[
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alonso Almeida, F. J., & Álvarez Gil, F. J. (2021). Developing argumentation in history texts: Epistemic modality and evidentiality. Pragmalinguistica. 29. 12-26. https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2021.i29.01.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bardenstein, R., & Ariel, M. (2022). The missing link between truth and intensification. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”. 46(2). 285-322.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bašić, I. (2020). Verbs of visual perception as evidentials in research article texts in English and Croatian. In Agnes Peterlin Pisanski and Tamara Mikolič Južnič (eds.) Academic Writing from Cross-Cultural Perspectives: Exploring the Synergies and Interactions (pp. 196-216). Ljubljana: Ljubljana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bednarek, M. (2006). Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach. Text & Talk. 26(6). 635-660. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.027.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bergqvist, H. (2015). Epistemic marking and multiple perspective: an introduction. STUF-Language Typology and Universals. 68(2). 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2015-0007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carlet, A., & Cebrian, J. (2022). The roles of task, segment type, and attention in L2 perceptual training. Applied Psycholinguistics. 43(2). 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000515.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chandrasoma, R., & Jayathilake, C. (2022). Argumentative essays and conceptual incongruities: students mediated by identity and interdisciplinarity. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2102013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornillie, B. (2009). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language. 16(1). 44-62. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dendale, P., & Tasmowski, L. (2001). Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics. 33(3). 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00005-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fetzer, A. (2014). Foregrounding evidentiality in (English) academic discourse: Patterned co-occurrences of the sensory perception verbs seem and appear. Intercultural Pragmatics. 11(3). 333-355. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Figueras Bates, C., & Kotwica, D. (2020). Introduction: Evidentiality, epistemicity and mitigation in Spanish. Corpus Pragmatics. 4(1). 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00071-y.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forker, D. (2018). Evidentiality and its relations with other verbal categories. In Alexandra Aikhenvald (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality (pp. 65-84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fox, B. (2001). Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 11(2). 167-192. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2001.11.2.167.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gholami, J., Nejad, S. R., & Pour, J. L. (2014). Metadiscourse markers misuses: A study of EFL learners’ argumentative essays. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 98. 580-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.454.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ha, M. J. (2022). Syntactic complexity in EFL writing: Within-genre topic and writing quality. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 23(1). 187-205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holvoet, A. (2018). Epistemic modality, evidentiality, quotativity and echoic use marking. In Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.) Epistemic Modalities and Evidentiality in Cross-Linguistic Perspective (pp. 242-258). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, Y. (2022). A corpus-based study on the semantic use of reporting verbs in English majors’ undergraduate thesis writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 13(6). 1287-1295. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huh, M. H., & Lee, I. H. (2016). On the use of metadiscourse in EFL undergraduate student writing. English Teaching. 71(3). 99-120. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.71.3.201609.99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hunt, K. W. (1965). A synopsis of clause-to-sentence length factors. The English Journal. 54(4). 300-309.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 7(2). 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2019). Points of reference: Changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics. 40(1). 64-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IBM. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20.0. New York: IBM Corp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (Forthcoming). Boosters and hedges as metalinguistic markers in upper-intermediate EFL students’ argumentative essays. In Anna Cristina Petras (ed.) Metalinguistic Markers: Emergence, Discourse, Variation. Berlin: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2021a). Discourse markers in peer reviews of academic essays by future teachers of English as a Foreign Language. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An International Review of English Studies. 56(1). 55-84. https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2021-0020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2021b). Self-mention in academic writing by in-service teachers of English: Exploring Authorial Voices. In Mariela Burada, Oana Tatu, and Raluca Sinu (eds.) Exploring Language Variation, Diversity and Change (pp. 76-100). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2020a). Self-mention in argumentative essays written by pre-service teachers of English. Beyond Philology. An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching. 17(2). 97-128. https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2020.2.05.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2020b). The use of discourse markers in academic writing by in-service primary school teachers of English. Prague Journal of English Studies, 9(1), 197-229. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2020-0009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2019). Discourse markers in argumentative essays in EFL by Norwegian preservice primary school teachers. In Christoph Haase and Natalia Orlova (eds.) English Language Teaching through the Lens of Experience (pp. 83-100). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2018a). Discourse Markers in the Genre of Formal Letters Written by Intermediate Students of English as a Foreign Language. Kalbų Studijos. 33. 74-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.33.20672.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2018b). The Impact of Implicit Instruction upon the Use of English Discourse Markers in Written Tasks at the Advanced Beginners’ Level of EFL Proficiency. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture. 8. 56-73. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.08.2018.04.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2017a). Discourse markers in EFL academic essays written by primary school teacher candidates. Konin Language Studies, 5(4), 473-493.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2017b). Discourse markers in academic writing in EFL by Swedish preservice secondary school teachers of English. Logos & Littera. 4(1). 21-39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapranov, O. (2017c). The use of metonymy and metaphor in descriptive essays by intermediate and advanced EFL students. Linguistics beyond and within (LingBaW). 3(3). 87-101. https://doi.org/10.31743/lingbaw.5652.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lazić, K. O. (2018). Evidentiality and modality in English and Serbian academic discourse of forestry research papers. Анали Филолошког факултет. 30(1). 179-202. https://doi.org/10.18485/analiff.2018.30.1.10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liardét, C. L., & Black, S. (2019). “So and so” says, states and argues: A corpus-assisted engagement analysis of reporting verbs. Journal of Second Language Writing. 44. 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.02.001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacIntyre, R. (2020). Citation machines: The use of evidentials in the academic writing of Japanese university students. In Stefania Consonni, Larissa D’Angelo, Patrizia Anesa (eds.) Digital Communication and Metadiscourse: Changing Perspectives in Academic Genres (pp. 59-74). Bergamo: CELSB Libreria Universitaria.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Melac, E. (2022). The grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language & Linguistics. 26(2). 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, R. T., Mitchell, T. D., & Pessoa, S. (2014). Valued voices: Students’ use of engagement in argumentative history writing. Linguistics and Education. 28. 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nebot, A. C., & Bates, C. F. (2018). Evidentiality in discourse. In Carolina F. Bates and Adreian C. Nebod (eds.) Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish (pp. 1-24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nuyts, J. (1999). Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papafragou, A. (2006). Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua. 116(10). 1688-1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papafragou, A., Li, P., Choi, Y., & Han, C. H. (2007). Evidentiality in language and cognition. Cognition. 103(2). 253-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pei, Z., Zheng, C., Zhang, M., & Liu, F. (2017). Critical Thinking and Argumentative Writing: Inspecting the Association among EFL Learners in China. English Language Teaching. 10(10). 31-42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramoroka, B. T. (2014). Integration of sources in academic writing: A corpus-based study of citation practices in essay writing in two departments at the University of Botswana. Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa. 5(1). 1-7. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC151594.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rocci, A. (2017). Modality in Argumentation – A Semantic Investigation of the Role of Modalities in the Structure of Arguments with an Application to Italian Modal Expressions. Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romero, E. D. (2022). Reportive evidentiality. A perception-based complement approach to digital discourse in Spanish and English. Journal of Pragmatics, 201, 134-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
San Roque, L., Floyd, S., & Norcliffe, E. (2017). Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua. 186. 120-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shi, Z., F. Liu, C. Lai, & Jin, T. (2022). Enhancing the use of evidence in argumentative writing through collaborative processing of content-based automated writing evaluation feedback. Language Learning & Technology. 26(2). 106-128. https://doi.org/10125/73481.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sidnell, J. (2012). “Who knows best?”: Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation. Pragmatics and Society. 3(2). 294-320. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.2.08sid.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šinkūnienė, J., & Van Olmen, D. (2012). Modal verbs of necessity in academic English, Dutch, and Lithuanian: Epistemicity and/or evidentiality? Darbai ir Dienos. 58. 153-181.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Straughn, C. A. (2011). Evidentiality in Uzbek and Kazakh. The University of Chicago.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szczygłowska, T. (2022). Lexical verbs of epistemic modality in academic written English: disciplinary variation. Linguistica Silesiana. 43. 91-111. https://doi.org/10.24425/linsi.2022.141219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Council of Europe. (2011). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. https://www.coe.int/en/web/languagepolicy/home?e1_en.asp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. London / Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whitt, R. J. (2009). Auditory evidentiality in English and German: The case of perception verbs. Lingua. 119(7). 1083-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, S. M., & Allison, D. (2003). Exploring appraisal in claims of student writers in argumentative essays. Journal of Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL. 18(3). 71-91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yeh, S. S. (1998). Validation of a scheme for assessing argumentative writing of middle school students. Assessing Writing. 5(1). 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-2935(99)80009-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yildiz, M., & Turan, Ü. D. (2021). Contrastive interlanguage analysis of evidentiality in PhD dissertations. Discourse and Interactio. 14(1). 124-152. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2021-1-124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhao, C. G. (2017). Voice in timed L2 argumentative essay writing. Assessing Writing. 31. 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, J. (2022). Evidentiality and other types readjusted: Interpersonal modality revisited. Journal of World Languages. 8(1). 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0011.
]Search in Google Scholar
| 15 lip 2023