Insect pollination determines the productivity of 75% of crop species grown on Earth (Kevan & Baker, 1983; Klein et al., 2007; Michener, 2007). Additionally, in recent years the production area for crops requiring pollination by insects has markedly increased, which in turn increases the importance of this ecosystem service for agriculture (Aizen et al., 2008). Horticulture and especially fruit growing are playing an increasingly important role in agricultural production. Nowadays, regions specializing in a specific type of fruit and vegetable production can be found in numerous countries.
Apple trees (
Fruit trees, including apple trees, are highly dependent on pollination by insects (Free, 1964; Delaplane & Mayer, 2000; Pardo & Borges, 2020), and only with sufficient pollination is it possible to obtain a high fruit yield of good commercial quality. In large commercial orchards, honeybees (
In many countries around the world, controlled rearing of selected bees species from the genus
The aim of the study was to verify the possibility of using
The experiment was conducted from April to September 2019 in an apple orchard in Poland. The orchard covered an area of 3.75 h and had approximately 5,100 apple trees representing twenty-two cultivars. Fifteen trees comprising the cultivars Lobo, Piros and Champion, were selected for the experiment. Three variants of pollination were established for each of the cultivars. The first group included trees with restricted pollinator access during the bloom period - self-pollination, the second group of trees that could only be accessed by mason bees - pollination by mason bees, and the third group of trees could be freely accessed by various insect pollinators - open pollination. In order to eliminate the influence of other pollinators and evaluate the effectiveness of pollination by
Mean number of clusters per tree and mean number of flowers per cluster in the tested groups
clusters | flowers | clusters | flowers | clusters | flowers | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
44.0 | 5.6 | 34.8 | 4.5 | 127.8 | 4.3 | |
50.6 | 5.6 | 35.4 | 4.5 | 109.6 | 4.3 | |
46.0 | 5.6 | 51.2 | 4.5 | 120.6 | 4.3 |
The 300 × 315 cm cages were made of mesh with the opening diameter of 1 mm. The base of each cage was a metal hoop with a diameter of 100 cm. The mesh below the hoop was tightly tied to the tree trunk. From the top, the cage was attached to the wire which was part of the orchard trellis. Additionally, every two or three days during the bloom period blooming branches that are considered effective pollenisers of the cultivars used in the experiment were placed in the cages. For cv. Lobo they were Gloster, Idared, Champion; for cv. Piros they were Champion and Delikates and for cv. Champion they were Delikates and Lobo. The cages were removed from the trees after they shed blossom. The fruit sets were counted on each tree before fruit drop. When the fruits ripened, the entire crop was harvested. The fruits from each tree were counted and weighed to the nearest 0.1 kg. Then, 10% of the fruits from each tree were randomly selected, and the numbers of seeds were counted after halving.
The effect of apple tree pollination by mason bees was assessed by determining:
the percentage of initial fruits relative to the number of flowers per tree; the percentage of ripe fruits relative to the number of flowers per tree; the mean fruit weight and number of fruits per tree; the number of seeds per fruit.
In order to control the presence of insects that were important for open pollination, individual trees were observed at the beginning of the experiment. Two trees of each cultivar were randomly selected for testing from the rows containing trees from the experimental groups. Each of the trees was observed for ten minutes, and worker honeybees, bumblebees, wild bees and other insects were counted separately. The observations were repeated six times between 1:00 pm and 3:00 pm on sunny days, when the air temperature was above 15°C.
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test was used for testing normality in all variables. The one-way analysis of variance was used to demonstrate the effect of the factor studied, and Duncan's test was performed to verify whether there were statistical differences between the average values experimental groups.
The number of seeds in the treatment groups was compared through the use of the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Bonferroni-Dunn post hoc test. The Statistica v.13 software was used to perform the analysis at a significance level α = 0.05.
The fruitlet set and the pollination treatment were significantly related for all the cultivars tested (Fig. 1).
The fruitlet rate of cv. Lobo was higher for open-pollinated and caged trees pollinated by
In cv. Piros, the fruitlet rate was higher for open-pollinated trees than for self-pollinated trees, with an intermediate value recorded for caged trees pollinated by
The fruit set at harvest for all varieties also differed among the pollination treatments (Fig. 2). The fruit rate of cv. Lobo was higher for open-pollinated trees and those pollinated by
A similar relationship was noted in cv. Champion, but a significant difference was observed only between the fruit rate for open-pollinated trees and self-pollinated trees (F=11.90; df=2, 12; p=0.0014). In the case of open pollination, 56% of all insects visiting the flowers were honeybees, 22% wild bees, 10% bumblebees and 12% other insects, mainly Diptera flies.
The number of fruits obtained from one tree differed depending on the pollination treatment for all the cultivars tested (Fig. 3). In cv. Lobo, the mean fruit number per tree was higher for open-pollinated trees and those pollinated by
The weight of fruit obtained from one tree and the pollination treatment were related for all the cultivars tested (Fig. 4). The mean weight of fruit per tree was higher for open-pollinated trees (8.7 kg) and those pollinated by
The fruit yield was higher for open-pollinated trees than for self-pollinated trees, with an intermediate value recorded for caged trees pollinated by
The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference between the treatment groups (p < 0.001) for all the cultivars tested (Fig. 5). The median seed number per fruit was higher for the open pollination treatment (10) and pollination by
There were significant differences between the treatment groups in cv. Piros (H=46.172; df=2, 85; p<0.001) and cv. Champion (H=92.803; df=2, 140; p<0.001). Pollination by
Most apple cultivars require cross-pollination with compatible pollen to ensure the profitability of commercial fruit cultivation, even with partially self-pollinating varieties. Therefore, cross-pollination with the participation of insect pollinators is believed to increase the fruit yield (Ramírez & Davenport, 2013). In general, more fruits are set and more seeds develop with open pollination than when trees are deprived of pollinators. Therefore, fruit set and seed set have been assumed to be the best indicator of pollination efficiency (Pardo & Borges, 2020).
The method of pollination influenced the number of fruit sets in all the apple cultivars examined. The highest share of fruitlets in relation to the number of flowers was observed in the open pollination group, then in the pollination by
Losada & Herrero (2013), Garratt et al. (2014b) and Jahed & Hirst (2018), indicate that with hand-pollination used to ensure the selection of an appropriate pollinizer, the proportion of fruit set to the total number of flowers ranges from 23% to 84%. Fruit setting in open pollination depends on native wild bees’ presence, their abundance, species richness, functional group diversity or the use of managed pollinators i.e., honeybee accompanied by bumblebees and mason bees (Brittain et al., 2013; Mallinger & Gratton, 2015; Blitzer et al., 2016; Földesi et al., 2016; Sapir et al., 2017). The pollination success of apples has been found to be significantly related to the species richness of wild bees.
In open pollination of apple trees by managed mason bees
However, when there is a shortage of pollinators in orchards, open pollination of flowers yields up to 20% of fruit set when the measurement is performed during the first fruitlet thinning, or 15% when the measurement pertains to ripe fruit (Losada & Herrero, 2013; Garratt et al., 2014a; 2016). Regardless of the use of the honeybee as a support for little abundant wild pollinators, 11–18% of fruitlets remain on apple trees from three to four weeks after petal drop (Mallinger & Gratton, 2015).
In trees with no access to insect pollinators, fruit set is the lowest. Very slightly self-pollinating varieties produce no more than 2% of fruit (Fuji - 1%; Golden Delicious - 1.8%). A higher level of self-pollination was noted in cv. Elstar (7%), Cox and Gala (8–10%) and Idared (12.3%), while Cox's Orange Pippin (0.7–17%) is most variable in terms of this trait (Garratt et al., 2014b; De Witte et al., 1996).
In our experiment, caged trees from the self-pollination group presented 1.5–17% final fruit set after fruitlet drop in the three cultivars studied. Our study has proven that cv. Lobo has low potential for self-pollination and self-fertilization. The efficiency of apple trees pollinated by
The sources of compatible pollen in the cages were blooming branches of the polliniser's variety, which had a limited amount of pollen. The transfer of foreign pollen may have been difficult, because the branches of the polliniser were located at the same height as the tree trunk, and the insects flew more frequently in the upper part of the crown. The activity of the female bees in the cage was lower because they did not collect and carry pollen into the nest but only used it as their forage. However, the appropriate density of red mason bees in the cage leads to effective pollination of flowers, resulting in fruitlet set (measured before June drop) of 20% and 38%, depending on the season (Ladurner et al., 2004).
A poorer pollination effect in the caged trees compared to open pollination may result from the presence of only one species of pollitaor. In open pollination, there is the synergy effect of various wild pollinator species or managed pollinators from the genus
Both fruit setting and seed development demonstrate the effectiveness of insect pollination. Seed setting and yield can reflect bees’ contribution to pollination (Russo et al., 2017). This is a good measure of pollination efficiency because higher bee densities are required to obtain a high seed-set and lower the misshapen fruit incidence than to ensure proper fruit setting (Ladurner et al., 2004). Poor pollination in the early bloom period may reduce the number of seeds in the fruit (Volz et al., 1996). The seeds are formed as a result of the fertilization of ovules, which is preceded by pollination. Thus, the number of seeds in a fruit is dependent on the intensity of pollination, i.e. the number of pollen grains deposited on the stigma (Doust & Doust, 1988).
In most varieties of apples, the fruit has five carpels, each with two seeds. Sometimes the fruit has 6 carpels, or a carpel develops three seeds. The Northern Spy cultivar has four ovules that can develop into up to twenty seeds (Delaplane & Mayer, 2000).
Following hand-pollination of different apple cultivars with foreign pollen, 5.4–8.6 seeds (Jahed & Hirst, 2018) or 3.5–4 seeds develop in the fruit (Garratt et al., 2014b). When
Seed setting is an important indicator of apple fruit development and is associated with marketable yield and high-quality fruit. Apples with a high seed count are larger and have a better shape and taste than the misshapen ones (Brault & Oliveira, 1995; Keulemans et al., 1996; Buccheri & Vaio, 2005). It is assumed that at least from six to eight ovules must be fertilized so that the fruit is not misshapen. This means that misshapen fruits have two or more empty carpels (Bralt & de Oliviera, 1995; Sheffield, 2014). Thus, fruit development is stimulated by pollination, pollen germination and seed-derived phytohormones (Dust & Dust, 1988). The apple fruit develops mainly from the receptacle, and proper fruit development has an impact on the marketable yield (Shivanna & Tandon, 2014).
Trees pollinated by