[Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 108(4), 441–485.10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441]Search in Google Scholar
[Bazerman, M. H., Magliozzi, T., & Neale, M. A. (1985). Integrative bargaining in a competitive market. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 294–313.10.1016/0749-5978(85)90026-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 45–62.10.1002/ejsp.2420240104]Search in Google Scholar
[Bottom, W. P., & Studt, A. (1993). Framing effects and the distributive aspect of integrative bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(3), 459–474.10.1006/obhd.1993.1064]Search in Google Scholar
[Caputo, A. (2013). A literature review of cognitive biases in negotiation processes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24(4), 374–398.10.1108/IJCMA-08-2012-0064]Search in Google Scholar
[Chmielecki, M. (2013). Conceptual negotiation metaphors across cultures – research findings from Poland, China, The United States and Great Britain. Journal of Intercultural Management, 5(3), 103–118.10.2478/joim-2013-0022]Search in Google Scholar
[Chmielecki, M., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2017). Goal vs. relationship-based approach: a comparative study between American, Chinese, and Polish negotiators. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, P. A. Wilson, & S. M. Croucher (Eds.), Approaches to conflict: theoretical, interpersonal, and discursive dynamics (pp. 93–110). Lanham: Lexington Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. R. (2005).Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. ABC Research Group10.1017/CBO9780511610332.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963).A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2(4), 169-187.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981).Getting to yes: How to negotiate without giving in. London: Arrow.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gelfand, M. J., & Christakopoulou, S. (1999). Culture and negotiator cognition: Judgment accuracy and negotiation processes in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 248–269.10.1006/obhd.1999.2845]Search in Google Scholar
[Gelfand, M. J., Higgins, M., Nishii, L. H., Raver, J. L., Dominguez, A., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., & Toyama, M. (2002). Culture and egocentric perceptions of fairness in conflict and negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 833–845.10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.833]Search in Google Scholar
[Gino, F., Moore, D. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). See no evil: Why we fail to notice unethical behavior. In R. M. Kramer, A. E. Tenbrunsel, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Social decision making: Social dilemmas, social values, and ethical judgments (pp. 241–263). New York: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heifetz, A., & Segev, E. (2004). The evolutionary role of toughness in bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior, 49(1), 117–134.10.1016/j.geb.2003.11.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.10.2307/1914185]Search in Google Scholar
[Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological review, 94(2), 211–228.10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.211]Search in Google Scholar
[Korobkin, R. (1998). Inertia and preference in contract negotiation: The psychological power of default rules and form terms. Vanderbilt Law Review, 51, 1583–1651.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kramer, R. M., Pommerenke, P., & Newton, E. (1993). The social context of negotiation: Effects of social identity and interpersonal accountability on negotiator decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37(4), 633–654.10.1177/0022002793037004003]Search in Google Scholar
[Kristensen, H., & Gärling, T. (2000). Anchor points, reference points, and counter-offers in negotiations. Group decision and negotiation, 9(6), 493–505.10.1023/A:1008722223618]Search in Google Scholar
[Kumar, R., & Gladwin, T. N. (1987). The social psychology of crisis bargaining: Toward a contingency model. Journal of World Business, 20, 23–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1987).Manager as negotiator. Simon and Schuster.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). Interests: The measure of negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 2(1), 73–92.10.1111/j.1571-9979.1986.tb00339.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (2007). Claiming a large slice of a small pie: Asymmetric disconfirmation in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 212–233.10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.212]Search in Google Scholar
[Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1979). Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(4), 418–434.10.1016/0022-1031(79)90047-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (Eds.), Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives (pp. 61–94). New York: Praeger.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mumpower, J. L., Sheffield, J., Darling, T. A., & Milter, R. G. (2004). The accuracy of post-negotiation estimates of the other negotiator’s payoff. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(3), 259–290.10.1023/B:GRUP.0000031089.91654.26]Search in Google Scholar
[Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1985). The effects of framing and negotiator over-confidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 34–49.10.2307/256060]Search in Google Scholar
[Neale, M. A., Huber, V. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(2), 228–241.10.1016/0749-5978(87)90039-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972).Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980).Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Mood and heuristics: The influence of happy and sad states on sensitivity and bias in stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1005–1023.10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1005]Search in Google Scholar
[Raiffa, H. (1982).The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.10.2307/1340912]Search in Google Scholar
[Ritov, I. (1996). Probability of regret: Anticipation of uncertainty resolution in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 228–236.10.1006/obhd.1996.0051]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and brain sciences, 23(5), 645–665.10.1017/S0140525X00003435]Search in Google Scholar
[Sułkowski, Ł. (2009). The problems of epistemology of corporate culture. Journal of Intercultural Management, 1(1), 5–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sułkowski, Ł. (2012). Elements of Organizational Culture–theoretical and methodological problems. Management, 16(2), 63–71.10.2478/v10286-012-0056-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008).Nudge: The gentle power of choice architecture. New Haven, Conn.: Yale.10.1037/e722852011-067]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 47(1), 98–123.10.1016/0749-5978(90)90048-E]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1992). Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(2), 176–197.10.1016/0749-5978(92)90010-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, L. L. (2006). Negotiation theory and research. Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203943243]Search in Google Scholar
[Traavik, L. E. (2011). Is bigger better? Dyadic and multiparty integrative negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 22(2), 190–210.10.1108/10444061111126701]Search in Google Scholar
[Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124]Search in Google Scholar
[Whyte, G., & Sebenius, J. K. (1997). The effect of multiple anchors on anchoring in individual and group judgment. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 69(1), 75–85.10.1006/obhd.1996.2674]Search in Google Scholar
[Wickham, P. A. (2003). The representativeness heuristic in judgements involving entrepreneurial success and failure. Management Decision, 41(2), 156–167.10.1108/00251740310457605]Search in Google Scholar