[Alexander, Gerianne M. 2003. An Evolutionary Perspective of Sex-Typed Toy Preferences: Pink, Blue, and the Brain. – Archives of Sexual Behaviour 32 (1): 7–14.10.1023/A:1021833110722]Search in Google Scholar
[Banks, Sharon. 1979. Gift-Giving: A Review and an Interactive Paradigm. – Advances in Consumer Research 6: 319–324.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barker, John and Susie Weller. 2003. “Is It Fun?” Developing Children Centered Research Methods. – International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23 (1): 33–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330310790435.10.1108/01443330310790435]Search in Google Scholar
[Belk, Russell W. 1977. Gift-Giving Behaviour. Faculty Working Papers. Urbana, IL; Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. https://archive.org/stream/giftgivingbehavi450belk?ref=ol#page/n5/mode/2up (accessed September 21, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Belk, Russell W. 1988. Possessions and the Extended Self. – Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 139–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209154.10.1086/209154]Search in Google Scholar
[Best, Joel. 1998. Too Much Fun: Toys as Social Problems and the Interpretation of Culture. – Symbolic Interaction 21 (2): 197–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1998.21.2.197.10.1525/si.1998.21.2.197]Search in Google Scholar
[Blakemore, Judith and Renee Centers. 2005. Characteristics of Boys’ and Girls’ Toys. – Sex Roles 53: 619–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7729-0.10.1007/s11199-005-7729-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Bremner, Pauline. 2008. Gift Giving to Children at Christmas and Birthdays. A Conference Paper. – Annual Conference of the Academy of Marketing (AM2008): Reflective Marketing in a Material World, 8–10 July 2008, Aberdeen, UK. https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/247930/gift-giving-to-children-at-christmas-and-birthdays (accessed September 22, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Briggs, Charles L. 2020. Moving Beyond “the Media”: Critical Intersections between Traditionalization and Mediatization. – Journal of Folklore Research 57 (2): 81–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/jfolkrese.57.2.03.10.2979/jfolkrese.57.2.03]Search in Google Scholar
[Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bryant, Brenda K. 1985. The Neighborhood Walk: Sources of Support in Middle Childhood. – Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 50 (3): 122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3333847.10.2307/3333847]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckingham, David. 2011. The Material Child: Growing up in Consumer Culture. Cambridge: Polity.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bustad, Leo K. 1996. Recent Discoveries About Our Relationships with the Natural World. – Compassion: Our Last Great Hope – Selected Speeches of Leo K. Bustad. Renton, WA: Delta Society, 1–12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Charles, Nickie and Charlotte Aull Davies. 2008. My Family and Other Animals: Pets as Kin. – Sociological Research Online 13 (5): 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1798.10.5153/sro.1798]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen, Pia Monrad and Allison James, eds. 2000. Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices. London: Falmer Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Couldry, Nick and Andreas Hepp. 2016. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Csikszentmihalyi, Mikaly and Eugene Rochberg-Halton. 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167611.10.1017/CBO9781139167611]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, Gary; Susan Whelan, Anthony Foley and Margaret Walsh. 2010. Gifts and Gifting. – International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (4): 413–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00271.x.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00271.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Einarsdóttir, Johanna. 2007. Research with Children: Methodological and Ethical Challenges. – European Early Childhood Education 15 (2): 197–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13502930701321477.10.1080/13502930701321477]Search in Google Scholar
[Eisenberg, Nancy. 1982. The Development of Reasoning regarding Prosocial Behavior. – The Development of Prosocial Behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press, 220–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-234980-5.50014-6.10.1016/B978-0-12-234980-5.50014-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Eisewicht, Paul and Heiko Kirschner. 2015. Giving in on the Field: Localizing Life-World Analytic Ethnography in Mediatized Fields. – Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 44 (5): 657–673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241615595437.10.1177/0891241615595437]Search in Google Scholar
