[1. Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X. and Briggs, J.M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864), 756-760. DOI: 10.1126/science.1150195.10.1126/.1150195]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects - The 2014 Revision Highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, US.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. European Commission. (2014). Living well, within the limits of our planet. The New General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. European Commission. (2007). Green paper - Towards a new culture for urban mobility. COM(2007) 0551 final. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. European Commission. (2009). Action plan of urban mobility. European Communities, COM(2009) 490 final. Brussels, Belgium.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. European Center for Government Transformation. (2015). Boosting innovation in cities to deliver better public services – A view from tomorrow’s leaders. College of Europe student case studies, Final report.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Figliozzi M.A. (2010). The impacts of congestion on commercial vehicle tour characteristics and costs. Transport. Res E-Log. 46(4), 496–506.10.1016/j.tre.2009.04.005]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Russo, F. and Comi, A. (2012). City characteristics and urban goods movements: A way to environmental transportation system in a sustainable city. Procd. Soc. Behv. 39, 61–73. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.091.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.091]Search in Google Scholar
[9. European Commission. (2011). White paper - Roadmap to a single European transport area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. European Commission, COM, 144 final. Brussels, Belgium.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Taniguchi, E. Thompson, R. and Yamada, T. (2003). Visions for city logistics. In 3rd International Conference on City Logistics, Madeira, Portugal, 1-16, 2003.10.1108/9780080473222-001]Search in Google Scholar
[11. European Commission. (2006). Keep Europe moving - Sustainable mobility for our continent. COM 314 final. ISBN 92-79-02312-8. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Transportation Research Board. (2012). Guidebook for understanding urban goods movement. NCFRP Report 14, Washington, D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. European Commission. (2014) Work programme 2014-2015. Horizon 2020.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. SAGE Publications Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Graindorge, T. and Breuil, D. (2014). Evaluation of the urban freight transportation projects. In Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference: Transport Solutions from Research to Deployment, April 14-17, 2014, Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Balm, S., Browne, M., Leonardi, J. and Quak, H. (2014). Developing an evaluation framework for innovative urban and interurban freight transport solutions. Procd. Soc. Behv., 125, 386-397.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1482]Search in Google Scholar
[17. CITYLOG. (2012). Sustainability and efficiency of city logistics. CITYLOG, Final Report.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. ENCLOSE. (2014). Cross-evaluation of energy efficient, sustainable urban logistics measures in the ENCLOSE towns. Evaluation and Policy Tool. ENergy efficiency in City LOgistics Services for small and mid-sized European Historic Towns, Deliverable 5.1.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. CIVITAS-MIRACLES. (2006). Multi-initiative for rationalised accessibility and clean liveable environments. Last Report Publishable.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. BESTUFS. (2008). Quantification of urban freight transport effects II. Best Urban Freight Solutions, Deliverable 5.2.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. BESTFACT. (2013). Recommendation and policy tools. Best practice factory for freight transport, Deliverable 3.1.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. C-LIEGE. (2014). Clean last mile transport and logistics management for smart and efficient local governments in Europe. Towards clean urban freight transport, Final Report.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. FREILOT. (2011). Evaluation methodology and plan urban. Freight Energy Efficiency Pilot, Deliverable 4.1.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. CITYLAB. (2015). Definition of necessary indicators for evaluation. City Logistics in Living Laboratories, Deliverable 5.1.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Mitropoulos, L.K. and Prevedouros, P.D. (2013). Assessment of sustainability for transportation vehicle,” Transp. Res. Record: Journal of the Trans. Res. B., 2344, 88-97.10.3141/2344-10]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Mitropoulos, L.K., Prevedouros, P.D. and Nathanail, E.G. (2011). Life cycle assessment through a comprehensive sustainability framework: A case study of urban transportation vehicles. In XXIVth World Road Congress, September 26-30, 2011. Mexico City, Mexico.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Nathanail, E. and Papoutsis, K. (2013). Towards a sustainable urban freight transport and urban distribution. Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering, 1(1), 58-63.10.12720/jtle.1.1.58-63]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Jeon, C.M., Amekudzi, A. and Guensler, R. (2008). Sustainability assessment at the transportation planning level: Performances and measures and indexes. In 87th Transportation Research Board Annual Conference. CD-ROM, January 13-17, 2008. Washington D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Nathanail, E., Gogas, M. and Adamos, G. (2016). Smart interconnections and urban freight transport towards achieving sustainable city logistics. Transp. Res. Proc. 14, 983 – 992.10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.078]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Cellura, M., Longo, S. and Mistretta, M. (2011).The energy and environmental impacts of Italian household consumptions: An input output approach. Renew Sus. Energ. Rev. 15(8), 3897-3908. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.025.10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.025]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W.P., Suh, S., Weidema, B.P. and Pennington, D.W. (2004). Life cycle assessment part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ. Int. 30, 701-720. DOI: ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005.10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[32. Norris, G. (2001). Integrating life cycle cost analysis in LCA. Int. J Life Cycle Ass. 6(2), 118-120.10.1007/BF02977849]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Kloepffer, W. (2008). Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int. J Life Cycle Ass. 13(2), 89–95.10.1065/lca2008.02.376]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Finkbeiner, M., Schau, M.S., Lehmann, A. and Traverso, M. (2010). Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 2, 3309–3322.10.3390/su2103309]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Onat, N.C., Kucukvar, M. and Tatari, O. (2015). Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States. Appl. Energ. 150, 36-49.10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.001]Search in Google Scholar
[36. NOVELOG. (2016). Understanding cities tool. New Cooperative Business Models and Guidance for Sustainable City Logistics, Deliverable D2.3.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Bąk, M. Costs and fees in transport. WUG, Gdańsk, 110, [in Polish].]Search in Google Scholar
[38. European Commission. (2014). Update of the handbook on external costs of transport – Final report. RICARDO AEA.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (1999). Enterprise risk management – Integrated framework,” Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, Risk Management. Standards Australia, AS/NZS 4360:1999. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from: www.coso.org/.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. FERMA. (2002). A risk management standard. Federation of European Risk Management Associations,” 2002. Retrieved November 15, 2017, from: www.ferma.eu/risk-management/standards/risk-management-standard/.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Kiba-Janiak, M. (2016). Risk management in the field of urban freight transport. Transp. Res. Proc. 16, 165-178.10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.017]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Donnelly, R. (2007). A hybrid microsimulation model of freight flows. In Taniguchi, E. and Thompson, R.G. (Ed.), City Logistics V, (pp. 235–246).Institute of City Logistics, Kyoto.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Valdivia, S., Ugaya, C., Hildenbrand, J., Traverso, M., Mazijn, B. and Sonnemann, G. (2013). Approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment – Our contribution to Rio+20. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 18(9), 1673-1685. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0529-1.10.1007/s11367-012-0529-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[44. Allen, J., Browne, M., Woodburn, A. and Leonardi, J. (2012). The role of urban consolidation centers in sustainable freight transport. Transport Rev. 32(32), 473-490.10.1080/01441647.2012.688074]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Santen, V. (2017). Towards more efficient logistics: Increasing load factor in a shipper’s road transport. Int. J. Logist. Manag., 28(2), 228-250. DOI.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2015-0071.10.1108/IJLM-04-2015-0071]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[46. Organization for economic Co-Operation and Development. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators methodology and user guide. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from: http://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Nathanail, E., Adamos, G. and Gogas. M. (2017). A novel framework for assessing sustainable urban logistics. Transp. Res. Proc. 25C, 1036-1045.10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.477]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590]Search in Google Scholar