This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Okaygoun D, Oliveira DD, Soman S, Williams R. Advances in the management of haemophilia: emerging treatments and their mechanisms. J Biomed Sci 2021;28(1): 64. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00760-4.OkaygounDOliveiraDDSomanSWilliamsR.Advances in the management of haemophilia: emerging treatments and their mechanisms. 2021;28(1): 64. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00760-4.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hilgers R-D, Konig F, Molenberghs G, Senn S. Design and analysis of clinical trials for small rare disease populations. J Rare Dis Res Treat 2016; 1 (3): 53–60. doi: 10.29245/2572-9411/2016/3.1054.HilgersR-DKonigFMolenberghsGSennS.Design and analysis of clinical trials for small rare disease populations. 2016; 1 (3): 53–60. doi: 10.29245/2572-9411/2016/3.1054.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available from https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (accessed 19th December 2022).National Library of Medicine. . Available from https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (accessed 19th December 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Tomeo F, Mariz S, Brunetta AL, Stoyanova-Beninska V, Penttila K, Magrelli A. Haemophilia, state of the art and new therapeutic opportunities, a regulatory perspective. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 87(11): 4183–4196. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14838.TomeoFMarizSBrunettaALStoyanova-BeninskaVPenttilaKMagrelliA.Haemophilia, state of the art and new therapeutic opportunities, a regulatory perspective. 2021; 87(11): 4183–4196. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14838.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chaudhari N, Ravi R, Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: Challenges and solutions. Perspect Clin Res 2020; 11(2): 64–69. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_206_19.ChaudhariNRaviRGogtayNJThatteUM.Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: Challenges and solutions. 2020; 11(2): 64–69. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_206_19.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Catherine NLA, Lever R, Marcellus L, et al. Retaining participants in community-based health research: A case example on standardized planning and reporting. Trials 2020; 21(1): 393. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04328-9.CatherineNLALeverRMarcellusL, Retaining participants in community-based health research: A case example on standardized planning and reporting. 2020; 21(1): 393. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04328-9.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mein G, Seale C, Rice H, et al. Altruism and participation in longitudinal health research? Insights from the Whitehall II Study. Soc Sci Med 2012; 75(12): 2345–52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.006.MeinGSealeCRiceH, Altruism and participation in longitudinal health research? Insights from the Whitehall II Study. 2012; 75(12): 2345–52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.006.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brueton V, Stenning SP, Stevenson F, Tierney J, Rait G. Best practice guidance for the use of strategies to improve retention in randomized trials developed from two consensus workshops. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 88: 122–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.010.BruetonVStenningSPStevensonFTierneyJRaitG.Best practice guidance for the use of strategies to improve retention in randomized trials developed from two consensus workshops. 2017;88:122–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.010.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rosal MC, White MJ, Borg A, et al. Translational research at community health centers: challenges and successes in recruiting and retaining low-income La-tino patients with type 2 diabetes into a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Educ 2010; 36(5): 733–49. doi: 10.1177/0145721710380146.RosalMCWhiteMJBorgA, Translational research at community health centers: challenges and successes in recruiting and retaining low-income La-tino patients with type 2 diabetes into a randomized clinical trial. 2010; 36(5): 733–49. doi: 10.1177/0145721710380146.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kadam RA, Borde SU, Madas SA, Salvi SS, Limaye SS. Challenges in recruitment and retention of clinical trial subjects. Perspect Clin Res 2016; 7(3): 137–43. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184820.KadamRABordeSUMadasSASalviSSLimayeSS.Challenges in recruitment and retention of clinical trial subjects. 2016; 7(3): 137–43. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184820.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Otado J, Kwagyan J, Edwards D, Ukaegbu A, Rockcliffe F, Osafo N. Culturally competent strategies for recruitment and retention of African American populations into clinical trials. Clin Transl Sci 2015; 8(5): 460–6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12285.OtadoJKwagyanJEdwardsDUkaegbuARockcliffeFOsafoN.Culturally competent strategies for recruitment and retention of African American populations into clinical trials. 2015; 8(5): 460–6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12285.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fahim C, Hylton D, Simunovic M, et al. Development of the IRIS-AR strategy: an intervention to improve rates of accrual and retention for the VTE-PRO randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20(1): 447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3536-8.FahimCHyltonDSimunovicM, Development of the IRIS-AR strategy: an intervention to improve rates of accrual and retention for the VTE-PRO randomized controlled trial. 2019; 20(1): 447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3536-8.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Crom DB, Tyc VL, Rai SN, et al. Retention of survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a longitudinal study of bone mineral density. J Child Health Care 2006; 10(4): 337–50. doi: 10.1177/1367493506067886.CromDBTycVLRaiSN, Retention of survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a longitudinal study of bone mineral density. 2006; 10(4): 337–50. doi: 10.1177/1367493506067886.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Northouse LL, Rosset T, Phillips L, Mood D, Schafenacker A, Kershaw T. Research with families facing cancer: the challenges of accrual and retention. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29(3): 199–211. doi: 10.1002/nur.20128.NorthouseLLRossetTPhillipsLMoodDSchafenackerAKershawT.Research with families facing cancer: the challenges of accrual and retention. 