Otwarty dostęp

Answering Current Challenges of and Changes in Producing Official Time Use Statistics Using the Data Collection Platform MOTUS


Zacytuj

Ahmad, N., and S.-H. Koh. 2011. Incorporating estimates of household production of non-market services into international comparisons of material well-being. UNECE Working Paper No. 42. STD/DOC(2011)7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg3h0jgk87g-en. Search in Google Scholar

Ashofteh, A., and J.M. Bravo. 2021. “Data science training for official statistics: A new scientific paradigm of information and knowledge development in national statistical systems.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 37(3): 771–789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-210841. Search in Google Scholar

Bonke, J., and P. Fallesen. 2010. “The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary-and booklet-based surveys.” Survey Research Methods 4(2): 91–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i2.3614. Search in Google Scholar

Bruno, M., F. Inglese, and G. Ruocco. 2022. “Trusted Smart Surveys: Architectural and Methodological Challenges Related to New Data Sources.” In Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics, edited by N. Salvati, C. Perna, S. Marchetti,and R. Chambers, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, 406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16609-9_31. Search in Google Scholar

Cai, L, and Y. Zhu. 2015. “The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era.” Data science journal 14. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2015-002. Search in Google Scholar

Carletto, C., H. Chen, T. Kilic, and F. Perucci. 2022. “Positioning household surveys for the next decade.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 38(3): 923–946. DOI: https://10.3233/SJI-220042. Search in Google Scholar

Chenu, A. 2004. “Prendre la mesure du travail.” In Pour une histoire des sciences sociales. Hommage à Pierre Bourdieu, edited by J. Heilbron, R. Lenoir and G.D. Sapiro: 281–304. Paris: Fayard. Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2018. Eurostat, European statistics code of practice: for the national statistical authorities and Eurostat (EU statistical authority). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2785/798269: Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2020. Harmonised European Time Use Surveys (HETUS) – 2018 guidelines – Re-edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2785/926903. Search in Google Scholar

Fernee, H., and N. Sonck. 2013. “Is everyone able to use a smartphone in survey research?” Survey Practice 6(4): 2884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2013-0020. Search in Google Scholar

Gohar, A., and G. Nencioni. 2021. “The role of 5G technologies in a smart city: The case for intelligent transportation system.” Sustainability 13(9): 5188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095188. Search in Google Scholar

Juster, F.T. 1986. “Response errors in the measurement of time use.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(394): 390–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478283. Search in Google Scholar

Keusch, F., B. Struminskaya, C. Antoun, M.P. Couper, and F. Kreuter. 2019. “Willingness to participate in passive mobile data collection.” Public Opinion Quarterly 83 (S1): 210–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz007. Search in Google Scholar

Kuonen, D., and B. Loison. 2019. “Production processes of official statistics and analytics processes augmented by trusted smart statistics: Friends or foes?” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 35(4): 615–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-190530. Search in Google Scholar

Lavrakas, P.J. 2008. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Minnen, J., I. Glorieux, T.P. van Tienoven, S. Daniels, D. Weenas, J. Deyaert, S. van den Bogaert, and S. Rymenants 2014. “Modular Online Time Use Survey (MOTUS)-Translating an existing method in the 21st century.” Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research 11(1): 73–93. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13085/eIJTUR.11.1.73-93. Search in Google Scholar

Minnen, J., J. Olsen, and K. Sabbe. 2022. CRŒSS: Establishing a Cross-domain data collection platform for the ESS (European Statistical System). Brussels and Bonn: Statistics Belgium, Destatis, hbits CV and Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Available at: https://torvub.be/torwebdat/publications/t2023_13.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Pronovost, G. 1989. “The sociology of time.” Sociologie Contemporaine (La) 37(3): 1–124. Search in Google Scholar

Radermacher, W.J. 2020. Official Statistics 4.0. Verified Facts for People in the 21st Century. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31492-7. Search in Google Scholar

Ricciato, F., A. Wirthmann, K. Giannakouris, and M. Skaliotis. 2019. “Trusted smart statistics: Motivations and principles.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 35(4): 589–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-190584. Search in Google Scholar

Ricciato, F., A. Wirthmann, and M. Hahn. 2020. “Trusted Smart Statistics: How new data will change official statistics.” Data and Policy 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2020.7. Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, J.p. 1999. “The time diary method. Structure and uses.” In Time use research in the social sciences, edited by W.E. Pentland, A.S. Harvey, M.P. Lawton, and M.A. McColl: 47–89. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47155-8_3. Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, J.P., and G. Godbey. 1997. Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press. Search in Google Scholar

Salemink, I., S. Dufour, and M. van der Steen. 2020. “A vision on future advanced data collection.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 36 (3): 685–699. DOI: https://10.3233/SJI-200658. Search in Google Scholar

Salgado, D., M.E. Esteban, M. Novás, S. Sadaña, and L. Sanguiao. 2018. “Data Organisation and Process Design Based on Functional Modularity for a Standard Production Process.” Journal of Official Statistics 34(4): 811–833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0041. Search in Google Scholar

Sonck, N., and H. Fernee. 2013. Using smartphones in survey research: a multifunctional tool. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research. Search in Google Scholar

Stodden, V. 2014. “The reproducible research movement in statistics.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 30(2): 91–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-140818. Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, O., J. Gershuny, A. Sevilla, P. Walthery, and M. Vega-Rapun. 2020. “Time use diary design for our times-an overview, presenting a Click-and-Drag Diary Instrument (CaDDI) for online application.” Journal of Time Use Research 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32797/jtur-2020-1. Search in Google Scholar

Szalai, A. 1972. The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. The Hague: Mouton. Search in Google Scholar

Te Braak, P., F. van Droogenbroeck, J. Minnen, T.P. van Tienoven, and I. Glorieux. 2022a. “Teachers’ working time from time-use data: Consequences of the invalidity of survey questions for teachers, researchers, and policy.? Teaching and Teacher Education 109: 103536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103536. Search in Google Scholar

Te Braak, P., T.P. van Tienoven, J. Minnen, and I. Glorieux. 2022b. “Bias in estimated working hours in time use diary research: The effect of cyclical work time patterns on postponing designated registration days.? Time and Society 31(4): 508–534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X221111948. Search in Google Scholar

United Nations. 2016. Integrating a Gender Perspective into Statistics. Studies in Methods, Series F No. 111. New York: United Nations Publication. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/Standards-and-Methods/files/Handbooks/gender/Integrating-a-Gender-Perspective-into-Statistics-E.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2023. American Time Use Survey User’s Guide. Understanding ATUS 2003 to 2023. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/tus/atususers-guide.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Vassilev, G., W. King, S. Wallace, and J. White. 2020. Modernization of the Production of Time-use Statistics. UK: UK Office for National Statistics. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/-statcom/53rd-session/documents/BG-3h-Modernization_UN_EG_TUS2021_FINAL_-SENT_rev-E.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Yan, T., S. Fricker and S. Tsai. 2019. “Response burden: What is it and what predicts it?” In Advances in Questionnaire Design, Development, Evaluation and Testing, edited by P. Beatty, D. Collins, L. Kaye, J.L. Padilla, G. Willis and A. Wilmot: 193–212. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119263685. Search in Google Scholar

Zeni, M., I. Bison, F. Reis, B. Gauckler, and F. Giunchiglia. 2020. “Improving Time Use Measurement with Personal Big Data Collection – The Experience of the European Big Data Hackathon 2019.” Journal of Official Statistics 37(2): 341–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2021-0015. Search in Google Scholar

Zerubavel, E. 1982. Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in social life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Mathematics, Probability and Statistics