Otwarty dostęp

Evaluating the creep behaviour of plastic-processed aggregate-based concrete

 oraz   
15 mar 2025

Zacytuj
Pobierz okładkę

Figure 1

PPAs used in this study: (a) texture and physical appearance, (b) optical microscopic image, and (c) grading curve in comparison with the ASTM maximum and minimum limits of LWA [26].
PPAs used in this study: (a) texture and physical appearance, (b) optical microscopic image, and (c) grading curve in comparison with the ASTM maximum and minimum limits of LWA [26].

Figure 2

Grading curve of the (a) natural coarse and (b) fine aggregates in comparison with the ASTM limits [26].
Grading curve of the (a) natural coarse and (b) fine aggregates in comparison with the ASTM limits [26].

Figure 3

Creep test setup.
Creep test setup.

Figure 4

Creep setup with (a) loaded sample and (b) unloaded samples.
Creep setup with (a) loaded sample and (b) unloaded samples.

Figure 5

Results of time-dependent strain for loaded specimens of PPACs and CN.
Results of time-dependent strain for loaded specimens of PPACs and CN.

Figure 6

Results of shrinkage strain for unloaded specimens of PPACs and CN.
Results of shrinkage strain for unloaded specimens of PPACs and CN.

Figure 7

Results of creep strain of PPACs and CN.
Results of creep strain of PPACs and CN.

Figure 8

Comparison between the experimental results and the predictions of the analytical models related to the creep coefficient of PPAC mixes.
Comparison between the experimental results and the predictions of the analytical models related to the creep coefficient of PPAC mixes.

Figure 9

Regression and experimental curves for creep coefficients of PPAC mixes.
Regression and experimental curves for creep coefficients of PPAC mixes.

Figure 10

Comparison between the proposed model and the experimental results for the creep coefficient of PPAC mixes.
Comparison between the proposed model and the experimental results for the creep coefficient of PPAC mixes.

Figure 11

Relationship between the dry density and creep coefficient for all the concrete series.
Relationship between the dry density and creep coefficient for all the concrete series.

Figure 12

Relationship between the compressive strength (28 days) and creep coefficient for all the concrete series.
Relationship between the compressive strength (28 days) and creep coefficient for all the concrete series.

Figure 13

Relationship among the compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and creep coefficient for all the concrete series.
Relationship among the compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and creep coefficient for all the concrete series.

Figure 14

Relationship among the Poisson ratio, compressive strength, and creep coefficient for all the concrete series.
Relationship among the Poisson ratio, compressive strength, and creep coefficient for all the concrete series.

Parameters of the creep coefficient in different models_

Type of model
AASHTO LRFD (2007) [39] ACI 209.2R-08 [40]
B = ( 61 0.58 f c ) B=(61-0.58\hspace{.25em}fc^{\prime} ) B = 10 B=10
d = 1 d=1 d = 0.6 d=0.6
λ = 1.9 \lambda =1.9 λ = 2.35 \lambda =2.35
γ c = k v s k h k f t o 0.118 {\gamma }_{c}={k}_{vs}{k}_{h}{k}_{f}{t}_{\text{o}}^{-0.118} γ c = γ l a γ H γ v s γ s γ ρ γ α {\gamma }_{c}={\gamma }_{la}{\gamma }_{H}{\gamma }_{vs}{\gamma }_{s}{\gamma }_{\rho }{\gamma }_{\alpha }
K v s = 1.45 0.0051 ( v / s ) {K}_{vs}\hspace{.25em}=\hspace{.25em}1.45\hspace{.25em}-\hspace{.25em}0.0051(v/s) ≥ 1.0 γ l a = 1.25 ( t o ) 0.118 {\gamma }_{la}=1.25{({t}_{o})}^{-0.118}
K h = 1.56 0.008 RH {K}_{h}\hspace{.25em}=\hspace{.25em}1.56\hspace{.25em}-\hspace{.25em}0.008\text{RH} γ H = 1.27 0.0067 RH {\gamma }_{H}=1.27-0.0067\text{RH}
k f = 35 7 + f c {k}_{f}=\frac{35}{7+fc^{\prime} } γ v s = 2 / 3 1 + 1.13 · e .0213 v s {\gamma }_{vs}=2/3\left[1+1.13\cdot {\text{e}}^{-.0213\left(\frac{v}{s}\right)}\right]
γ s = 0.82 + 0.00264 ( S l ) {\gamma }_{s}=0.82+0.00264({S}_{l})
γ ρ = 0.88 + 0.0024 ( ρ a ) {\gamma }_{\rho }=0.88+0.0024({\rho }_{a})
γ α = 0.46 + 0.09 α {\gamma }_{\alpha }=0.46+0.09\alpha

Coefficient of correlation of the proposed model for the creep coefficient of PPAC mixes_

Concrete type Coefficient of correlation (equation (2))
PPAC25 0.98
PPAC50 0.96
PPAC75 0.97
PPAC100 0.97

Calculations for calibrating the ACI models for PPAC mixes_

Model type Parameter Concrete type
PPAC25 PPAC50 PPAC75 PPAC100
ACI 209.2R-08 γ l a {\gamma }_{la} 0.844 0.844 0.844 0.844
γ H {\gamma }_{H} 1.015 1.015 1.015 1.015
γ v s {\gamma }_{vs} 1.158 1.158 1.158 1.158
γ s {\gamma }_{s} 1.189 1.268 1.282 1.321
γ ρ {\gamma }_{\rho } 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
γ α {\gamma }_{\alpha } 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73
γ c {\gamma }_{c} 0.759 0.810 0.819 0.844
C u {C}_{u} 3.30 2.83 3.50 2.40
λ PA = C u / γ c {\lambda }_{\text{PA}}={C}_{u}/{\gamma }_{c} 4.35 3.49 4.27 2.84

Mix proportions for concrete mixes used in the current study_

Concrete series W/C Total water Free water Cement Fine aggregate Coarse aggregate
PPA CNA
kg/m3
CN 0.50 240.3 225 450 880 688
PPAC25 239 847 141 516
PPAC50 237.6 815 282 344
PPAC75 236.2 782 423 172
PPAC100 234.8 750 565

Major mechanical properties for all the concrete series

Sample Dry density (kg/m3) Compressive strength (MPa) Tensile strength (MPa) Flexural strength (MPa) Modulus of elasticity (GPa) Poisson ratio Abrasion-weight loss (g)
CN 2,183 41.8 3.58 5.42 27.82 0.25 0.40
PPAC25 2,086 35.3 3.32 5.24 20.58 0.28 0.60
PPAC50 1,995 31.7 2.42 5.04 15.06 0.38 0.61
PPAC75 1,896 30.4 2.36 4.47 10.66 0.39 0.63
PPAC100 1,777 30.2 2.25 3.99 10.14 0.39 0.66

Regression analysis results of the PPAC mixes_

Model type Parameter Concrete type
PPAC25 PPAC50 PPAC75 PPAC100
Best fit B 17.72 26.45 12.71 12.46
D 0.77 0.92 0.76 0.77
C u 3.04 2.42 3.03 2.05
R 2 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.98
AASHTO (2007) B 40.52 42.60 43.36 43.47
D 1
C u 2.84 2.47 3.06 2.09
R 2 0.97 0.96 0.93 0.92
ACI 209.2R-08 B 10
D 0.6
C u 3.30 2.83 3.50 2.40
R 2 0.97 0.94 0.96 0.96

Aggregate properties used in the current study_

Test Experimental values Standard used
CNA PPA
Fineness modulus 5.83 5.67 ASTM C136/C136M-14 [26]
Unit weight (kg/m3) 1,554 1,132 ASTM C29/C29M-16 [27]
Voids (%) 37.79 37.44 ASTM C29/C29M-16 [27]
Specific gravity 2.59 1.81 ASTM C127-15 [28]
Water absorption (%) 1.48 0.95 ASTM C127-15 [28]