[Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A. 2002. Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. The Quarterly journal of economics 117 (4): 1231-129410.1162/003355302320935025]Search in Google Scholar
[Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A. 2005. Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Handbook of economic growth, edited by P. Aghion and S. Durlauf, 385-472. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Acemoglu, D. 2006. A simple model of inefficient institutions. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108 (4): 515-546.10.1111/j.1467-9442.2006.00460.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. 2010. The role of institutions in growth and development. Review of Economics and Institutions 1 (2): 1-33.10.5202/rei.v1i2.14]Search in Google Scholar
[Alston, J.L. 1996. Empirical work in institutional economics: an overview. In Empirical studies in institutional change, edited by L.J. Alston, Th. Eggertsson, and D.C. North, 25-30. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174633.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Alston, J.L. 2008. The ‘case’ for case studies in new institutional economics. In New institutional economics: a guidebook, edited by E. Brousseau and J. M. Glachant, 103-121. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511754043.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Aralica, Z., Svilokos, T., and Bacic, K. 2018. Institutions, and firms’ performances in transition countries: the case of the selected CESEE countries. The South East European Journal of Economics and Business 13 (1): 68-80.10.2478/jeb-2018-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Aron, J. 2000. Growth and institutions: a review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer 15 (1): 99-135.10.1093/wbro/15.1.99]Search in Google Scholar
[Bevan, A. A. and Estrin, S. 2004. The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics 32 (4): 775-787.10.1016/j.jce.2004.08.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Boettke, J.P. and Coyne, Ch. J. 2009. Context matters: institutions and entrepreneurship. foundations and trends in entrepreneurship 5 (3): 135-209.10.1561/0300000018]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowen, G. 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27-40.10.3316/QRJ0902027]Search in Google Scholar
[Brosig, M. 2011. The interplay of international institutions in Kosovo between convergence, confusion and niche capabilities. European Security 20 (2): 185-204.10.1080/09662839.2011.564614]Search in Google Scholar
[Burki, Sh. J. and Perry, G.E. 1998. Beyond the Washington consensus: institutions matter. World Bank Latin American and Caribbean studies; viewpoints. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.10.1596/0-8213-4282-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang, H.J. 2011. Institutions and economic development: theory, policy and history. Journal of Institutional Economics (4): 473-498.10.1017/S1744137410000378]Search in Google Scholar
[Coffey, A. 2014. Analyzing documents. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative analysis, edited by U. Flick, 367-380. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446282243.n25]Search in Google Scholar
[Coşkun, R. 2017. An objection to the “closed system” approach that attributed to the Classical Management in Management and Organization textbooks: a qualitative analysis on the implications of “open system” in selected books written before 1925. 8th International Social Sciences Conference in the Balkans, September 6-11, Constanta, Romania.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dauti, B. 2015. Determinants of foreign direct investment in transition economies, with special reference to Macedonia: evidence from gravity model. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 10 (2): 7-28.10.1515/jeb-2015-0007]Search in Google Scholar
[De Melo, M., Denizer, C. and Gelb, A. 1996. Patterns of transition from plan to market. The World Bank Economic Review 10 (3): 397-424.10.1093/wber/10.3.397]Search in Google Scholar
[Den Boer, N. and der Borgh, V.Ch. 2011. International statebuilding and contentious universities in Kosovo. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 5 (1): 67-88.10.1080/17502977.2011.541784]Search in Google Scholar
[Dewatripont, M. and Roland, G. 1992. Economic reform and dynamic political constraints. The Review of Economic Studies 59 (4): 703-730.10.2307/2297994]Search in Google Scholar
[Efendic, A. S. and Pugh, G. T. 2007. Institutions and economic performance: an overview of empirical research with the main focus on transition economies. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 2 (1): 25-30.10.2478/v10033-007-0012-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Efendic, A. S., Pugh, G.T., and Adnett N. 2011. Institutions and economic performance: A meta-regression analysis. European Journal of Political Economy 27 (3): 586-59910.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Efendic, A. and Pugh, G. 2015. Institutional effects on economic performance in post-socialist transition: a dynamic panel analysis. Acta Oeconomica 65 (4): 503-523.10.1556/032.65.2015.4.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Elo, S. and Kyngas, H. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1): 107-115.10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Engerman, S. and Sokoloff, K. 2005. Institutional and noninstitutional explanations of economic differences. In Handbook of new institutional economics, edited by C.]Search in Google Scholar
[Menard, and M.M. Shirley, 639-665. Berlin: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst, A. 2011. Fuzzy governance: state-building in Kosovo since 1999 as interaction between international and local actors. Democracy and Security 7 (2): 123-139.10.1080/17419166.2011.572781]Search in Google Scholar
[Estrin, S. and Uvalic. M. 2014. FDI into transition economies: are the Balkans different? Economics of Transition 22 (2): 281-312.10.1111/ecot.12040]Search in Google Scholar
[Furubotn, E.G. and Richter, R. 2010. Institutions and economic theory: the contribution of the new institutional economics: University of Michigan Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Graneheim, U.H. and Lundman, B. 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24 (2):105-112.10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Gow, J. 2009. Kosovo-the final frontier? from transitional administration to transitional statehood. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3 (2): 239-257.10.1080/17502970902830034]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, R.E. and Jones, Ch. I. 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1): 83-116.10.1162/003355399555954]Search in Google Scholar
