1. bookTom 8 (2019): Zeszyt 1 (January 2019)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2336-9205
Pierwsze wydanie
11 Mar 2014
Częstotliwość wydawania
3 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

Nonlinear Reaction functions: Evidence from India

Data publikacji: 03 Jan 2019
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 8 (2019) - Zeszyt 1 (January 2019)
Zakres stron: 111 - 132
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2336-9205
Pierwsze wydanie
11 Mar 2014
Częstotliwość wydawania
3 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

1. Blinder, A.S. (1998), “Central Banking in Theory and Practice”, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

2. Clarida, R., Gali, J. and Gertler, M. (1998), “Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence”, European Economic Review, Vol. 42, No. 06, pp.1033-1067.10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00016-6Search in Google Scholar

3. Clarida, R., Gali, J. and Gertler, M. (1999), “The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVII, pp. 1661-1707.10.1257/jel.37.4.1661Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Cukierman, A. and Muscatelli, A. (2003), “Do Central Banks Have Precautionary Demands for Expansions and for Price Stability? A New Keynesian Approach”, Available on the web athttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ceb8/6df0e6f1932871bcde7c9c58a025e716b91f.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

5. Cukierman, A. and Gerlach, S. (2003), “The Inflation Bias Result Revisited: Theory and Some International Evidence”, The Manchester School, Vol. 71, No. 05, pp. 541-565.10.1111/1467-9957.00366Search in Google Scholar

6. Cukierman, A. and Muscatelli, A. (2008), “Nonlinear Taylor Rules and Asymmetric Preferences in Central Banking: Evidence from the United Kingdom and the United States”, The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 08, No.01, Article: 07.10.2202/1935-1690.1488Search in Google Scholar

7. Dolado, J., Pedrero, R.M.D. and Ruge-Murcia, F. (2004), “Nonlinear Monetary Policy Rules: Some New Evidence for the US”, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, Vol. 08, No. 03, Article 02.Search in Google Scholar

8. Dolado, J.J., Maria-Dolores, R. and Naveira, M. (2005), “Are Monetary Policy Reaction Functions Asymmetric? The Role of Nonlinearity in the Phillips Curve”, European Economic Review, Vol. 49, No. 02, pp. 485-503.10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00032-1Search in Google Scholar

9. Friedman, B. M. (2000), “Monetary Policy”, NBER Working Paper, No. W8057.Search in Google Scholar

10. Hutchinson M.M., Sengupta, R. and Singh, N. (2010), “Estimating a Monetary Policy Rule for India”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 45. No. 38, pp. 67-69.Search in Google Scholar

11. Krušković, B. (2017), “Exchange Rate and Interest Rate in the Monetary Policy Reaction Function”, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Vol. 06, No. 01, pp. 55-86.10.1515/jcbtp-2017-0004Search in Google Scholar

12. Kydland, F.E. and Prescott E.C. (1977), “Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 85, No. 03, pp. 473-491.10.1086/260580Search in Google Scholar

13. Lewis, M.K. and Mizen P.D. (2000), “Monetary Economics”, Oxford University Press. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lokendra, K. and Bhanumurthy, N.R. (2016), “Regime Shifts in India’s Monetary Policy Response Function,” National Institute of Public Finance and Policy New Delhi, Working Paper Series, No. 177.Search in Google Scholar

15. Martin, C. and Milas, C. (2004), “Modelling Monetary Policy: Inflation Targeting in Practice”, Economica, Vol. 71 pp. 209-221.Search in Google Scholar

16. Mohanty M S and Klau Marc. (2004), “Monetary policy rules in emerging market economies; Issues and evidence”, BIS Working Papers, No. 149Search in Google Scholar

17. Naini, A. and Naderian, M. (2016), “Over-reaction to Policy Signals, and Central Bank Optimal Communication Policy”, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Vol. 05, No. 03, pp. 165-18710.1515/jcbtp-2016-0025Search in Google Scholar

18. Nobay, A.R. and Peel, D.A. (2003), “Optimal Discretionary Monetary Policy in a Model of Asymmetric Central Bank Preferences”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No.489, pp. 657-65.10.1111/1468-0297.t01-1-00149Search in Google Scholar

19. Persson, T., Tabellini, G. (1999), “Political economics and macroeconomic policy”, In, Taylor, J.B., Woodford, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam.10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10035-1Search in Google Scholar

20. Petersen, K. (2007), “Does the Federal Reserve Follow a Non-Linear Taylor Rule?”, University of Connecticut Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 2007-37.Search in Google Scholar

21. Ranjan, R, R. Jain and S. C. Dhal (2007), “India’s Potential Economic Measurement Issues and Policy Implications”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 42, No. 17, (28 April).Search in Google Scholar

22. Ruge-Murcia, F.J. (2003), “Does the Barro-Gordon Model Explain the Behavior of US Inflation? A Reexamination of the Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 50, No. pp. 1375-1390.10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00083-7Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Siklos, P. and Wohar, M. (2005), “Estimating Taylor-Type Rules: An Unbalanced Regression?” In T. Fomby and D. Terrell (Eds.) Advances in Econometrics: Econometric Analysis of Economic and Financial Time Series. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Search in Google Scholar

24. Singh, B. (2010), “Monetary Policy Behaviour in India: Evidence from Taylor-type Policy Frameworks”, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai, Staff Studies No. SS (DEAP) 2/2010,Search in Google Scholar

25. Shin, Y., Yu, B.C. & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Sickels, R., & Horrace, W. (Eds), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 281-314.10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9Search in Google Scholar

26. Taylor, J. (1993), “Discretion versus policy rules in practice”, Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy, Vol. 39, pp.195-214.10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-LSearch in Google Scholar

27. Virmani, V. (2004), “Operationalising Taylor-type Rules for the Indian Economy: Issues and Some Results (1992 Q3 2001 Q4)”, IIMA Working Papers, No. 2004/07-04, July 2004/1832.Search in Google Scholar

28. Woodford, M. (2003), “Optimal Interest-Rate Smoothing”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No. 04, pp. 861-886.10.1111/1467-937X.00270Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo