Zacytuj

Figure 1

Poverty and informality in Latin American countries.Source: Data from the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2014b).Notes: 1. The y-axis is analyzed based on monetary poverty in urban areas. 2. The informality rate is the percentage of workers who are working in the informal sector.
Poverty and informality in Latin American countries.Source: Data from the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2014b).Notes: 1. The y-axis is analyzed based on monetary poverty in urban areas. 2. The informality rate is the percentage of workers who are working in the informal sector.

Figure 2

Poverty and informality in Colombia during the period 2002–2013.Source: Integrated Household Survey (NADS, 2014).
Poverty and informality in Colombia during the period 2002–2013.Source: Integrated Household Survey (NADS, 2014).

Figure 3

Changes in poverty indicators and informality rate in Colombia during 2002–2013.Source: Integrated Household Survey (NADS, 2014).Notes: Index for every indicator. 2002=100.
Changes in poverty indicators and informality rate in Colombia during 2002–2013.Source: Integrated Household Survey (NADS, 2014).Notes: Index for every indicator. 2002=100.

Figure 4

Distribution of log monthly labor income by informality.Source: Integrated Household Survey (NADS, 2014).Notes: 1. The graphs illustrate density functions estimated by kernel methodology.2. The estimated kernel is the Epanechnikov kernel with optimal bandwidth.
Distribution of log monthly labor income by informality.Source: Integrated Household Survey (NADS, 2014).Notes: 1. The graphs illustrate density functions estimated by kernel methodology.2. The estimated kernel is the Epanechnikov kernel with optimal bandwidth.

Figure 5

Distribution of log hourly labor income by informality.Source: Integrated Household Survey. (NADS, 2014).Notes: 1. The graphs illustrate density functions estimated by kernel methodology.2. The estimated kernel is the Epanechnikov kernel with optimal bandwidth.
Distribution of log hourly labor income by informality.Source: Integrated Household Survey. (NADS, 2014).Notes: 1. The graphs illustrate density functions estimated by kernel methodology.2. The estimated kernel is the Epanechnikov kernel with optimal bandwidth.

Figure 6

Continuous formalization and poverty indicators in Colombia.Source: Integrated Household Survey. (NADS, 2014).Note: Data were estimated considering monthly income and informal employment.
Continuous formalization and poverty indicators in Colombia.Source: Integrated Household Survey. (NADS, 2014).Note: Data were estimated considering monthly income and informal employment.

Average individual earnings gaps by informality type in Colombia, 2002–2013

InformalityLabor income2002200520082013
Informal sectorMonthly income35.732.840.542.3
Hourly income30.428.636.637.6
Informal employmentMonthly income40.938.944.043.6
Hourly income36.234.239.839.1

Informal employment and employment in the informal sector in Colombia, 2013

Employment in the informal Sector: 57.5Occupational position
Informal employment: 59.6Own account workersEmployersUnpaid workersWage-earning workers
FormalInformalFormalInformal
123456
Economic EstablishmentFormal sector (establishment with more than 5 employees)A4.4 (719640)1.5 (243867)0.2 (28405)30.8 (5015828)5.4 (891832)
Informal sector (establishment with 5 or fewer employees)B36.3 (5913077)3.2 (524612)0.5 (78009)2.7 (448819)2.1 (348184)8.1 (1327603)
Households hiring domestic workersC0.9 (155388)3.7 (602247)

Average earnings by occupational position and informality

CategoryAverage monthly labor income1% total averageAverage hourly labor income% total average
Own-account workers in the informal sector508,250543,45061
Own-account workers in the formal sector1,834,81219412,427221
Employers in the informal sector1,355,5761437,109126
Employers in the formal sector3,492,59136920,162358
Formal employees in the formal sector1,638,4241739,020160
Informal employees in the formal sector691,276734,09873
Formal employees in the informal sector909,387964,67783
Informal employees in the informal sector507,253543,26958
Total average947,5491005,633100

Effects of changes in informality on poverty indicators in Colombia, 2002-2013. Monthly labor income

PeriodInformalityKind of effectHeadcount ratioGapSeverity
Change in indicator% total changeChange in indicator% total changeChange in indicator% total change
2002-2005InformalChange explained byEarnings gap-0.510.8-0.39.9-0.28.7
sectorinformalityInformality rate-0.512.0-0.39.9-0.29.2
Change not explained by informality-3.377.2-2.380.1-1.782.1
Total change-4.3100.0-2.8100.0-2.1100.0
InformalChange explained byEarnings gap-0.511.5-0.28.5-0.27.8
employmentinformalityInformality rate-0.817.9-0.414.9-0.211.7
Change not explained by informality-3.370.6-2.276.6-1.780.6
Total change-4.7100.0-2.8100.0-2.1100.0
2008-2013InformalChange explained byEarnings gap0.4-4.00.2-3.90.1-3.7
SectorinformalityiInformality rate-0.11.0-0.11.10.01.2
Change not explained by informality-10.6103.0-5.5102.8-3.3102.5
Total change-10.3100.0-5.3100.0-3.2100.0
InformalChange explained byEarnings gap0.3-2.60.1-2.10.1-1.8
employmentinformalityInformality rate-0.32.5-0.12.2-0.12.1
Change not explained by informality-10.1100.1-5.399.8-3.399.7
Total change-10.1100.0-5.3100.0-3.3100.0

Workers by informality type and poverty

Type of informalityFormal/informalPoorNot poorTotal
Informal sectorEmployment in the informal sector15.841.757.5
Employment in the formal sector2.540.042.5
Total18.381.7100.0
Informal employmentInformal employment16.543.159.6
Formal employment1.838.640.4
Total18.381.7100.0

Formalization effect on poverty indicators in Colombia, 2013

InformalityIncomeChange in indicatorsHead count ratioGapSeverity
Informal sectorMonthlyChange in indicator−11.2−4.8−2.6
incomeChange in percentage−40.0%−47.1%−49.0%
HourlyChange in indicator−10.1−4.4−2.4
incomeChange in percentage−33.7%−37.0%−35.2%
Informal employmentMonthlyChange in indicator−12.7−5.3−2.8
incomeChange in percentage−44.5%−51.0%−52.3%
HourlyChange in indicator−11.6−4.6−2.4
incomeChange in percentage−41.3%−45.9%−46.4%