Reproduction and Accompanying Fauna of Red Mason Bee Osmia rufa L. (syn. Osmia bicornis L.) in Areas with Different Levels of Urbanization
, , oraz
24 cze 2021
O artykule
Kategoria artykułu: Original Article
Data publikacji: 24 cze 2021
Zakres stron: 123 - 137
Otrzymano: 24 maj 2020
Przyjęty: 24 mar 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2021-0009
Słowa kluczowe
© 2021 Barbara Zajdel et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Damage caused by the 3 most significant parasitic species (C_ indagator, M_ obscurus, Ch_ osmiae) in habitats with different urbanization levels
Urbanization level | Habitat | Cells occupied by parasites per tube | Total for area | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
min-max | Total for site | |||||
Me | Mean ± SD | Me | Mean ± SD | |||
H | C1 | 0.14 – 1.19 | 0.18 |
0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.25 |
0.56 ± 0.61 |
C2 | 1.26 – 1.94 | 1.39 |
1.53 ± 036 | |||
C3 | 0.08 – 0.56 | 0.28 |
0.31 ± 0.24 | |||
C4 | 0.16 – 0.37 | 0.23 |
0.25 ± 0.1 | |||
M | S1 | 2.51 – 3.03 | 2.93 |
2.8 ± 2.7 | 1.10 |
1.58 ± 1.09 |
S2 | 0.47 – 1.10 | 0.69 |
0.75 ± 0.31 | |||
S3 | 0.25 – 2.21 | 1.03 |
1.16 ± 0.99 | |||
L | V1 | 0.32 – 0.45 | 0.38 |
0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.45 |
0.64 ± 0.44 |
V2 | 0.27 – 1.44 | 0.92 |
0.87 ± 0.59 | |||
V3 | 0.28 – 1.19 | 0.51 |
0.66 ± 0.48 |
Species, families and orders of A/C-fauna of red mason bees (fauna classification according to Krunić et al_, 2005)
Species | City | Suburbs | Village | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||
Cleptoparasites | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
+ | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
Chrysopidae sp. | + | + | ||||||||
Parasitoids | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
+ | ||||||||||
Predators | + | + | + | + | ||||||
+ | ||||||||||
Birds ( |
+ | + | ||||||||
Nest destroyers | + | + | + | |||||||
+ | ||||||||||
+ | ||||||||||
+ | + | |||||||||
+ | + | + | + | |||||||
+ | + | + | + | + | + | |||||
+ | + | + | + | |||||||
+ | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
Cleptobionts | + | + | ||||||||
Accidental nest residents | + | + | + | + | ||||||
+ | ||||||||||
+ | ||||||||||
+ | ||||||||||
+ | ||||||||||
+ | + | + | + | |||||||
+ | + | |||||||||
+ | + | + | + | + | + | |||||
+ | + | |||||||||
No. of species per year | 9 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 11 | 14 | |
Total no. of species in the area | 15 | 16 | 20 |
Mean of cocoons in habitats and areas with different urbanization levels
Urbanization level | Habitat | Emergence rate ( |
Mean per tube | Population growth rate ( |
% of occupied tubes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
min-max | Total for site | Total for area | |||||
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||||||
H | C1 | 96.33 | 5.4 – 8.3 | 6.9* ± 3.2 |
7.3 ± 3.6 |
5.65 | 99.85 |
C2 | 97.00 | 8.2 – 9.2 | 8.6 ± 3.4 |
||||
C3 | 97.33 | 5.7 – 8.6 | 7.7 ± 4.2 |
||||
C4 | 97.90 | 5.4 – 7.6 | 6.0 ± 3,5 |
||||
M | S1 | 97.83 | 5.3 – 5.7 | 5.2 ± 3.1 |
6.2 ± 3.5 |
5.18 | 97.73 |
S2 | 98.25 | 6.6 – 74 | 7.0 ± 3.8 |
||||
S3 | 98.83 | 6.0 – 7.1 | 6.7 ± 3.5 |
||||
L | V1 | 98.08 | 6.0 – 9.0 | 7.0 ± 3.1 |
7.4 ± 3.3 |
5.86 | 93.67 |
V2 | 98.75 | 6.6 – 8.6 | 7.7 ± 3.7 |
||||
V3 | 98.67 | 6.3 – 9.0 | 7.5 ± 3.1 |
Mortality (dead larvae and pupae) in habitats with different urbanization levels
Urbanization level | Habitat | Mean per tube | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
min-max | Total for site mean ± SD | Total for area ± SD | ||
H | C1 | 1.07 – 1.87 | 1.59 ± 1.6 |
1.31 ± 1.60 |
C2 | 0.84 – 1.42 | 1.31 ± 1.2 |
||
C3 | 1.42 – 1.84 | 1.55 ± 1.6 |
||
C4 | 0.46 – 1.39 | 0.89 ± 1.6 |
||
M | S1 | 0.29 – 0.78 | 0.60 ± 1.2 |
1.04 ± 1.60 |
S2 | 1.80 – 2.04 | 1.60 ± 1.8 |
||
S3 | 0.68 – 1.24 | 1.00 ± 1.5 |
||
L | V1 | 0.71 – 1.06 | 1.11± 1.3 |
0.85 ± 1.20 |
V2 | 0.60 – 0.95 | 0.70 ± 1.1 |
||
V3 | 0.60 – 1.09 | 0.75 ± 1.0 |