2006; 29(3): 199–211. doi: 10.1002/nur.20128.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gemmill R, Williams AC, Cooke L, Grant M. Challenges and strategies for recruitment and retention of vulnerable research participants: promoting the benefits of participation. Appl Nurs Res 2012; 25(2): 101–7. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2010.02.003.GemmillRWilliamsACCookeLGrantM.Challenges and strategies for recruitment and retention of vulnerable research participants: promoting the benefits of participation. 2012; 25(2): 101–7. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2010.02.003.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kinuthia J, Ronen K, Unger JA, et al. SMS messaging to improve retention and viral suppression in prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programs in Kenya: A 3-arm randomized clinical trial. PLoS Med 2021; 18(5): e1003650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003650.KinuthiaJRonenKUngerJA, SMS messaging to improve retention and viral suppression in prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programs in Kenya: A 3-arm randomized clinical trial. 2021; 18(5): e1003650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003650.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Roy A, Lieb W, Garrett B, et al. Recruitment and retention strategies in a clinical trial for children with chronic hepatitis C infection. J Pediatr Nurs 2013; 28(3): 243–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2012.08.006.RoyALiebWGarrettB, Recruitment and retention strategies in a clinical trial for children with chronic hepatitis C infection. 2013; 28(3): 243–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2012.08.006.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gul RB, Ali PA. Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19(1-2): 227–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03041.x.GulRBAliPA.Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants. 2010; 19(1-2): 227–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03041.x.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leighton PA, Brealey SD, Dias JJ. Interventions to improve retention in a surgical, clinical trial: A pragmatic, stakeholder-driven approach. J Evid Based Med 2018; 11(1): 12–19. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12271.LeightonPABrealeySDDiasJJ.Interventions to improve retention in a surgical, clinical trial: A pragmatic, stakeholder-driven approach. 2018; 11(1): 12–19. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12271.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Regan EM. Clinical trials informed consent: An educational intervention to improve nurses' knowledge and communications skills. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2018; 22(6): E152–E158. doi: 10.1188/18.CJON.E152-E158.ReganEM.Clinical trials informed consent: An educational intervention to improve nurses' knowledge and communications skills. 2018; 22(6): E152–E158. doi: 10.1188/18.CJON.E152-E158.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Penkofer S, Byrn M, Mumby P, Ferrans CE. Improving subject recruitment, retention, and participation in research through Peplau's theory of interpersonal relations. Nurs Sci Q 2011; 24(2): 146–51. doi: 10.1177/0894318411399454.PenkoferSByrnMMumbyPFerransCE.Improving subject recruitment, retention, and participation in research through Peplau's theory of interpersonal relations. 2011; 24(2): 146–51. doi: 10.1177/0894318411399454.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hood B. Exploring nurses' experiences of caring for patients participating in cancer clinical trials. Br J Nurs 2022; 31(17): S18–S24. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.17.S18.HoodB.Exploring nurses' experiences of caring for patients participating in cancer clinical trials. 2022; 31(17): S18–S24. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.17.S18.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Morse EV, Simon PM, Besch CL, Walker J. Issues of recruitment, retention, and compliance in community-based clinical trials with traditionally underserved populations. Appl Nurs Res 1995; 8(1): 8–14. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(95)80240-1.MorseEVSimonPMBeschCLWalkerJ.Issues of recruitment, retention, and compliance in community-based clinical trials with traditionally underserved populations. 1995; 8(1): 8–14. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(95)80240-1.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Katz BP, et al. Subject retention and adherence in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51(6): 933–40. doi: 10.1002/art.20831.MazzucaSABrandtKDKatzBP, Subject retention and adherence in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug. 2004; 51(6): 933–40. doi: 10.1002/art.20831.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fletcher S, Jenner K, Pembroke L, Holland M, Khair K. The experiences of people with haemophilia and their families of gene therapy in a clinical trial setting: regaining control, the Exigency study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17(1): 155. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02256-2.FletcherSJennerKPembrokeLHollandMKhairK.The experiences of people with haemophilia and their families of gene therapy in a clinical trial setting: regaining control, the Exigency study. 2022; 17(1): 155. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02256-2.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Berger AM, Edwards Neumark D, Chamberlain J. Enhancing recruitment and retention in randomized clinical trials of cancer symptom management. Oncol Nurs Forum 2007; 34(2): E17–22. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.E17-E22.BergerAM, Edwards NeumarkDChamberlainJ.Enhancing recruitment and retention in randomized clinical trials of cancer symptom management. 2007; 34(2): E17–22. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.E17-E22.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Robinson KA, Dinglas VD, Sukrithan V, et al. Updated systematic review identifies substantial number of retention strategies: using more strategies retains more study participants. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68(12): 1481–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.013.RobinsonKADinglasVDSukrithanV, Updated systematic review identifies substantial number of retention strategies: using more strategies retains more study participants. 2015; 68(12): 1481–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.013.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar