Visibility and perception analysis of city monuments: The case of Bratislava city centre (Slovakia)

AMEDEO, D., GOLLEDGE, R., STIMSON, R. (2009): Person environment behaviour research: Investigating activities and experiences in spaces and environments. New York, London, Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

APPLETON, J. (1975): The experience of landscape. Chichester, John Wiley and Sons.Search in Google Scholar

ASHWORTH, G., PAGE, S. J. (2011): Urban tourism research: Recent progress and current paradoxes. Tourism Management, 32(1): 1–15.10.1016/j.tourman.2010.02.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

BATTY, M. (2001): Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1): 123–150.10.1068/b2725Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

BAUDER, M., FREYTAG, T. (2015): Visitor mobility in the city and the effects of travel preparation. Tourism Geographies, 17(5): 682–700.10.1080/14616688.2015.1053971Search in Google Scholar

BELL, S. (1999): Landscape: pattern, perception and process. London, E&FN Spon.Search in Google Scholar

BENEDIKT, M. L. (1979): To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6(1): 47–65.10.1068/b060047Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

BERTAMINI, M., YANG, T. L., PROFFITT, D. R. (1998): Relative size perception at a distance is best at eye level. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(4): 673–682.10.3758/BF03206054Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

BISHOP, I. D. (2003): Assessment of visual qualities, impacts, and behaviours, in the landscape, by using measures of visibility. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(5): 677–688.10.1068/b12956Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CAÑAS, I., AYUGA, E., AYUGA, F. (2009): A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public. Land Use Policy, 26(4): 1173–1181.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CHURCH, A., COLES, T. (2007): Tourism and many faces of power. In: Church, A., Coles, Z. [eds.]: Tourism, space and power (pp. 269–283). London, New York, Routledge.10.4324/9780203392096-23Search in Google Scholar

DANIEL, T. C. (2001): Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21^st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(4): 267–281.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

DALTON, R. C., BAFNA, S. (2003): The syntactical image of the city: a reciprocal definition of spatial syntaxes. In International Space Syntax Symposium. London. Available at: http://www.spacesyntax/symposia/SSS4/fullpapers/59DaltonBafnapapers.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

DE FLORIANI, L., MARZANO, P., PUPPO, E. (1994): Line-of-sight communication on terrain models. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 8(4): 329–342.10.1080/02693799408902004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

DI LORENZO, G., READES, J., CALABRESE, F., RATTI, C. (2012): Predicting personal mobility with individual and group travel histories. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(5): 838–857.10.1068/b37147Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

EDWARDS, D., GRIFFIN, T., HAYLLAR, B. (2008): Urban tourism research: developing an agenda. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(4): 1032–1052.10.1016/j.annals.2008.09.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

FISHER, P. F. (1995): An exploration of probable viewsheds in landscape planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22(5): 527–546.10.1068/b220527Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

FISHER-GEWIRTZMAN, D. (2016): Integrated ‘weighted views’ to quantitative 3D visibility analysis as a predictive tool for perception of space. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science https://doi.org/10.1177/026581351667648610.1177/0265813516676486Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

FYHRI, A., JACOBSEN, J. K. S., TØMMERVIK, H. (2009): Tourists’ landscape perceptions and preferences in a Scandinavian coastal region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(4): 202–211.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

GARNERO, G., FABRIZIO, E. (2015): Visibility analysis in urban spaces: a raster-based approach and case studies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42(4): 688–707.10.1068/b130119pSearch in Google Scholar

GRANÖ, J. G. (1929): Reine Geographie: eine methodologische Studie beleuchtet mit Beispielen aus Finnland und Estland. Helsinki, Helsingfors.Search in Google Scholar

GRASS DEVELOPMENT TEAM (2010): Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software, Version 6.4.0, Open Source Geospatial Foundation. Available at: http://grass.osgeo.orgSearch in Google Scholar

HLAVATÁ, Z., OŤAHEĽ, J. (2010): Visual analysis of selected historical dominants in Bratislava. Geografický časopis, 62(3): 239–311.Search in Google Scholar

IRA, V. (2003): The changing intra-urban structure of the Bratislava city and its perception. Geografický časopis, 55(2): 91–107.Search in Google Scholar

JACOBS, M. (2011): Psychology of the visual landscape. In: Nijhuis, S., et al. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape. (pp. 41–54). Delft, University of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

