[
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Ferretti, M., and Parmentola, A. 2012. An individual‐level assessment of the relationship between spin‐off activities and research performance in universities. R&D Management 42 (3): 225-242.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abramo, G., and D’Angelo, C. A. 2014. How do you define and measure research productivity?. Scientometrics 101 (2): 1129-1144.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aistrich, M., Saghafi, M. M., and Sciglimpaglia, D. 2006. Ivory tower or real world: do educators and practitioners see the same world? Marketing Education Review 16 (3): 73-80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aksnes, D. W., and Rip, A. 2009. Researchers’ perceptions of citations. Research Policy 38 (6): 895-905.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alfirević, N., Vican, D. and Pavičić, J. 2018. What Drives the Perception of School Principals as Professional Managers in Small European Countries? The Case of Croatia. Croatian Journal of Education 20 (4): 1299-1325.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bensman, S. J. 2012. The impact factor: Its place in Garfield’s thought, in science evaluation, and in library collection management. Scientometrics 92 (2): 263-275.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bordignon, F. 2021. Dataset of search queries to map scientific publications to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Data in Brief 34: 106731. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.106731)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bornmann, L. 2017. Measuring impact in research evaluations: a thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements. Higher Education 73 (5): 775-787.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brajdić Vuković, M., Vignjević Korotaj, B., and Ćulum Ilić, B. 2020. STEM colonization: Applying hard sciences’ socio-organisational patterns and evaluation procedures to the soft sciences in Croatia. European Journal of Education 55 (4): 542-559.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butt, M. M., Huisman, J., Hussain, D., Alam, M., and Amin, M. 2021. Antecedents and consequences of students’ attitudes towards internationally accredited business schools: a signalling theory perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. (https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2021.1942388)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ciurak, P., Mijač, T. and Wierczyński, G. 2021. An overview of science evaluation in Poland and Croatia. Management – Journal of Contemporary Management Issues 26 (2): 229-244.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chudlarský, T., and Dvořák, J. 2020. Can Crossref citations replace Web of Science for research evaluation? The share of open citations. Journal of Data and Information Science 5 (4): 35-42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cucari, N., Tutore, I., Montera, R., and Profita, S. 2022. A bibliometric performance analysis of publication productivity in the corporate social responsibility field: Outcomes of SciVal analytics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. (https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2346)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dimzov, S., Matošić, M., and Urem, I. 2021. University rankings and institutional affiliations: Role of academic librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 47 (5): 102387. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102387)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Donovan, C. 2011. State of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issue. Research Evaluation 20 (3): 175-179.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dresbeck, R. 2015. SciVal. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 103 (3): 164.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellegaard, O., and Wallin, J. A. 2015. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics 105: 1809-1831.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garfield, E. 1971/1977. The Mystery of the Transposed Journal Lists - Wherein Bradford’s Law of Scattering Is Generalized According to Garfield’s Law of Concentration, Current Contents, 7 (5). Reprinted in Garfield, E. 1977. Essays of an Information Scientist, ISI Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garfield, E. 1972. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science 178 (4060): 471-479.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garfield, E. 1979. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics 1 (4): 359-375.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garfield, E. 2006. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 295 (1), 90-93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glänzel, W., and de Lange, C. 2002. A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 54 (1): 75–89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grotkowska, G., Wincenciak, L., and Gajderowicz, T. 2015. Ivory-tower or market-oriented enterprise: The role of higher education institutions in shaping graduate employability in the domain of science. Higher Education Research & Development 34 (5): 869-882.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gulbrandsen, M., and Smeby, J. C. 2005. Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy 34 (6): 932-950.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall, C. M., and Page, S. J. 2015. Following the impact factor: Utilitarianism or academic compliance? Tourism Management 51: 309-312.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hedrick, D. W., Henson, S. E., Krieg, J. M., and Wassell Jr, C. S. 2010. The effects of AACSB accreditation on faculty salaries and productivity. Journal of Education for Business 85 (5): 284-291.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herman, R. D., and Renz, D. O. 2004. Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review 64 (6): 694-704.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herman, R. D., and Renz, D. O. 2008. Advancing nonprofit organizational effectiveness research and theory: Nine theses. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 18 (4): 399-415.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., and Rafols, I. 2015. Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520 (7548): 429-431.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ibáñez, A., Bielza, C., and Larrañaga, P. 2013. Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: a case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–2009. Scientometrics 95 (2): 689–716.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Katz, J., and Hicks, D. 1997. How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40 (3): 541-554.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ke, S. W., Lin, W. C., and Tsai, C. F. 2016. Research performance of AACSB accredited institutions in Taiwan: before versus after accreditation. SpringerPlus 5: 1285.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kleinman, D. L., Feinstein, N. W., and Downey, G. 2013. Beyond commercialization: Science, higher education and the culture of neoliberalism. Science & Education 22 (10): 2385-2401.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
König, Lj.S. and Maškarin Ribarić, H. 2019. Is there a mismatch between employers’ and university teachers’ perceptions on graduate employability in Croatia?. Management – Journal of Contemporary Management Issues 24 (1): 87-102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Körfgen, A., Förster, K., Glatz, I., Maier, S., Becsi, B., Meyer, A., Kromp-Kolb, H. and Stötter, J. 2018. It’s a Hit! Mapping Austrian research contributions to the sustainable development goals. Sustainability 10 (9): 3295. (https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093295)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Law, R., and Leung, D. 2020. Journal impact factor: A valid symbol of journal quality? Tourism Economics 26 (5): 734-742.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, F., Guo, W., and Zuo, C. 2018. High impact factor journals have more publications than expected. Current Science 114 (5): 955–956.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Low, W. Y., Ng, K. H., Kabir, M. A., Koh, A. P., and Sinnasamy, J. 2014. Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia. Scientometrics 98 (2): 1521-1533.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowe, R. A., and Gonzalez-Brambila, C. 2007. Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity. The Journal of Technology Transfer 32: 173-194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McManus, C., Baeta Neves, A. A., Maranhão, A. Q., Souza Filho, A. G., and Santana, J. M. 2020. International collaboration in Brazilian science: financing and impact. Scientometrics 125 (3): 2745-2772.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mingers, J., and Willmott, H. 2013. Taylorizing business school research: On the ‘one best way’ performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations 66 (8): 1051-1073.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miranda, R., & Garcia-Carpintero, E. 2019. Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas. Scientometrics 121 (1): 479-501.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitra, D., and Golder, P. N. 2008. Does academic research help or hurt MBA programs?. Journal of Marketing 72 (5): 31-49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moed, H. F. 2009. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis 57 (1): 13-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen, T. V., Ho-Le, T. P., and Le, U. V. 2017. International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: an analysis of patterns and impact. Scientometrics 110 (2): 1035-1051.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norris, M., and Oppenheim, C. 2007. Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of Informetrics 1 (2): 161-169.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavičić, J., Alfirević, N., and Mihanović, Z. 2009. Market orientation in managing relationships with multiple constituencies of Croatian higher education. Higher Education 57 (2): 191-207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlović, D. 2022. How to approach state capture in post-communist Europe. A new research agenda. Journal of Contemporary European Studies: 1-19. (https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2106951)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pečlin, S., Južnič, P., Blagus, R., Sajko, M. Č., and Stare, J. 2012. Effects of international collaboration and status of journal on impact of papers. Scientometrics 93 (3): 937-948.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peters, K. 2007. Business school rankings: content and context. Journal of Management Development 26 (1): 49-53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips, P. A., Page, S and Sebu, J. 2020. Business and management research themes and impact [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 not approved]. Emerald Open Research 2:67 (https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13987.1)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Podlubny, I. 2005. Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science. Scientometrics 64 (1): 95-99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Purkayastha, A., Palmaro, E., Falk-Krzesinski, H.J., and Baas, J. 2019. Comparison of two article level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR). Journal of Informetrics 13 (2): 635–642.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberge, G., Kashnitsky, Y., and James, C. 2022. Elsevier 2022 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Mapping. Mendeley Data, V1 (https://doi.org/10.17632/6bjy52jkm9.1)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosi, M., Tuček, D., Potočan, V., and Jurše, M. (2018). Market orientation of business schools: A development opportunity for the business model of university business schools in transition countries. Ekonomie+Management 21 (4): 175-194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siemens, J. C., Burton, S., Jensen, T., and Mendoza, N. A. 2005. An examination of the relationship between research productivity in prestigious business journals and popular press business school rankings. Journal of Business Research 58 (4): 467-476.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simmons, R., and Smyth, J. 2016. Crisis of youth or youth in crisis? Education, employment and legitimation crisis. International Journal of Lifelong Education 35 (2): 136-152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šimić Banović, R. 2019. Uhljeb–a post-socialist homo croaticus: a personification of the economy of favours in Croatia? Post-Communist Economies 31 (3): 279-300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomas, H., & Cornuel, E. 2012. Business schools in transition? Issues of impact, legitimacy, capabilities and re‐invention. Journal of Management Development 31 (4): 329-335.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vican, D., Alfirević, N., and Pavičić, J. 2017. Challenges Facing the Educational System, School Effectiveness and School Principals in Croatia. In Conference Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference “Future World by 2050”, edited by D. Križman Pavlović, M. Paulišić M., and K. Kostelić, 11-29. Pula: Juraj Dobrila University of Pula – Faculty of Economics and Tourism “Dr. Mijo Mirković”.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waltman, L., and van Eck, N. J. 2013. Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics 96 (3): 699-716.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. 2015. Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method. Journal of Informetrics 9 (4): 872-894.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waltman, L. 2016. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics 10 (2): 365-391.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, D., Song, C., and Barabási, A. L. 2013. Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 342 (6154): 127-132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Živković, Ž., and Panić, M. 2020. Development of science and education in the Western Balkan countries: competitiveness with the EU. Scientometrics 124 (3): 2319-2339.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Župič, I., and Čater, T. 2015. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods 18 (3): 429-472.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 