Seeing the bigger picture: Qualitative research in the Zoom^® age

1 World Health Organization. WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. Available at https://www.who.int/toolkits/whoqol (accessed December 2021). World Health Organization WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life Available at https://www.who.int/toolkits/whoqol (accessed December 2021). Search in Google Scholar

2 Osborne TR, Ramsenthaler C, Siegert RJ, et al. What issues matter most to people with multiple myeloma and how well are we measuring them? A systematic review of quality of life tools. Eur J Haematol 2012; 89: 437–457 doi:10.1111/ejh.12012. OsborneTR RamsenthalerC SiegertRJ What issues matter most to people with multiple myeloma and how well are we measuring them? A systematic review of quality of life tools Eur J Haematol 2012 89 437 457 10.1111/ejh.12012 22985406 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3 Koot HM. The study of quality of life: concepts and methods. In: Koot HM., Wallender JL eds. Quality of Life in Child and Adolescent Illness. New York, Taylor and Francois Inc; 2001:3–21. KootHM The study of quality of life: concepts and methods In: KootHM. WallenderJL eds. Quality of Life in Child and Adolescent Illness New York Taylor and Francois Inc 2001 3 21 Search in Google Scholar

4 Parens E, Asch A. Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2003;9(1):40–47 doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.10056. ParensE AschA Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 2003 9 1 40 47 doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.10056. 10.1002/mrdd.1005612587137 Search in Google Scholar

5 Macduff C. Respondent-generated quality of life measures: useful tools for nursing or more fool's gold? J Adv Nurs 2000; 32(2): 375–382 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01486.x. MacduffC Respondent-generated quality of life measures: useful tools for nursing or more fool's gold? J Adv Nurs 2000 32 2 375 382 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01486.x 10964185 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6 Fletcher S, Jenner K, Holland M, Khair K. The lived experience of a novel disruptive therapy in a group of men and boys with haemophilia A with inhibitors: Emi & Me. Health Expect. 2021;1–12. doi:10.1111/hex.13404. FletcherS JennerK HollandM KhairK The lived experience of a novel disruptive therapy in a group of men and boys with haemophilia A with inhibitors: Emi & Me Health Expect. 2021 1 12 10.1111/hex.13404 884924634878209 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7 Fletcher S, Jenner K, Holland M, Chaplin S, Khair K. An exploration of why men with severe haemophilia might not want gene therapy: The exigency study. Haemophilia 2021;27:760–768. doi: 10.1111/hae.14378. FletcherS JennerK HollandM ChaplinS KhairK An exploration of why men with severe haemophilia might not want gene therapy: The exigency study Haemophilia 2021 27 760 768 10.1111/hae.14378 34265145 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8 Khair K, Steadman L, Chaplin S, Holland M, Jenner K, Fletcher S. Parental perspectives on gene therapy for children with haemophilia: the Exigency study. Haemophilia 2020; 27(1): 120–128. doi: 10.1111/hae.14188. KhairK SteadmanL ChaplinS HollandM JennerK FletcherS Parental perspectives on gene therapy for children with haemophilia: the Exigency study Haemophilia 2020 27 1 120 128 10.1111/hae.14188 33216422 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9 Fletcher S, Jenner K, Pembroke L, Holland M, Khair K. The experience of people with haemophilia undergoing gene therapy in a clinical trial setting: Regaining Control, an Exigency Study (manuscript submitted for publication, 2021). FletcherS JennerK PembrokeL HollandM KhairK The experience of people with haemophilia undergoing gene therapy in a clinical trial setting: Regaining Control, an Exigency Study (manuscript submitted for publication, 2021) 10.1186/s13023-022-02256-2898174735379267 Search in Google Scholar

10 Charon R. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA 2001; 286(15): 1897–902. doi:10.1001/jama.286.15.1897. CharonR Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust JAMA 2001 286 15 1897 902 10.1001/jama.286.15.1897 11597295 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11 Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med 2011; 86(3): 359–64. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1. HojatM LouisDZ MarkhamFW WenderR RabinowitzC GonnellaJS Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients Acad Med 2011 86 3 359 64 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1 21248604 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12 Attar HS, Chandramani S. Impact of physician empathy on migraine disability and migraineur compliance. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2012; 15(Suppl 1): S89–94. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.100025 AttarHS ChandramaniS Impact of physician empathy on migraine disability and migraineur compliance Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2012 15 Suppl 1 S89 94 10.4103/0972-2327.100025344422023024571 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13 Carey MA, Smith MW. Capturing the group effect in focus groups: a special concern in analysis. Qualitative Health Research 1994; 4(1): 123–127. doi.10.1177/104973239400400108 CareyMA SmithMW Capturing the group effect in focus groups: a special concern in analysis Qualitative Health Research 1994 4 1 123 127 10.1177/104973239400400108 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14 Kaplowitz MD, Hoehn JP. Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation? Ecological Economics 2001; 36(2): 237–247 doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00226-3. KaplowitzMD HoehnJP Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation? Ecological Economics 2001 36 2 237 247 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00226-3 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15 MacDougall C, Baum F. The devil's advocate: a strategy to avoid groupthink and stimulate discussion in focus groups. Qualitative Health Research 1997; 7 (4): 532–541. doi10.1177/104973239700700407. MacDougallC BaumF The devil's advocate: a strategy to avoid groupthink and stimulate discussion in focus groups Qualitative Health Research 1997 7 4 532 541 10.1177/104973239700700407 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16 Khair K, Phillott A, Loran C, Pollard D, Forrester C, Alavian S, Hook S. HaemophiliaLIVE: an ethnographic study on the impact of haemophilia on daily life. J Haem Pract 2014;1(3): 14–20. doi: 10.17225/jhp.00030. KhairK PhillottA LoranC PollardD ForresterC AlavianS HookS HaemophiliaLIVE: an ethnographic study on the impact of haemophilia on daily life J Haem Pract 2014 1 3 14 20 10.17225/jhp.00030 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17 Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, Lawless M. Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2019; 18: 1–8. doi:10.1177/1609406919874596. ArchibaldMM AmbagtsheerRC CaseyMG LawlessM Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2019 18 1 8 10.1177/1609406919874596 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18 Gray LM, Wong-Wylie G, Rempel GR, Cook K. Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: Zoom video communications. The Qualitative Report 2020; 25(5): 1292–1301. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212. GrayLM Wong-WylieG RempelGR CookK Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: Zoom video communications The Qualitative Report 2020 25 5 1292 1301 10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar