<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The socioeconomic performance of industrial small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in comparison to that of non-industrial SMSTs, is subject to evaluation in this paper, to see if the presence of industry has adverse effects on socioeconomic factors. We studied 32 variables accounting for dimensions of socioeconomic performance in Slovenian SMSTs and conducted various statistical tests. We found only minor differences between the two groups, pertaining mainly to some elements of economic structure and demography, and some mixed relations of industrial employment and socioeconomic performance. The results demonstrate that industrial SMSTs should not be labelled automatically as ‘disadvantaged’. We discuss why our results differ from general research expectations in the literature: in the local context, we outline the “egalitarian syndrome” and policies of polycentric spatial development; in the global context, we discuss the “failed tertiarisation effect” and the differences between post-socialist and “Western” countries. We conclude by proposing that research should be re-oriented towards the more place-sensitive issues of industrial towns across Europe.</p></abstract>

The socioeconomic performance of industrial small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in comparison to that of non-industrial SMSTs, is subject to evaluation in this paper, to see if the presence of industry has adverse effects on socioeconomic factors. We studied 32 variables accounting for dimensions of socioeconomic performance in Slovenian SMSTs and conducted various statistical tests. We found only minor differences between the two groups, pertaining mainly to some elements of economic structure and demography, and some mixed relations of industrial employment and socioeconomic performance. The results demonstrate that industrial SMSTs should not be labelled automatically as ‘disadvantaged’. We discuss why our results differ from general research expectations in the literature: in the local context, we outline the “egalitarian syndrome” and policies of polycentric spatial development; in the global context, we discuss the “failed tertiarisation effect” and the differences between post-socialist and “Western” countries. We conclude by proposing that research should be re-oriented towards the more place-sensitive issues of industrial towns across Europe.

The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives

Moravian Geographical Reports

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The socioeconomic performance of industrial small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in comparison to that of non-industrial SMSTs, is subject to evaluation in...

The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives

Data publikacji: 09 kwi 2020

Zakres stron: 16 - 28

Otrzymano: 19 wrz 2019

Przyjęty: 20 sty 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0002

Słowa kluczowe
small and medium-sized towns, industry, socioeconomic development, post-socialism, tertiarisation effect, Slovenia

© 2020 David Bole et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives

Data publikacji: 09 kwi 2020

Zakres stron: 16 - 28

Otrzymano: 19 wrz 2019

Przyjęty: 20 sty 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0002

Słowa kluczowesmall and medium-sized towns, industry, socioeconomic development, post-socialism, tertiarisation effect, Slovenia

© 2020 David Bole et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
small and medium-sized towns, industry, socioeconomic development, post-socialism, tertiarisation effect, Slovenia