[Aerts, S., Van Houtte, M., Dewaele, A., Cox, N., and Vincke, J. (2012). Sense of Belonging in Secondary Schools: A Survey of LGB and Heterosexual Students in Flanders. Journal of Homosexuality, 59, 90-113. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.108000918369.2012.638548 10.1080/00918369.2012.63854822269049]Search in Google Scholar
[Bajos, N. and Bozon, M. (2008). Enqueˆte sur la sexualite´ en France. Paris: E ´ ditions La De´couverte.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakker, F., de Graaf, H., de Haas, S., Kedde, H., Kruijer, H., and Wijsen, C. (2009). Seksuele gezondheid in Nederland 2009. Utrecht: Ruthers Nisso Groep. Available at: http://www.rutgerswpf.nl/sites/default/files/Seksuele%20Gezondheid%20in%Nederland%202009.pdf (accessed March 30, 2014)]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauermeister, J., Pingel, E., Zimmerman, M., Couper, M., Carballo-Die´guez, A., and Strecher, V.J. (2012). Data Quality in Web-Based HIV/AIDS Research: Handling Invalid and Suspicious data. Field Methods, 24, 272-291. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X12443097]Search in Google Scholar
[Best, S.J. and Krueger, B.S. (2004). Internet Data Collection. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412984553]Search in Google Scholar
[Buysse, A., Caen, M., Dewaele, A., Enzlin, P., Lievens, J., T’Sjoen, G., Van Houtte, M., and Vermeersch, H (2013). Seksuele Gezondheid in Vlaanderen. Ghent: Academia Press.10.26530/OAPEN_472415]Search in Google Scholar
[Claeys, L. and Spee, S. (2005). Een Virtuele Illusie of Ree¨le Kansen? - Gender in de Netwerkmaatschappij. Antwerp: Steunpunt Gelijkekansenbeleid, University of Antwerp/University of Hasselt. Available at: http://www.steunpuntgelijkekansen.be/wp-content/uploads/18.-Een-virtuele-illusie-of-reele-kansen-L.-Claeys.pdf (accessed March 30, 2014) ]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P. (2000). Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464-494. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/31864110.1086/318641]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P. (2008). Designing Effective Web Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. de Leeuw, E.D. (2005). To Mix or not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 233-255.]Search in Google Scholar
[Denscombe, M. (2006). Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect - An Evaluation Based on Completion Rates and Data Contents of Near-Identical Questionnaires Delivered in Different Modes. Social Science Computer Review, 24, 246-254. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/089443930528452210.1177/0894439305284522]Search in Google Scholar
[Dewaele, A., Cox, N., van den Berghe, W., and Vincke, J. (2011). Families of Choice? Exploring the Supportive Networks of Lesbians, Gay Men and Bisexuals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 312-331. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1559-1816.2010.00715.x Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. London: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Edelman, M. (1993). Understanding the Gay and Lesbian Vote in 1992. Public Perspective, 4, 32-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, J.R. and Mathur, A. (2005). The Value of Online Surveys. Internet Research, 15, 195-219.10.1108/10662240510590360]Search in Google Scholar
[Fernee, H. and Keuzenkamp, S. (2011). Selectiviteit van de Roze Vragenlijst.]Search in Google Scholar
[Een Vergelijking met Paneldata (paper presented at Sociology Day on May 26, 2011, Den Haque). Available at: http://www.google.be/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source¼web&cd=1&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scp.nl%2Fdsresource%3Ftype%3Dpdf%26objectid%3Ddefault%3A29290%26versionid%3D%26subobjectname%3D&ei=9eg3U4DgMsWqhAeQg4CwAw&usg=AFQjCNG6pS0WGCZ1_Hf4RaSfq8ILoHQYAQ&bvm=bv.63808443,d.ZG4. (accessed March 30, 2014)]Search in Google Scholar
[Gronow, J., Haavio-Mannila, E., Kivinen, M., Lonkila, M., and Rotkirch, A. (1997). Cultural Inertia and Social Change in Russia. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Sociology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grov, C., Bimbi, D.S., Nanı´n, J.E., and Parsons, J.T. (2006). Ethnicity, Gender, and Generational Factors Associated with the Coming-Out Process Among Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 115-121. 10.1080/0022449060955230616817058]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. (2006). Non-Response Rates and Non-Response Bias in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl03310.1093/poq/nfl033]Search in Google Scholar
[Haavio-Mannila, E. and Kontula, O. (2001). Seksin Trendit Meilla¨ ja Naapureissa. Helsinki: WSOY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heerwegh, D. (2001). Surveyonderzoek Middels het Internet: Een exploratie van het Terrein. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Departement Sociologie, Afdeling voor dataverzameling en analyse. Available at: https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0034437/public/Files/Survey-onderzoek%20middels%20het%20Internet.pdf (accessed March 30, 2014) ]Search in Google Scholar
[Kerker, B.D., Mostashari, F., and Thorpe, L. (2006). Health Care Access and Utilization Among Women Who Have Sex With Women: Sexual Behavior and Identity. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 970-979. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9096-810.1007/s11524-006-9096-8243858616897415]Search in Google Scholar
[Koch, S.N. and Emrey, J.A. (2001). The Internet and Opinion Measurement: Surveying Marginalized Populations. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 131-138. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.0001210.1111/0038-4941.00012]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreuter, F., Presser, S., and Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847-865. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn06310.1093/poq/nfn063]Search in Google Scholar