[Fifield, Sarah and Darryl Forsyth. 1999. A Pet for the Children: Factors Related to Family Pet Ownership. – Anthrozoös 12 (1): 24–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/089279399787000426.10.2752/089279399787000426]Search in Google Scholar
[Galimberti, Gabriele. 2014. Toy Stories: Photos of Children from Around the World and Their Favorite Things. New York, NY: Abrams Image.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerbner, George. 1969. Toward ‘Cultural Indicators’: The Analysis of Mass Mediated Public Message Systems. – The Analysis of Communication Content: Developments in Scientific Theories and Computer Techniques, edited by George Gerbner in collaboration with Ole R. Holsti, Klaus Krippendorff, William J. Paisley and Philip J. Stone. New York, NY: Wiley, 123–132.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halkoaho, Jenniina and Pirjo Laaksonen. 2009. Understanding What Christmas Gifts Mean to Children. – Young Consumers 10 (3): 248–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17473610910986053.10.1108/17473610910986053]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartmann, Waltraut and Gilles Brougere. 2008. Toy Culture in Preschool Education and Children’s Toy Preferences. – Toys, Games, and Media, edited by Jeffrey Goldstein in collaboration with David Buckingham and Gilles Brougere. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 37–54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hepp, Andreas; Stig Hjarvard and Knut Lundby. 2015. Mediatization: Theorizing the Interplay between Media, Culture and Society. – Media, Culture & Society (2): 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715573835.10.1177/0163443715573835]Search in Google Scholar
[Hjarvard, Stig. 2008. The Mediatization of Society. – Nordicom Review 29 (2): 105–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0181.10.1515/nor-2017-0181]Search in Google Scholar
[Hjarvard, Stig. 2014. Mediatization and Cultural and Social Change: An Institutional Perspective. – Mediatization of Communication. Handbooks of Communication Science 21, edited by Knut Lund by. Berlin: De Gruyter, 199–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v8i1p21-44.10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v8i1p21-44]Search in Google Scholar
[Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crises of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691214429]Search in Google Scholar
[John, Deborah Roedder. 1999. Consumer Socialization of Children: A Retrospective Look at Twenty-Five Years of Research. – Journal of Consumer Research 26 (3): 183–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209559.10.1086/209559]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalmus, Veronika. 2004. What Do Pupils and Textbooks Do with Each Other? Methodological Problems of Research on Socialization through Educational Media. – Journal of Curriculum Studies 36: 469−485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270310001630670.10.1080/00220270310001630670]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalmus, Veronika and Triin Roosalu. 2012. Institutional Filters on Children’s Internet Use: An Additional Explanation of Cross-National Differences in Parental Mediation. – E-Youth: Balancing between Opportunities and Risks, edited by Michel Walrave in collaboration with Wannes Heirman, Sara Mels, Christiane Timmerman and Heidi Vandebosch. Oxford: Peter Lang Publishers House, 235–250.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kantar Emor. 2020. “Kompass 2020” Eesti elanikkonna trendiuuring. Available upon request at https://www.kantaremor.ee/teenuse-kategooria/trendiuuringud/ (accessed September 29, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kleine, Dorothy; Gemma Pearson and Sammia Poveda. 2016. Method Guide 8. Participatory Methods: Engaging Children’s Voices and Experiences in Research.http://globalkidsonline.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Guide-8-Participatory-methods-Kleine-Pearson-Poveda.pdf (accessed September 21, 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Krotz, Friedrich. 2009. Mediatization: A Concept with Which to Grasp Media and Societal Change. – Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, edited by Knut Lundby. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 21–40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kutsar, Dagmar; Kairi Kasearu and Triin Kurrikoff. 2012. Family Trends and Changing Parenting Practices in Estonia. – Cognition, Brain, Behaviour: An Interdisciplinary Journal 16 (2): 171–190.