From biosemiotics to physiosemiotics. Towards a speculative semiotics of the inorganic world.

Barbieri, M., 2009. A Short History of Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 2, 221–245, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-009-9042-8 >.10.1007/s12304-009-9042-8 Search in Google Scholar

Barbieri, M., 2015. Code Biology: A New Science of Life. New Jersey: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-14535-8 Search in Google Scholar

Bartlett, S., Wong, M. L., 2020. Defining Lyfe in the Universe: From Three Privileged Functions to Four Pillars. Life, 10, 41, available at: < https://doi.org/10.3390/life10040042 >.10.3390/life10040042 Search in Google Scholar

Bateson, G., 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company. Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, J., 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822391623 Search in Google Scholar

Capra, F., 1996. The Web of Life. New York: Anchor. Search in Google Scholar

Capra, F., Luisi, L. F., 2014. The System View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511895555 Search in Google Scholar

Champagne, M., 2013. A Necessary Condition for Proof of Abiotic Semiosis. Semiotica, 197, 283–287.10.1515/sem-2013-0092 Search in Google Scholar

Cimatti, F., 2018. A Biosemiotic Ontology. The Philosophy of Giorgio Prodi. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8 Search in Google Scholar

Cimatti, F., 2019. Linguaggio e natura nell’Italian Thought: il dibattito sulla “soglia semiotica” fra Umberto Eco e Giorgio Prodi. Amalgama, 38, 60–69. Search in Google Scholar

Coletta, J., 2016. The ‘Irrelevance’ of Habit Formation: Stjernfelt, Hofstadter, and Rocky Paradox of Peircean Physiosemiosis. In West, D., Anderson, M. (Eds.), Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit. Before and Beyond Consciousness. Cham: Springer, 65–80.10.1007/978-3-319-45920-2_4 Search in Google Scholar

Deacon, T., 2021. How molecules became signs. Biosemiotics, 14, 537–559, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09453-9 >.10.1007/s12304-021-09453-9 Search in Google Scholar

Deely, J., 1990. Basic of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Deely, J., 2001. Physiosemiosis in the semiotic spiral: A play of musement. Sign Systems Studies, 29 (1), 27–47, available at: < https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2001.29.1.03 >.10.12697/SSS.2001.29.1.03 Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U., 1976. Codice. Versus, 14, 1–38.10.1007/BF03287333 Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U., 1999. Kant and the Platypus: Essay in Language and Cognition. San Diego: A Harvest Book. Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U., 2018. Giorgio Prodi and the lower threshold of semiotics. Sign System Studies, 46 (2/3), 343–351, available at: < https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2018.46.2-3.07>.10.12697/SSS.2018.46.2-3.07 Search in Google Scholar

Emmeche, C., 1994. The computational notion of life. Theoria – Segunda Epoca, 9 (21), 1–30. Search in Google Scholar

Emmeche, C., 1999. The biosemiotics of emergent properties in a pluralist ontology. In Taborsky, E. (Ed.), Semiosis, Evolution, Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, 89–108. Search in Google Scholar

Farina, A., Belgrano, A., 2004. The eco-field: A new paradigm for landscape ecology. Ecological Restoration, 19, 107–110.10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00613.x Search in Google Scholar

Farina, A., Belgrano, A., 2005. The Eco-field Hypothesis: Toward a Cognitive Landscape. Landscape Ecology, 21, 5–17, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-7755-x >.10.1007/s10980-005-7755-x Search in Google Scholar

Farina, A., 2012. A biosemiotic perspective of the resource criterion: Toward a general theory of resources. Biosemiotics, 5 (1), 17-32, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9119-z >.10.1007/s12304-011-9119-z Search in Google Scholar

Farina, A., 2021. Ecosemiotic Landscape. A Novel Perspective for the Toolbox of Environmental Humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108872928 Search in Google Scholar

Froese, T., 2022. To Understand the Origin of Life We Must First Understand the Role of Normativity. Biosemiotics, 14, 657–663, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09467-3 >.10.1007/s12304-021-09467-3 Search in Google Scholar

Gadd, G. M., 2021. Fungal biomineralization. Current Biology, 31 (24), 1557-1563, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.041 >.10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.041 Search in Google Scholar

Kauffman, S., 1993. The Origins of Order. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1007/978-94-015-8054-0_8 Search in Google Scholar

Kauffman, S., Logan, R. K., Este, R. et al., 2008. Propagating organization: An inquiry. Biology and Philosophy, 23, 27–45.10.1007/s10539-007-9066-x Search in Google Scholar

Koch, W. A., 1987. A plea for evolutionary cultural semiotics. In Eschbach, A., Koch, W. A. (Eds.), A Plea for Cultural Semiotics. Bochum: Brookmeyer, 53–131. Search in Google Scholar

Krampen, M., 1986. Phytosemiotics. In Sebeok, T. (Ed.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 726–730. Search in Google Scholar

