This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Aliwy, A.H., & Ameer, E.H.A. (2017). Comparative study of five text classification algorithms with their improvements. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(14), 4309–4319.AliwyA.H.AmeerE.H.A.2017Comparative study of five text classification algorithms with their improvementsInternational Journal of Applied Engineering Research121443094319Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, J., & Perez-Carballo, J. (2001). The nature of indexing: How humans and machines analyze messages and texts for retrieval. Part II: Machine indexing, and the allocation of human versus machine effort. Information Processing and Management 37(2), 255–277.AndersonJ.Perez-CarballoJ.2001The nature of indexing: How humans and machines analyze messages and texts for retrieval. Part II: Machine indexing, and the allocation of human versus machine effortInformation Processing and Management37225527710.1016/S0306-4573(00)00046-7Search in Google Scholar
Chen, H., & Dumais, S. (2000). Bringing order to the web: Automatically categorizing search results. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Den Haag, 145–152.ChenH.DumaisS.2000Bringing order to the web: Automatically categorizing search resultsInProceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDen Haag14515210.1145/332040.332418Search in Google Scholar
Golub, K. (2006). Automated subject classification of textual web documents. Journal of Documentation, 62(3), 350–371.GolubK.2006Automated subject classification of textual web documentsJournal of Documentation62335037110.1108/00220410610666501Search in Google Scholar
Golub, K. (2007). Automated subject classification of textual documents in the context of web-based hierarchical browsing: PhD thesis. Lund: Department of Electrical and Information Technology, Lund University.GolubK.2007Automated subject classification of textual documents in the context of web-based hierarchical browsingPhD thesis.LundDepartment of Electrical and Information Technology, Lund UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Golub, K. (2017). Automatic subject indexing of text. In ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, 2017. http://www.isko.org/cyclo/automatic.GolubK.2017Automatic subject indexing of textIn ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, 2017. http://www.isko.org/cyclo/automatic.Search in Google Scholar
Golub, K., Soergel D., Buchanan, G., Tudhope, D., Lykke, M., & Hiom, D. (2016). A framework for evalu ating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 3–16.GolubK.SoergelD.BuchananG.TudhopeD.LykkeM.HiomD.2016A framework for evalu ating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrievalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67131610.1002/asi.23600Search in Google Scholar
Golub, K., Hamon, T., & Ardö, A. (2007). Automated classification of textual documents based on a controlled vocabulary in engineering. Knowledge Organization, 34(4), 247–263.GolubK.HamonT.ArdöA.2007Automated classification of textual documents based on a controlled vocabulary in engineeringKnowledge Organization34424726310.5771/0943-7444-2007-4-247Search in Google Scholar
Hunter, R.N. (1991). Successes and failures of patrons searching the online catalog at a large academic library: A transaction log analysis. RQ, 30(3), 395–402.HunterR.N.1991Successes and failures of patrons searching the online catalog at a large academic library: A transaction log analysisRQ303395402Search in Google Scholar
Khoo, M. et al. (2015). Augmenting Dublin Core digital library metadata with Dewey Decimal Classification. Journal of Documentation, 71(5), 976–998.KhooM.2015Augmenting Dublin Core digital library metadata with Dewey Decimal ClassificationJournal of Documentation71597699810.1108/JD-07-2014-0103Search in Google Scholar
Lancaster, F.W. (2003). Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice. Facet: London.LancasterF.W.2003Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and PracticeFacetLondonSearch in Google Scholar
Leininger, K. (2000). Interindexer consistency in PsycINFO. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 32(1), 4–8.LeiningerK.2000Interindexer consistency in PsycINFOJournal of Librarianship and Information Science3214810.1177/096100060003200102Search in Google Scholar
Lösch, M., Waltinger, U., Hortsmann, W., & Mehler, A. (2011). Building a DDC-annotated corpus from OAI metadata. Journal of Digital Information, 12(2).LöschM.WaltingerU.HortsmannW.MehlerA.2011Building a DDC-annotated corpus from OAI metadataJournal of Digital Information122Search in Google Scholar
Meadow, K., & Meadow, J. (2012). Search query quality and web-scale discovery: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. College & Undergraduate Libraries 19(2–4), 163–175.MeadowK.MeadowJ.2012Search query quality and web-scale discovery: A qualitative and quantitative analysisCollege & Undergraduate Libraries192–416317510.1080/10691316.2012.693434Search in Google Scholar
Robertson, S., & Zaragoza, H. (2009). The probabilistic relevance model: BM25 and beyond. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3(4), 333–389.RobertsonS.ZaragozaH.2009The probabilistic relevance model: BM25 and beyondFoundations and Trends in Information Retrieval3433338910.1561/1500000019Search in Google Scholar
Roitblat, H.L., Kershaw, A., & Oot, P. (2010). Document categorization in legal electronic discovery: Computer classification vs. manual review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 70–80.RoitblatH.L.KershawA.OotP.2010Document categorization in legal electronic discovery: Computer classification vs. manual reviewJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology611708010.1002/asi.21233Search in Google Scholar
Ruiz, M.E., Aronson, A.R., & Hlava, M. (2008). Adoption and evaluation issues of automatic and computer aided indexing systems. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 1–4.RuizM.E.AronsonA.R.HlavaM.2008Adoption and evaluation issues of automatic and computer aided indexing systemsIn Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology4511410.1002/meet.2008.1450450143Search in Google Scholar
Silvester, J.P. (1997). Computer supported indexing: A history and evaluation of NASA’s MAI system. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Services, 61(24), 76–90.SilvesterJ.P.1997Computer supported indexing: A history and evaluation of NASA’s MAI systemIn Encyclopedia of Library and Information Services61247690Search in Google Scholar
Svanberg, M. (2013). Slutrapport: Dewey-Projektet. http://www.kb.se/Dokument/Deweyprojektet%20slutrapport%2020130614.pdfSvanbergM.2013Slutrapport: Dewey-Projektethttp://www.kb.se/Dokument/Deweyprojektet%20slutrapport%2020130614.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Svarre, T.J., & Lykke, M. (2014). Simulated work tasks: The case of professional users. In Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium, 215–218.SvarreT.J.LykkeM.2014Simulated work tasks: The case of professional usersInProceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium21521810.1145/2637002.2637027Search in Google Scholar
Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, MIT Press.SvenoniusE.2000The Intellectual Foundation of Information OrganizationCambridgeMIT Press10.7551/mitpress/3828.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, R., Shafer, K., & Vizine-Goetz, D. (1997). Evaluating Dewey concepts as a knowledge base for automatic subject assignment. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Int. Conf. on Digital libraries (DL ’97), 37–46.ThompsonR.ShaferK.Vizine-GoetzD.1997Evaluating Dewey concepts as a knowledge base for automatic subject assignmentIn Proceedings of the Second ACM Int. Conf. on Digital libraries (DL ’97)374610.1145/263690.263790Search in Google Scholar
Trivedi, M., Sharma, S., Soni, N., & Nair, S. (2015). Comparison of text classification algorithms. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 4(2).TrivediM.SharmaS.SoniN.NairS.2015Comparison of text classification algorithmsInternational Journal of Engineering Research & Technology42Search in Google Scholar
Villén-Rueda, L., Senso, J.A., & De Moya-Anegón, F. (2007). The use of OPAC in a large academic library: A transactional log analysis study of subject searching. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(3), 327–337.Villén-RuedaL.SensoJ.A.De Moya-AnegónF.2007The use of OPAC in a large academic library: A transactional log analysis study of subject searchingThe Journal of Academic Librarianship33332733710.1016/j.acalib.2007.01.018Search in Google Scholar
Wang, J. (2009). An extensive study on automated Dewey Decimal Classification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2269–2286.WangJ.2009An extensive study on automated Dewey Decimal ClassificationJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology60112269228610.1002/asi.21147Search in Google Scholar
Wartena, C., & Franke-Maier, M. (2018). A hybrid approach to assignment of Library of Congress Subject Headings. Archives of Data Science, 1(4). https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000105121WartenaC.Franke-MaierM.2018A hybrid approach to assignment of Library of Congress Subject HeadingsArchives of Data Science14https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000105121Search in Google Scholar
