[Anderson W.C. 1980. Tissue culture propagation of red and black raspberries, Rubus idaeus and R. occidentalis. Acta Hort. 112: 13-20. http://www.actahort.org/books/112/112_1.htm.10.17660/ActaHortic.1980.112.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Biedermann I.E.G. 1987. Factors affecting estab–lishment and development of Magnolia hy–brids in vitro. Acta Hort. 212: 625-629. http://www.actahort.org/books/212/212_104.htm.10.17660/ActaHortic.1987.212.104]Search in Google Scholar
[Blaydes O.F. 1966. Interaction of kinetin and various inhibi–tors in the growth of soybean tissue. Physiol. Plant. 19: 748-753. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1966.tb07060.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1966.tb07060.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Burgos L., Ledbetter C.A. 1993. Improved efficiency in apricot breeding: Effects of embryo development and nutrient media on in vitro germination and seedling establishment. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 35: 217-222. DOI: 10.1007/BF00037273.10.1007/BF00037273]Search in Google Scholar
[Chalupa V. 1990. Micropropagation of hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Biol. Plant. 32: 332-338. DOI: 10.1007/BF02898493.10.1007/BF02898493]Search in Google Scholar
[Callaway D.J. 1994. The world of Magnolias. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA, 260 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chée R., Pool R.M. 1987. Improved inorganic media constituents for in vitro shoot multiplication of Vitis vinifera. Sci. Hort. 32: 85-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(87)90019-7.10.1016/0304-4238(87)90019-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Coke J.E. 1996. Basal nutrient medium for in vitro cul–tures of loblolly pines. US Patent: 5, 534, 434.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Oliveira L.F., Ribas L.L.F., Quoirin M., Koehler H.S., Higa A.R. 2011. Micropropagation of Pinus taeda L. via axillary buds. BMC Proc. 5 (Suppl. 7): 144. DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P144.10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P144]Search in Google Scholar
[De Proft M.P., Maene L.J., Debergh P.C. 1985. Car–bon dioxide and ethylene evolution in the cul–ture atmosphere of Magnolia cultured in vitro. Physiol. Plant. 65: 375-379. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb08660.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb08660.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Driver J.A., Kuniyuki A.H. 1984. In vitro propagation of Paradox walnut rootstock [Juglans hindsii x Jug-lans regia, tissue culture]. HortScience 19: 507-509.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ďurkovic J. 2003. Regeneration of Acer caudatifo-lium Hayata plantlets from juvenile explants. Plant Cell Rep. 21: 1060-1064. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-003-0634-5.10.1007/s00299-003-0634-512835999]Search in Google Scholar
[Dutt M., Li Z.T., Dhekney S.A., Gray D.J. 2007. Transgenic plants from shoot apical meristems of Vitis vinifera L. “Thompson Seedless” via Agrobacte-rium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 26: 2101-2110. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-007-0424-6.10.1007/s00299-007-0424-617701039]Search in Google Scholar
[Emershad R.L., Ramming D.W. 1994. Effects of media on embryo enlargement, germination and plant de–velopment in early-ripening genotypes of Prunus grown in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 37: 55-59. DOI: 10.1007/BF00048117.10.1007/BF00048117]Search in Google Scholar
[Fenning T.M., Gartland K.M.A., Brasier C.M. 1993. Mi–cropropagation and regeneration of English Elm, Ulmus procera. J. Exp. Bot. 44: 1211-1217. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/44.7.1211.10.1093/jxb/44.7.1211]Search in Google Scholar
[Fernándes-Lorenzo J.L., Iglesias-Díaz M.I., Gutiérrez-Araujo O. 2000. Micropropagation of a selected root-stock of Acer palmatum. Acta Hort. 536: 347-353. http://www.actahort.org/books/536/536_40.htm.10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.536.40]Search in Google Scholar
[Fett-Neto A.G., Melanson S.J., Sakata K., DiCosmo F. 1993. Improved growth and taxol yield in develop–ing calli of Taxus cuspidata by medium composi–tion modification. Nat. Biotechnol. 11: 731-734. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0693-731.10.1038/nbt0693-731]Search in Google Scholar
[Figlar R.B., Nooteboom H.P. 2004. Notes on Mag-noliaceae IV. Blumea 49: 87-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651904X486214.10.3767/000651904X486214]Search in Google Scholar
[Gabryszewska E. 1997. Wpływ tidiazuronu i cytokinin na wzrost I rozwój pędów Magnolia x soulangeana ‘Alexandrina’ in vitro. In: Dubert F., Skoczowski A. (Eds.), Zastosowanie kultur in vitro w fizjologii roślin. PAN, Kraków, pp. 79-82. [in Polish]]Search in Google Scholar
[Gamborg O.L., Miller R.A., Ojima K. 1968. Nutrient re–quirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50: 151-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5.10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray D.J., Benton C.M. 1991. In vitro micropropagation and plant establishment of muscadine grape cultivars (Vitis rotundifolia). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 27: 7-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF00048199.10.1007/BF00048199]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammatt N., Ridout M.S. 1992. Micropropagation of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 31: 67-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF00043477.10.1007/BF00043477]Search in Google Scholar
[Harada H., Murai Y. 1996. Micropropagation of Prunus mume. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 46: 265-261. Kamenická A. 1998. Influence of selected carbohydrates on rhizogenesis of shoots saucer magnolia in vitro. Acta Physiol. Plant. 20: 425-429. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-998-0030-4.10.1007/s11738-998-0030-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamenická A., Lanaková M. 2000. Effect of me–dium composition and type of vessel closure on axillary shoot production of magnolia in vitro. Acta Physiol. Plant. 22: 129-134. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-000-0067-5.10.1007/s11738-000-0067-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamenická A., Valka J. 1997. Cultivation and propaga–tion of magnolias. Technical University Publishers, Zvolen, Slovakia, pp. 42-82.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamenická A., Kormuťák A., Lanaková M. 2001. Estab–lishing micropropagation conditions for three Mag–nolia species. Propag. Ornam. Plants 1: 41-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Linsmaier E.M., Skoog F. 1965. Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 18: 100-127. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1965.tb06874.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1965.tb06874.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Lloyd G., McCown B. 1980. Commercially-feasible mi–cropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifo-lia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 30: 421-427.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marinescu L., Radomir A.M., Radu T., Teodorescu A., Fleancu M., Popescu C. 2008. Preliminary results regarding the influence of cytokinin on the micro–propagation of Magnolia soulangiana Soul. Lucrări Ştiinţifice, Seria B, Horticultura 51: 601-607.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merkle S.A., Wiecko A.T. 1990. Somatic embryogenesis in three magnolia species. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115: 858-860.10.21273/JASHS.115.5.858]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller C.O. 1978. Cytokinin modification of metabolism of p-coumaric acid by a cell suspension of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Planta 140: 193-199. DOI: 10.1007/BF0039024810.1007/BF00390248]Search in Google Scholar
[Ming L., Huan-Cheng M.A. 2003. The review of the asexual propagation on Magnoliaceae. J. Southwest Forestry College 23: 92-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cul–tures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakamura K., Wakita Y., Yokota S., Yoshizawa N., Idei T. 1995. Induction of multiple shoots by shoot apex culture in Magnolia obovata Thunb. Plant Tiss. Cult. Lett. 12(1): 34-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Orlikowska T., Gabryszewska E. 1995. In vitro propaga–tion of Acer rubrum cv. Red Sunset. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 3: 195-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parris J.K., Touchell D.H., Ranney T.G., Adelberg J. 2012. Basal salt composition, cytokinins, and phe–nolic binding agents influence in vitro growth and ex vitro establishment of Magnolia ‘Ann’. HortScience 47: 1625-1629.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phelan S., Hunter A., Douglas G.C. 2009. Effect of explants source on shoot proliferation and adventitious regen–eration in 10 Buddleia. Sci. Hortic. 120: 518-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.009.10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Podwyszyńska M., Wojtania A., Gabryszewska E. 2000. Application of m-topolin for plant micropropaga–tion. Zesz. Nauk. Inst. Sadow. Kwiac. 7: 173-180. [in Polish with English abstract]]Search in Google Scholar
[Quoirin M., Lepoivre E. 1977. Improved media for in vitro culture of Prunus sp. Acta Hort. 78: 437-442.10.17660/ActaHortic.1977.78.54]Search in Google Scholar
[Radomir A.-M. 2012. Comparative study on the in vitro multiplication potential of Magnolia stellata and Magnolia x soulangiana species. J. Hort. Forest Biotechnol. 16: 39-44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radomir A.-M., Radu C.M. 2008. Research on behavior of Magnolia soulangeana in the multiplication stage of ‘in vitro ‘ culture. Lucrări Ştiinţifice, Seria B, Horticultura 51: 258-261.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rugini E.1984. In vitro propagation of some olive (Olea europaea sativa L.) cultivars with dif–ferent rootability, and medium development using analytical data from developing shoots and embryos. Sci. Hortic. 24: 123-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(84)90143-2.10.1016/0304-4238(84)90143-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Rugini E., Caricato G. 1995. Somatic embryogenesis and plant recovery from mature tissues of olive cultivars (Olea europaea L.) ‘Canino’ and ‘Moraiolo’. Plant Cell Rep. 14: 257-260. DOI: 10.1007/BF00233645.10.1007/BF00233645]Search in Google Scholar
[Santos C.V., Brito G., Pinto G., Fonseca H.M.A.C. 2003. In vitro plantlet regeneration of Olea europaea ssp. Maderensis. Sci. Hortic. 97: 83-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00148-6.10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00148-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Shanjani P.S. 2003. Nitrogen effect on callus induction and plant regeneration of Juniperus excelsa. Int. J. Agr. Biol. 5: 419-422.]Search in Google Scholar
[Standardi A., Catalano F. 1985. Tissue culture propaga–tion of kiwi fruit. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 34: 236-243.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang H., Ren Z., Krczal G. 2000. Improvement of English walnut somatic embryo germination and conversion by desiccation treatments and plantlet development by lower medium salts. In Vitro Cell. Dev. - Pl. 36: 47-50. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-000-0011-9.10.1007/s11627-000-0011-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Tubesing Ch. E. 1998. Magnolias with a future: Propaga–tion and nursery culture. In: Hunt D. (Ed.), Magno–lias and their allies. International Dendrology Soci–ety, Milborne Port, pp. 193-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valova M., Krajcova D., Kamenická A. 1996. Changes of mineral elements in explant of Magnolia x soulangiana Soul.-Bod. during the culturing in vitro. Folia Dendrol. 21-22: 331-339.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yu X., Reed B.M. 1993. Improved shoot multiplication of mature hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) in vitro using glucose as a carbon source. Plant Cell Rep. 12: 256-259. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237130.10.1007/BF0023713024197152]Search in Google Scholar
[Zefang T., Yahui H., Chao H. 2003. In vitro culture of Magnolia grandiflora. J. Hunan Agr. Univ. 29: 478-480.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang C.H., Mei X.G., Liu L., Yu L.J. 2000. Enhanced paclitaxel production induced by the combination of elicitors in cell suspension cultures of Taxus chinensis. Biotechnol. Lett. 22: 1561-1564.]Search in Google Scholar