Kull, K., 1999. On the history of joining bio with semio: F. S. Rothschild and the biosemiotics rules. Sign Systems Studies, 27, 128–138, available at: < https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.1999.27.06 >.10.12697/SSS.1999.27.06 Search in Google Scholar

Kull, K., 2000. An introduction to phytosemiotics: Semiotic botany and vegetative sign systems. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 326–350, available at: < https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2000.28.18 >.10.12697/SSS.2000.28.18 Search in Google Scholar

Kull, K., Emmeche, C. & Favareau, D., 2008. Biosemiotic question. Biosemiotics, 1 (1), 41–55, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9008-2 >.10.1007/s12304-008-9008-2 Search in Google Scholar

Kull, K., Pattee, H., 2009. A biosemiotic conversation: Between physics and semiotic. Sign System Studies, 37, (1/2), 311–331, available at: < https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.12 >.10.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.12 Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B., 2006. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In Bijker, E., Law, J. (Eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: MIT Press, 225–258. Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B., 2015. Facing Gaia: eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Cambridge: Polity Press. Search in Google Scholar

LeDoux, J., 2019. The Deep History of Ourselves. The Four-Billion-Year Story of How We Got Conscious Brains. New York: Viking. Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, J., 1985. La semiosfera. L’asimmetria e il dialogo nelle strutture pensanti. Venezia: Marsilio Editore. Search in Google Scholar

Lovelock, J., 1979. Gaia. A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Malafouris, L., 2013. How Things Shape the Mind. A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Maran, T., 2020. Ecosemiotics. The Study of Sign in Changing Ecologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108942850 Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, H., Varela, F., 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: Riedel Publishing Company.10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4 Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, W., 1999. Ecosemiotics and the semiotics of nature. Semiosis, Evolution, Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. Aachen: Shaker Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, A., 2000. Umberto Eco’s semiotic threshold. Sign System Studies, 28 (1), 50–61, available at: < https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2000.28.03 >.10.12697/SSS.2000.28.03 Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, A., 2001. Protosemiotics and physicosemiosis, Sign System Studies, 29 (1), 13–27, available at: < https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2001.29.1.02 >.10.12697/SSS.2001.29.1.02 Search in Google Scholar

Nurse, P., 2020. What Is Life? Understanding Biology in Five Steps. Oxford: David Fickling Books. Search in Google Scholar

Prodi, G., 1976. Le basi materiali della significazione. Versus, 13, 69–93. Search in Google Scholar

Prodi, G., 1988. La biologia come semiotica naturale. In Herzfeld, M., Melazzo, L. (Eds.), Semiotic Theory and Practice. Proceeding of the Third International Congress of the IASS Palermo, Vol. I. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 929-951.10.1515/9783110868883-095 Search in Google Scholar

Prodi, G., 2010. Sign and Codes in Immunology. In Favareau, D. (Ed.), Essential Readings in Biosemiotics. New York: Springer, 323-337.10.1007/978-1-4020-9650-1_10 Search in Google Scholar

Prodi, G., 2021. Le basi materiali della significazione. Milano: Mimesis. Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T., 1963. Communication in animals and men. Language, 39, 448–466.10.2307/411126 Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T., 1988. Communication, language, and speech: evolutionary considerations. In Herzfeld, M., Melazzo, L. (Eds), Semiotic Theory and Practice: Proceedings of the Third International Congress of the IASS Palermo, Vol. II. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1083–1091.10.1515/9783110868883-109 Search in Google Scholar

Stoffregen, T. A., 2000. Affordances and events. Ecological Psychology, 12 (1), 1–28.10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_1 Search in Google Scholar

Swenson, R., Turvey, M., 1991. Thermodynamic Reasons for Perception-Action Cycles. Ecological Psychology, 4 (3), 317–348.10.1207/s15326969eco0304_2 Search in Google Scholar

von Uexküll, J., 1913. Baustein zu einer biologischen. Burckmann: München. Search in Google Scholar

von Uexküll, J., 1921. Umwelt und Innerwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-24819-5 Search in Google Scholar

von, Uexküll, J., 1982. The theory of meaning. Semiotica, 42 (1), 1–87.10.1515/semi.1982.42.1.1 Search in Google Scholar

Weber, A., 2001. The “surplus of meaning”. Biosemiotic aspects in Francisco J. Varela’s philosophy of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9 (2), 11–29. Search in Google Scholar

Zámečník, L., H., Krbec, J., 2019. Describing Life: Towards the Conception of Howard Pattee. Linguistic Frontiers, 2 (1), 1–9, available at: < https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2018-0012 >.10.2478/lf-2018-0012 Search in Google Scholar

Zengiaro, N., 2022. Ecosemiotic of the city. Designing the post-Anthropocene. European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscape, 5 (2), (article accepted). Search in Google Scholar

Zengiaro, N., 2022a. The Time of Materials: Rethinking the Anthropocene from Stones. Versus, 135 (2), 283–300. Search in Google Scholar