[1. Blinder, A.S. (1998), “Central Banking in Theory and Practice”, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Clarida, R., Gali, J. and Gertler, M. (1998), “Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence”, European Economic Review, Vol. 42, No. 06, pp.1033-1067.10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00016-6]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Clarida, R., Gali, J. and Gertler, M. (1999), “The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVII, pp. 1661-1707.10.1257/jel.37.4.1661]Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Cukierman, A. and Muscatelli, A. (2003), “Do Central Banks Have Precautionary Demands for Expansions and for Price Stability? A New Keynesian Approach”, Available on the web athttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ceb8/6df0e6f1932871bcde7c9c58a025e716b91f.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Cukierman, A. and Gerlach, S. (2003), “The Inflation Bias Result Revisited: Theory and Some International Evidence”, The Manchester School, Vol. 71, No. 05, pp. 541-565.10.1111/1467-9957.00366]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Cukierman, A. and Muscatelli, A. (2008), “Nonlinear Taylor Rules and Asymmetric Preferences in Central Banking: Evidence from the United Kingdom and the United States”, The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 08, No.01, Article: 07.10.2202/1935-1690.1488]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Dolado, J., Pedrero, R.M.D. and Ruge-Murcia, F. (2004), “Nonlinear Monetary Policy Rules: Some New Evidence for the US”, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, Vol. 08, No. 03, Article 02.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Dolado, J.J., Maria-Dolores, R. and Naveira, M. (2005), “Are Monetary Policy Reaction Functions Asymmetric? The Role of Nonlinearity in the Phillips Curve”, European Economic Review, Vol. 49, No. 02, pp. 485-503.10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00032-1]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Friedman, B. M. (2000), “Monetary Policy”, NBER Working Paper, No. W8057.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Hutchinson M.M., Sengupta, R. and Singh, N. (2010), “Estimating a Monetary Policy Rule for India”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 45. No. 38, pp. 67-69.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Krušković, B. (2017), “Exchange Rate and Interest Rate in the Monetary Policy Reaction Function”, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Vol. 06, No. 01, pp. 55-86.10.1515/jcbtp-2017-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kydland, F.E. and Prescott E.C. (1977), “Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 85, No. 03, pp. 473-491.10.1086/260580]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Lewis, M.K. and Mizen P.D. (2000), “Monetary Economics”, Oxford University Press. Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Lokendra, K. and Bhanumurthy, N.R. (2016), “Regime Shifts in India’s Monetary Policy Response Function,” National Institute of Public Finance and Policy New Delhi, Working Paper Series, No. 177.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Martin, C. and Milas, C. (2004), “Modelling Monetary Policy: Inflation Targeting in Practice”, Economica, Vol. 71 pp. 209-221.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Mohanty M S and Klau Marc. (2004), “Monetary policy rules in emerging market economies; Issues and evidence”, BIS Working Papers, No. 149]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Naini, A. and Naderian, M. (2016), “Over-reaction to Policy Signals, and Central Bank Optimal Communication Policy”, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Vol. 05, No. 03, pp. 165-18710.1515/jcbtp-2016-0025]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Nobay, A.R. and Peel, D.A. (2003), “Optimal Discretionary Monetary Policy in a Model of Asymmetric Central Bank Preferences”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No.489, pp. 657-65.10.1111/1468-0297.t01-1-00149]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Persson, T., Tabellini, G. (1999), “Political economics and macroeconomic policy”, In, Taylor, J.B., Woodford, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam.10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10035-1]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Petersen, K. (2007), “Does the Federal Reserve Follow a Non-Linear Taylor Rule?”, University of Connecticut Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 2007-37.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Ranjan, R, R. Jain and S. C. Dhal (2007), “India’s Potential Economic Measurement Issues and Policy Implications”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 42, No. 17, (28 April).]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Ruge-Murcia, F.J. (2003), “Does the Barro-Gordon Model Explain the Behavior of US Inflation? A Reexamination of the Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 50, No. pp. 1375-1390.10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00083-7]Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar
[23. Siklos, P. and Wohar, M. (2005), “Estimating Taylor-Type Rules: An Unbalanced Regression?” In T. Fomby and D. Terrell (Eds.) Advances in Econometrics: Econometric Analysis of Economic and Financial Time Series. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Singh, B. (2010), “Monetary Policy Behaviour in India: Evidence from Taylor-type Policy Frameworks”, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai, Staff Studies No. SS (DEAP) 2/2010,]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Shin, Y., Yu, B.C. & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Sickels, R., & Horrace, W. (Eds), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 281-314.10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Taylor, J. (1993), “Discretion versus policy rules in practice”, Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy, Vol. 39, pp.195-214.10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Virmani, V. (2004), “Operationalising Taylor-type Rules for the Indian Economy: Issues and Some Results (1992 Q3 2001 Q4)”, IIMA Working Papers, No. 2004/07-04, July 2004/1832.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Woodford, M. (2003), “Optimal Interest-Rate Smoothing”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No. 04, pp. 861-886.10.1111/1467-937X.00270]Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar