Otwarty dostęp

Transitioning a Survey to Self-Administration using Adaptive, Responsive, and Tailored (ART) Design Principles and Data Visualization

Journal of Official Statistics's Cover Image
Journal of Official Statistics
Special Section on Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design

Zacytuj

AAPOR (The American Association for Public Opinion Research). 2015. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 8th edition. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: AAPOR.Search in Google Scholar

Amaya, A., P. Biemer, and D. Kinyon. 2017. “Total Error in a Big Data World with Applications to the Residential Energy Consumption Survey.” Presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.Search in Google Scholar

Biemer, P. 2010. “Total Survey Error: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 817–848. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq058.10.1093/poq/nfq058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Biemer, P., K.H. Harris, B. Burke, K. Considine, C. Halpern, and C. Suchindran. 2017a. “Transitioning an In-Person Longitudinal Survey to a Mixed-Mode, Two-Phase Survey Design: Preliminary Results.” Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. New Orleans, LA.Search in Google Scholar

Biemer, P., J. Murphy, S. Zimmer, C. Berry, G. Deng, and K. Lewis. 2017b. “Using Bonus Monetary Incentives to Encourage Web Response in Mixed-Mode Household Surveys.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx015.10.1093/jssam/smx015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Breyfogle, F. 2003. Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Camoes, J. 2008. How to Create a Thematic Map in Excel. Available at: http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/how-to-create-thematic-map-excel/ (accessed November 26, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Chun, A.Y., B. Schouten, and J. Wagner. 2017. “JOS Special Issue on Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design: Looking Back to See Forward – Editorial.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(3): 571–577. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2017-0027.10.1515/JOS-2017-0027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cleveland, W. 1993. Visualizing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cramér, H. 1946. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400883868Search in Google Scholar

Dillman, D., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, and Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 4th Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Dillman, D.A. and M.L. Edwards. 2016. “Designing a Mixed-Mode Survey.” In Wolfe, Christof, Joye, Dominique, Smith, Tom W. and Fu, Yang-chih, Sage Handbook of Survey Methodology. Sage Publications Wolf, Joye, Smith and Fu. Thousand Oaks. CA, 255–268.Search in Google Scholar

Duprey, M., J. Murphy, P. Biemer, and R. Chew. 2017. “Veni, Vidi, Vici: Interactive Data Visualizations for Adaptive Total Design.” Presented at the 5th Workshop on Adaptive and Responsive Survey Design. Ann Arbor, MI.Search in Google Scholar

Eddy, W.F. and Marton, K., Editors. 2012. Effective Tracking of Building Energy Use: Improving the Commercial Buildings and Residential Energy Consumption Surveys. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.Search in Google Scholar

Edgar, J., J. Murphy, and M. Keating. 2016. “Comparing Traditional and Crowdsourcing Methods for Pretesting Survey Questions.” SAGE Open 6(4): 1–14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016671770.10.1177/2158244016671770Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.10.1002/0471725277Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R. and S. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 169(3): 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hardin, M., D. Horn, R. Perez, and L. Williams. 2012. “Which Chart or Graph is Right for You? Telling Impactful Stories with Data.” Tableau Software. Available at: http://theathenaforum.org/sites/default/files/WHich%20chart%20is%20right%20for%20you.pdf (accessed November 26, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Hornbaek, K. and E. Frokjaer. 2003. “Reading Patterns and Usability in Visualizations of Electronic Documents.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 10(2): 119–149. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/772047.772050.10.1145/772047.772050Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Howden, L., S. Joestl, and R. Cohen. 2015. Improving Response Rates using a Mixed-Mode Approach: Results from the National Health Care Interview Survey. Presented at the 2015 FedCASIC Conference. Available at: https://www.census.gov/fedcasic/fc2015/ppt/27_howden.pdf (accessed November 21, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Laflamme, F. and J. Wagner. 2016. “Responsive and Adaptive Designs.” In The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology, edited by C. Wolf, D. Joye, T. Smith, and Y. Fu. Los Angeles: Sage.10.4135/9781473957893.n26Search in Google Scholar

Link, M. and A. Mokdad. 2005. “Alternative Modes for Health Surveillance Surveys: an Experiment with Web, Mail, and Telephone.” Epidemiology 16: 701–704. Doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000172138.67080.7f.10.1097/01.ede.0000172138.67080.7f16135951Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Luiten, A. and B. Schouten. 2013. “Tailored Fieldwork Design to Increase Representative Household Survey Response: an Experiment in the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 176: 169–189. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Morganstein, D.R. and D.A. Marker. 1997. “Continuous Quality Improvement in Statistical Agencies.” In Survey Measurement and Process Quality, edited by L.E. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E.D. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin. (pp. 475–500). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, J., D. Mayclin, A. Richards, and D. Roe. 2016. “A Multi-method Approach to Survey Pretesting.” In 2015 FCSM Research Conference Proceedings. Available at: https://fcsm.sites.usa.gov/files/2016/03/D3_Murphy_2015FCSM.pdf. (accessed November 26, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, J., P. Biemer, M. Duprey, and R. Chew. 2017. “Interactive Adaptive Total Design Reports for Near Real-Time Survey Monitoring.” Presented at the 2017 Conference of the European Survey Research Association. Lisbon, Portugal.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indictators of Representativeness of Survey Nonresponse.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., A. Peytchev, and J. Wagner. 2017. Adaptive Survey Design. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781315153964Search in Google Scholar

Tufte, E. 2001. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (2nd ed.). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. ISBN 0-9613921-4-2.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. American Community Survey (ACS) 2014 Data Release New and Noteable. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/news/data-releases/2014/release.html#par_textimage_12. (accessed November 21, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Zimmer, S., P. Biemer, P. Kott, and C. Berry. 2016. “Testing a Model-Directed, Mixed Mode Protocol in the RECS Pilot Study.” In 2015 FCSM Research Conference Proceedings. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sitesusa/wp-content/uploads/sites/242/2016/03/G2_Zimmer_2015FCSM.pdf. (accessed November 26, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Mathematics, Probability and Statistics