JANEČKOVÁ MOLNÁROVÁ, K., SKŘIVANOVÁ, Z., KALIVODA, O., SKLENIČKA, P. (2017): Rural identity and landscape aesthetics in exurbia: Some issues to resolve from a Central Europe perspective. Moravian Geographical Reports, 28(1): 2–12.10.1515/mgr-2017-0001Search in Google Scholar

KIDNER, D. B., RALLINGS, P. J., WARE, A. J. (1997): Parallel processing for terrain analysis in GIS: visibility as a case study. GeoInformatica, 1(2): 183–207.10.1023/A:1009740712769Search in Google Scholar

LIN, T., LIN, H., HU, M. (2017): Three-dimensional visibility analysis and visual quality computation for urban open spaces aided by Google SketchUp and WebGIS. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 44(4): 618–646.10.1177/0265813515605097Search in Google Scholar

LLOBERA, M. (2003): Extending GIS-based visual analysis: the concept of visualscapes. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 17(1): 25–48.10.1080/713811741Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LOTHIAN, A. (1999): Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning 44(4): 177–198.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LYNCH, K. (1960): The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

MEILINGER, T., FRANZ, G., BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (2012): From isovists via mental representations to behaviour: first steps toward closing the causal chain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37(1): 48–62.10.1068/b34048tOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

MORELLO, E., RATI, C. (2009): A digital image of the city: 3D isovists in Lynch's urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(5): 837–853.10.1068/b34144tOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

NIJHUIS, S., VAN LAMMEREN, R., VAN DER HOEVEN, F. [eds.] (2011): Exploring the visual landscape. Delft, University of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

NIJHUIS, S. (2011): Visual research in landscape architecture. In: Nijhuis, S. Van Lammeren, R., Van der Hoeven, F. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape (pp. 103–146). Delft, University of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

NIJHUIS, S., VAN LAMMEREN, R., ANTROP, M. (2011): Exploring the visual landscape – Introduction. In: Nijhuis, S., Van Lammeren, R., Van der Hoeven, F. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape (pp. 15–39). Delft, University of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

ODE, Ĺ., TVEIT, M. S., FRY, G. (2008): Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: touching base with aesthetic theory. Landscape Research, 33(1): 89–117.10.1080/01426390701773854Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

OŤAHEĽ, J. (1999): Visual landscape perception. Landscape pattern and aesthetic assessment. Ekologia (Bratislava) 18(1): 63–74.Search in Google Scholar

OŤAHEĽ, J. (2003): Visual quality of the landscape: approaches to analysis. Ekologia (Bratislava), 22(Suppl. 2): 150–160.Search in Google Scholar

ROOS-KLEIN LANKHORST, J, DE VRIES, S., BUIS, A. (2011): Mapping landscape attractiveness – A GIS-based landscape appreciation model for the Dutch countryside. In: Nijhuis, S., Van Lammer, R., Van der Hoeven, F. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape (pp. 147–161). Delft, University of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

RØD, J. K., VAN DER MEER, D. (2009): Visibility and dominance analysis: assessing a high-rise building project in Trondheim. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(4): 698–710.10.1068/b34118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

SAARINEN, T. F. (1976): Environmental planning – perception and behaviour. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

SEVENANT, M., ANTROP, M. (2007): Settlement models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes: two case studies in Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(4): 362–374.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.09.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

SPECTOR, R. H. (1990): Visual Fields. In: Walker, H. K., Hall, W. D., Hurst, J. W. [eds.]: Clinical Methods, 3^rd edition. The history, Physical and Laboratory examination (pp. 565–572). Atlanta, Georgia, Boston, Butterwortth Publishers, Emory University School of Medicine.Search in Google Scholar

VAN LAMMEREN, R. (2011): Geomatics in physiognimc landscape research – A Dutch view. In: Nijhuis, S., Van Lammer, R., Van der Hoeven, F. [eds.]: Exploring the visual landscape (pp. 73–97). Delft, University of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

ŻEMŁA, M. (2016): Tourism destination: The networking approach. Moravian Geographical Reports, 24(4): 2–14.10.1515/mgr-2016-0018Search in Google Scholar

ZUBE, E. H., SELL, G. L., TAYLOR, J. G. (1982): Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9: 1–33.10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar