This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Barre, R. (2010). Towards socially robust S&T indicators: Indicators as debatable devices, enabling collective learning. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 227–231.BarreR.2010Towards socially robust S&T indicators: Indicators as debatable devices, enabling collective learningResearch Evaluation19322723110.3152/095820210X512069Search in Google Scholar
Biggs, M., & Karlsson, H. (2011). Evaluating quality in artistic research. In Biggs, M. & Karlsson, H. (Eds.) The Routledge companion to research in the arts (pp. 405–424). London, UK: Routledge.BiggsM.&KarlssonH.2011Evaluating quality in artistic researchBiggsM.&KarlssonH.The Routledge companion to research in the arts405424London, UKRoutledge10.4324/9780203841327Search in Google Scholar
Borgdorff, H. A. H. (2012). The conflict of the faculties: Perspectives on artistic research and academia. Leiden, NE: Leiden University Press.BorgdorffH. A. H.2012The conflict of the faculties: Perspectives on artistic research and academiaLeiden, NELeiden University Press10.26530/OAPEN_595042Search in Google Scholar
Engels, T. C., & Guns, R. (2018). The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 44–59.EngelsT. C.&GunsR.2018The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian modelJournal of Data and Information Science34445910.2478/jdis-2018-0020Search in Google Scholar
Flemish Community. (2014). Besluit van de Vlaamse regering betreffende de codificatie van de decretale bepalingen betreffende het Hoger Onderwijs (Higher Education Codex). Retrieved from http://data-onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/edulex/inhoudstafel.aspx?docid=14650Flemish Community2014Besluit van de Vlaamse regering betreffende de codificatie van de decretale bepalingen betreffende het Hoger Onderwijs (Higher Education Codex)Retrieved fromhttp://data-onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/edulex/inhoudstafel.aspx?docid=14650Search in Google Scholar
Gielen, P. (2013). Artistic praxis and the neoliberalization of the educational space. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 47(1), 58–71.GielenP.2013Artistic praxis and the neoliberalization of the educational spaceJournal of Aesthetic Education471587110.5406/jaesteduc.47.1.0058Search in Google Scholar
Hellström, T. (2010). Evaluation of artistic research. Research Evaluation, 19(5), 306–316.HellströmT.2010Evaluation of artistic researchResearch Evaluation19530631610.3152/095820210X12809191250807Search in Google Scholar
Jewesbury, D. (2009). Some problems with ‘research’ in UK Fine Art institutions. Art & Research, 2(2), 1–3.JewesburyD.2009Some problems with ‘research’ in UK Fine Art institutionsArt & Research2213Search in Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2010). What is artistic research?. Journal for Artistic Research. Retrieved from https://www.jar-online.net/what-artistic-researchKleinJ.2010What is artistic research?. Journal for Artistic ResearchRetrieved fromhttps://www.jar-online.net/what-artistic-researchSearch in Google Scholar
Laermans, R. (2018). Onderzoekskunst? Retrieved from https://www.dewitteraaf.be/artikel/detail/nl/4579LaermansR.2018Onderzoekskunst?Retrieved fromhttps://www.dewitteraaf.be/artikel/detail/nl/4579Search in Google Scholar
Lesage, D. (2009). Who’s afraid of artistic research? On measuring artistic research output. Art & Research, 2(2), 1–10.LesageD.2009Who’s afraid of artistic research? On measuring artistic research outputArt & Research22110Search in Google Scholar
Lewandowska, K., & Stano, P. M. (2018). Evaluation of research in the arts: Evidence from Poland. Research Evaluation, 27(4), 323–334.LewandowskaK.&StanoP. M.2018Evaluation of research in the arts: Evidence from PolandResearch Evaluation27432333410.1093/reseval/rvy021Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.NelsonR.2013Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistancesLondon, UKPalgrave MacMillan10.1057/9781137282910Search in Google Scholar
O’Riley, T. (2011). A discrete continuity: On the relation between research and art practice. Journal of Research Practice, 7(1), P1.O’RileyT.2011A discrete continuity: On the relation between research and art practiceJournal of Research Practice71P1Search in Google Scholar
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Ravelli, L., & Nicholson, S. (2011). Doctoral writing in the visual and performing arts: Issues and debates. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(2), 242–255.PaltridgeB.StarfieldS.RavelliL.&NicholsonS.2011Doctoral writing in the visual and performing arts: Issues and debatesInternational Journal of Art & Design Education30224225510.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01700.xSearch in Google Scholar
Rust, C. (2007). Unstated contributions: How artistic inquiry can inform inter-disciplinary research. International Journal of Design, 1(3), 69–76.RustC.2007Unstated contributions: How artistic inquiry can inform inter-disciplinary researchInternational Journal of Design136976Search in Google Scholar
Schwarzenbach, J., & Hackett, P. (2015). Transatlantic reflections on the practice-based PhD in fine art. London, UK: Routledge.SchwarzenbachJ.&HackettP.2015Transatlantic reflections on the practice-based PhD in fine artLondon, UKRoutledge10.4324/9781315754741Search in Google Scholar
Sheikh, S. (2009). Objects of study or commodification of knowledge? Remarks on artistic research. Art & Research, 2(2), 1–8.SheikhS.2009Objects of study or commodification of knowledge? Remarks on artistic researchArt & Research2218Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2018). An attempt to create an indicator for performance-based funding for artistic research in Norway. In Ysebaert, W. & Van Kerckhoven, B. (Eds.) Evaluating art and design research: Reflections, evaluation practices and research presentations (pp. 93–109). Brussels, BE: VUB Press.SivertsenG.2018An attempt to create an indicator for performance-based funding for artistic research in NorwayYsebaertW.&VanKerckhoven, B.Evaluating art and design research: Reflections, evaluation practices and research presentations93109Brussels, BEVUB PressSearch in Google Scholar
Sullivan, G. (2006). Research acts in art practice. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 19–35.SullivanG.2006Research acts in art practiceStudies in Art Education481193510.1080/00393541.2006.11650497Search in Google Scholar
Vanhaesebrouck, K. (2018). Measuring artistic research, or the real agenda behind Bologna in higher arts education. In Ysebaert, W. & Van Kerckhoven, B. (Eds.) Evaluating art and design research: Reflections, evaluation practices and research presentations (pp. 16–22). Brussels, BE: VUB Press.VanhaesebrouckK.2018Measuring artistic research, or the real agenda behind Bologna in higher arts educationYsebaertW.&VanKerckhoven, B.Evaluating art and design research: Reflections, evaluation practices and research presentations1622Brussels, BEVUB PressSearch in Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (2016). The white cube in the black box: Assessing artistic research quality in multidisciplinary academic panels. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1223–1236.WilsonJ.2016The white cube in the black box: Assessing artistic research quality in multidisciplinary academic panelsAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education4181223123610.1080/02602938.2015.1075190Search in Google Scholar
Wissler, R. (1997). Artistic practice and research: Towards a community of judgment. In Double Dialogues: The Arts and their Theoretical Paradigms Conference Proceedings (pp. 88–105). Melbourne, AU: Theatreworks.WisslerR.1997Artistic practice and research: Towards a community of judgmentDouble Dialogues: The Arts and their Theoretical Paradigms Conference Proceedings88105Melbourne, AUTheatreworksSearch in Google Scholar
Ysebaert, W. & Martens, B. (2018). The ECOOM-VUB stakeholder-driven evaluation design for art and design research outcomes. In Ysebaert, W. & Van Kerckhoven, B. (Eds.) Evaluating art and design research: Reflections, evaluation practices and research presentations (pp. 93–109). Brussels, BE: VUB Press.YsebaertW.&MartensB.2018The ECOOM-VUB stakeholder-driven evaluation design for art and design research outcomesYsebaertW.&VanKerckhoven, B.Evaluating art and design research: Reflections, evaluation practices and research presentations93109Brussels, BEVUB PressSearch in Google Scholar