This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). Evaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankings. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 514−525.AbramoG.D’AngeloC. A.2015Evaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankings9351452510.1016/j.joi.2015.04.002Search in Google Scholar
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, A. C., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1016−1030.AbramoG.D’AngeloA. C.MurgiaG.2017The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants1141016103010.1016/j.joi.2017.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Adams, J. (2013). Collaborations: The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557−560.AdamsJ.2013Collaborations: The fourth age of research497745155756010.1038/497557a23719446Search in Google Scholar
Andersson, D. E., Gunessee, S., Matthiessen, C. W., & Find, S. (2014). The geography of Chinese science. Environment and Planning A, 46(12), 2950−2971.AnderssonD. E.GunesseeS.MatthiessenC. W.FindS.2014The geography of Chinese science46122950297110.1068/a130283pSearch in Google Scholar
Archambault, É., & Larivière, V. (2011). Scientific publications and patenting by companies: A study of the whole population of Canadian firms over 25 years. Science and Public Policy, 38(4), 269–278.ArchambaultÉLarivièreV.2011Scientific publications and patenting by companies: A study of the whole population of Canadian firms over 25 years38426927810.3152/030234211X12924093660192Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, J. C. (2007). The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-Speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.BennettJ. C.2007Lanham, Maryland, USARowman & Littlefield PublishersSearch in Google Scholar
Björkman, B. (2011). Pragmatic strategies in English as an academic lingua franca: Ways of achieving communicative effectiveness? Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 950−964.BjörkmanB.2011Pragmatic strategies in English as an academic lingua franca: Ways of achieving communicative effectiveness?43495096410.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.033Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1954−1962.BornmannL.LeydesdorffL.2011Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing62101954196210.1002/asi.21611Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 336−345.BornmannL.LeydesdorffL.2012Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches6233634510.1016/j.joi.2011.11.002Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., Walch-Solimena, C., & Ettl, C. (2011). Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 537−546.BornmannL.LeydesdorffL.Walch-SolimenaC.EttlC.2011Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data5453754610.1016/j.joi.2011.05.005Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Waltman, L. (2011). The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science-A visualization approach by using density maps. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 547−553.BornmannL.WaltmanL.2011The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science-A visualization approach by using density maps5454755310.1016/j.joi.2011.04.006Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1989). Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the science citation index database. Scientometrics, 15(5–6), 325−330.BraunT.GlänzelW.SchubertA.1989Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the science citation index database155–632533010.1007/BF02017057Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., & Dióspatonyi, I. (2005). World flash on basic research: The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 62(3), 297−319.BraunT.DióspatonyiI.2005World flash on basic research: The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations62329731910.1007/s11192-005-0023-7Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., Zsindely, S., Dióspatonyi, I., & Zádor, E. (2007). Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics, 70(3), 651−667.BraunT.ZsindelyS.DióspatonyiI.ZádorE.2007Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals70365166710.1007/s11192-007-0306-2Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Y.G., & Iino, M. (2005). Current Japanese reforms in English language education: The 2003 “action plan”. Language Policy, 4(1), 25−45.ButlerY.G.IinoM.2005Current Japanese reforms in English language education: The 2003 “action plan”41254510.1007/s10993-004-6563-5Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (2010). Language Isolates and Their History, or, What’s Weird, Anyway? In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 16−31). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.CampbellL.2010Language Isolates and Their History, or, What’s Weird, Anyway?1631BerkeleyBerkeley Linguistics Society10.3765/bls.v36i1.3900Search in Google Scholar
Castelvecchi, D. (2015). Physics paper sets record with more than 5,000 authors. Nature News, 15/05/2015. 10.1038/nature.2015.17567CastelvecchiD.2015Nature News, 15/05/201510.1038/nature.2015.17567Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Csomós, G., & Tóth, G. (2016). Exploring the position of cities in global corporate research and development: A bibliometric analysis by two different geographical approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 516−532.CsomósG.TóthG.2016Exploring the position of cities in global corporate research and development: A bibliometric analysis by two different geographical approaches10251653210.1016/j.joi.2016.02.004Search in Google Scholar
Csomós, G. (2018). A spatial scientometric analysis of the publication output of cities worldwide. Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 547−566.CsomósG.2018A spatial scientometric analysis of the publication output of cities worldwide12254756610.1016/j.joi.2018.05.003Search in Google Scholar
