Otwarty dostęp

Reduced Sensitivity to Fluopyram in Meloidogyne graminis following Long-Term Exposure in Golf Turf

Christian L. Kammerer
Christian L. Kammerer
, 
Philip F. Harmon
Philip F. Harmon
 oraz 
William T. Crow
William T. Crow
   | 15 lis 2023
Journal of Nematology's Cover Image
O artykule
Poprzedni artykuł
Następny artykuł
Zacytuj
Article Category: Research Paper
Data publikacji: 15 lis 2023
Zakres stron: -
Otrzymano: 16 lut 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0048
Słowa kluczowe
© 2023 Christian L. Kammerer et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figure 1:

AMS sediment sampler slide hammer (AMS, Idaho) used to collect soil cores used in the enhanced degradation experiment. Shown with cylindrical plastic liners and the steel sampler which threads to the end of the hammer.
AMS sediment sampler slide hammer (AMS, Idaho) used to collect soil cores used in the enhanced degradation experiment. Shown with cylindrical plastic liners and the steel sampler which threads to the end of the hammer.

Figure 2:

Custom-made 15.2-cm-diam. PVC tubes which housed soil cores prior to the planting of a tomato plant and inoculation with Meloidogyne spp. eggs.
Custom-made 15.2-cm-diam. PVC tubes which housed soil cores prior to the planting of a tomato plant and inoculation with Meloidogyne spp. eggs.

Figure 3:

Response of Meloidogyne incognita galls on tomato roots to increasing rates of fluopyram 30, 60, and 180 days after fluopyram application to soil collected from small plots with different previous fluopyram application histories in the first repetition (A) and second repetition (B) of the enhanced degradation bioassay experiment. Treatment refers to the fluopyram history of the plots: Treatment A had a four year history and B had a one year history of four applications of 500 g fluopyram/ha per year. U had no previous fluopyram history. *,**Different from treatment U at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05, respectively.
Response of Meloidogyne incognita galls on tomato roots to increasing rates of fluopyram 30, 60, and 180 days after fluopyram application to soil collected from small plots with different previous fluopyram application histories in the first repetition (A) and second repetition (B) of the enhanced degradation bioassay experiment. Treatment refers to the fluopyram history of the plots: Treatment A had a four year history and B had a one year history of four applications of 500 g fluopyram/ha per year. U had no previous fluopyram history. *,**Different from treatment U at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05, respectively.

Figure 4:

Response of Meloidogyne enterolobii galls on tomato roots to increasing rates of fluopyram 30, 60, and 180 days after fluopyram application to soil with different previous fluopyram application histories collected from commercial turf fields in the enhanced degradation bioassay experiment. *,**Different from no history at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05, respectively.
Response of Meloidogyne enterolobii galls on tomato roots to increasing rates of fluopyram 30, 60, and 180 days after fluopyram application to soil with different previous fluopyram application histories collected from commercial turf fields in the enhanced degradation bioassay experiment. *,**Different from no history at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05, respectively.

Figure 5:

Effects of 24 hours and 72 hours of in-vitro exposure to fluopyram concentrations rate of 8 ppm and 16 ppm on motility of Meloidogyne graminis J2 from small plots with different fluopyram use histories (A) first repetition (B) second repetition. Treatment refers to the fluopyram history of the plots: Treatment A had a four year history and B had a one year history of four applications of 500 g fluopyram/ha per year, U had no previous fluopyram history. *,**Different from treatment U at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05.
Effects of 24 hours and 72 hours of in-vitro exposure to fluopyram concentrations rate of 8 ppm and 16 ppm on motility of Meloidogyne graminis J2 from small plots with different fluopyram use histories (A) first repetition (B) second repetition. Treatment refers to the fluopyram history of the plots: Treatment A had a four year history and B had a one year history of four applications of 500 g fluopyram/ha per year, U had no previous fluopyram history. *,**Different from treatment U at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05.

Figure 6:

Effects of 24 hours and 72 hours of in-vitro exposure to fluopyram concentrations rate of 8 ppm and 16 ppm on motility of Meloidogyne graminis J2 from commercial turf fields that either applied fluopyram often or that never used fluopyram. “Yes” indicates history of fluopyram use and “no” indicates no history of fluopyram use. *,**Different from no history at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05, respectively.
Effects of 24 hours and 72 hours of in-vitro exposure to fluopyram concentrations rate of 8 ppm and 16 ppm on motility of Meloidogyne graminis J2 from commercial turf fields that either applied fluopyram often or that never used fluopyram. “Yes” indicates history of fluopyram use and “no” indicates no history of fluopyram use. *,**Different from no history at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05, respectively.

Figure 7:

Effects of 24 hours and 72 hours of in-vitro exposure to fluopyram concentrations rate of 8 ppm and 16 ppm on motility of Meloidogyne graminis J2 from either commercial turf fields that had applied fluopyram often or from an unexposed greenhouse population. “Yes” indicates history of fluopyram use and “no” indicates no history of fluopyram use. *,**Different from no history at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05, respectively.
Effects of 24 hours and 72 hours of in-vitro exposure to fluopyram concentrations rate of 8 ppm and 16 ppm on motility of Meloidogyne graminis J2 from either commercial turf fields that had applied fluopyram often or from an unexposed greenhouse population. “Yes” indicates history of fluopyram use and “no” indicates no history of fluopyram use. *,**Different from no history at the specified fluopyram rate P ≤ 0.10, P ≤ 0.05, respectively.

Response of Meloidogyne enterolobii galls on tomato transplanted 30, 60, or 180 days after application (DAA) of fluopyram treatments at rates of 0, 250, 500, and 1000 g/ha (Rate) to soil collected from commercial turf fields with different histories of fluopyram use (History). Data were subjected to analysis of variance; predictor variables were Rate and History.

Predictor Variable 30 DAA 60 DAA 180 DAA
Rate 0.131a 0.033 0.820
History 0.146 0.002 0.278
Rate×History 0.893 0.006 0.603

Response of Meloidogyne incognita galls and egg masses on tomato transplanted 30, 60, or 180 days after application (DAA) of fluopyram treatments at rates of 0, 250, 500, and 1000 g/ha (Rate) to soil collected from small plots with different histories of fluopyram use (History). Data were subjected to analysis of variance, predictor variables were Rate and History.

Predictor Variable 30 DAA 60 DAA 180 DAA
Repetition 1
Rate 0.202a 0.612 0.065
History < 0.0001 0.002 0.04
Rate×History 0.062 0.908 0.65
Repetition 2
Rate 0.031 0.487 0.032
History 0.817 0.612 0.143
Rate×History 0.032 0.086 0.387
eISSN:
2640-396X
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
Volume Open
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Life Sciences, other
Kanał RSS czasopisma