[
BAERMAN, Matthew – BROWN, Dunstan (2013): Case Syncretism. In: M. Haspelmath – M. Dryer (eds.): The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: https://wals.info/chapter/28
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BURZIO, Luigi (1986): Italian Syntax: a government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. 468 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CAHA, Pavel (2009): The Nanosyntax of Case. Tromsø: University of Tromsø. 322 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CAHA, Pavel (2013): Explaining the structure of case paradigms by the mechanisms of Nanosyntax. In: Natural Language ---amp--- Linguistic Theory, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1015–1066.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ČERMÁK, František – BLATNÁ, Renata – HLAVÁČOVÁ, Jaroslava – KLÍMOVÁ, Jana – KOCEK, Jan – KOPŘIVOVÁ, Marie – KŘEN, Michal – PETKEVIČ, Vladimír – SCHMIEDTOVÁ, Věra – ŠULC, Michal (2000): SYN2000: žánrově vyvážený korpus psané češtiny. Praha: Ústav Českého národního korpusu, FF UK. Available at: http://www.korpus.cz
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CHOMSKY, Noam (1981): Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 384 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CHOMSKY, Noam (1986): Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group. 314 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CHOMSKY, Noam – LASNIK, Howard (2015): The Theory of Principles and Parameters. In: The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 11–116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EMONDS, Joseph (2000): Lexicon and Grammar: The English Syntacticon. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 470 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EMONDS, Joseph (2010): Case Theory Revisited: Nominative and Accusative Super Case. In: A. BIČAN – J. KLAŠKA – P. MACUROVÁ – J. ZMRZLÍKOVÁ (eds.): Karlík a továrna na lingvistiku. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 98–124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HALLE, Morris – MARANTZ, Alec (1993): Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In: K. L. Hale – S. J. Keyser (eds.): The View from Building 20. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 111–176.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HINZEN, Wolfram (2014): On The Rationality of Case. In: Language Sciences, Vol. 46, pp. 133–151.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KARLÍK, Petr (2000): Hypotéza modifikované valenční teorie. In: Slovo a slovesnost. Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 170–189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KIPARSKY, Paul (1973): “Elsewhere” in Phonology. In: S. R. Anderson – P. Kiparsky (eds.): Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 93–106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOOPMAN, Hilda – SPORTICHE, Dominique (1991): The Position of Subjects. In: Lingua. Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 211–258.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KŘEN, Michal – CVRČEK, Václav – HENYŠ, Jan – HNÁTKOVÁ, Milena (2021): Korpus SYN, version 9 from 5. 12. 2021. Praha: Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KŘEN, Michal – CVRČEK, Václav – HENYŠ, Jan – HNÁTKOVÁ, Milena – JELÍNEK, Tomáš (2020): SYN2020: reprezentativní korpus psané češtiny. Praha: Ústav Českého národního korpusu, FF UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LINDERT, Patrick (2017): Case in Polish Predication and Control. In: University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 23, pp. 121–130.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MCFADDEN, Thomas (2007): Default Case and the Status of Compound Categories in Distributed Morphology. In: University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 13, pp. 225–238.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PARROTT, Jeffrey Keith (2009): Case variation in coordination: Danish vs. Faroese. In: Nordlyd, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 165–185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PRZEPIÓRKOWSKI, Adam (1999): Case assignment and the complement/adjunct dichotomy. Tübingen: University of Tübingen. 474 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHÜTZE, Carson (2001): On the Nature of Default Case. In: Syntax, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 205–238.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SIGURÐSSON, Halldór (2006): The Nominative Puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis. In: Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 289–308.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SIGURÐSSON;, Halldór (2008): The case of PRO. In: Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 403–450.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠMILAUER, Vladimír (1966): Novočeská skladba. Praha: SPN. 574 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠTÍCHA, František (2004): Nominativ a instrumentál predikátového substantiva v současné češtině: sonda do korpusu. In: Slovo a slovesnost, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 113–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STURGEON, Anne (2005): The discourse function of left dislocation in Czech. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Vol. 31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ULIČNÝ, Oldřich (2000): Instrumentál v struktuře české věty. Praha: Karolinum. 166 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VESELOVSKÁ, Ludmila (1998): Possessive Movement in the Czech Nominal Phrase. In: Journal of Slavic Linguistics. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 255–300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VESELOVSKÁ, Ludmila (2001): Agreement Patterns of Czech Group Nouns and Quantifiers. In: N. Corver – H. Van Riemsdijk (eds.): Semi-Lexical Categories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 273–320.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VESELOVSKÁ, Ludmila (2008): The extended verbal projection in Czech: Three variants of the verb be. In: G. Zybatow – L. Szucsich – U. Jughanns – R. Meyer (eds.): Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 555–569.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WOOLFORD, Ellen (2006): Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 111–130.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WURMBRAND, Susi (2012): Infinitives, Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 371 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