de Almeida, E. C. E., & Guimarães, J. A. (2013). Brazil’s growing production of scientific articles-how are we doing with review articles and other qualitative indicators? Scientometrics, 97(2), 287−315.de AlmeidaE. C. E.GuimarãesJ. A.2013Brazil’s growing production of scientific articles-how are we doing with review articles and other qualitative indicators?97228731510.1007/s11192-013-0967-ySearch in Google Scholar
de Solla Price, D. (1978). Toward a model for science indicators. In Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R. K. Merton, A. Thackray, H. Zuckerman (Eds.), Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators (pp. 69–95). New York: John Wiley & Sons.de Solla PriceD.1978ElkanaY.LederbergJ.MertonR. K.ThackrayA.ZuckermanH.6995New YorkJohn Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Docampo, D., & Cram, L. (2014). On the internal dynamics of the Shanghai ranking. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1347−1366.DocampoD.CramL.2014On the internal dynamics of the Shanghai ranking9821347136610.1007/s11192-013-1143-0Search in Google Scholar
Docampo, D., Egret, D., & Cram, L. (2015). The effect of university mergers on the Shanghai ranking. Scientometrics, 104(1), 175−191.DocampoD.EgretD.CramL.2015The effect of university mergers on the Shanghai ranking104117519110.1007/s11192-015-1587-5Search in Google Scholar
Frenken, K., Heimeriks, G. J., & Hoekman, J. (2017). What drives university research performance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden Ranking data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 859−872.FrenkenK.HeimeriksG. J.HoekmanJ.2017What drives university research performance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden Ranking data11385987210.1016/j.joi.2017.06.006Search in Google Scholar
Grossetti, M., Eckert, D., Gingras, Y., Jégou, L., Larivière, V., & Milard, B. (2014). Cities and the geographical deconcentration of scientific activity: A multilevel analysis of publications (1987–2007). Urban Studies, 51(10), 2219−2234.GrossettiM.EckertD.GingrasY.JégouL.LarivièreV.MilardB.2014Cities and the geographical deconcentration of scientific activity: A multilevel analysis of publications1987-200751102219223410.1177/0042098013506047Search in Google Scholar
Gupta, B. M., Kshitij, A., & Verma, C. (2011). Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999-2008. Scientometrics, 86(2), 261-283.GuptaB. M.KshitijA.VermaC.2011Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999-200886226128310.1007/s11192-010-0272-ySearch in Google Scholar
He, T. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571−582.HeT.2009International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries80357158210.1007/s11192-007-2043-ySearch in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (1995). Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(2), 401–424.HicksD.1995Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge4240142410.1093/icc/4.2.401Search in Google Scholar
Iwai, Y. (2008). The perceptions of Japanese students toward academic English reading: Implications for effective ESL reading strategies. Multicultural Education, 15(4), 45–50.IwaiY.2008The perceptions of Japanese students toward academic English reading: Implications for effective ESL reading strategies1544550Search in Google Scholar
Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2017). National ties of international scientific collaboration and researcher mobility found in Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 110(2), 673−694.KatoM.AndoA.2017National ties of international scientific collaboration and researcher mobility found in Nature and Science110267369410.1007/s11192-016-2183-zSearch in Google Scholar
Kealey, T. (1996). The Economic Laws of Scientific Research. New York: St. Martin’s Press.KealeyT.1996New YorkSt. Martin’s Press10.1007/978-1-349-24667-0Search in Google Scholar
Kim, H., Yoon, J. W., & Crowcroft, J. (2012). Network analysis of temporal trends in scholarly research productivity. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 97−110.KimH.YoonJ. W.CrowcroftJ.2012Network analysis of temporal trends in scholarly research productivity619711010.1016/j.joi.2011.05.006Search in Google Scholar
King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. What different countries get for their research spending. Nature, 430, 311–316.KingD. A.2004The scientific impact of nations. What different countries get for their research spending43031131610.1038/430311a15254529Search in Google Scholar
Kumar, S., & Garg, K. C. (2005). Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China. Scientometrics, 64(2), 121-132.KumarS.GargK. C.2005Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China64212113210.1007/s11192-005-0244-9Search in Google Scholar
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519−533.LarivièreV.GingrasY.ArchambaultÉ.2006Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities68351953310.1007/s11192-006-0127-8Search in Google Scholar
Lee, L. C., Lin, P. H., Chuang, Y. W., & Lee, Y. Y. (2011). Research output and economic productivity: A Granger causality test. Scientometrics, 89(2), 465−478.LeeL. C.LinP. H.ChuangY. W.LeeY. Y.2011Research output and economic productivity: A Granger causality test89246547810.1007/s11192-011-0476-9Search in Google Scholar
Leta, J., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67(1), 87-105.LetaJ.GlänzelW.ThijsB.20066718710510.1007/s11192-006-0051-ySearch in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23-36.LeydesdorffL.WagnerC.2009Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system781233610.1007/s11192-008-1830-4Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S., & Bornmann, L. (2014). The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 606−617.LeydesdorffL.WagnerC. S.BornmannL.2014The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations8360661710.1016/j.joi.2014.05.002Search in Google Scholar
Li, J., Qiao, L., Li, W., & Jin, Y. (2014). Chinese-language articles are not biased in citations: Evidences from Chinese-English bilingual journals in Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 912–916.LiJ.QiaoL.LiW.JinY.2014Chinese-language articles are not biased in citations: Evidences from Chinese-English bilingual journals in Scopus and Web of Science8491291610.1016/j.joi.2014.09.003Search in Google Scholar
Liefner, I., Hennemann, S., & Lu, X. (2006). Cooperation in the innovation process in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Zhongguancun, Beijing. Environment and Planning A, 38(1), 111–130.LiefnerI.HennemannS.LuX.2006Cooperation in the innovation process in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Zhongguancun, Beijing38111113010.1068/a37343Search in Google Scholar
Lin, C. S., Huang, M. H., & Chen, D. Z. (2013). The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 611−621.LinC. S.HuangM. H.ChenD. Z.2013The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count7361162110.1016/j.joi.2013.03.007Search in Google Scholar
López-navarro, I., Moreno, A. I., Quintanilla, M. Á., & Rey-Rocha, J. (2015). Why do I publish research articles in English instead of my own language? Differences in Spanish researchers’ motivations across scientific domains. Scientometrics, 103(3), 939-976.López-NavarroI.MorenoA. I.QuintanillaM. Á.Rey-RochaJ.2015Why do I publish research articles in English instead of my own language? Differences in Spanish researchers’ motivations across scientific domains103393997610.1007/s11192-015-1570-1Search in Google Scholar
Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2010). Geographic characteristics of the growth of informetrics literature 1987-2008. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 591−601.LuK.WolframD.2010Geographic characteristics of the growth of informetrics literature 1987-20084459160110.1016/j.joi.2010.06.008Search in Google Scholar
Maisonobe, M., Eckert, D., Grossetti, M., Jégou, L., & Milard, B. (2016). The world network of scientific collaborations between cities: domestic or international dynamics? Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1025−1036.MaisonobeM.EckertD.GrossettiM.JégouL.MilardB.2016The world network of scientific collaborations between cities: domestic or international dynamics?1041025103610.1016/j.joi.2016.06.002Search in Google Scholar
Maisonobe, M., Grossetti, M., Milard, B., Jégou, L., & Eckert, D. (2017). The global geography of scientific visibility: a deconcentration process (1999–2011). Scientometrics, 113(1), 479−493.MaisonobeM.GrossettiM.MilardB.JégouL.EckertD.2017The global geography of scientific visibility: a deconcentration process1999–2011113147949310.1007/s11192-017-2463-2Search in Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C.W., & Schwarz, A.W. (1999). Scientific centres in Europe: An analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 36(3), 453−477.MatthiessenC.W.SchwarzA.W.1999Scientific centres in Europe: An analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators36345347710.1080/0042098993475Search in Google Scholar
Meo, S. A., Al Masri, A. A., Usmani, A. M., Memon, A. N., & Zaidi, S. Z. (2013). Impact of GDP, Spending on R&D, Number of Universities and Scientific Journals on Research Publications among Asian Countries. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66449MeoS. A.Al MasriA. A.UsmaniA. M.MemonA. N.ZaidiS. Z.2013Impact of GDP, Spending on R&D, Number of Universities and Scientific Journals on Research Publications among Asian Countries86e6644910.1371/journal.pone.0066449368876123840471Search in Google Scholar
Miyairi, N., & Chang, H. W. (2012). Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan, 2000-2009. Scientometrics, 92(1), 197−205.MiyairiN.ChangH. W.2012Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan, 2000-200992119720510.1007/s11192-012-0722-9Search in Google Scholar
Moin, M., Mahmoudi, M., & Rezaei, N. (2005). Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 62(2), 239−248.MoinM.MahmoudiM.RezaeiN.2005Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century62223924810.1007/s11192-005-0017-5Search in Google Scholar
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213−228.MongeonP.Paul-HusA.2016The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis106121322810.1007/s11192-015-1765-5Search in Google Scholar
Morrison, J. (2014). China becomes world’s third-largest producer of research articles. Nature News, 06/02/2014. 10.1038/nature.2014.14684MorrisonJ.2014China becomes world’s third-largest producer of research articles06/02/201410.1038/nature.2014.14684Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nature Index (2016). US tops global research performance. Nature Index, 20/04/2016. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/us-tops-global-research-performanceNatureIndex2016Nature Index, 20/04/2016https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/us-tops-global-research-performanceSearch in Google Scholar
Paasi, A. (2005). Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), 769–789.PaasiA.2005Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces37576978910.1068/a3769Search in Google Scholar
Pan, K. R., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2, 902PanK. R.KaskiK.FortunatoS.2012World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science290210.1038/srep00902350935023198092Search in Google Scholar
Paul-Hus, A., Mongeon, P., Sainte-marie, M., & Larivière, V. (2017). The sum of it all: Revealing collaboration patterns by combining authorship and acknowledgements. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 80−87.Paul-HusA.MongeonP.Sainte-MarieM.LarivièreV.2017The sum of it all: Revealing collaboration patterns by combining authorship and acknowledgements111808710.1016/j.joi.2016.11.005Search in Google Scholar
Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2016). How can differences in international university rankings be explained? Scientometrics, 109(3), 2263−2278.PiroF. N.SivertsenG.2016How can differences in international university rankings be explained?10932263227810.1007/s11192-016-2056-5Search in Google Scholar
Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: policy implications. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1231−1254.ShehattaI.MahmoodK.2016Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: policy implications10921231125410.1007/s11192-016-2065-4Search in Google Scholar
Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2016). Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1849−1857.SudP.ThelwallM.2016Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration6781849185710.1002/asi.23515Search in Google Scholar
Tardy, C. (2004). The role of English in scientific communication: Lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3), 247−269.TardyC.2004The role of English in scientific communication: Lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex?3324726910.1016/j.jeap.2003.10.001Search in Google Scholar
Tian, P. (2016). China’s diaspora key to science collaborations. Nature Index, 23/06/2016. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/chinas-diaspora-key-to-science-collaborationsTianP.2016Nature Index, 23/06/2016https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/chinas-diaspora-key-to-science-collaborationsSearch in Google Scholar
Uddin, S., Hossain, L., Abbasi, A., & Rasmussen, K. (2012). Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network. Scientometrics, 90(2), 687–699.UddinS.HossainL.AbbasiA.RasmussenK.2012Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network90268769910.1007/s11192-011-0511-xSearch in Google Scholar
Van Noorden, R. (2010). Cities: Building the best cities for science. Nature, 467(7318), 906−908.Van NoordenR.2010Cities: Building the best cities for science467731890690810.1038/467906a20962821Search in Google Scholar
Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results: Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423-428.Van RaanA. F. J.1998The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results: Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations42342342810.1007/BF02458380Search in Google Scholar
Van Weijen, D. (2012). The Language of (Future) Scientific Communication. Research Trends, 31, 11/2012. https://www.researchtrends.com/issue-31-november-2012/the-language-of-future-scientific-communication/Van WeijenD.2012https://www.researchtrends.com/issue-31-november-2012/the-language-of-future-scientific-communication/Search in Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (2008). Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries. Scientometrics, 74(2), 237−254.VinklerP.2008Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries74223725410.1007/s11192-008-0215-zSearch in Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (2010). The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.VinklerP.2010OxfordChandos Publishing10.1533/9781780630250Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X., Xu, S., Wang, Z., Peng, L., & Wang, C. (2013). International scientific collaboration of China: Collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics, 95(3), 885−894.WangX.XuS.WangZ.PengL.WangC.2013International scientific collaboration of China: Collaborating countries, institutions and individuals95388589410.1007/s11192-012-0877-4Search in Google Scholar
Xie, Y., Zhang, C., & Lai, Q. (2014). China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(26), 9437−9442.XieY.ZhangC.LaiQ.2014China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology111269437944210.1073/pnas.1407709111408443624979796Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, H., & Guo, H. (1997). Scientific research collaboration in China. Scientometrics, 38(2), 309−319.ZhangH.GuoH.1997Scientific research collaboration in China38230931910.1007/BF02457416Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009a). Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output. Scientometrics, 81(3), 839−857.ZhouP.ThijsB.GlänzelW.2009aRegional analysis on Chinese scientific output81383985710.1007/s11192-008-2255-9Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009b). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593−621.ZhouP.ThijsB.GlänzelW.2009bIs China also becoming a giant in social sciences?79359362110.1007/s11192-007-2068-xSearch in Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. (2005). The making of an innovative region from a centrally planned economy: Institutional evolution in Zhongguancun Science Park in Beijing. Environment and Planning A, 37(6), 1113−1134.ZhouY.2005The making of an innovative region from a centrally planned economy: Institutional evolution in Zhongguancun Science Park in Beijing3761113113410.1068/a3716Search in Google Scholar
Zou, Y., & Laubichler, M.D. (2017). Measuring the contributions of Chinese scholars to the research field of systems biology from 2005 to 2013. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1615−1631.ZouY.LaubichlerM.D.2017Measuring the contributions of Chinese scholars to the research field of systems biology from 2005 to 201311031615163110.1007/s11192-016-2213-xSearch in Google Scholar