This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Aiston, S. J., & Jung, J. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: An international comparison. Gender and Education, 27(3), 205–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1024617AistonS. J.JungJ. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: An international comparison. , 27(3), 205–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1024617Search in Google Scholar
Akca, S., & Akbulut, M. (2018). Predatory journals in Turkey: An investigation through Beall’s list. Bilgi Dünyasi, 19(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2018.695AkcaS.AkbulutM. (2018). Predatory journals in Turkey: An investigation through Beall’s list. , 19(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2018.695Search in Google Scholar
Altbach, P. G., Yudkevich, M., & Rumbley, L. E. (2015). Academic inbreeding: Local challenge, global problem. Acia Pacific Education Review, 16, 317–330. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9391-8AltbachP. G.YudkevichM.RumbleyL. E. (2015). Academic inbreeding: Local challenge, global problem. , 16, 317–330. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9391-8Search in Google Scholar
Andersen, L. B., & Pallesen, T. (2008). “Not just for the money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 28–47. http://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887889AndersenL. B.PallesenT. (2008). “Not just for the money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions. , 11(1), 28–47. http://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887889Search in Google Scholar
Andras, P. (2011). Research: metrics, quality, and management implications. Research Evaluation, 20(2), 90–116. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876265AndrasP. (2011). Research: metrics, quality, and management implications. , 20(2), 90–116. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876265Search in Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. , 4(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189Search in Google Scholar
Baum, C. F. (2008). Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions. Stata Journal, 8(2), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0800800212BaumC. F. (2008). Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions. , 8(2), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0800800212Search in Google Scholar
Bedeian, A. G., Van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman III, H. H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309312BedeianA. G.Van FleetD. D.HymanH. H.III (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. , 12(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309312Search in Google Scholar
Besancenot, D., Huynh, K. V., & Faria, J. R. (2012). Search and research: The influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. Theory and Decision, 73, 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7BesancenotD.HuynhK. V.FariaJ. R. (2012). Search and research: The influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. , 73, 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7Search in Google Scholar
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton University Press.BoyerE. L. (1990). . Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Braxton, J. M., & Del Favero, M. (2002). Evaluating scholarship performance: Traditional and emergent assessment templates. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.43BraxtonJ. M.Del FaveroM. (2002). Evaluating scholarship performance: Traditional and emergent assessment templates. , 114, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.43Search in Google Scholar
Brinn, T., & Jones, M. J. (2008). The composition of editorial boards in accounting: A UK perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810842304BrinnT.JonesM. J. (2008). The composition of editorial boards in accounting: A UK perspective. , 21(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810842304Search in Google Scholar
Brogaard, J., Engelberg, J., & Parsons, C. A. (2014). Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations. Journal of Financial Economics, 111, 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jfineco.2013.10.006BrogaardJ.EngelbergJ.ParsonsC. A. (2014). Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations. , 111, 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.006Search in Google Scholar
Cao, C., Baas, J., Wagner, C.S., & Jonkers, K. (2020). Returning scientists and the emergence of China’s science system. Science and Public Policy, 47(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz056CaoC.BaasJ.WagnerC.S.JonkersK. (2020). Returning scientists and the emergence of China’s science system. , 47(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz056Search in Google Scholar
Chavarro, D., Rafols, I., & Tang, P. (2018). To what extent is inclusion in the Web of Science an indicator of journal ‘quality’? Research Evaluation, 27(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy001ChavarroD.RafolsI.TangP. (2018). To what extent is inclusion in the Web of Science an indicator of journal ‘quality’?, 27(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy001Search in Google Scholar
Christopher, J. (2021). The raw truth about paper mills. FEBS Letters, 595(13), 1751–1757. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.14143ChristopherJ. (2021). The raw truth about paper mills. , 595(13), 1751–1757. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.14143Search in Google Scholar
Csomós, G. (2024). Mapping the geography of editors-in-chief. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0002CsomósG. (2024). Mapping the geography of editors-in-chief. , 9(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0002Search in Google Scholar
Dawson, D., Morales, E., McKiernan, E. C., Schimanski, L. A., Niles, M. T., & Alperin, J. P. (2022). The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure. PLOS One, 17(4), e0265506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265506DawsonD.MoralesE.McKiernanE. C.SchimanskiL. A.NilesM. T.AlperinJ. P. (2022). The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure. , 17(4), e0265506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265506Search in Google Scholar
Demir, S. B. (2018). Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? Journal of Informetrics, 12, 1296–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008DemirS. B. (2018). Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?, 12, 1296–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008Search in Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101DiMaggioP.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. , 48(2), 147–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101Search in Google Scholar
Ductor, L., & Visser, B. (2022). When a co-author joins an editorial board. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 200, 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.014DuctorL.VisserB. (2022). When a co-author joins an editorial board. , 200, 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.014Search in Google Scholar
Floyd, S. W., Schroeder, D. M., & Finn, D. A. (1994). Only if I’m first author: Conflict over credit in management scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 734–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/256709FloydS. W.SchroederD. M.FinnD. A. (1994). Only if I’m first author: Conflict over credit in management scholarship. , 37, 734–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/256709Search in Google Scholar
Gasparyan, A. Y. (2013). Selecting your editorial board: Maintaining standards. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28(7), 972–973. https://doi.org/10.3346%2Fjkms.2013.28.7.972GasparyanA. Y. (2013). Selecting your editorial board: Maintaining standards. , 28(7), 972–973. https://doi.org/10.3346%2Fjkms.2013.28.7.972Search in Google Scholar
Grancay, M., Vveinhardt, J., & Sumilo, E. (2017). Publish or perish: How Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000-2015. Scientometrics, 111, 1813–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2332-zGrancayM.VveinhardtJ.SumiloE. (2017). Publish or perish: How Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000-2015. , 111, 1813–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2332-zSearch in Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers. , 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434Search in Google Scholar
Hames, I. (2001). Editorial boards: Realizing their potential. Learned Publishing, 14, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315101753141347HamesI. (2001). Editorial boards: Realizing their potential. , 14, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315101753141347Search in Google Scholar
Hardin, W. G., Liano, K., Chan, K. C., & Fok, R. C. W. (2008). Finance editorial board membership and research productivity. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31, 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0067-2HardinW. G.LianoK.ChanK. C.FokR. C. W. (2008). Finance editorial board membership and research productivity. , 31, 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0067-2Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, C. (2013). Reflections on editing the Journal of Finance, 2006-2012. (Working Paper, July 10, 2015). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2191787HarveyC. (2013). . (Working Paper, July 10, 2015). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2191787Search in Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J., & Moktan, S. (2020). The tyranny of the top five. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 419–470. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191574HeckmanJ. J.MoktanS. (2020). The tyranny of the top five. , 58(2), 419–470. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191574Search in Google Scholar
Hermanowicz, J. C. (2013). The culture of mediocrity. Minerva, 51, 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9231-0HermanowiczJ. C. (2013). The culture of mediocrity. , 51, 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9231-0Search in Google Scholar
Hewlin, P. F. (2003). And the award for the best actor goes to... : Facades of conformity in organisational settings. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040752HewlinP. F. (2003). And the award for the best actor goes to... : Facades of conformity in organisational settings. , 28(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040752Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457380HicksD. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. , 44(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457380Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007HicksD. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. , 41(2), 251–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, D., Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429aHicksD.WoutersP.WaltmanD.RijckeS.RafolsI. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden manifesto for research metrics. , 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429aSearch in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102HirschJ. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. , 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102Search in Google Scholar
Hladchenko, M., & Moed, H. F. (2021). The effect of publication traditions and requirements in research assessment and funding policies upon the use of national journals in 28 post-socialist countries. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101190HladchenkoM.MoedH. F. (2021). The effect of publication traditions and requirements in research assessment and funding policies upon the use of national journals in 28 post-socialist countries. , 15(4), 101190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101190Search in Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M., & Rothman, H. (1999). The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly? The Economic Journal, 109(453), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00407HodgsonG. M.RothmanH. (1999). The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly?, 109(453), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00407Search in Google Scholar
Horta, H. (2013). Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effect on research information exchange and scientific output: New insights for academic based research. Higher Education, 65(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9559-7HortaH. (2013). Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effect on research information exchange and scientific output: New insights for academic based research. , 65(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9559-7Search in Google Scholar
Horta, H. (2022). Academic inbreeding: Academic oligarchy, effects, and barriers to change. Minerva, 60, 593–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09469-6HortaH. (2022). Academic inbreeding: Academic oligarchy, effects, and barriers to change. , 60, 593–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09469-6Search in Google Scholar
Horta, H., Meoli, M., & Santos, J. M. (2022). Academic inbreeding and choice of strategic research approaches. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(1), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12328HortaH.MeoliM.SantosJ. M. (2022). Academic inbreeding and choice of strategic research approaches. , 76(1), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12328Search in Google Scholar
Horta, H., Veloso, F., & Grediaga, R. (2010). Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Science, 56(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1109HortaH.VelosoF.GrediagaR. (2010). Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. , 56(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1109Search in Google Scholar
Jonkers, T., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1971-xJonkersT.TijssenR. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. , 77(2), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1971-xSearch in Google Scholar
Karadag, E. (2021). Academic (dis)qualification of Turkish rectors: Their career paths, H-index, and the number of articles and citations. Higher Education, 81, 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00542-1KaradagE. (2021). Academic (dis)qualification of Turkish rectors: Their career paths, H-index, and the number of articles and citations. , 81, 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00542-1Search in Google Scholar
Karadag, E., & Ciftci, S.K. (2022). Deepening the effects of the academic inbreeding: Its impact on individual and institutional research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 63, 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09670-8KaradagE.CiftciS.K. (2022). Deepening the effects of the academic inbreeding: Its impact on individual and institutional research productivity. , 63, 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09670-8Search in Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. G. (1984). Rankings of finance departments by faculty representation on editorial boards of professional journals: A note. Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03902.xKaufmanG. G. (1984). Rankings of finance departments by faculty representation on editorial boards of professional journals: A note. , 39(4), 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03902.xSearch in Google Scholar
Klemencic, M., & Zgaga, P. (2015). Slovenia: The slow decline of academic inbreeding. In M. Yudkevich, G. P. Altbach, & L. E. Rumbley (Eds.), Academic inbreeding and mobility in higher education: Global perspectives (pp. 156–181). London: Palgrave Macmillan.KlemencicM.ZgagaP. (2015). Slovenia: The slow decline of academic inbreeding. In YudkevichM.AltbachG. P.RumbleyL. E. (Eds.), (pp. 156–181). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Korytkowski, P., & Kulcyzcki, E. (2019). Examining how country-level science policy shapes publication patterns: The case of Poland. Scientometrics, 119, 1519–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03092-1KorytkowskiP.KulcyzckiE. (2019). Examining how country-level science policy shapes publication patterns: The case of Poland. , 119, 1519–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03092-1Search in Google Scholar
Koys, D. J. (2008). Judging academic qualifications, professional qualifications, and participation of faculty using AACSB guidelines. Journal of Education for Business, 83(4), 207–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.4.207-213KoysD. J. (2008). Judging academic qualifications, professional qualifications, and participation of faculty using AACSB guidelines. , 83(4), 207–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.4.207-213Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E. (2017). Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland. Research Evaluation, 26(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw023KulczyckiE. (2017). Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland. , 26(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw023Search in Google Scholar
Kulikowski, K., Przytula, S., & Sulkowski, L. (2023). When publication metrics become the fetish: The research evaluation systems’ relationship with academic work engagement and burnout. Research Evaluation, 32(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac032KulikowskiK.PrzytulaS.SulkowskiL. (2023). When publication metrics become the fetish: The research evaluation systems’ relationship with academic work engagement and burnout. , 32(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac032Search in Google Scholar
Kuzhabekova, A., & Ruby, A. (2018). Raising research productivity in a post-Soviet higher education system: A case from Central Asia. European Education, 50(3), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2018.1444942KuzhabekovaA.RubyA. (2018). Raising research productivity in a post-Soviet higher education system: A case from Central Asia. , 50(3), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2018.1444942Search in Google Scholar
Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1994). Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. Journal of Political Economy, 102(1), 194–203. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261927LabandD. N.PietteM. J. (1994). Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. , 102(1), 194–203. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261927Search in Google Scholar
Lariviere, V., Macaluso, B., Archambault, E., & Gingras, Y. (2010). Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications, and citations. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X492495LariviereV.MacalusoB.ArchambaultE.GingrasY. (2010). Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications, and citations. , 19(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X492495Search in Google Scholar
Lindsey, D. (1976). Distinction, achievement, and editorial board membership. American Psychologist, 31(11), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.31.11.799LindseyD. (1976). Distinction, achievement, and editorial board membership. , 31(11), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.31.11.799Search in Google Scholar
Lone, F. A., & Hussain, M. (2017). Gender variations in research productivity: Insights from scholarly research. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1608. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1608/LoneF. A.HussainM. (2017). Gender variations in research productivity: Insights from scholarly research. , 1608. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1608/Search in Google Scholar
Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., & McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review, 58(5), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096282LongJ. S.AllisonP. D.McGinnisR. (1993). Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. , 58(5), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096282Search in Google Scholar
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.LotkaA. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. , 16(12), 317–323.Search in Google Scholar
Lowe, D. J., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2009). Scholarly achievement and accounting editorial board membership. Journal of Accounting Education, 27(4), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jaccedu.2010.07.004LoweD. J.Van FleetD. D. (2009). Scholarly achievement and accounting editorial board membership. , 27(4), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jaccedu.2010.07.004Search in Google Scholar
Lu, X., & Zhang, W. (2015). The reversed brain drain: A mixed-method study of the reversed migration of the Chinese overseas scientists. Science, Technology and Society, 20(3), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721815597127LuX.ZhangW. (2015). The reversed brain drain: A mixed-method study of the reversed migration of the Chinese overseas scientists. , 20(3), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721815597127Search in Google Scholar
Lutmar, C., & Reingewertz, Y. (2021). Academic in-group bias in the top five economics journals. Scientometrics, 126, 9543–9556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04174-9LutmarC.ReingewertzY. (2021). Academic in-group bias in the top five economics journals. , 126, 9543–9556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04174-9Search in Google Scholar
Lutter, M., & Schröder, M. (2016). Who becomes a tenured professor, and why? Panel data evidence from German sociology, 1980-2013. Research Policy, 45, 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.019LutterM.SchröderM. (2016). Who becomes a tenured professor, and why? Panel data evidence from German sociology, 1980-2013. , 45, 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.019Search in Google Scholar
Luty, J., Arokiadass, S. M. R., Easow, J. M., & Anapreddy, J. R. (2009). Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(3), 200–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.026740LutyJ.ArokiadassS. M. R.EasowJ. M.AnapreddyJ. R. (2009). Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals. , 35(3), 200–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.026740Search in Google Scholar
Ma, L., & Ladisch, M. (2019). Evaluation complacency or evaluation inertia? A study of evaluative metrics and research practices in Irish universities. Research Evaluation, 28(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz008MaL.LadischM. (2019). Evaluation complacency or evaluation inertia? A study of evaluative metrics and research practices in Irish universities. , 28(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz008Search in Google Scholar
Macfarlane, B. (2007). Defining and rewarding academic citizenship: The implications for university promotion policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 261–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600800701457863MacfarlaneB. (2007). Defining and rewarding academic citizenship: The implications for university promotion policy. , 29(3), 261–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600800701457863Search in Google Scholar
Macfarlane, B., & Jefferson, A. E. (2022). The closed academy? Guild power and academic social class. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12305MacfarlaneB.JeffersonA. E. (2022). The closed academy? Guild power and academic social class. , 76(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12305Search in Google Scholar
Maddi, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2024). Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in PLOS ONE and the challenges of appropriate attribution. Journal of Data and Information Science, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0015MaddiA.Teixeira da SilvaJ.A. (2024). Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in PLOS ONE and the challenges of appropriate attribution. , Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0015Search in Google Scholar
Mani, J., Makarević, J., Juengel, E., Ackermann, H., Nelson, K., Bartsch, G., Blaheta, R. A. (2013). I publish in I edit? Do editorial board members preferentially publish their own scientific work? PLOS One, 8(12), e83709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083709ManiJ.MakarevićJ.JuengelE.AckermannH.NelsonK.BartschG.BlahetaR. A. (2013). I publish in I edit? Do editorial board members preferentially publish their own scientific work?, 8(12), e83709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083709Search in Google Scholar
Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2001). Good editorial practice: Editors as educators. Croatian Medical Journal, 42(2), 113–120.MarusicM.MarusicA. (2001). Good editorial practice: Editors as educators. , 42(2), 113–120.Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, S. J., & Rathmann, J. M. K. (2018). How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics, 117, 1663–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1MayerS. J.RathmannJ. M. K. (2018). How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. , 117, 1663–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1Search in Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 265-278). University of Chicago Press.MertonR. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In StorerN. W. (Ed.), (pp. 265–278). University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Müller, M., Cowan, R., & Barnard, H. (2018). On the value of foreign PhDs in the developing world: Training versus selection effects in the case of South Africa. Research Policy, 47(5), 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.013MüllerM.CowanR.BarnardH. (2018). On the value of foreign PhDs in the developing world: Training versus selection effects in the case of South Africa. , 47(5), 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.013Search in Google Scholar
Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2NederhofA. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A review. , 66(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2Search in Google Scholar
Nederhof, A. J., Zwaan, R. A., De Bruin, R. E., & Dekker, P. J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the Humanities and the Social and Behavioral Sciences: A comparative study. Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017063NederhofA. J.ZwaanR. A.De BruinR. E.DekkerP. J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the Humanities and the Social and Behavioral Sciences: A comparative study. , 15(5-6), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017063Search in Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. W., & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. PNAS, 118(7), e2012208118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118NielsenM. W.AndersenJ. P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. , 118(7), e2012208118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118Search in Google Scholar
Önder, C., & Erdil, S. E. (2015). Divergent behaviors of actors under common institutional expectations: University-, departmental-, and individual-level predictors of scientific publication productivity of academics (In Turkish: Ayni kurumsal beklentilere tabi aktörlerin farklilaşan davranişlari: Öğretim üyelerinin bilimsel yayin üretkenliklerinin üniversite, bölüm ve birey düzeyindeki yordayicilari). METU Studies in Development (In Trukish: ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi), 42(3), 481–519.ÖnderC.ErdilS. E. (2015). Divergent behaviors of actors under common institutional expectations: University-, departmental-, and individual-level predictors of scientific publication productivity of academics (In Turkish: Ayni kurumsal beklentilere tabi aktörlerin farklilaşan davranişlari: Öğretim üyelerinin bilimsel yayin üretkenliklerinin üniversite, bölüm ve birey düzeyindeki yordayicilari). , 42(3), 481–519.Search in Google Scholar
Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455PacheA. C.SantosF. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. , 35(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455Search in Google Scholar
Persson, O., Glanzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60, 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7dPerssonO.GlanzelW.DanellR. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. , 60, 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7dSearch in Google Scholar
Petersen, J., Hattke, F., & Vogel, R. (2017). Editorial governance and journal impact: A study of management and business journals. Scientometrics, 112, 1593–1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2434-7PetersenJ.HattkeF.VogelR. (2017). Editorial governance and journal impact: A study of management and business journals. , 112, 1593–1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2434-7Search in Google Scholar
Petzold, K., & Netz, N. (2023). How do signals of academic performance vary across disciplines? Evidence from a survey experiment among university professors in Germany. Soziale Welt, forthcoming.PetzoldK.NetzN. (2023). How do signals of academic performance vary across disciplines? Evidence from a survey experiment among university professors in Germany. , forthcoming.Search in Google Scholar
PLOS Medicine Editors (2006). The impact factor game. PLOS Medicine, 3(6), e291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291PLOS Medicine Editors (2006). The impact factor game. , 3(6), e291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291Search in Google Scholar
Pontika, N., Klebel, T., Correia, A., Metzler, H., Knoth, P., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2022). Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(4) 888–911. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00224PontikaN.KlebelT.CorreiaA.MetzlerH.KnothP.Ross-HellauerT. (2022). Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries. , 3(4) 888–911. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00224Search in Google Scholar
Rijcke, S., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use-a literature review. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038RijckeS.WoutersP. F.RushforthA. D.FranssenT. P.HammarfeltB. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use-a literature review. , 25(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038Search in Google Scholar
Sarigöl, E., Garcia, D., Scholtes, I., & Schweitzer, F. (2017). Quantifying the effect of editor-author relations on manuscript handling times. Scientometrics, 113(1), 609–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2309-ySarigölE.GarciaD.ScholtesI.SchweitzerF. (2017). Quantifying the effect of editor-author relations on manuscript handling times. , 113(1), 609–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2309-ySearch in Google Scholar
Sasvari, P., Bakacsi, G., & Urbanovics, A. (2022). Scientific career tracks and publication performance – relationships discovered in the Hungarian academic promotion system. Heliyon, 8, e09159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09159SasvariP.BakacsiG.UrbanovicsA. (2022). Scientific career tracks and publication performance – relationships discovered in the Hungarian academic promotion system. , 8, e09159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09159Search in Google Scholar
Scheidegger, F., Briviba, A., & Frey, B. S. (2023). Behind the curtains of academic publishing: Strategic responses of economists and business scholars. Scientometrics, 128, 4765–4790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04772-9ScheideggerF.BrivibaA.FreyB. S. (2023). Behind the curtains of academic publishing: Strategic responses of economists and business scholars. , 128, 4765–4790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04772-9Search in Google Scholar
Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Malighetti, P. (2019). Self-citations as a strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions. Research Policy, 48(2), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004SeeberM.CattaneoM.MeoliM.MalighettiP (2019). Self-citations as a strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions. , 48(2), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004Search in Google Scholar
Seeber, M., Klemencic, M., Meoli, M., & Sin, C. (2023). Publishing review reports to reveal and preserve the quality and fairness of the peer review process. European Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2192549SeeberM.KlemencicM.MeoliM.SinC. (2023). Publishing review reports to reveal and preserve the quality and fairness of the peer review process. . https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2192549Search in Google Scholar
Seglen, P. (1998). Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavia, 69(3), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809000920SeglenP. (1998). Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. , 69(3), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809000920Search in Google Scholar
Sharma, P. (2016). The job of a journal editor. Family Business Review, 29(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516655901SharmaP. (2016). The job of a journal editor. , 29(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516655901Search in Google Scholar
Smith, R. (2006a). The trouble with medical journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1258%2Fjrsm.99.3.115SmithR. (2006a). The trouble with medical journals. , 99, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1258%2Fjrsm.99.3.115Search in Google Scholar
Smith, R. (2006b). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society and Medicine, 99(4), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1258%2Fjrsm.99.4.178SmithR. (2006b). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. , 99(4), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1258%2Fjrsm.99.4.178Search in Google Scholar
Tahamtan, I., Afshar, A. S., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107, 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2TahamtanI.AfsharA. S.AhamdzadehK. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. , 107, 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, S. W., Fender, B. F., & Burke, K. G. (2006). Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: The opportunity costs of teaching and service. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 846–859. https://doi.org/10.2307/20111856TaylorS. W.FenderB. F.BurkeK. G. (2006). Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: The opportunity costs of teaching and service. , 72(4), 846–859. https://doi.org/10.2307/20111856Search in Google Scholar
Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003901018634TeodorescuD. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. , 39, 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003901018634Search in Google Scholar
Tutuncu, L. (2023a). All-pervading insider bias alters review time in Turkish university journals. Scientometrics, 128, 3743–3791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04724-3TutuncuL. (2023a). All-pervading insider bias alters review time in Turkish university journals. , 128, 3743–3791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04724-3Search in Google Scholar
Tutuncu, L. (2023b). Editorial board publication strategy and acceptance rates in Turkish national journals. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(4), 49–83. https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0019TutuncuL. (2023b). Editorial board publication strategy and acceptance rates in Turkish national journals. , 8(4), 49–83. https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0019Search in Google Scholar
Tutuncu, L. (2024). Gatekeepers or gatecrashers? The inside connection in editorial board publications of Turkish national journals. Scientometrics, 129, 957–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04905-0TutuncuL. (2024). Gatekeepers or gatecrashers? The inside connection in editorial board publications of Turkish national journals. , 129, 957–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04905-0Search in Google Scholar
Tutuncu, L., & Seeber, M. (2024). The importance of international and national publications for promotion and the impact of recruitment policies. Working paper. Zonguldak Bülent EcevitTutuncuL.SeeberM. (2024). . Working paper. Zonguldak Bülent EcevitSearch in Google Scholar
Tutuncu, L., Yucedogru, R., & Sarisoy, I. (2022). Academic favoritism at work: Insider bias in Turkish national journals. Scientometrics, 127, 2547–2576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04355-0TutuncuL.YucedogruR.SarisoyI. (2022). Academic favoritism at work: Insider bias in Turkish national journals. , 127, 2547–2576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04355-0Search in Google Scholar
Ünal, A. F. (2017). Competing institutional logics in the higher education of Turkey: Diversity in academic performance criteria and its effect on academic productivity ( In Turkish: Türkiye yükseköğretim alaninda rakip kurumsal mantiklar: Akademik performans kriterlerinde çeşitlilik ve yayin üretkenliği üzerine etkisi). Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 50(4), 83–114.ÜnalA. F. (2017). Competing institutional logics in the higher education of Turkey: Diversity in academic performance criteria and its effect on academic productivity ( In Turkish: Türkiye yükseköğretim alaninda rakip kurumsal mantiklar: Akademik performans kriterlerinde çeşitlilik ve yayin üretkenliği üzerine etkisi). , 50(4), 83–114.Search in Google Scholar
Üsdiken, B., & Wasti, S. A. (2009). Preaching, teaching and researching at the periphery: Academic management literature in Turkey, 1970-1999. Organization Studies, 30(10), 1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609337952ÜsdikenB.WastiS. A. (2009). Preaching, teaching and researching at the periphery: Academic management literature in Turkey, 1970-1999. , 30(10), 1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609337952Search in Google Scholar
Velema, T.A. (2012). The contingent nature of brain gain and brain circulation: Their foreign context and the impact of return scientists on the scientific community in their country of origin. Scientometrics, 93, 893–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0751-4VelemaT.A. (2012). The contingent nature of brain gain and brain circulation: Their foreign context and the impact of return scientists on the scientific community in their country of origin. , 93, 893–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0751-4Search in Google Scholar
Walker, J. T., Salter, A., Fontinha, R., & Salandra, R. (2019). The impact of journal re-grading on perception of ranking systems: Exploring the case of the Academic Journal Guide and Business and Management scholars in the UK. Research Evaluation, 28(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz010WalkerJ. T.SalterA.FontinhaR.SalandraR. (2019). The impact of journal re-grading on perception of ranking systems: Exploring the case of the Academic Journal Guide and Business and Management scholars in the UK. , 28(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz010Search in Google Scholar
Walters, W. H. (2015). Do editorial board members in library and information science publish disproportionately in the journals for which they serve as board members? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 46(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.46.4.03WaltersW. H. (2015). Do editorial board members in library and information science publish disproportionately in the journals for which they serve as board members?, 46(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.46.4.03Search in Google Scholar
Weiser, C. J. (1997). Faculty scholarship and productivity expectations — An administrator’s perspective. HortScience, 32(1), 37–39. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.32.1.37WeiserC. J. (1997). Faculty scholarship and productivity expectations — An administrator’s perspective. , 32(1), 37–39. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.32.1.37Search in Google Scholar
Woolston, C. (2020). University drops impact factor. Nature, 595, 462. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01759-5WoolstonC. (2020). University drops impact factor. , 595, 462. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01759-5Search in Google Scholar
Wu D., Lu, X., Li, J., & Li, J. (2020). Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field. Scientometrics, 124, 1579–1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03505-6WuD.LuX.LiJ.LiJ. (2020). Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field. , 124, 1579–1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03505-6Search in Google Scholar
Xu, S., An, M., & An, X. (2021). Do scientific publications by editorial board members have shorter publication delays and then higher influence? Scientometrics, 126, 6697–6713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04067-xXuS.AnM.AnX. (2021). Do scientific publications by editorial board members have shorter publication delays and then higher influence?, 126, 6697–6713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04067-xSearch in Google Scholar
Yoon, A. H. (2013). Editorial bias in legal academia. Journal of Legal Analysis, 5(2), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lat005YoonA. H. (2013). Editorial bias in legal academia. , 5(2), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lat005Search in Google Scholar
Zdenek, R. (2018). Editorial board self-publishing rates in Czech Economic journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9922-2ZdenekR. (2018). Editorial board self-publishing rates in Czech Economic journals. , 24, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9922-2Search in Google Scholar
Winclawska, B. M. (1996). Polish Sociology Citation Index (principles for creation and the first results). Scientometrics, 35, 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016909WinclawskaB. M. (1996). Polish Sociology Citation Index (principles for creation and the first results). , 35, 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016909Search in Google Scholar