Ozone is a multifaceted molecule. It exerts a harmful effect as an element of photochemical smog (5) and by-product of the operation of laser printers, copy machines, and similar devices (10). Ozone is a reactive molecule readily oxidising sensitive organic molecules. Due to its intense smell, it is detectable in concentrations well below those causing acute toxicity. However, low concentrations even below the detection limit are harmful long-term and are associated with the occurrence of respiratory tract inflammation and bronchial asthma (3). There is also a link between ozone pollution and ailments of organs not directly exposed to environmental ozone, atherosclerosis being an example of such a condition (15). Ozone entering the body
On the other hand, ozone has various applications with different beneficial effects in the alternative treatment of certain ailments (1), also in veterinary medicine (2, 12). Available data show that the efficacy of ozone treatment may not be attributable merely to the placebo effect and the mechanisms of its effect must be investigated (16). To make the issue more complicated, there are reports showing that ozone may exert an anti-inflammatory effect on an organism in low concentrations and protect it from the harmful influence of higher concentrations (8). The most probable explanation is the well-known phenomenon of hormesis, which is exactly this: the protective effect of low-level exposure against subsequent high-level exposure. However, the exact molecular mechanism needs to be elucidated.
An inflammatory response is triggered by receptors sensing molecules generated in response to tissue damage called damage-associated molecular patterns. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play the major role in triggering the response to these molecules. Activation of TLRs leads to nuclear translocation of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) transcription factor, induction of expression of pro-inflammatory interleukins such as tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 1 (IL-1) and initiation of inflammation. However, inflammation is a complex process, the essence of which is the interplay of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory factors which control its intensity. Anti-inflammatory factors are therefore equally important for determining the inflammation course. The well-known interleukins with anti-inflammatory properties are interleukin 10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) (9, 11). TGF-β is one of the anti-inflammatory factors which targets NF-κB.
Some of these factors (for example TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-10) are synthesised and released upon the activation of inflammation-associated cells. The expression of these genes would seem to increase with their inflammation-associated release. Other substances such as NF-κB and TGF-β are synthesised in the inactive form and activated when needed. Whether their expression level remains unchanged in the course of the inflammatory response or changes due to some regulatory mechanism is a matter of interest (6).
This study investigated the local and systemic effects of ozone associated with an inflammatory response. The experimental setup involved exposing rats to high levels of ozone and then assaying the expression levels of two NF-κB subunit genes (
Male Wistar Han rats numbering 20 and aged 6 months were used for the study. The animals were divided into four groups of 5 animals each. Group I was the control. The remaining three groups were exposed for 2 h to airborne ozone at a concentration of 0.5 ppm in a dedicated exposure chamber. After exposure, the animals were sacrificed with a fatal dose of isoflurane administered in an anaesthetic chamber. Animals of group II were sacrificed 3 h after the exposure, animals of group III after 24 hours and those of group IV after 48 h. The rats of group I were sacrificed in the same manner. Samples of the lungs and liver were taken, fixed in RNA
Complementary DNA was synthesised with a RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with 2 μg of total RNA for each sample. The real-time RT-PCR was performed in a 7500Fast thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The reaction mixture was composed as follows: 1 μL of diluted (1 : 2) RT product, 10 μL of qPCR SYBR Select Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 μL of primer mix (5 μM each) and 8 μL of nuclease-free water. The temperature cycle profile was as follows: 10 min at 95°C followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. Each sample was subjected to these procedures in triplicate.
The expression of two NF-κB subunit genes as well as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10 and TGF-β1 genes was studied with real-time RT-PCR using glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as a reference gene (Table 1). All primer sequences were designed using Primer-BLAST and manufactured as custom order Pure and Simple Primers (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). No secondary structures were detected nor pseudogenes amplified. Reactions without the template were used as negative controls.
Genes and sequences of primers used in the experiment
Gene name | GenBank number | 5ʹ→3ʹ | Exon junction | Product length (bp) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | NM_017008.4 | Forward | CATGGCCTTCCGTGTTCCTA | 74 | |
Reverse | ACTTGGCAGGTTTCTCCAGG | 825/826 | |||
Nuclear factor of kappa-light-chain- enhancer in B - cells 1 (NF-κB1) | NM_001276711.1 | Forward | GCCAACTGGCAGGTATTTGAC | 2694/2695 | 117 |
Reverse | TTGCAGCCTCGTGTCTTCTG | ||||
Nuclear factor of kappa-light-chain- enhancer in B - cells 2, p49/p100 (NF-κB2) | NM_001008349.1 | Forward | TGGTACAGAGCGGTAAGAGTG | 2326/2327 | 134 |
Reverse | TCTGTCTCAGCCAGGCTACC | ||||
Interleukin 10 (IL-10) | NM_012854.2 | Forward | TGCGACGCTGTCATCGATTT | 379/380 | 129 |
Reverse | TGGCCTTGTAGACACCTTTGT | ||||
Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) | NM_012675.3 | Forward | ATGGGCTCCCTCTCATCAGT | 106 | |
Reverse | GCTTGGTGGTTTGCTACGAC | 433/434 | |||
Interleukin 1beta (IL-1β) | NM_031512.2 | Forward | CCTATGTCTTGCCCGTGGAG | 82 | |
Reverse | AGAGGACGGGCTCTTCTTCAA | 354/355 | |||
Transforming growth factor, beta 1 (TGF-β1) | NM_021578.2 | Forward | CTGCTGACCCCCACTGATAC | 94 | |
Reverse | AGCCCTGTATTCCGTCTCCT | 779/780 |
Statistical differences in gene expression between group I (control) and the ozone-exposed groups II, III and IV (respectively sacrificed at 3 h, 24 h and 48 h) were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test in cases when the data were normally distributed or by the non-parametric Kruskal– Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test when the data were not normally distributed. The data are presented as boxes and whiskers indicating mean and standard deviation.
Surprisingly, the expression of TGF-β1 followed the expression change pattern characteristic for pro-inflammatory interleukins. Its expression level rose in Group II at 3 h and dropped dramatically to levels lower than in the control group in Group III at 24 and Group IV at 48 h post-exposure. Changes in the expression of IL-10 were significantly different from the changes in the expression of pro-inflammatory interleukins. The expression level of IL-10 was the highest 3 h after ozone exposure (Group II) and this level changed slightly up to 24 h (Group III). IL-10 gene expression diminished 48 h after ozone exposure (Group IV) to the level in the control group (Group I).
The expression of IL-1β rose sharply 3 hours after ozone exposure and reached twice the level in the control animals. Surprisingly, 24 h after exposure, the IL-1β expression also dropped sharply, declining to only 50% of the expression level in the control group. In the 48 h group, the expression level was higher than in the 24 h group but still lower than in the control animals. Changes in TNF-α expression followed roughly the same pattern with the difference that at 24 h the expression level was slightly lower and at 48 h slightly higher than in the control animals. The expression changes of the two NF-κB subunit genes in the lung were similar, albeit different as regards their extents. The expression level increased up to 3 h after exposure, then decreased markedly up to 24 h, but was higher (while still much lower than in the control group) 48 h after exposure.
Our results showed clearly that inhalational exposure to ozone at high concentration invokes an inflammatory state in the lungs, the organs directly exposed to it, but they also made apparent a response in an organ anatomically and functionally distant from the airways, namely the liver. The liver was purposely chosen for this study as an organ involved in the inflammatory response as the synthesiser of acute phase proteins, the blood concentrations of which increase (and sometimes decrease) in inflammation. Additionally, the liver is not associated with the lungs anatomically or functionally, unlike the heart.
What the mechanism of the systemic ozone influence is remains a matter of speculation. Ozone, being a very reactive molecule, can only directly affect tissues and cells to which it can have direct access. It is rapidly scavenged by other active molecules, such as polyunsaturated fatty acids abundant in cell membrane phospholipids (7) and free radical scavengers, such as glutathione or tocopherol. If ozone exerts a systemic influence, it must be
Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, belonging to the class of rapid transcription factors, is among the first responders to harmful stimuli. It is the product of the expression of the two genes
The changes in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β in the lungs are clearly associated with the irritating effect of the ozone. Their expression rose 3 h after exposure, but dropped dramatically to levels even lower than in the control animals 24 h after. It seems that the ozone action induced an anti-inflammatory response, which is made more plausible by the detected increase in TGF-β expression 3 h after exposure and then gradual decrease 24 h and 48 h thereafter. What is interesting is that the expression of another anti-inflammatory interleukin, IL10, gradually diminished post-exposure. It can be posited that if the expression level of TNF-α and IL-1β decreased in an anti-inflammatory reaction, TGF-β rather than IL-10 may be involved.
Our most striking findings are the changes in the expression of NF-κB and pro- and anti-inflammatory interleukins in the liver. It is well known that this organ is responsible for the production of many proteins associated with inflammation, the acute phase proteins among them. However, nothing is known about the inflammatory response of this organ due to the indirect influence of the inflammatory stimulus affecting lungs. The hepatic expression of NF-κB was significantly higher 24 and 48 h after exposure. That was markedly different from the situation in the lungs where NF-κB expression rose then dropped rapidly. It is obvious that the mechanism influencing the NF-κB expression in the liver must be different from the direct mechanism in lungs. The changes in the expression of pro-inflammatory interleukins were more pronounced for IL-1β than TNF-α. This suggests that the liver reacts to the ozone action with the induction of an inflammatory state, albeit one invisible at the morphological level. It is known that IL-1 and IL-6 regulate the acute phase (14) and this may partially explain the changes in IL-1 expression in the liver.
Similar to the manner of the changes in the lungs, those in the expression of anti-inflammatory proteins were evidenced only for TGF-β, the expression of which was first attenuated conspicuously, then returned to approximately the normal level and then was augmented 48 h after exposure. This is suggestive of TGF-β interference with the NF-κB pathway (4) also in the liver, influencing this organ’s reaction to inflammatory stimulation.
This is our first attempt to study the relationship between the local and systemic actions of inhaled ozone. It also touches upon the largely unstudied aspect of changes in the gene expression of proteins (like NF-κB and TGF-β) which are activated by a mechanism not associated directly with the induction of gene expression. As often happens, the results of the study generate more questions than answers. One of the aspects to study is the involvement of interleukin 6 (IL-6) in the liver response to inhaled ozone. A more classical approach should also be reprised and the peroxidation level measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). Another interesting problem planned for future investigation is the involvement of reactive oxygen species protective systems in the model used for this research.