<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> Six years after the outbreak of the financial crisis that had shaken the global financial system, experts and analysts all over the world continue discussing the effectiveness, scope and adequacy of mechanisms and measures implemented in the meantime, as well as the adequacy of the underlying theoretical concept. A global consent has been reached on ensuring financial stability through the interaction of monetary, fiscal and prudential policy to ensure the necessary macroprudential dimension of regulatory and supervisory frameworks. The USA crisis spilled over to Europe. Strong support of governments to bail out banks quickly resulted in sovereign debt crises in some peripheral EU Member States. Fiscal insolvency of these countries strongly shook the EU and increased doubts in the monetary union survival. The European Union stood united to defend the euro and responded strongly with a new complex and comprehensive financial stability framework. This supranational framework is a counterpart to the global financial stability framework created by the G20 member countries. Starting from the specific features of the monetary policy whose capacities are determined by euroisation, available instruments and resources for preventive supervisory activities, as well as the role of the government in crisis management, Montenegro created a framework for maintaining financial stability and prescribed fostering and maintaining financial stability as the main objective of the Central Bank of Montenegro.</p></abstract>

Six years after the outbreak of the financial crisis that had shaken the global financial system, experts and analysts all over the world continue discussing the effectiveness, scope and adequacy of mechanisms and measures implemented in the meantime, as well as the adequacy of the underlying theoretical concept. A global consent has been reached on ensuring financial stability through the interaction of monetary, fiscal and prudential policy to ensure the necessary macroprudential dimension of regulatory and supervisory frameworks. The USA crisis spilled over to Europe. Strong support of governments to bail out banks quickly resulted in sovereign debt crises in some peripheral EU Member States. Fiscal insolvency of these countries strongly shook the EU and increased doubts in the monetary union survival. The European Union stood united to defend the euro and responded strongly with a new complex and comprehensive financial stability framework. This supranational framework is a counterpart to the global financial stability framework created by the G20 member countries. Starting from the specific features of the monetary policy whose capacities are determined by euroisation, available instruments and resources for preventive supervisory activities, as well as the role of the government in crisis management, Montenegro created a framework for maintaining financial stability and prescribed fostering and maintaining financial stability as the main objective of the Central Bank of Montenegro.

Global Financial Crisis – Policy Response

Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice

{"article-title":"Global Financial Crisis \u2013 Policy Response"}

Six years after the outbreak of the financial crisis that had shaken the global financial system, experts and analysts all over the world continue discussing...

Global Financial Crisis – Policy Response

Data publikacji: 11 mar 2014

Zakres stron: 9 - 26

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2014-0002

Słowa kluczowe
financial crisis, financial stability, banks

This content is open access.

Global Financial Crisis – Policy Response

Data publikacji: 11 mar 2014

Zakres stron: 9 - 26

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2014-0002

Słowa kluczowefinancial crisis, financial stability, banks

This content is open access.

Słowa kluczowe
financial crisis, financial stability, banks