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kyronlampi-Kylmanen, Taina and Kaarina Maatta. 2011. Using Children as Research Subjects: How to Interview a Child Aged 5 to 7 Years. – Educational Research and Reviews 6 (1): 87–93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lauristin, Marju; Peeter Vihalemm, Veronika Kalmus, Margit Keller, Maie Kiisel, Anu Masso, Signe Opermann, Külliki Seppel and Triin Vihalemm. 2017. Teoreetiline hoovõtt: ühiskond ja elavik. – Eesti ühiskond kiirenevas ajas. Uuringu “Mina. Maailm. Meedia” 2002–2014 tulemused, edited by Peeter Vihalemm in collaboration with Marju Lauristin, Veronika Kalmus and Triin Vihalemm. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, 1–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Livingstone, Sonia. 2009. On the Mediation of Everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008. – Journal of Communication 59 (1): 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01401.x.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01401.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Livingstone, Sonia. 2011. If Everything Is Mediated, What Is Distinctive About the Field of Communication? – International Journal of Communication (5): 1472–1475.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lopez, Alberto and Rachel Rodriguez. 2018. Children and Their Brands: How Young Consumers Relate to Brands. – Journal of Consumer Marketing 35 (2): 130–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-06-2016-1842.10.1108/JCM-06-2016-1842]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundby, Knut. 2014. Introduction: Mediatization of Communication. – Mediatization of Communication. Handbooks of Communication Science 21, edited by Knut Lundby. Berlin: De Gruyter, 3–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.10.1515/9783110272215]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyon, Philippa. 2020. Using Drawing in Visual Research: Materializing the Invisible. – The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, edited by Luc Pauwels and Dawn Mannay. London: Sage Publishing, 297–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526417015.n18.10.4135/9781526417015.n18]Search in Google Scholar
[Marshall, David and Robert Aitken. 2006. Putting Brands in the Picture: Children’s Drawings of Their Favourite Things. – Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research 7, edited by Margaret Craig Lees, Teresa Davis and Gary Gregory. Sidney: Association for Consumer Research: 268–276.]Search in Google Scholar
[Masso, Anu; Marju Lauristin, Signe Opermann and Veronika Kalmus. 2020. Applying the Morphogenetic Perspective for the Analysis of Estonian Social Transformations. – Researching Estonian Transformation: Morphogenetic Reflections, edited by Veronika Kalmus in collaboration with Marju Lauristin, Signe Opermann and Triin Vihalemm. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 1–31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mauss, Marcel. 1966 [1925]. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen and West. https://archive.org/details/giftformsfunctio00maus (accessed December 30, 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Melson, F. Gail. 1988. Availability of and Involvement with Pets by Children: Determinants and Correlates. – Anthorozoos 2: 45–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/089279389787058181.10.2752/089279389787058181]Search in Google Scholar
[Melson, F. Gail. 2001. Why the Wild Things Are: Animals in the Lives of Children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Melson, F. Gail. 2003. Child Development and the Human-Companion Animal Bond. – American Behavioral Scientist 47 (1): 31–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203255210.10.1177/0002764203255210]Search in Google Scholar
[Mertala, Pekka; Hannele Karikoski, Liisa Tähtinen and Vesa-Matti Sarenius. 2016. The Value of Toys: 6–8-Year-Old Children’s Toy Preferences and the Functional Analysis of Popular Toys.– International Journal of Play 5 (1): 11–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2016.1147291.10.1080/21594937.2016.1147291]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, Anders. 2005. Children’s Toy Collections in Sweden: A Less Gender-Typed Country? – Sex Roles 52: 93–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1196-5.10.1007/s11199-005-1196-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevski, Elyna and Andra Siibak. 2016. Mediation Practices of Parents and Older Siblings in Guiding Toddlers’ Touchscreen Technology Use: An Ethnographic Case Study. – Media Education – Studi, richerche e buone pratiche 7 (2): 320–340.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Cass, Aron and Peter Clarke. 2001. Dear Santa, Do You Have My Brand? A Study of the Brand Requests, Awareness and Request Styles at Christmas Time. – Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2 (1): 37–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.88.10.1002/cb.88]Search in Google Scholar
[Parsons, Andrew G. and Paul W. Ballantine. 2008. The Gifts We Buy for Children. – Young Consumers 9 (4): 308–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17473610810920515.10.1108/17473610810920515]Search in Google Scholar
[Paus-Hasebrink, Ingrid. 2018. The Role of Media within Children’s Socialization: A Praxeological Approach. – Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 44 (4): 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-2016.10.1515/commun-2018-2016]Search in Google Scholar
[Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, Pille; Taavi Tatsi, Pille Runnel and Agnes Aljas. 2014. Researching Audience in Museums: A Multimethod and Multisite Interventionist Approach. – Audience Research Methodologies Between Innovation and Consolidation, edited by Geoffroy Patriarche in collaboration with Helena Bilandzic, Jakob Linaa Jensen and Jelena Juršic. New York, NY; London: Routledge, 87–106.]Search in Google Scholar
[Renslow, Jillian and Jonathan Maupin. 2017. Draw-and-Write Technique Elicits Children’s Perceptions of Health in the USA and Guatemala. – Health Education Journal 77 (1): 15–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896917735569.10.1177/0017896917735569]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834.10.7312/rosa14834]Search in Google Scholar
[Runnel, Pille. 2015. Post Scriptum. Making of: The Challenges of Exhibition Production. – Hopeless Youth, edited by Francisco Martinez and Pille Runnel. Tartu: Estonian National Museum, 526–544.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runnel, Pille and Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, eds. 2014. Democratising the Museum: Reflections on Participatory Technologies. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03972-6.10.3726/978-3-653-03972-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Schultz Kleine, Susan; Robert E. Kleine and Chris T. Allen. 1995. How is a Possession “Me” or “Not Me”? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment. – Journal of Consumer Research 22 (3): 327–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209454.10.1086/209454]Search in Google Scholar
[Schütz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann. 1973. The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Slotterback, Carole. 2006. Terrorism, Altruism, and Patriotism: An Examination of Children’s Letters to Santa Claus 1998–2002. – Current Psychology 25 (2): 144–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-006-1009-1.10.1007/s12144-006-1009-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Talves, Kairi and Veronika Kalmus. 2015. Gendered Mediation of Children’s Internet Use: A Keyhole for Looking into Changing Socialization Practices. – Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 9 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-4.10.5817/CP2015-1-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Tatlow-Golden, Mimi and Suzanne Guerin. 2010. My Favourite Things to Do and My Favourite People: Exploring Salient Aspects of Children’s Self-Concept. – Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research 17 (4): 545–562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210364667.10.1177/0907568210364667]Search in Google Scholar
[Todd, Brenda; Rico Antonio Fischer, Steven Costa, Amanda Roestorf, Kate Harbour, Paul Hardiman and John A. Barry. 2017. Sex Differences in Children’s Toy Preferences: A Systematic Review, Meta-Regression, and Meta-Analysis. – Infant and Child Development 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2064.10.1002/icd.2064]Search in Google Scholar
[Wærdahl, Randi; Veronika Kalmus and Margit Keller. 2009. Consumer Socialisation and Value Orientations among Estonian and Chinese Young People. – Children & Society 25: 127–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00271.x.10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00271.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiseman, Nicola; Cristin Rossmann, Jessica Lee and Neil Harris. 2019. “It’s Like You Are in the Jungle”: Using the Draw-and-Tell Method to Explore Preschool Children’s Play Preferences and Factors That Shape Their Active Play. – Health Promotion Journal of Australia 30: 85–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.209.10.1002/hpja.209]Search in Google Scholar
[Wegener-Spöhring, Gisela. 2008. War Toys in the World of Fourth Graders: 1985 and 2002. –Toys, Games, and Media, edited by Jeffrey Goldstein in collaboration with David Buckingham and Giller Brougere. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 19–36.]Search in Google Scholar
