[
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.10.1093/jopart/mum032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berg, L. N., Thomas, E., Iakovleva, T., Pinheiro, R., & Benneworth, P. (2022). Universities and Regions: New Insights and Emerging Developments. In Universities and Regional Engagement. Routledge.10.4324/9781003150299-14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., Palgan, Y. V., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., von Wirth, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 317-335, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418787222.10.1177/0969776418787222
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’and’Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-234.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chesbrough, H., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Open Social Innovation. In New Frontiers in Open Innovation.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cole, L. (2021). A framework to conceptualize innovation purpose in public sector innovation labs. Policy Design and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619.10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Document search – Web of Science Core Collection. (n.d.). Retrieved 30 June 2022, from https://www-webofscience-com.proxy-ub.rug.nl/wos/woscc/basic-search.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EIS-RIS 2021 | Research and Innovation. (n.d.). Retrieved 27 June 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/en/statistics/performance-indicators/european-innovation-scoreboard/eis#.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. Research Policy, 51(1), 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390.10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Global Innovation Index | Tracking Innovation through the COVID-19 Crisis. (n.d.). Global Innovation Index. Retrieved 27 June 2022, from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/Home.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gomes, L. A. de V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30-48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009.10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, A., & Fuglsang, L. (2020). A living lab logic for public sector innovation: The case of European living labs. The 5th Innovation in Public Services and Public Policy Conference.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Janssen, M., Konopnicki, D., Snowdon, J. L., & Ojo, A. (2017). Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD). Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9746-2.10.1007/s10796-017-9746-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaletka, C., Markmann, M., & Pelka, B. (2016). Peeling the Onion. An Exploration of the Layers of Social Innovation Ecosystems. Modelling a context sensitive perspective on driving and hindering factors for social innovation. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 1(2), Article 2. https://pub.sinnergiak.org/esir/article/view/42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lepik, K.-L., & Urmanavičienė, A. (2022). The Role of Higher Education Institutions in Development of Social Entrepreneurship: The Case of Tallinn University Social Entrepreneurship Study Program, Estonia. In C. Păunescu, K.-L. Lepik, & N. Spencer (Eds.), Social Innovation in Higher Education: Landscape, Practices, and Opportunities (pp. 129–151). Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84044-0_7.10.1007/978-3-030-84044-0_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Litmaps. (n.d.). Litmaps. Retrieved 10 May 2022, from https://app.litmaps.com.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11077-018-9315-7.10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2021). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. Public Management Review, 23(2), 297-316, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946.10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meister Broekema, P., Horlings, L. G., & Bulder, E. (2021a). Tackling societal challenges together Co-creation strategies and social innovation in EU policy and funded projects. European Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1133.10.1002/epa2.1133
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meister Broekema, P., Horlings, L. G., & Bulder, E. A. M. (2021b). Understanding the value of co-creation for social innovation interpretations of social innovation and co-creation in European policy-related documents between 1995 and 2018. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1909464.10.1080/13511610.2021.1909464
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269, https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2021). The Role of Universities in Social Innovation Within Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Model: Practical Implications from Polish Experience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00804-y.10.1007/s13132-021-00804-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moulaert, F., & MacCallum, D. (2019). Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. (n.d.). Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. Retrieved 13 May 2022, from https://oecd-opsi.org/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. (2016). Public sector innovation. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-12-en.10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-12-en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oeij, P. R. A., Torre, W. van der, Vaas, S., & Dhondt, S. (2018). Understanding Social Innovation as an innovation process. TNO, /report-completed-understanding-social-innovation-as-an-innovation-process/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public Sector Innovation Research: What’s Next? Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.122.10.5172/impp.12.2.122
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rădulescu, M. A., Leendertse, W., & Arts, J. (2022). Living Labs: A Creative and Collaborative Planning Approach. In A. Franklin (Ed.), Co-Creativity and Engaged Scholarship: Transformative Methods in Social Sustainability Research (pp. 457-491). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84248-2_15.10.1007/978-3-030-84248-2_15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reichert, D. S. (n.d.). The Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. 108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Savini, F., & Bertolini, L. (2019). Urban experimentation as a politics of niches. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(4), 831-848, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19826085.10.1177/0308518X19826085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. (2017). Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1), 7-14, https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045.10.22215/timreview/1045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHIINE - Multi Disciplinary Innovation for Social Change. (n.d.). Retrieved 30 May 2022, from https://socialchangelab.eu/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torvinen, H., & Jansson, K. (2022). Public health care innovation lab tackling the barriers of public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 0(0), 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2029107.10.1080/14719037.2022.2029107
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Transitions Performance Index (TPI). (n.d.). [Text]. European Commission - European Commission. Retrieved 27 June 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policy-making/support-national-research-and-innovation-policy-making/transitions-performance-index-tpi_en.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Unceta, A., Barandiaran, X., & Restrepo, N. (2019). The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance-The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain. Sustainability, 11(21), 6103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216103.10.3390/su11216103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333-1357, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland Innovation Lab. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 290-299, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920.10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920
]Search in Google Scholar
