Article Category: Research Paper
Data publikacji: 07 cze 2023
Zakres stron: 26 - 42
Otrzymano: 14 lut 2023
Przyjęty: 19 maj 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0015
Słowa kluczowe
© 2023 Dag W. Aksnes et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Purpose
The aim of this study is to analyze the evolution of international research collaboration from 1980 to 2021. The study examines the main global patterns as well as those specific to individual countries, country groups, and different areas of research.
Design/methodology/approach
The study is based on the Web of Science Core collection database. More than 50 million publications are analyzed using co-authorship data. International collaboration is defined as publications having authors affiliated with institutions located in more than one country.
Findings
At the global level, the share of publications representing international collaboration has gradually increased from 4.7% in 1980 to 25.7% in 2021. The proportion of such publications within each country is higher and, in 2021, varied from less than 30% to more than 90%. There are notable disparities in the temporal trends, indicating that the process of internationalization has impacted countries in different ways. Several factors such as country size, income level, and geopolitics may explain the variance.
Research limitations
Not all international research collaboration results in joint co-authored scientific publications. International co-authorship is a partial indicator of such collaboration. Another limitation is that the applied full counting method does not take into account the number of authors representing in each country in the publication.
Practical implications
The study provides global averages, indicators, and concepts that can provide a useful framework of reference for further comparative studies of international research collaboration.
Originality/value
Long-term macro-level studies of international collaboration are rare, and as a novelty, this study includes an analysis by the World Bank’s division of countries into four income groups.