[Laumann, E., Gagnon, J.H., Michael, R.T., and Michaels, S. (1994). The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lievens, J. and Waege, H. (2009). Participatie in Vlaanderen. Basisgegevens van de participatiesurvey. Leuven: Acco.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loosier, P.S. and Dittus, P.J. (2010). Group Differences in Risk Across Three Domains Using an Expanded Measure of Sexual Orientation. Journal of Primary Prevention, 31, 261-272. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org.1007/s10935-010-0228-210.1007/s10935-010-0228-221153707]Search in Google Scholar
[Mathy, R.M., Schillace, M., Coleman, S.M., and Berquist, B.E. (2002). Methodological Rigor With Internet Samples: New Ways to Reach Underrepresented Populations. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 253-266.10.1089/10949310276014725912123248]Search in Google Scholar
[McCabe, S.E., Hughes, T.L., Bostwick, W., Morales, M., and Boyd, C.J. (2012).]Search in Google Scholar
[Measurement of Sexual Identity in Surveys: Implications for Substance Abuse Research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 649-657. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s10508-011-9768-7 Mercer, C.H., Bailey, J.V., Johnson, A.M., Erens, B., Wellings, K., Fenton, K.A., and Copas, A.J. (2007). Women Who Report Having Sex With Women: British National Probability Data on Prevalence, Sexual Behaviors, and Health Outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1126-1133. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH2006.08643910.2105/AJPH.2006.086439187421617463372]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, I.H. and Wilson, P.A. (2009). Sampling Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 23-31. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1037a001458710.1037/a0014587]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramirez-Valles, J. (2002). The Protective Effects of Community Involvement for HIV Risk Behavior: A Conceptual Framework. Health Education Research, 17, 389-403.10.1093/her/17.4.38912197585]Search in Google Scholar
[Raymond, H.F., Rebchook, G., Curotto, A., Vaudrey, J., Amsden, M., Levine, D., and McFarland, W. (2010). Comparing Internet-Based and Venue-Based Methods to Sample MSM in the San Francisco Bay Area. Aids and Behavior, 14, 218-224. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9521-610.1007/s10461-009-9521-619160034]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, A.L., Austin, S.B., Corliss, H.L., Vandermorris, A.K., and Koenen, K.C. (2010). Pervasive Trauma Exposure Among US Sexual Orientation Minority Adults and Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2433-2441. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.16897110.2105/AJPH.2009.168971297816720395586]Search in Google Scholar
[Rothblum, E. (2007). From Science Fiction to Computer-Generated Technology: Sampling Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals. In The Health of Sexual Minorities: Public Health Perspectives on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Populations, I.H. Meyer and M.E. Northridge (eds). New York: Springer, 441-454.10.1007/978-0-387-31334-4_17]Search in Google Scholar
[Schillewaert, N. and Meulemeester, P. (2005). Comparing Response Distributions of Offline and Online Data Collection Methods. International Journal of Market Research, 47, 163-178.10.1177/147078530504700203]Search in Google Scholar
[Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., and Couper, M. (2009). Selection Bias in Web-Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores. Sociological Methods and Research, 37, 291-318.10.1177/0049124108327128]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarcz, S., Spindler, H., Scheer, S., Valleroy, L., and Lansky, A. (2007). Assessing Representativeness of Sampling Methods for Reaching Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Direct Comparison of Results Obtained from Convenience and Probability Samples. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 596-602.10.1007/s10461-007-9232-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Silenzio, V.M.B., Duberstein, P.R., Tang, W., Lu, N., Tu, X., and Homan, C.M. (2009).]Search in Google Scholar
[Connecting the Invisible Dots: Reaching Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adolescents and Young Adults at Risk for Suicide Through Online Social Networks. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 469-474. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.02910.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.029]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., Couper, M.P., and Steiger, D.M. (2003). Humanizing Self-Administered Surveys: Experiments on Social Presence in Web and IVR Surveys: Experiments on Social Presence in Web and IVR Surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 1-24. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00032-810.1016/S0747-5632(02)00032-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Kesteren, N.M.C., Hospers, H., and Kok, G. (2007). Sexual Risk Behavior Among HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Literature Review. Patient Education and Counseling, 65, 5-20.10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.00317098392]Search in Google Scholar
[Vincke, J. and Bleys, R. (2003). Vitale Vragen 2001. Eindrapport. Antwerp: Sensoa. Vincke, J. and Stevens, P. (1999). Een Beleidsgerichte Algemene Survey van Vlaamse Homoseksuele Mannen en Vrouwen--Basisrapport. Brussels: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Cel Gelijke Kansen, Universiteit Gent. Available at: http://www.psw.ugent.be/cms_global/uploads/publicaties/personal/eindrapport.pdf. (accessed March 30, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Vincke, J. and van Heeringen, K. (2004). Summer Holiday Camps for Gay and Lesbian Young Adults: An Evaluation of Their Impact on Social Support and Mental Well-Being. Journal of Homosexuality, 47, 33-46. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org10.1300/J082v47n02_0210.1300/J082v47n02_0215271621]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright, K.B. (2005). Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, article 11. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-61012005.tb00259.x/full?utm_source. (accessed March 30, 2014). ]Search in Google Scholar