[
Abdulqader, H. B., Murad, I. H. & Abdulghani, M. I. (2017). The Impact of the Application of Lexical Approach on Developing Students’ Writing Skills at a University Level. European Scientific Journal, 13(32).10.19044/esj.2017.v13n32p130
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abebe Lolamo (2013). A study of design and implementation of Grammar Tasks/activities: The Case of English grammar in use I at Hossana College of Teacher Education (Unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allotte, R. (2001). The Natural Origin of Language. Knebworth: Able Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Attar, E. M. & Allami, H. (2013). The Effects of Teaching Lexical Collocations on Speaking Ability of Iranian EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(6).10.4304/tpls.3.6.1070-1079
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Addisu Sewbihon (2020). Evaluating Ninth Graders’ EFL Textbook in the Ethiopian EFL Context: Vocabulary and Grammar in Focus. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 7(1).10.15408/ijee.v7i1.15738
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barcroft, J. (2004). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Lexical Input Processing Approach. Foreign Language Annals, 37 (2), 200-208.10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02193.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bayissa Gedefa (2013). Exploring the Implementation of CLT in Teaching Grammar at Fre- Hewot No 2 Secondary and Preparatory School (Unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker, J. (1975). The phrasal lexicon. In Nash-Webber, B&R. Schank (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing (p. 70-73). Cambridge, Masss: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.10.3115/980190.980212
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, England: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bircan, P. (2010). Lexical Approach in teaching vocabulary to young language Learners. Andolu University, Turkey.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (Eds.) (2008). Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199161
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). ‘Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language’. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83-110.10.1017/S0267190512000050
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BonJour, L. (2006). Epistemological problems of perception. Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved on January 18, 2018 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-episprob/. Collins Essential English Dictionary. New York: HarperCollins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, D. (2000). Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Longman Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burn, A. (2009). Grammar and Communicative Language Teaching: Why, when, and how to teach it? Camtesol Conference.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carter, R. (2001). Vocabulary. In Ronald Carter and David Nunan (eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. (pp. 42-47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667206.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chao, L. (2016). A Lexical-Chunk Based Study of Business English Correspondence Writing. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(4).10.17265/1539-8072/2016.04.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511811937
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chun-guang, T. (2014) An Empirical Research on the Corpus-Driven Lexical Chunks Instruction. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. (5th ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cruse, D. A. (1984). Lexical Semantics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cullen, R. (2008). Teaching grammar as a liberating force. ELT Journal, 62(3), 221-230.10.1093/elt/ccm042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Graaff, R. (1997). The Esperanto experiment. Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249-276.10.1017/S0272263197002064
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. Long, & C. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 726-755). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444315783.ch38
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeKeyser, R. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 54, 1-25.10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dellar, H. & Walkley, A. (2016). Teaching Lexically: Principles and Practice. United Kingdom: Delta Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dokchandra, D. (2019). Thai EFL Learners’ Collocational Competence and Their Perceptions of Collocational Difficulty. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(7), 776-784.10.17507/tpls.0907.04
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dornyei, Z. (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eidian, F. Gorjian, B. & Aghvami, F. (2013). The Impact of Lexical Collocation Instruction on Developing Writing Skill among Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4 (3).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, N. C. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition: word structure, collocation, word-class, and meaning. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 124-125). CUP.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.10.2307/40264512
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fang, X. (2014). Chunking-A Good Way of Memorizing and Teaching Vocabulary. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fillmore, C. J, Kay, P. & O’Connor, C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501-538.10.2307/414531
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Folse, K. S. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.23925
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Folse, K. S. (2010). Is explicit vocabulary focus the reading teacher’s job? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 139-160.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gebreezabhar, G/hiwet (2016). An Evaluation of the Design of Vocabulary Tasks and Their Implementation with Reference to Grade Nine English Textbook (unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghezelseflou, M. & Seyedrezaei, S. H. (2015). The Effect of Teaching Vocabulary through Collocations on the Vocabulary Retention of Iranian EFL Students. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 4 (3), 162-170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gregg, K. (1984). Krashen’s monitor and Occam’s razor. Applied Linguistics, 5, 79-100.10.1093/applin/5.2.79
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halliday, M. (1966). Lexis as a linguistic level. In C. E. Bazell, J. C. Caford, M.A.K. Halliday & R. H. Robinso (Eds.), In memory of J. R. Firth (pp.148-162). London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn.). London: Arnold.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson/Longman.10.1177/003368820103200109
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hailu Mulissa (2007). A Study of Vocabulary Teaching Techniques via Plasma TV and Students’ Attitudes towards the Techniques: A Case of Three Government High Schools in Addis Ababa with References to Grade Nine (unpublished). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoey, M. (2000). The Hidden Lexical Clues of Textual Organisation: A Preliminary Investigation into an Unusual Text from a Corpus Perspective. In: Burnard, L., McEnery, T. (Eds.), Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective (pp. 31-41). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming. A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524773
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyun-Jeong, N. (2013). Implementing the Lexical approach to Teaching English Grammar to Korean L2 Learners. Modern Studies in English Language and Literature, 57(3), 324-47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ismael Ali. (2007). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Contextual Guessing Activities: Grade 11 in Focus (unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38, 1212-1218.10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jiemin, D. (2006). A survey on Students’ Attitude toward Teaching and Learning in Lexical Approach. CELEA Journal, 129(3).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Junying, Z. & Xuefei, W. (2007). Chunking- An Effective Approach to Vocabulary Teaching and Learning in College Classrooms. CELEA Journal (Bimonthly), 30(3).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kalivoda, T. (1981). Developing advanced listening comprehension skill in a foreign language: Problems and possibilities. Hispania, 64(1), 80-85.10.2307/340336
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kidist Yohannes (2007). An Investigation into the Effectiveness of Teaching Grammar through Literary Texts (Unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Lincolnwood: Ladero Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krashen, S. D. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krashen, S. D., & Terrel, T. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2016). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 703-723. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.101644110.1080/09588221.2015.1016441
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, R. W. (1987a). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, M. (2000). Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach. London: Language Teaching Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, M. (2008). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lightbown, P.M. & Pienemann, M. (1993). Comments on Stephen D. Krashen’s “Teaching Issues: Formal grammar instruction.” TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 717-722.10.2307/3587404
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lubke, G. H. & Muthen, B. O. (2004). Applying Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Models for Continuous Outcomes to Likert Scale Data Complicates Meaningful Group Comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514-534.10.1207/s15328007sem1104_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mackey, A., & Gass, S.M. (2005) Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, J. (2001). Language, register and genre. In Burns, A. & Coffin, C. (Eds.), Analyzing English in a Global Context (pp. 149-166). London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113-128.10.1093/applin/11.2.113
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics 13, 221-245. Retrieved on November19, 2017 from http://www.10.1017/S026144480000887910.1017/S0261444800008879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.b.). Perception. Retrieved from www.merrium-webster.com/thesaurus/perception
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.10.1037/h0043158
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. UK: Multilingual Matters10.21832/9781847692092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Minda, M. (2003). The Effectiveness of Current Vocabulary Teaching Techniques in Facilitating Production in Junior Secondary Schools: Grade Seven in Focus (Unpublished MA thesis) Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moeller, A. J., Ketsman, O. & Masmaliyeva, L. (2009). The Essentials of Vocabulary Teaching: From Theory to Practice. Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montgomery, D. & Runger, G. (2006). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. NJ: Wiley, John and Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mousavi, S. M. & Heidari D. L. (2018). Effect of collocations on Iranian EFL learners’ writing: Attitude in focus. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 8(4), 131–145.10.18844/gjflt.v8i4.3568
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nassaji, H. &Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145.10.1017/S0267190504000066
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nattinger, J. and DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical Phrases in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524759
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nation, I. S. P. (2005). Teaching vocabulary. Asian EFL Journal. 7(3), 47-54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newell, A. & Rosenbloom, P.S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.). Cognitive Skills and their acquisition (pp.1-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norman, F. (2017). To what extent is a lexically focused ELT course book more effective than a grammar focused one? : A comparative analysis of teachers’ attitudes to, and the effectiveness of, the course books Outcomes Second Edition and Speak Out at a private language school chain in the UK (MA Dissertation, unpublished). The University of Sussex.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), pp. 625-632.10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-52810.1111/0023-8333.00136
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (eds.), Language and communication. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qader, H.B.A. (2016). The Effect of Lexical Chunks on Kurdish EFL Learners’ Writing Skill. Education. 6(4),101-106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahimi, M., Momeni, G. & Nejati, R. (2012). The Impact of Lexically-based Language Teaching on Students’ Achievement in Learning English as Foreign Language. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 31-36.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahimi, M. & Momeni, G. (2012). The effect of teaching collocations on English language proficiency. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 37 – 42.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahimkhani, M. & Hemmati, F. (2016). The Impact of Message Units as ‘Chunks’ on EFL Production. Social Sciences & Humanities. 24 (4), 1503 – 1522.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reza, K. & Ashouri, S. (2016). The Effect of Lexical Collocation Instruction on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Size. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 6(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richards, J.C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. (2nd. Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667305
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romer, U., & Schulze, R. (Eds.). (2009). Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface. John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/scl.35
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenbloom, P.S. & Newell, A. (1987). An integrated computational model of stimulus-response compatibility and practice. In J. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and research (vol. 21), (pp. 19-89). London: Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sahragard, R. & Sadighi, S. (2013). The Effect of Lexical Collocational Density on the Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 5 (1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt, R.W. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.10.1017/S0272263100011189
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (2000). Vocabulary, Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scrivener, T. (2011). Learning Teaching: The Essential Guide to Language Teaching (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Setegn, M. (2007). Investigating Vocabulary Learning Strategies Employed by Somali-Speaking Students: Preparatory Classes in Focus (unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seyedrezaei, S, H. & Ghezelseflou, M. (2015). The Effect of Teaching Vocabulary through Collocations on the Vocabulary Learning of Iranian EFL Students. Journal of Language Sciences & Linguistics. 3(1), 9-16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shooshtari, Z.G. & Karami, N. (2013). Lexical Collocation Instruction and Its Impact on Iranian Non-academic EFL Learners’ Speaking Ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4).10.4304/jltr.4.4.767-776
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sinclair, J. M. (1991), Corpus Concordance Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sinclair, J. M. & Renouf, A. (Eds.) (1988). A lexical syllabus for language learning. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 140-158). Harlow: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: a meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263-308.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sullivan, G. & Artino Jr., A. R. (2013). Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert-Type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 5(4), 541-542.10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swan, M. (2006). Chunks in the classroom: Let‘s not go overboard‘. Teacher Trainer, 20(3), 5-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, J. (2012). An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of the Lexical Approach to Improving Writing in SLA. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3).10.4304/jltr.3.3.578-583
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, J. (2013). Input of Chunks and its effects on L2 Learners’ Listening Competency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(7).10.4304/tpls.3.7.1264-1269
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thornbury, S. (1998). The Lexical Approach: a journey without maps? MET, 7(4), 7-13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61, 569-613.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00622.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuan, N. H. & Nguyen, N. B. (2014).The Use of Lexical Approach in Enhancing Learners’ Oral Communication Performance at Nguyen Hue University. Journal of Science Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 2(10).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Westfall, T. & Weber, C. (2005). English to go: Lexical Approach Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.oebv.at/system/files/celum/371891_developing_sense.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Widdowson, H. (1989). Proper Words in Proper Places. ELT News 8, British Council, Vienna.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willis, D. (2003). Rules, Patterns and Words: grammar and lexis in English language teaching. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511733000
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woodrow, L. (2014). Writing about Quantitative Research in Applied Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230369955
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woolfolk, A. E. (1995). Educational psychology (6th ed.). Needham: Allyn & Bacon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: principle and practice. Applied Linguistic, 21(4), 463-489.10.1093/applin/21.4.463
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, R., Mao, Z., and Liu, Y. (2012). Lexical Approach and Its Application in College English Classes. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(10).10.4304/tpls.2.10.2090-2095
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yemeserach, B. (2015). Grammar Learning Strategies Use of Grade 11 Students at Medhanealem Preparatory School: Gender in Focus (Unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, X. (2013). From Memorized Chunks to Rule Formation: A Study of Adult Chinese Learners of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(1).10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.98
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zafarghandi, A. M., Tahriri, A. & Bandari, M. D. (2015). The Impact of Teaching Chunks on Speaking Fluency of Iranian EFL Learners. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziafar, M. (2015). Good Language Learners and their Use of Lexical İtems and L1 in Second Language Acquisition. International Scientific Research Journal, 1(5). DOI: 10.18483/IRJSci.110.18483/IRJSci.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zumbo, B. D., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1993). Is the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement? Canadian Psychology, 34, 390-400.10.1037/h0078865
]Search in Google Scholar