[Al Hamad, A., Lewis, D., and Silva, P.L.N. (2008). Assessing the Performance of the Thousand Pounds Automatic Editing Procedure at the ONS and the Need for an Alternative Approach. Working Paper No. 21, UN/ECE Work Session on Statistical Data Editing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2008.04. sde.html (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethlehem, J. (2009). Applied Survey Methods. Wiley series in survey methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470494998]Search in Google Scholar
[Boskovitz, A. (2008). Data Editing and Logic: the Covering Set Method from the Perspective of Logic. Ph. D. thesis, Australian National University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Camstra, A. and Renssen, R. (2011). Standard Process Steps Based on Standard Methods as Part of the Business Architecture. Proceedings of the 58th World Statistical Congress (Session STS044): International Statistical Institute, 1-10. Available at: http://2011.isiproceedings.org/ (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Damerau, F. (1964). A Technique for Computer Detection and Correction of Spelling Errors. Communications of the ACM, 7, 171-176.10.1145/363958.363994]Search in Google Scholar
[De Jonge, E. and Van der Loo, M. (2011). Manipulation of Linear Edits and Error Localization with the Editrules Package. Technical Report 201120, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/methoden/ onderzoekmethoden/discussionpapers/archief/2011/default.htm (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[De Jonge, E. and Van der Loo, M. (2012). Editrules: R Package for Parsing and Manipulating of Edit Rules and Error Localization, R package version 2.5. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/methoden/onderzoekmethoden/discussionpapers/ archief/2012/default.htm (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[De Waal, T. and Quere, R. (2003). A Fast and Simple Algorithm for Automatic Editing of Mixed Data. Journal of Official Statistics, 19, 383-402.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Waal, T., Pannekoek, J., and Scholtus, S. (2011). Handbook of Statistical Data Editing and Imputation. Wiley handbooks in survey methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470904848]Search in Google Scholar
[De Waal, T., Pannekoek, J., and Scholtus, S. (2012). The Editing of Statistical Data: Methods and Techniques for the Efficient Detection and Correction of Errors and Missing Values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 4, 204-210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wics.119410.1002/wics.1194]Search in Google Scholar
[Di Zio, M., Guarnera, U., and Luzi, O. (2005). Editing Systematic Unity Measure Errors Through Mixture Modelling. Survey Methodology, 31, 53-63. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Fellegi, I.P. and Holt, D. (1976). A Systematic Approach to Automatic Edit and Imputation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 17-35.10.1080/01621459.1976.10481472]Search in Google Scholar
[Granquist, L. and Kovar, J.G. (1997). Editing of Survey Data: How Much is Enough? In Survey Measurement and Process Quality. L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwartz, and D. Trewin (eds). Wiley series in probability and statistics. New York: Wiley, 416-435.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. (1989). Survey Errors and Survey Costs. Wiley series in survey probability and mathematical statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/0471725277]Search in Google Scholar
[Hedlin, D. (2003). Score Functions to Reduce Business Survey Editing at the U.K. Office for National Statistics. Journal of Official Statistics, 19, 177-199.]Search in Google Scholar
[Latouche, M. and Berthelot, J.-M. (1992). Use of a Score Function to Prioritize and Limit Recontacts in Editing Business Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 8, 389-400.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawrence, D. and McDavitt, C. (1994). Significance Editing in the Australian Survey of Average Weekly Earning. Journal of Official Statistics, 10, 437-447.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawrence, D. and McKenzie, R. (2000). The General Application of Significance Editing. Journal of Official Statistics, 16, 243-253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levenshtein, V.I. (1966). Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10, 707-710.]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B. (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (second Edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119013563]Search in Google Scholar
[Pannekoek, J., Shlomo, N., and de Waal, T. (forthcoming). Calibrated Imputation of Numerical Data Under Linear Edit Restrictions. Annals of Applied Statistics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pannekoek, J. and Zhang, L.-C. (2011). Partial (donor) Imputation with Adjustments. Working Paper No. 40, UN/ECE Work Session on Statistical Data Editing, Ljubljana. Available at: http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2011.05.sde.html (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pannekoek, J. and Zhang, L.-C. (2012). On the General Flow of Editing. Working Paper No. 10, UN/ECE Work Session on Statistical Data Editing, Oslo. Available at: http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2012.09.sde.html (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Scholtus, S. (2009). Automatic Correction of Simple Typing Errors in Numerical Data with Balance Edits. Technical Report 09046, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/methoden/onderzoekmethoden/discussionpapers/ archief/2009/default.htm (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Scholtus, S. (2011). Algorithms for Correcting Sign Errors and Rounding Errors in Business Survey Data. Journal of Official Statistics, 27, 467-490.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scholtus, S. (2013). Automatic Editing with Hard and Soft Edits. Survey Methodology, 39, 59-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scholtus, S. and Go¨ksen, S. (2012). Automatic Editing with Hard and Soft Edits - Some First Experiences. Technical Report 201225, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/methoden/onderzoekmethoden/discus sionpapers/archief/2012/default.htm (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[UNECE Secretariat (2009). Generic Statistical Business Process Model version 4.0. Joint UNECE/Eurostat/OECD Work Session on Statistical Metadata. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Van der Loo, M. (2012). rspa: Adapt Numerical Records to Fit (in)Equality Restrictions with the Successive Projection Algorithm. R package version 0.1-1. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rspa/index.html (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Van der Loo, M. and De Jonge, E. (2011). Deductive Imputation with the Deducorrect Package. Technical Report 201126, Statistics Netherlands, The Hague. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/methoden/onderzoekmethoden/discussionpapers/ archief/2011/default.htm (accessed October 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Van der Loo, M., De Jonge, E., and Scholtus, S. (2011). Deducorrect: Deductive Correction, Deductive Imputation, and Deterministic Correction. R package version 1.3-1. Available at: http://cran.r-proiect.org/web/packages/deducorrect/index.html (accessed October 2013). ]Search in Google Scholar