This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. (2011). Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 87(3), 499–514. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0352-7AbramoG.&D’AngeloC.2011Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometricsScientometrics87349951410.1007/s11192-011-0352-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, 1(1). doi:10.1177/0891988714527516AminM.&MabeM.2000Impact factors: Use and abusePerspectives in Publishing1110.1177/089198871452751624687189Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
ARWU. (2018). Academic ranking of world universities. Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2018.htmlARWU2018Academic ranking of world universitiesRetrieved fromhttp://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2018.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
ASCB. (2016). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). Retrieved from http://www.ascb.org/dora/ASCB2016San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA)Retrieved fromhttp://www.ascb.org/dora/Search in Google Scholar
Borgman, C. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the Networked world. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67(3), 751–753.BorgmanC.2015Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the Networked worldJournal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 201667375175310.7551/mitpress/9963.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40. doi:10.1515/jdis-2017-0006ChenC.2017Science mapping: A systematic review of the literatureJournal of Data and Information Science2214010.1515/jdis-2017-0006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Clarivate Analytics. (2018). InCites Indicators Handbook. Category Normalized Citation Impact. Retrieved from http://help.incites.clarivate.com/inCites2Live/8980-TRS/version/5/part/8/data/InCites-Indicators-Handbook%20-%20June%202018.pdfClarivate Analytics2018InCites Indicators Handbook. Category Normalized Citation ImpactRetrieved fromhttp://help.incites.clarivate.com/inCites2Live/8980-TRS/version/5/part/8/data/InCites-Indicators-Handbook%20-%20June%202018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Ding, Z. Q., Ge, J. P., Wu, X. M., & Zheng, X. N. (2013). Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries. Scientometrics, 96(3), 829–844. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-0968-xDingZ. Q.GeJ. P.WuX. M.&ZhengX. N.2013Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countriesScientometrics96382984410.1007/s11192-013-0968-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471–479.GarfieldE.1972Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studiesScience178406047147910.1126/science.178.4060.4715079701Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1990). Keywords plus - ISI’s breakthrough retrieval method. 1. Expanding your searching power on current - contents on diskette. Current Contents, 32, 5–9.GarfieldE.1990Keywords plus - ISI’s breakthrough retrieval method. 1. Expanding your searching power on current - contents on disketteCurrent Contents3259Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. doi:10.1038/520429aHicksD.WoutersP.WaltmanL.de RijckeS.&RafolsI.2015The Leiden Manifesto for research metricsNature520754842943110.1038/520429a25903611Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Zhu, D. H., Lv, Q., Porter, A. L., Robinson, D. K. R., & Wang, X. F. (2017). Early insights on the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI): An overlay map-based bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 111(3), 2041–2057. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2349-3HuangY.ZhuD. H.LvQ.PorterA. L.RobinsonD. K. R.&WangX. F.2017Early insights on the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI): An overlay map-based bibliometric studyScientometrics11132041205710.1007/s11192-017-2349-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ibrahim, B. (2018). Arab Spring’s effect on scientific productivity and research performance in Arab countries. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1555–1586. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2935-zIbrahimB.2018Arab Spring’s effect on scientific productivity and research performance in Arab countriesScientometrics11731555158610.1007/s11192-018-2935-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
James, W., Liz, A., Eleonora, B., Philip, C., Stephen, C., Steven, H., . . . , & Ben, J. (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management.JamesW.LizA.EleonoraB.PhilipC.StephenC.StevenH.&BenJ.2015The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and managementSearch in Google Scholar
Jia, T. (2018). China’s research works are underrepresented. Paper presented at the The 2nd International Conference on Data-driven Knowledge Discovery, Beijing.JiaT.2018China’s research works are underrepresented. Paper presented at the The 2nd International Conference on Data-driven Knowledge DiscoveryBeijingSearch in Google Scholar
Kumar, A. J., & Pandit, R. (2018). Science and engineering research in India (1985–2016): Insights from two scientometric databases. Current Science, 115(3), 399–409. doi:10.18520/cs/v115/i3/399-409KumarA. J.&PanditR.2018Science and engineering research in India (1985–2016): Insights from two scientometric databasesCurrent Science115339940910.18520/cs/v115/i3/399-409Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya Anegon, F., & Moed, H. (2009). Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: The effect of poorly cited journals in oncology. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 244–256. doi:10.1177/01655 51508098603Lopez-IllescasC.de Moya AnegonF.&MoedH.2009Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: The effect of poorly cited journals in oncologyJournal of Information Science35224425610.1177/01655 51508098603Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lukman, R., Krajnc, D., & Glavic, P. (2010). University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 619–628. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.015LukmanR.KrajncD.&GlavicP.2010University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicatorsJournal of Cleaner Production18761962810.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moed, H., & Plume, A. (2011). The multi-dimensional research assessment matrix. Research Trends(23).MoedH.&PlumeA.2011The multi-dimensional research assessment matrixResearch Trends23Search in Google Scholar
QS. (2019). QS World University Rankings. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodologyQS2019QS World University RankingsRetrieved fromhttps://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodologySearch in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R., Egghe, L., & Guns, R. (2018). Becoming metric-wise: A bibliometric guide for researchers: Chandos-Elsevier.RousseauR.EggheL.&GunsR.2018Becoming metric-wise: A bibliometric guide for researchersChandos-ElsevierSearch in Google Scholar
Shanghai Ranking. (2018). The best universities in China. Retrieved from http://www.zuihaodaxue.com/zuihaodaxuepaiming-methodology-2018.htmlShanghaiRanking.2018The best universities in ChinaRetrieved fromhttp://www.zuihaodaxue.com/zuihaodaxuepaiming-methodology-2018.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2018). The Norwegian model in Norway. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3, 3–19. doi:10.2478/jdis-2018-0017SivertsenG.2018The Norwegian model in NorwayJournal of Data and Information Science331910.2478/jdis-2018-0017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
The University of Manchester. (2015). Manchester 2020: The university of Manchester’s strategy plan. Retrieved from www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/vision/The University of Manchester2015Manchester 2020: The university of Manchester’s strategy planRetrieved fromwww.manchester.ac.uk/discover/vision/Search in Google Scholar
Thelwall, M., Kayvan, K., Paul, W., Ludo, W., Sarah de, R., Alex, R., & Thomas, F. (2015). The metric tide: Literature review (Supplementary Report to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management).ThelwallM.KayvanK.PaulW.LudoW.Sarah deR.AlexR.&ThomasF.2015The metric tide: Literature review (Supplementary Report to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management)Search in Google Scholar
Times Higher Education. (2019). The world university rankings. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/methodology-world-university-rankings-2019Times Higher Education2019The world university rankingsRetrieved fromhttps://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/methodology-world-university-rankings-2019Search in Google Scholar
U.S. News. (2018). Best global universities rankings. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodologyU.S. News2018Best global universities rankingsRetrieved fromhttps://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodologySearch in Google Scholar
Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2010). Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.002VieiraE. S.&GomesJ. A. N. F.2010Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article featuresJournal of Informetrics4111310.1016/j.joi.2009.06.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007WaltmanL.2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicatorsJournal of Informetrics10236539110.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., & Eck, N. (2013). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics, 96(3), 699–716. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0913-4WaltmanL.&EckN.2013Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparisonScientometrics96369971610.1007/s11192-012-0913-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Xinhuanet. (2018). The General Office of the Central Office of the Communist Party of China, the General Office of the State Council issued “Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Project, Talent and Institutional Assessment”. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htmXinhuanet2018The General Office of the Central Office of the Communist Party of China, the General Office of the State Council issued “Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Project, Talent and Institutional Assessment”Retrieved fromhttp://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htmSearch in Google Scholar
