guide No. 18. Version 4.0 (11/2015). Braunschweig, Germany: EURAMET e.V.Search in Google Scholar

[5] European Cooperation in Legal Metrology. (2015). Software guide. (Measuring instruments directive 2014/32/EU1). WELMEC 7.2.Search in Google Scholar

[6] European Cooperation in Legal Metrology. (2015). Directive 2009/23/EC: Common application. Non-automatic weighing instruments. WELMEC 2, Iss. 6.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM). (2008). Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM). (2011). Evaluation of measurement data - Supplement 2 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” - Extension to any number of output quantities. JCGM 102:2011.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM). (2008). Evaluation of measurement data - An introduction to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” and related documents. JCGM 100:2008.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM). (2012). Evaluation of measurement data - The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. JCGM 106:2012.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Witkovský, V., Wimmer, G., Ďuriš, S. (2015). On statistical methods and reference confidence intervals in interlaboratory comparisons for temperature. Inetrnational Journal of Thermophysiscs, 36 (8), 2150-2171.10.1007/s10765-015-1917-0Search in Google Scholar

[12] Palenčár, R., Sopkuliak, P., Palenčár, J., Ďuriš, S., Suroviak, E., Halaj, M. (2017). Application of Monte Carlo Method for evaluation of uncertainties of ITS-90 by Standard Platinum Resistance Thermometer. Measurement Science Review, 17 (3), 108-116.10.1515/msr-2017-0014Search in Google Scholar

[13] Palenčár, R., Wimmer, G., Halaj, M. (2002). Determination of the uncertainties and covariances in the calibration of the set of weights. Measurement Science Review, 2 (1), 9-20.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Charvátová, H., Janáčová, D., Fialka, M., Kolomazník, K. (2010). Mass analysis of the components separated from printed circuit boards. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 15 (1), 58-61.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rojas, R. (1996). Neural Networks: A Systematic Introduction. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-61068-4Search in Google Scholar

[16] Haikyn, S. (2008). Neural Networks and Learning Machines, (3rd ed.). Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sutkens, J.A.K., Vandewalle J. (1999). Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letters, 9, 293-300.10.1023/A:1018628609742Search in Google Scholar

[18] Huang, G., Song, S., Wu, C., You, K. (2012). Robust support vector regression for uncertain input and output data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 23, 1690-1700.10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2212456Search in Google Scholar

[19] Vapnik, V. (1999). An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10, 988-999.10.1109/72.788640Search in Google Scholar

[20] Nyulászi, L., Andoga, R., Butka, P., Gašpar, V. (2016). Comparison of experimental identification methods using measured data from a turbojet engine. In IEEE 14th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI). IEEE, 23-37.10.1109/SAMI.2016.7422976Search in Google Scholar

[21] Tetko, I.V., Livingstone, D.J., Luik, A.I. (1995). Neural network studies. 1. Comparison of overfitting and overtraining. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 35, 826-833.10.1021/ci00027a006Search in Google Scholar

[22] Chicco, D. (2017). Ten quick tips for machine learning in computational biology. BioData Mining, 10 (35).10.1186/s13040-017-0155-3Search in Google Scholar

[23] Rojas, R. (1996). A short proof of the posterior probability property of classifier neural networks. Neural Computation, 8 (1), 41-43.10.1162/neco.1996.8.1.41Search in Google Scholar

[24] Møller, M.F. (1991). A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks, 6, 525-533.10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80056-5Search in Google Scholar

[25] Congalton, G.C. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37 (1), 35-46.10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-BSearch in Google Scholar

[26] Dovica, M., Buša, J., Palenčár, R., Ďuriš, S., Šooš, Ľ., Vrba, I., Kelemenová, T., Škovránek, T. (2013). Comparison of methods for analysis of deviations from roundness. Measurement Techniques, 56 (9), 1021-1025.10.1007/s11018-013-0323-xSearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1335-8871
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
6 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Control Engineering, Metrology and Testing