[
Abzianidze, L. et al. (2017). The Parallel Meaning Bank: Towards a Multilingual Corpus of Translations Annotated with Compositional Meaning Representations. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, pages 242–247.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baranescu, L. et al. (2013). Abstract Meaning Representation for Sembanking. In Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Sophia, pages 178–186.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barwise, J., and Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, pages 159–219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bos, J. (2021): Quantification Annotation in Discourse Representation. In The 17th Joint ACL – ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation, Groningen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bunt, H. et al. (2022). Quantification Annotation in ISO 24617-12. In Proceedings of the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, pages 3407–3416.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gil, D. (1993). Nominal and verbal quantification. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 46.4, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pages 275–317.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gysel van, J. E. L. et al. (2021). Designing a Uniform Meaning Representation for Natural Language Processing. Künstl Intell 35, Springer-Verlag, pages 343–360.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hajič, J. et al. (2020a). Prague Dependency Treebank – Consolidated 1.0. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Marseille, pages 5208–5218.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hajič, J. et al. (2020b). Prague Dependency Treebank – Consolidated 1.0. LINDATCLARIAH, Prague: Charles University. Accessible at: http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-3185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hladiš, F. (1956). K významu a užití příslovce řádově. Naše řeč, 48(4), pages 254–256.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kamp, H. et al. (2011). Discourse Representation Theory. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 15, Elsevier, MIT, pages 125–394.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keenan, E. L. (2012). The Quantifier Questionnaire. In Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 90, Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kopečný, F. (1953). Kvantitativní přívlastek a určení míry. Slovo a slovesnost, 14(3), pages 115–121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mikulová, M. et al. (2006). Annotation on the tectogrammatical level in the Prague Dependency Treebank. Annotation manual. Technical report, 2006/30, Prague: Charles University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mikulová, M., and Bejček E. (2017). Prague Database of Forms and Functions 1.0. LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ, Prague: Charles University. Accessible at: http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-2542.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mikulová, M., and Panevová, J. (2021). Formy a funkce okolnostních určení v češtině. Určení prostorová a časová. Prague: Charles University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Panevová, J. (1980). Formy a funkce ve stavbě české věty. Prague: Academia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steedman, M. (2001). The Syntactic Process. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šindlerová, J., and Štěpánková, B. (2021). Between Adverbs and Particles: A Corpus Study of Selected Intensifiers. Jazykovedný časopis, 72(2), pages 444–453.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vondráček, M. (1999). Příslovce a částice – hranice slovního druhu. Naše řeč, 82(2), pages 72–78.
]Search in Google Scholar