In the last decades, the quality of water and the biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems have considerably worsened because of excessive exploitation (4). Large amounts of chemicals are released into the environment as a result of intense urbanisation processes, industrial activities and agriculture contributing to surface water contamination (13, 31). Pollutants that are particularly harmful include heavy metals,
DNA integrity defects caused by genotoxicants in the aquatic environment damage the genome at various levels of its organisation. These abnormalities include the induction of point mutations and karyotype defects and they induce nucleoplasmic processes and uncontrolled cellular proliferation; a genome made defective in these ways may also be inherited by subsequent generations (19).
Fish are excellent model animals for genotoxicological research and provide an early warning of toxicant-induced environmental changes and degradation caused by toxic substances (8, 19). Aquatic organisms are often exposed to a complex mixture of contaminants. Simultaneous exposure to both essential and non-essential metals may produce effects that result from various types of interactions between these elements. Generally, the total impact of multiple toxicants on the organism may consist in an additive toxic effect, being the sum of the effects of individual substances. The toxic effect of a given mixture may be weaker (antagonism) or significantly stronger (synergism) than the sum of toxic effects of its individual components. Furthermore, one substance may have a protective effect against another (1). An example of heavy metals that often occur together in the aquatic environment would be cadmium and zinc, which are commonly used in industry and released into the environment as a by-product of zinc ore smelting (10). Special focus is directed at toxic metals such as cadmium. This metal has no known essential role in living organisms and has been considered as the main threat to all living organisms among heavy metals (12). There are maximum permissible concentrations set down for this element in surface waters, bottom sediments, and fish flesh. Even low concentrations of Cd can cause DNA damage and this element has been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a human carcinogen (2). On the other hand, zinc is an essential metal, which plays an important role in the biological function of numerous proteins and enzymes (17). However, like Cd, Zn can be toxic in excessive concentrations (24).
The effects of Cd and Zn known from the scientific literature are based on studies which analysed these metals separately. To date, there have been few studies analysing the combined effect of contamination with Zn and Cd, which occurs very often in surface waters (1). These elements are mainly found in drainage ditches in zinc ore mining areas, where cadmium occurs naturally, and in phosphate rocks used to manufacture fertilisers (14).
The Prussian carp (
Methods used to determine the genotoxicity profile of aquatic pollution, for example with heavy metals, are the single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE), otherwise known as the comet assay, and the erythrocyte micronucleus assay (EMN). These methods provide a means of assessing the extent of DNA integrity disorders in individual cells (SCGE) and nuclear chromatin damage in fish erythrocytes (EMN). These tests are commonly used as genotoxicity indicators of various agents in studies on aquatic organisms (36).
In this study, fish were exposed
After the two-week acclimation period, the fish were divided into four groups of 21 specimens each. These were the control group and three treatment groups exposed to 4.0 mg/L Cd, 4.0 mg/L Zn and a 4.0 mg/L Cd and 4.0 mg/L Zn mixture for up to 28 days. The water in the tanks was changed every other day to maintain constant concentrations of the metals. The concentrations of cadmium and zinc were selected taking into account the levels of these metals found in surface waters (ranging from 1 to over 16 mg/L) (27, 35).
After 14 and 21 days of exposure to the metals, blood samples of approximately 1 mL were drawn from the caudal vein with a sterile heparinised syringe from seven randomly selected fish from each group anaesthetised with 50 mg/L MS-222 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After blood sampling, the fish were euthanised and then subjected to decapitation. The seven remaining fish on the 28th day were subjected to the same procedure. The experiments were performed in accordance with the research protocols approved by the Local Animal Ethics Committee in Kraków, Poland (approval no. 144/2019).
The assessment was performed using a Zeiss Imager A2 epifluorescence microscope equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam MRc5 camera (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany). Cellular damage was assessed using CASP 1.2.3b software (23).
Erythrocytes of Prussian carp with different levels of DNA damage in the comet assay: cells from control samples after 14 days (a), after 21 days (c), and after 28 days (e); cells after exposure to Cd for 14 days (b), for 21 days (d) and for 28 days (f). 400×
Comet assay results for Prussian carp exposed to different treatments of cadmium, zinc and their binary mixture
Group |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Cd | Zn | Cd + Zn | |
Day | DNA in Tail (%) | |||
14 | 26.30 ± 0.56 Aa | 31.78 ± 0.69 Ab | 33.35 ± 0.67 Ab | 37.87 ± 0.76 Ac |
21 | 28.08 ± 0.65 Aa | 31.84 ± 0.59 Ab | 24.40 ± 0.53 Bc | 31.89 ± 0.64 Bb |
28 | 32.04 ± 0.61 Ba | 32.87 ± 0.67 Aa | 28.58 ± 0.51 Cb | 31.90 ± 0.59 Ba |
Tail moment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 48.82 ± 1.49 Aa | 64.46 ± 1.82 Abc | 63.77 ± 1.85 Ab | 69.51 ± 1.91 Ac |
21 | 53.58 ± 1.80 Ba | 46.11 ± 1.33 Bb | 30.39 ± 1.05 Bc | 38.81 ± 1.39 Bd |
28 | 2.80 ± 0.35 Ca | 2.18 ± 0.28 Ca | 3.56 ± 0.33 Ca | 4.14 ± 0.54 Cb |
Small letters denote statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between the groups on different exposure days (a–d), while capital letters indicate significant differences in the groups between successive days of exposure (A–C)
The highest percentage of DNA in the tail, 37.87 ± 0.76% Tail DNA, was observed in fish simultaneously exposed to Cd and Zn and was noted after 14 days of the experiment. Subsequently, the level of DNA damage to that observed in the control fish on day 28 of the experiment. In fish exposed to Zn, the percentage of chromatin breaks also significantly decreased after 21 and 28 days. In the specimens exposed to cadmium for 14 (31.78 ± 0.69) and 21 days (31.84 ± 0.59%), there was a statistically significant increase (P<0.05) in DNA damage in the comet tail compared to the control group (26.30 ± 0.56% and 28.08 ± 0.65%, respectively). The level of observed damage in these cadmium-exposed fish rose by 5.48 % after 14 days of exposure, and after 21 days of exposure, the percentage of DNA damage was 3.76% higher than in the control group (Table 1).
DNA migration in the nucleus presented with an auxiliary parameter – TM – ranging from 2.80 ± 0.35 (after 28 days) to 53.58 ± 1.80 (after 21 days) in the control group. In fish exposed to heavy metals, the highest TM values were recorded after 14 days of exposure: 69.51 ± 1.91 in the group simultaneously exposed to Cd and Zn, 64.46 ± 1.80 in fish exposed to Cd, and 63.77 ± 1.85 in those exposed to Zn. The TM values for all the treatment groups were significantly higher as compared to the control group, except for the group exposed for 28 days. The TM values decreased with exposure time in all the groups. After 21 days of the experiment, the control group showed an increase in the value of the TM parameter (Table 1).
Giemsa-stained peripheral blood smear of erythrocytes of Prussian carp with micronuclei (a and b), a nuclear bud (c), a notched nucleus (d), binucleated cells with unequal nuclear division (e), and a cell with abnormal cytoplasm (f). Arrows show the abnormalities. Erythrocytes are from the control group after 21 days of the experiment (c and d), exposed to Cd after 14 days (f) and exposed to Cd after 28 days (a, b and e). 1000×
The frequency of erythrocyte nuclear and cellular abnormalities in Prussian carp exposed to different concentrations of cadmium, zinc and their binary mixture
Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Cd | Zn | Cd + Zn | |
Day | MN (one or more micronuclei) | |||
14 | 2.30 ± 0.36 Aa | 12.49 ± 1.08 Ab | 7.35 ± 0.80 Ac | 16.07 ± 1.68 Ab |
21 | 1.29 ± 0.21 Ba | 4.00 ± 0.48 Bb | 4.61 ± 1.14 ABb | 3.67 ± 0.43 Bb |
28 | 3.11 ± 0.34 Aab | 2.33 ± 0.298 Ca | 3.69 ± 0.34 Bbc | 4.53 ± 0.63 Bc |
BUD (nuclear buds) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 0.26 ± 0.05 Aa | 0.16 ± 0.08 Aa | 0.15 ± 0.05 Aa | 0.34 ± 0.08 Aa |
21 | 0.11 ± 0.05 Ba | 0.19 ± 0.06 Aa | 0.21 ± 0.10 Aa | 0.12 ± 0.05 Ba |
28 | 0.07 ± 0.03 Ba | 0.28 ± 0.07 Ab | 0.17 ± 0.06 Aab | 0.18 ± 0.08 ABab |
BNC (binuclear cells) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 0.25 ± 0.22 Aa | 0.30 ± 0.09 Aa | 0.22 ± 0.06 Aa | 0.12 ± 0.07 Aa |
21 | 0.19 ± 0.07 ABa | 0.23 ± 0.06 Aa | 0.32 ± 0.12 ABab | 0.54 ± 0.14 Bb |
28 | 0.09 ± 0.03 Ba | 0.43 ± 0.11 Bb | 0.69 ± 0.17 Bb | 0.51 ± 0.08 Bb |
AN (abnormal shapes of nucleus) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 0.01 ± 0.01 Aa | 0.04 ± 0.02 Aa | Not found | 0.18 ± 0.09 Aa |
21 | 0.21 ± 0.07 Ba | 0.03 ± 0.02 Aab | 0.012 ± 0.011 Ab | Not found |
28 | 0.15 ± 0.05 Ba | 1.68 ± 0.43 Bb | 0.009 ± 0.009 Ac | 0.036 ± 0.036 Ad |
NT (different shapes of notched nuclei) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 2.28 ± 0.45 Aa | 0.07 ± 0.03 Ab | 0.91 ± 0.18 ABc | 3.94 ± 0.52 Ad |
21 | 0.67 ± 0.10 Ba | 2.91 ± 0.42 Bb | 0.66 ± 0.12 Aa | 1.30 ± 0.26 Ba |
28 | 0.69 ± 0.14 Ba | 1.15 ± 0.24 Cab | 1.57 ± 0.36 Bb | 0.28 ± 0.07 Cc |
Total nuclear abnormalities (MN+BUD+BNC+AN+NT) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 5.50 ± 0.63 Aa | 14.57 ± 1.27 Ab | 8.35 ± 0.80 Ac | 20.61 ± 1.84 Ad |
21 | 2.39 ± 0.23 Ba | 7.36 ± 0.69 Bb | 5.80 ± 1.10 Ab | 5.62 ± 0.65 Bb |
28 | 4.08 ± 0.41 Aa | 5.66 ± 0.48 Cb | 6.12 ± 0.38 Ab | 5.53 ± 0.64 Bab |
A (apoptotic cells) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 0.02 ± 0.013 a | 0.44 ± 0.24 Ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.10 ± 0.06 c |
21 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.001 Aa | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
28 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 2.04 ± 0.56 Bb | 0.011 ± 0.001 Aa | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
AC (abnormal shapes of cytoplasm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
14 | 0.86 ± 0.16 Aa | 22.11 ± 1.99 Ab | 1.33 ± 0.12 Ac | 2.16 ± 0.55 Ac |
21 | 0.39 ± 0.12 Ba | 1.31 ± 0.16 Bb | 4.60 ± 1.13 Bb | 1.21 ± 0.15 Bb |
28 | 0.94 ± 0.16 Aa | 1.31 ± 0.25 Bab | 1.94 ± 0.39 Ab | 1.32 ± 0.18 Bab |
Small letters denote statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between the groups on different exposure days (a–d), while capital letters indicate significant differences in the groups between successive days of exposure (A–C)
The average frequency of MN erythrocytes in the control group ranged from 1.29 ± 0.21 to 3.11 ± 0.34. The highest induction of micronuclei in erythrocytes was observed on day 14 in fish exposed to Cd and Zn (16.07 ± 1.67), the Cd group had approximately 20% fewer MN (12.49 ± 1.08) and the Zn group had more than 50% fewer (7.34 ± 0.80). The average number of micronucleated erythrocytes in the treatment groups exposed to heavy metals was statistically significantly higher than the number in the control group. In all the groups, the MN frequency decreased along with the exposure time. In fish intoxicated with either Cd or Zn, the MN frequency after 28 days of exposure was similar to that found in the control group. The frequency of MN induction remained significantly higher in fish simultaneously exposed to both these metals with reference to the control and cadmium-exposed groups (Table 2).
The awareness of potential risks related to the presence of heavy metals in the aquatic environment has evoked considerable interest in the use of fish for the biomonitoring of carcinogens, teratogens, and mutagens in the aquatic environment. The subject literature clearly indicates that potential genotoxic effects leading to mutations and population decline in fish exposed to such toxicants are not well understood (3, 19). This study was planned to assess the effects of such pollutants as cadmium and zinc in the peripheral blood erythrocytes of Prussian carp. Assessment of these in the wild-caught fish could allow for early detection and warning of habitat pollution serious enough to threaten the extinction of some of the fish populations. Genotoxicity assessment is performed using cytogenetic assays (as genotoxicity biomarkers), including the comet assay and the erythrocyte micronucleus assay (21, 36, 40). The results of the assays conducted in the present study confirmed the genotoxic effect of sublethal Cd and Zn concentrations on the peripheral erythrocytes of Prussian carp exposed to Cd and Zn, used individually or in combination.
The comet assay provides important information on cellular DNA integrity defects caused by teratogenic or carcinogenic agents (25). This technique is used to assess the genotoxicity caused by environmental pollution, which also affects the aquatic environment comprising fish habitats (21, 34). The most commonly used parameters that indicate DNA damage in the comet assay are the percentage of DNA in the tail and the tail moment (39). The present study demonstrated that the exposure of fish to the combination of Cd and Zn caused considerably greater DNA damage than individual exposure to each of these metals. It was also shown that the highest intensity of DNA integrity defects (% Tail DNA and TM) in each of the treatment groups was observed on day 14 of exposure, followed by a decrease in the percentage of DNA in the comet tail in the subsequent weeks (Table 1). Such results corroborate previous reports on the effect of cadmium and zinc on other fish species and cell types (1, 19). Singh
There are various testing methods used to detect genotoxins in the aquatic environment, including the erythrocyte micronucleus assay, which also makes identifying other types of structural defects in the cell possible. These abnormalities are related to nuclear and cytoplasmic defects within the cell (21, 34). The EMN assay performed on erythrocytes has been successfully used as an indicator of genotoxic stress in fish caused by heavy metals both in the field and in laboratory conditions (11, 18). Micronuclei are formed as a result of abnormal cell division involving the loss of a fragment or an entire chromosome. The resultant chromatin structures are separated from the daughter nuclei during anaphase, and after cell division become enclosed by a nuclear membrane, forming the so-called micronuclei. Such segregation of chromosomes or their fragments is a sign of genotoxic effects. In the control group of fish there was a fluctuation in the MN frequency at the level of 1.29–3.11%, while in the groups exposed to Zn and Cd for 14 days, it was significantly higher (7.35–16.07%). The present study showed a significant increase in the frequency of MN in the peripheral blood cells of the fish exposed to sublethal concentrations of Zn (over three times higher than the control fish), Cd (over six times higher) and combined Cd and Zn mixture (over eight times higher than the control fish). But after another week, the MN frequency had stabilised at a level close to that in the control group. Abu Bakar
Naik
Assays to detect ENA and ECA have been used to detect the genotoxic potential of various pollutants not only in the field, but also in laboratory conditions (21, 22, 36). In the present study, various kinds of nuclear abnormalities, such as nuclear buds (BUD), binuclear cells (BNC), abnormal shapes of the nucleus (AN), different shapes of notched nuclei (NT), apoptotic cells (A) and abnormal shapes of the cytoplasm (AC), appeared in the erythrocytes of fish exposed to Cd, Zn and their binary mixture at all exposure times. The highest frequency of BUD, A, AN and AC was found in the erythrocytes of fish exposed mainly to cadmium. Regarding the other two nuclear defect types, a high BNC and NT frequency was observed in the erythrocytes of fish exposed to the Cd Zn mixture. Similar results were reported by Jindal and Verma (21) and Singh
In the present study, the assay to detect ECA revealed considerable variability in the effects exerted by the metals studied, suggesting the involvement of various defence mechanisms affecting the level of their toxicity. When analysing the results obtained, it was demonstrated that the frequency of BUD and NT in the erythrocytes of fish treated with the Cd and Zn mixture was the highest on the 14th day of exposure. In the cadmium group, the peak frequency of AC and AN appeared after 14 and 28 days, respectively. The frequency of all these abnormalities decreased with the exposure time, suggesting that the cells exposed to the toxins activated a pathway of defence mechanisms reducing the number of nuclear and cellular defects. The frequency of such structural abnormalities as BUD and BNC following exposure to Cd, or BUD, A, AC, and AN following exposure to Zn did not significantly decrease by the end of the experiment. Furthermore, the A and AN frequency in the Cd group, and BNC and NT frequency in the Zn group increased with the time of exposure, which may confirm the toxic effect of these metals on fish erythrocytes. On the other hand, in the control group, a decrease in the number of NT-damaged erythrocytes was observed with the passing of the experiment’s time, which could be related to the greater repair activity of the damage or possibly to the further transformation of these nuclear changes into micronuclei.
Other authors found much higher values of the studied parameters of genotoxic effects than those observed in the present experiment. In their study on Nile tilapia, Kehinde
Cadmium has chemical affinities similar to essential metals such as iron, zinc, and calcium and can enter cells through the mechanism of “ionic and molecular mimicry”, thus disturbing the metabolic processes of the organism (5, 9). The reasons for cadmium’s toxicity are its ability to disrupt enzymatic systems in cells by means of essential metal ion substitution
To conclude, the results of the present study have demonstrated that peripheral erythrocytes are an adequate model for testing the genotoxicity of the elements accumulating in fish. The differences in the frequency of chromatin abnormalities at various levels of its packaging observed in the SCGE and EMN assays following exposure to selected heavy metals and their mixture point to the a genotoxic character of these microelements. Furthermore, it was found that the differences in the pace of chromatin damage formation in the cells studied might result from the individual susceptibility of organisms within a given species to the agent analysed. The chemodynamics and bioaccumulative potential of metals may vary depending on the species, organ exposed, exposure time, and dose. Therefore, an integrated and comprehensive approach, using a set of assays for genotoxicity profile determination, should be adopted during ecotoxicological studies and environmental risk assessment pertaining to these elements.