[Harriss, J., Hunter, J., Lewis, C.M, 1995. Development and significance of nie. In The new institutional economics and third world development, edited by J. Harriss, J.Hunter, C.M. Lewis, 1-13. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203444290]Search in Google Scholar
[Hehir, A. 2009. NATO’s “Humanitarian intervention” in Kosovo: legal precedent or aberration? Journal of Human Rights 8 (3): 245-264.10.1080/14754830903110319]Search in Google Scholar
[Hsieh, H.F., and Shannon, S.E. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9): 1277-1288.10.1177/1049732305276687]Search in Google Scholar
[Keefer, P. and Knack, S. 1997. “Why don’t poor countries catch up? A cross‐national test of an institutional explanation. Economic inquiry 35 (3): 590-602.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb02035.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Keefer, P. and Knack, S. 1998. Political stability and economic stagnation. In The political dimension of economic growth, edited by S. Borner, M. Kaser, and M. Paldam., 136-153. Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-26284-7_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Khan, M. 1995. State failure in weak states: A critique of new institutional economics. In The new institutional economics and third world development, edited by Harriss, J., Hunter, J., Lewis, C.M, 71-86. Routledge.10.4324/9780203444290.pt2]Search in Google Scholar
[Knack, S. and Keefer, P. 1995. Institutions and economic performance: cross‐country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics 7 (3): 207-227.10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Krasniqi, A.B. and Mustafa, M. 2016. Small firm growth in a post-conflict environment: the role of human capital, institutional quality, and managerial capacities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 12 (4): 1165-1207.10.1007/s11365-016-0384-9]Search in Google Scholar
[La Porta, R., de Silanes, F.L., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. 1999. The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 222-279.10.1093/jleo/15.1.222]Search in Google Scholar
[Levi, M. 2008. A logic of institutional change. In the limits of rationality, edited by Levi, M. and Cook, S, 1-16. The University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. 2013. The constructivist credo. London and New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mair, J., Marti, I., and Ganly, K. 2007. Institutional voids as spaces of opportunity. European Business Forum 31(1): 35-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. 1989. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mayring, P. 2000. Qualitative content analysis. In Forum: qualitative social research 1(2) (database online). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385]Search in Google Scholar
[North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808678]Search in Google Scholar
[North, D.C. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97-112.10.1257/jep.5.1.97]Search in Google Scholar
[North, D.C. and Thomas, R.P. 1970. An economic theory of the growth of the western world. The Economic History Review 23 (1): 1-17.10.2307/2594560]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowell, S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., and Moules, N.J. 2017. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 1-13.10.1177/1609406917733847]Search in Google Scholar
[Pejovich, S. 1999. The effects of the interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic development. Journal of Markets and Morality 2 (2): 164-181.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pettifer, J. 2005. Kosova express: a journey in wartime: University of Wisconsin Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Redek, T. and Sušjan, A. 2005. The impact of institutions on economic growth: The case of transition economies. Journal of Economic Issues 39 (4): 995-1027.10.1080/00213624.2005.11506864]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F. 2004. Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of economic growth 9 (2): 131-165.10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85]Search in Google Scholar
[Roland, G. 2000. Transition and economics: politics, markets, and firms: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schreier, M. 2014. Qualitative content analysis. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, edited by U. Flick, 170-183. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781446282243.n12]Search in Google Scholar
[Skeith, L. and Gonsalves, C. 2017. Identifying the factors influencing practice variation in thrombosis medicine: A qualitative content analysis of published practice-pattern surveys. Thrombosis Research 159 (2017): 52-57.10.1016/j.thromres.2017.09.026]Search in Google Scholar
[Smallbone, D. and Welter, F. 2001. The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics 16 (4): 249-262.10.1023/A:1011159216578]Search in Google Scholar
[Sobel, R.S., Clark, J.R., and Lee, D.R. 2007. Freedom, barriers to entry, entrepreneurship, and economic progress. The Review of Austrian Economics 20 (4): 221-236.10.1007/s11138-007-0023-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Sobel, R.S. and Coyne, Ch. J. 2011. Cointegrating institutions: the time-series properties of country institutional measures. The Journal of Law and Economics 54 (1): 111-134.10.1086/652304]Search in Google Scholar
[Stake, R.E. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Svejnar, J. 2002. Transition economies: performance and challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1): 3-28.10.1257/0895330027058]Search in Google Scholar
[Tobin, G.A, and Begley, C.M. 2004. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing 48 (4): 388-396.10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Vitola, A. and Senfelde, M. 2015. The role of institutions in economic performance. Verslas: Teorija ir Praktika / Business: Theory and Practice 16(3): 271-279.10.3846/btp.2015.498]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiggins, S. and Davis, J. 2006. Economic institutions. IPPG briefing paper no. three. University of Manchester, Manchester. (Available online at http://www.ippg.org.uk/publications.html (Accessed October 9, 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamson, C.R. 2009. Informal institutions rule: institutional arrangements and economic performance. Public Choice 139 (3-4): 371-387.10.1007/s11127-009-9399-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, N., Radevic, D., Gherhes, C., and Vorley, T. 2017. The nature of corruption affecting entrepreneurship in transition economies: some lessons from Montenegro. The South East European Journal of Economics and Business 12 (2): 20-34.10.1515/jeb-2017-0014]Search in Google Scholar
[Yin, R.K. 2011. Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar