[
Adams, F., Beighley, S. M., 2013. Information, meaning, and animal communication. Animal communication theory: information and influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 399–420.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bakhtin, M., 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bateson, G., 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beer, C., 2020. Niko Tinbergen and questions of instinct. Animal behaviour, 164, 261–265.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bro-Jørgensen, J., 2010. Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(5), 292–300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, A. E., De Bivort, B., 2018. Ethology as a physical science. Nature Physics, 14(7), 653–657.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buccheri, R., Saniga, M., Stuckey, W. M. (Eds.), 2012. The nature of time: Geometry, physics and perception (Vol. 95). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bühler, K., 1934. Sprachtheorie (Vol. 2). Jena, Germany: Fischer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Candiotti, A., Zuberbühler, K., Lemasson, A., 2012. Context-related call combinations in female Diana monkeys. Animal cognition, 15(3), 327–339.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Church, R. M., 2019. Theories of timing behavior. In Mowrer, R. R., Klein, S. B. (Eds.) (2000), Handbook of contemporary learning theories. London: Routledge, pp. 41–72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clayton, N. S., Griffiths, D. P., Emery, N. J. et al., 2001. Elements of episodic–like memory in animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 356(1413), 1483–1491.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cowley, S. J., Steffensen, S. V., 2015. Coordination in language: Temporality and time-ranging. Interaction Studies, 16(3), 474–494.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crystal, J. D., 2006. Animal behavior: timing in the wild. Current Biology, 16(7), R252–R253.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dainton, B., 2016. Time and space. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Reus, K., Soma, M., Anichini, M. et al., 2021. Rhythm in dyadic interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1835), 20200337.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deacon, T. W., 2013. Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: Norton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dennett, D., 2018. From Bacteria to Bach and Back. The evolution of minds. London: Penguin Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dowden, B., 2009. The Metaphysics of Time: A Dialogue. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Echeverri, S. A., Miller, A. E., Chen, J. et al., 2021. How signaling geometry shapes the efficacy and evolution of animal communication systems. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 61(3), 787–813.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farina, A., Napoletano, B., 2010. Rethinking the landscape: new theoretical perspectives for a powerful agency. Biosemiotics, 3(2), 177–187.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fetzer, A. (2002). Communicative intentions in context. Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, J., 2020. Nonhuman primate alarm calls then and now. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 7(2), 108–116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frow, J., 2014. Genre. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fröhlich, M., Sievers, C., Townsend, S. W. et al., 2019. Multimodal communication and language origins: integrating gestures and vocalizations. Biological Reviews, 94(5), 1809–1829.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuller, J. L. R., 2013. Diversity of form, content, and function in the vocal signals of adult male blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni): An evolutionary approach to understanding a signal repertoire. New York: Columbia University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gros-Louis, F., Kriz, J., Kabashi, E. et al., 2008. Als2 mRNA splicing variants detected in KO mice rescue severe motor dysfunction phenotype in Als2 knockdown zebrafish. Human molecular genetics, 17(17), 2691–2702.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habermas, J., 1981. The theory of communicative action. London: Beacon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haentjens, N., 2018. A Systemic Functional Linguistic (SFL) Approach to Animal Communication. Doctoral thesis, Ghent University, Ghent.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hausberger, M., Henry, L., Testé, B. et al., 2008. Contextual sensitivity and birdsong: a basis for social life. In Oller, K., Griebel, U. (Eds.), Evolution of communicative flexibility—complexity, creativity, and adaptability in human and animal communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT, pp. 121–138.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haye, A., Larraín, A., 2011. What is an utterance? In Märtsin, M. et al. (Eds.), Dialogicality in focus: Challenges to theory, method and application. New York: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 33–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hebets, E. A., Barron, A. B., Balakrishnan, C. N. et al., 2016. A systems approach to animal communication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1826), 20152889.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmeyer, J., Stjernfelt, F., 2016. The great chain of semiosis. Investigating the steps in the evolution of semiotic competence. Biosemiotics, 9(1), 7–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hogan, B. G., Stoddard, M. C., 2018. Synchronization of speed, sound, and iridescent color in a hummingbird aerial courtship dive. Nature communications, 9(1), 1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoke, K. L., Hensley, N., Kanwal, J. K. et al., 2021. Spatio-temporal Dynamics in Animal Communication: A Special Issue Arising from a Unique Workshop-Symposium Model. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 61(3), 783–786.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoyningen-Huene, P., 1987. Context of discovery and context of justification. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 18(4), 501–515.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E., 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Transl. of and selection from Husserl 1954 by D. Carr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hymes, D., 1972. On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B., Holmes, J. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: selected readings (Vol. 565). New York: Penguin, pp. 269–293.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Høydal, Ø. A., Skytøen, E. R., Andersson, S. O. et al., 2019. Object-vector coding in the medial entorhinal cortex. Nature, 568(7752), 400–404.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ingold, T., 2011. Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Innis, H. A., 2004. Changing concepts of time. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ireland, T., 2015. The Spatiality of Being. Biosemiotics, 8(3), 381–401.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jakobson, R., 1935 [1971]. The dominant. In Mateijka, L., Krystyna, P. (Eds.), Readings in Russian poet ics: Formalist and structuralist views. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 82–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaszczolt, K. M., 2016. Temporal reference without the concept of time. In Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (Ed.), Conceptualizations of time. London: Benjamins, pp. 3–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kress, G., 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Taylor & Francis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lefebvre, H., 1995. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lefebvre, H., 2013. Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Low, S. M., 2003. Embodied space(s) anthropological theories of body, space, and culture. Space and culture, 6(1), 9–18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luckmann, T., 2009. Observations on the structure and function of communicative genres. Semiotica, 173(1–4), 267–282.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McLuhan, M., 1994. Understanding media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McTaggart, J. E., 1908. The Unreality of Time. Mind, 17(68), 457–474.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Magnus, R., 2011. Time-plans of the organisms: Jakob von Uexküll’s explorations into the temporal constitution of living beings. Sign Systems Studies, 39(2–4), 37–57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Malinowski, B., 1935. Coral Garden and their magic, 2 vols. London: Allen & Unwin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manser, M. B., 2013. Semantic communication in vervet monkeys and other animals. Animal Behaviour, 86(3), 491–496.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maran, T., 2017. On the diversity of environmental signs: A typological approach. Biosemiotics, 10(3), 355–368.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, J. R., 2011. Multimodal semiotics: Theoretical challenges. In Dreyfus, S., Hood, S., Stenglin, M. (Eds.), Semiotic margins: Meaning in multimodalities. London: A&C Black, pp. 243–270.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matsuno, K., 2011. Framework of space and time from the proto-semiotic perspective. Biosemiotics, 4(1), 103–118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mihailović, D. T., Balaž, I., Kapor, D., 2017. Time in philosophy and physics. Developments in Environmental Modelling, 29, 43–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morris, C., 1970 [1938]. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moser, E. I., Kropff, E., Moser, M. B., 2008. Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 69–89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Naguib, M., Riebel, K., 2014. Singing in space and time: the biology of birdsong. In Witzany, G. (Ed.), Biocommunication of animals. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 233–248.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nomura, N., Muranaka, T., Tomita, J. et al., 2018. Time from semiosis: E-series time for living systems. Biosemiotics, 11(1), 65–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nomura, N., Matsuno, K., Muranaka, T. et al., 2020. Toward a Practical Theory of Timing: Upbeat and E-Series Time for Organisms. Biosemiotics, 13(3), 347–367.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nomura, N., 2023. The Biological Production of Spacetime: A Sketch of the E-series Universe. Foundations of Science, 1–18, available at: < https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10699-023-09908-x >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Notman, H., Rendall, D., 2005. Contextual variation in chimpanzee pant hoots and its implications for referential communication. Animal behaviour, 70(1), 177–190.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ongstad, S., 2004. Bakhtin’s triadic epistemology and ideologies of dialogism. In Bostad, F., Brandist, C., Evensen, L. S. et al., (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language and culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ongstad, S., 2014. The Blindness of Focusing. Pragmatic theories of communication and the challenge of validation. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 5(2), 128–144.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ongstad, S., 2019. A conceptual framework for studying evolutionary origins of life-genres. Biosemiotics, 12(2), 245–266.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ongstad, S., 2021a. Can Animals Refer? Meta-Positioning Studies of Animal Semantics. Biosemiotics, 14(2), 433–457.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ongstad, S., 2021b. Genre Constituents in “Reflections on Genre as Social Action” – in the Light of 1980s’ Genre Research? Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 31, 86–108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ongstad, S., 2022a. Perceptions of Context. Epistemological and Methodological Implications for Meta-Studying Zoo-Communication. Biosemiotics, 1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ongstad, S., 2022b. Simple Utterances but Complex Understanding? Meta-studying the Fuzzy Mismatch between Animal Semantic Capacities in Varied Contexts. Biosemiotics, 15(1), 85–108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patricelli, G. L., Hebets, E. A., 2016. New dimensions in animal communication: the case for complexity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 12, 80–89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perconti, P., 2002. Context-dependence in human and animal communication. Foundations of Science, 7(3), 341–362.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perrino, S., 2020. Chronotope. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, 1–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., 2018. Temperament and brain networks of attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1744), 20170254.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramsay, A., 2011. Time, Space, and Hierarchy in Zoosemiotics. In Sebeok, T. A., Ramsay, A. (Eds.), Approaches to animal communication (Vol. 1). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 179–199.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reichert, M. S., Enriquez, M. S., Carlson, N. V., 2021. New dimensions for animal communication networks: space and time. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 61(3), 814–824.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romero, G. E., 2011. Philosophical problems of space-time theories. arXiv preprint arXiv:1105.4376, available at: < https://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.4376.pdf >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruesch, J., Bateson, G., 1951. Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schumacher, P. B., 2012. Context in neurolinguistics: Time-course data from electrophysiology. In Finkbeiner, R., Meibauer, J., Schumacher, P. B. (Eds.), What is a context? Linguistic approaches and challenges. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 33–53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schütz, A., 1970. Some structures of the life-world. In Collected papers III. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 116–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schütz, A., Luckmann, T., 1973. The structures of the life-world (Vol. 1). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sebeok, T. A., 2010. Biosemiotics: Its Roots, Proliferation and Prospects. Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary, 3, 217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Snowdon, C. T., 2008. Contextually flexible communication in nonhuman primates. In Oller, D. K., Griebel, U. (Eds.), Evolution of communicative flexibility: Complexity, creativity, and adaptability in human and animal communication. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 71–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tinbergen, N., 1953. Social behaviour in animals. London: Chapman and Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomecek, S. M., 2009. Animal communication. New York: Infobase publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsao, A., Sugar, J., Lu, L. et al., 2018. Integrating time from experience in the lateral entorhinal cortex. Nature, 561(7721), 57–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uexküll, J. v., 1926. Theoretical biology. Published by Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co. Ltd. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uexküll, J. v., Kriszat, G., 1957. A Stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In Schiller, C. H. (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept. New York: International University Press, pp. 5–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Dijk, T. A., 2008. Text, context and knowledge. Hizkuntza Naturalaren Prozesamenduari eta Zientzia Kognitiboei Nazioarteko, 5, available at: < https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.652.8455&rep=rep1&type=pdf >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Dijk, T. A., 2015. Context. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weible, D., 2011. Ritualization and exaptation: Towards a theory of hierarchical contextuality? Biosemiotics, 5, 211–226.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wijers, M., Trethowan, P., du Preez, B. et al., 2021. The influence of spatial features and atmospheric conditions on African lion vocal behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 174, 63–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, M., 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(4), 625–636.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wynne, C. D., 2007. What are animals? Why anthropomorphism is still not a scientific approach to behavior. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 2, available at: < http://courses.washington.edu/anmind/Wynneanthropomorphism-CCBR2007.pdf >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yablo, S., 2014. Aboutness (Vol. 3). Princeton; NJ: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
