[Baruch, Y. 1999. “Response Rate in Academic Studies -- A Comparative Analysis.” Human Relations 52: 421-438. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200401.10.1177/001872679905200401]Search in Google Scholar
[Baruch, Y. and B.C. Holtom. 2008. “Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational Research.” Human Relations 61: 1139-1160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863.10.1177/0018726708094863]Search in Google Scholar
[Bavdaž, M. 2010. “The Multidimensional Integral Business Survey Response Model.” Survey Methodology 36: 81-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bavdaž, M., ed. 2011. Final Report Integrating Findings on Business Perspectives Related to NSIs’ Statistics. Deliverable 3.2 of the BLUE-ETS Project. Available at: http://www.blueets.istat.it/fileadmin/deliverables/Deliverable3.2.pdf (accessed October 2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[Berglund, F., G. Haraldsen, and Ø. Kleven. 2013. “Causes and Consequences of Actual and Perceived Response Burden Based on Norwegian Data.” In Comparative Report on Integration of Case Study Results Related to Reduction of Response Burden and Motivation of Businesses for Accurate Reporting, edited by D. Giesen, M. Bavdaž, and I. Bolko. Deliverable 8.1 of the BLUE-ETS Project. Available at: http://www.blueets.istat.it/fileadmin/deliverables/Deliverable8.1.pdf (accessed February 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bing, M.N., J.M. LeBreton, H.K. Davison, D.Z. Migetz, and L.R. James. 2007. “Integrating Implicit and Explicit Social Cognitions for Enhanced Personality Assessment: A General Framework for Choosing Measurement and Statistical Methods.” Organizational Research Methods 10: 346-389. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428107301148.10.1177/1094428107301148]Search in Google Scholar
[Bless, H., G. Bohner, N. Schwarz, and F. Strack. 1990. “Mood and Persuasion: A Cognitive Response Analysis.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16: 331-345. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167290162013.10.1177/0146167290162013]Search in Google Scholar
[Braun, V. and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77-101. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]Search in Google Scholar
[Cameron, J., K.M. Banko, and W.D. Pierce. 2001. “Pervasive Negative Effects of Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation: The Myth Continues.” The Behavior Analyst 24: 1-44.10.1007/BF03392017273135822478353]Search in Google Scholar
[Carton, J.S. 1996. “The Differential Effects of Tangible Rewards and Praise on Intrinsic Motivation: A Comparison of Cognitive Evaluation Theory and Operant Theory.” The Behavior Analyst 19: 237-255.10.1007/BF03393167273361922478261]Search in Google Scholar
[Coffey, A. and P. Atkinson. 1996. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coyne, I.T. 1997. “Sampling in Qualitative Research: Purposeful and Theoretical Sampling; Merging or Clear Boundaries?” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26: 623-630. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x.10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x9378886]Search in Google Scholar
[Cutcliffe, J.R. 2000. “Methodological Issues in Grounded Theory.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 31: 1476-1484. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01430.x.10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01430.x10849161]Search in Google Scholar
[Cycyota, C.S. and D.A. Harrison. 2006. “What (Not) to Expect When Surveying Executives: A Meta-Analysis of Top Manager Response Rates and Technique over Time.” Organizational Research Methods 9: 133-160. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280770.10.1177/1094428105280770]Search in Google Scholar
[Dale, T. and G. Haraldsen eds. 2007. Handbook for Monitoring and Evaluating Business Survey Response Burdens, Eurostat. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec. europa.eu/portal/page/portal/research_methodology/documents/HANDBOOK_FOR_ MONITORING.pdf (accessed May 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, W.R. and N. Pihama. 2009. “Survey Response as Organizational Behavior: An Analysis of the Annual Enterprise Survey, 2003-2007.” New Zealand Association of Economists Conference 2009, 1-16. New Zealand: New Zealand Association of Economists. Available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article¼1832&context¼eispapers (accessed May 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Deci, E.L., R. Koestner, and M.R. Ryan. 1999. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effect of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 125: 627-668. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627]Search in Google Scholar
[Deci, E.L. and R.M. Ryan. 1980. “The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 13, edited by L. Berkowitz, 40-80. New York/London: Academic Press Inc.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60130-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Deci, E.L. and R.M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E. and W. De Heer. 2002. “Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 41-54. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dey, I. 1993. Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fazio, R.H. and M.A. Olson. 2003. “Implicit Measures in Social Cognition: Their Meaning and Use.” Annual Review of Psychology 54: 297-327. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225]Search in Google Scholar
[Fredrickson, B.L. 2001. “The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology. The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions.” American Psychologist 56: 218-226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218]Search in Google Scholar
[Gagné, M. and E.L. Deci. 2005. “Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 26: 331-362.10.1002/job.322]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerber, E.R. 1999. “The View from Anthropology: Ethnography and the Cognitive Interview.” In Cognition and Survey Research, edited by M.G. Sirken, D.J. Herrmann, S. Schlechter, N. Schwarz, J.M. Tanur, and R. Tourangeau, 214-237. New York: Wiley-Interscience.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giesen, D. 2012 “Exploring Causes and Effects of Perceived Response Burden.” In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Establishment Surveys (ICES IV), Montreal, Canada, 11-14 June 2012. Available at: http://www.amstat.org/ meetings/ices/2012/papers/302171.pdf (accessed May 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Giesen, D. and J. Burger. 2013 “Measuring and Understanding Response Quality in the Structural Business Survey Questionnaires.” Paper prepared for the European Establishment Statistics Workshop, Nuremberg, Germany, 9-11 September 2013. Available at: http://enbes.wikispaces.com/file/view/Giesen%20Burger%202013.pdf/ 456104004/Giesen%20Burger%202013.pdf (accessed May 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., R.B. Cialdini, and M.P. Couper. 1992. “Understanding The Decision to Participate in a Survey.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 475-495. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269338.10.1086/269338]Search in Google Scholar
[Haines, E.L. and K. Sumner. 2006. “Implicit Measurement of Attitudes, Stereotypes, and Self-Concepts in Organizations: Teaching Old Dogmas New Tricks.” Organizational Research Methods 9: 536-553. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428106286540.10.1177/1094428106286540]Search in Google Scholar
[Haraldsen, G., J. Jones, D. Giesen, and L.C. Zhang. 2013. “Understanding and Coping with Response Burden.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack, 219-252. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118447895.ch06]Search in Google Scholar
[Hedlin, D., T. Dale, G. Haraldsen, and J. Jones, eds. 2005 Developing Methods for Assessing Perceived Response Burden. A Joint Report of Statistics Sweden, Statistics Norway and the UK Office for National Statistics. Available at: http://eurostat.ec.europa.eu/pls/portal/url/ITEM/1CA1E9AC26242D43E0440003BA9322F9 (Accessed October 2006).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hedlin, D., H. Lindkvist, H. Bäckstro¨m, and J. Erikson. 2008. “An Experiment on Perceived Survey Response Burden Among Businesses.” Journal of Official Statistics 24: 301-318.]Search in Google Scholar
[Janik, F., and S. Kohaut. 2009 “Why Don’t They Answer? - Unit Non-Response in the IAB Establishment Panel.” FDZ Methodenreport, Nr. 7/2009, Bundesagentur fu¨r Arbeit. Available at: http://doku.iab.de/fdz/reporte/2009/MR_07-09.pdf (accessed February 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jobber, D., J. Saunders, and V.W. Mitchel. 2004. “Prepaid Monetary Incentive Effects on Mail Survey Response.” Journal of Business Research 57: 347-350. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00280-1.10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00280-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R.E. and L. Steinman. 2009. “The Use of Implicit Measures for Organizational Research: An Empirical Example.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 41: 202-212. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015164.10.1037/a0015164]Search in Google Scholar
[Kehr, H.M. 2004. “Integrating Implicit Motives, Explicit Motives and Perceived Abilities: The Compensatory Model of Work Motivation and Volition.” Academy of Management Review 29: 479-499. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.13670963.10.5465/amr.2004.13670963]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, J., and P. Phipps. 1995 “Respondent Motivation, Response Burden, and Data Quality in the Survey of Employer-provided training.” Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 1995, Ft. Lauderdale, FL. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/osmr/pdf/st950250.pdf (accessed May 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kruglanski, A.W. 1975. “The Endogenous-Exogenous Partition in Attribution Theory.” Psychological Review 82: 387-406. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.387.10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.387]Search in Google Scholar
[McClelland, D.C., J.W. Atkinson, R. Clark, and E.L. Lowell. 1953. The Achievement Motive. New York: Free Press.10.1037/11144-000]Search in Google Scholar
[McClelland, D.C. 1985. “How Motives, Skills and Values Determine What People Do.” American Psychologist 40: 812-825. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.812.10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.812]Search in Google Scholar
[McClelland, D.C., R. Koestner, and J. Weinberger. 1989. “How Do Self-Attributed and Implicit Motives Differ?” Psychological Review 96: 690-702. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690.10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690]Search in Google Scholar
[MacQueen, K.M., E. McLellan, K. Kay, and B. Milstein. 1998. “Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis.” Cultural Anthropology Methods Journal 10: 31-36.10.1177/1525822X980100020301]Search in Google Scholar
[Ouellette, J.A. and W. Wood. 1998. “Habit and Intention in Everyday Life: The Multiple Processes by Which Past Behavior Predicts Future Behavior.” Psychological Bulletin 124: 54-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54.10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54]Search in Google Scholar
[Pittman, T.S., A.K. Boggiano, and D.N. Ruble. 1983. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations: Limiting Conditions on the Undermining and Enhancing Effects of Reward on Intrinsic Motivation.” In Teacher and student perceptions: implications for learning, edited by J.M. Levine, 319-340. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Porter, S.R. 2004. “Raising Response Rates: What Works?” In New Directions for Institutional Research, 2004: 5-21. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.97.10.1002/ir.97]Search in Google Scholar
[Rivière, P. 2002. “What Makes Business Statistics Special?” International Statistical Review 70: 145-159. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00353.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00353.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogelberg, S.G. and J.M. Stanton. 2007. “Introduction: Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse.” Organizational Research Methods 10: 195-209. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428106294693.10.1177/1094428106294693]Search in Google Scholar
[Romero, E.J. and K.W. Cruthirds. 2006. “The Use of Humor in the Workplace.” Academy of Management Perspectives 20: 58-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2006.20591005.10.5465/amp.2006.20591005]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose, D.S., S.D. Sidle, and K.H. Griffith. 2007. “A Penny for Your Thoughts: Monetary Incentives Improve Response Rates for Company-Sponsored Employee Surveys.” Organizational Research Methods 10: 225-240. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428106294687.10.1177/1094428106294687]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, R.M. and E.L. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 54-67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.10.1006/ceps.1999.102010620381]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, G.W. and H.R. Bernard. 2003. “Techniques to Identify Themes.” Field Methods 15: 85-109. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569.10.1177/1525822X02239569]Search in Google Scholar
[Sandelowski, M., D. Holditch-Davis, and B.G. Harris. 1992. “Using Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: the Transition to Parenthood of Infertile Couples.” In Qualitative Methods in Family Research, edited by J.F. Gilgum, K. Daly, and G. Handel, 301-322. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seens, D. 2010. Analysis of Regulatory Compliance Costs: Part II. Paperwork Time Burden, Costs of Paperwork Compliance, and Paperwork Simplification. Statistics Canada: Ottawa. Available at: http://www.reducingpaperburden.gc.ca/eic/site/pbri-iafp.nsf/vwapj/December-Decembre2010_eng.pdf/$file/December-Decembre2010_eng.pdf (accessed September 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Seiler, C. 2010. “Dynamic Modelling of Nonresponse in Business Surveys.” In Technical Report Number 093, Department of Statistics, University of Munich. Available at: http://www.stat.uni-muenchen.de (accessed February 2011).]Search in Google Scholar
[Seo, M.G., L.B. Feldman, and J.M. Bartunek. 2004. “The Role of Affective Experience in Work Motivation.” Academy of Management Review 29: 423-439. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.13670972. 10.5465/amr.2004.13670972]Search in Google Scholar
[Silvester, J. 2008. “Work and Organizational Psychology.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, edited by C. Willig and W. Stainton-Rogers, 489-505. London: Sage.10.4135/9781848607927.n27]Search in Google Scholar
[Snijkers, G., G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. Willimack. 2013. Designing and Conducting Business Surveys. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118447895]Search in Google Scholar
[Stern, P. 1980. “Grounded Theory Methodology its Uses and Applications.” Image 12: 20-23.10.1111/j.1547-5069.1980.tb01455.x6898518]Search in Google Scholar
[Strack, F. and R. Deutsch. 2004. “Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behaviour.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 8: 220-247. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1.10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_115454347]Search in Google Scholar
[Strauss, A. and J. Corbin. 1994. “Grounded Theory Methodology: an Overview.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 273-285. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tetlock, P.E. 1985. “Accountability: A Social Check on the Fundamental Attribution Error.” Social Psychology Quarterly 48: 227-236.10.2307/3033683]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomaskovic-Devey, D., J. Leiter, and S. Thompson. 1994. “Organizational Survey Nonresponse.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 439-457.10.2307/2393298]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomaskovic-Devey, D., J. Leiter, and S. Thompson. 1995. “Item Nonresponse in Organizational Surveys.” Sociological Methodology 25: 77-110. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/271062.10.2307/271062]Search in Google Scholar
[Torres van Grinsven, V., I. Bolko, M. Bavdaž, and S. Biffignandi. 2011 “Motivation in Business Surveys.” In Proceedings of the BLUE-ETS Conference on Business Burden and Motivation in NSI Survey, Statistics Netherlands, Heerlen, 22-23 March 2011, 7-22. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/23FD3DF5-6696-4A04-B8EF-1FAACEAD995C/0/2011proceedingsblueets.pdf (accessed May 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Uhlmann, E.L., K. Leavitt, J.I. Menges, J. Koopman, M. Howe, and R.E. Johnson. 2012. “Getting Explicit About the Implicit: A Taxonomy of Implicit Measures and Guide for Their Use in Organizational Research.” Organizational Research Methods 15: 553-601. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428112442750.10.1177/1094428112442750]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenemark, M., G. Hollman Frisman, T. Svensson, and M. Kristenson. 2010. “Respondent Satisfaction and Respondent Burden among Differently Motivated Participants in a Health-Related Survey.” Field Methods 22: 378-390. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10376704.10.1177/1525822X10376704]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenemark, M., A. Persson, H. Noorlind Brage, T. Svensson, and M. Kristenson. 2011. “Applying Motivation Theory to Achieve Increased Response Rates, Respondent Satisfaction and Data Quality.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 393-414.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willimack, D.K., E. Nichols, and S. Sudman. 2002. “Understanding Unit and Item Nonresponse in Business Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 213-228. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willis, G.D. 2005. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar