This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Avery Jones, J.F., Vann, R., Wheeler, J. (2006), The origins of concepts and expressions used in the OECD model and their adoption by states, Bulletin – Tax Treaty Monitor, IBFD, Vol. 60, No. 6, sec. 2.3.1.Avery JonesJ.F.VannR.WheelerJ.2006The origins of concepts and expressions used in the OECD model and their adoption by statesIBFD606sec. 2.3.1.Search in Google Scholar
Barbier, C. (2016), The permanent establishment in a post BEPS world, Tilburg University, Tilburg.BarbierC.2016Tilburg UniversityTilburgSearch in Google Scholar
Boniecka, M., Sołtysiak, P. (2018), Wybrane aspekty prawne i podatkowe dotyczące klauzuli PPT, Przegląd Podatkowy, Vol. 10, pp. 41–51.BonieckaM.SołtysiakP.2018Wybrane aspekty prawne i podatkowe dotyczące klauzuli PPT104151Search in Google Scholar
Budesz, K., Komer, W. (2012), Umowy o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania. Opodatkowanie płatności do odbiorców zagranicznych, Difin, Warszawa.BudeszK.KomerW.2012DifinWarszawaSearch in Google Scholar
Dhuldhoya, V. (2018), The future of the permanent establishment concept, Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 72, No. 4a (Special Issue).DhuldhoyaV.2018The future of the permanent establishment concept724a(Special Issue).Search in Google Scholar
Dos Santos, A., Mota Lopes, C. (2016), Tax sovereignty, tax competition and the base erosion and peofit shifting concept of permanent establishment, EC Tax Review, Vol. 5–6, pp. 296–311.Dos SantosA.Mota LopesC.2016Tax sovereignty, tax competition and the base erosion and peofit shifting concept of permanent establishment5–629631110.54648/ECTA2016030Search in Google Scholar
Egger, P., Larch, M., Pfaffermayer, M., Winner, H. (2004), The impact of endogenous tax treaties on foreign direct investment: theory and empirical evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, John Wiley & Sons, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 901–931.EggerP.LarchM.PfaffermayerM.WinnerH.2004The impact of endogenous tax treaties on foreign direct investment: theory and empirical evidenceJohn Wiley & Sons39390193110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0019Search in Google Scholar
Eisenbeiss, J. (2016), BEPS action 7: evaluation of the agency permanent establishment, Intertax, Vol. 44, No. 6/7, pp. 481–502.EisenbeissJ.2016BEPS action 7: evaluation of the agency permanent establishment446/748150210.54648/TAXI2016039Search in Google Scholar
Elgin, C. (2013), Cyclicality of shadow economy, Economic Papers, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 478–490.ElginC.2013Cyclicality of shadow economy31447849010.1111/1759-3441.12011Search in Google Scholar
Engsig, S.K. (2014), Branches of companies in the EU: balancing the eleventh company law directive, national company law and the right of establishment, European Company and Financial Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1–44.EngsigS.K.2014Branches of companies in the EU: balancing the eleventh company law directive, national company law and the right of establishment11114410.1515/ecfr-2014-0053Search in Google Scholar
Garbarino, C. (2020), Permanent establishments and BEPS action 7: perspectives in evolution, Bocconi Legal Studies, No. 3713098, pp. 1–38.GarbarinoC.2020Permanent establishments and BEPS action 7: perspectives in evolutionNo. 3713098,138Search in Google Scholar
Genschel, P., Schwarz, P. (2011), Tax competition: a literature review, Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 9, pp. 339–370.GenschelP.SchwarzP.2011Tax competition: a literature review933937010.1093/ser/mwr004Search in Google Scholar
Gomułowicz, A. (2007), Wprowadzenie: Unikanie podwójnego opodatkowania, in: M. Jamroży, A. Cloer (Eds), Umowa o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania z Niemcami, C.H. Beck, Warszawa, pp. XXXIIIGomułowiczA.2007Wprowadzenie: Unikanie podwójnego opodatkowaniain:JamrożyM.CloerA.(Eds)C.H. BeckWarszawaXXXIIISearch in Google Scholar
Gross, T., Klein, P., Makris, M. (2020), Residence- and source-based capital taxation in open economies with infinitely-lived consumers, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 127, pp. 1–69.GrossT.KleinP.MakrisM.2020Residence- and source-based capital taxation in open economies with infinitely-lived consumers12716910.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103369Search in Google Scholar
Hongler, P., Pistone, P. (2015), Blueprints for a new PE Nexus to tax business income in the era of the digital economy, WU International Taxation Research Paper Series, No. 2015–15.HonglerP.PistoneP.2015Blueprints for a new PE Nexus to tax business income in the era of the digital economyNo. 2015–15.Search in Google Scholar
Jamroży, M. (2014), Planowanie podatkowe działalności prowadzonej poprzez zagraniczny zakład, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Vol. 198, pp. 255–266.JamrożyM.2014Planowanie podatkowe działalności prowadzonej poprzez zagraniczny zakład, Studia Ekonomiczne198255266Search in Google Scholar
Jamroży, M. (2016), Zakład zagraniczny w kontekście planu działań BEPS, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Vol. 294, pp. 59–72.JamrożyM.2016Zakład zagraniczny w kontekście planu działań BEPS, Studia Ekonomiczne2945972Search in Google Scholar
Jamroży, M. (2018), Ograniczony obowiązek podatkowy osób fizycznych, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Vol. 358, pp. 103–113.JamrożyM.2018Ograniczony obowiązek podatkowy osób fizycznych, Studia Ekonomiczne358103113Search in Google Scholar
Jamroży, M., Krysiak, C. (2018), Sztuczne unikanie statusu zakładu poprzez podział umów, in: B. Brzeziński, K. Lasiński-Sulecki, W. Morawski (Eds.), Nowe narzędzia prawne w podatkach dochodowych i majątkowych, Wolter Kluwer, Warszawa, pp. 435–510.JamrożyM.KrysiakC.2018Sztuczne unikanie statusu zakładu poprzez podział umówin:BrzezińskiB.Lasiński-SuleckiK.MorawskiW.(Eds.)Wolter KluwerWarszawa435510Search in Google Scholar
Janiszewska, M. (2020), Zmiany w procedurach podatkowych i uprawnieniach organów podatkowych – ich znaczenie w kontekście uszczelniania systemu podatkowego w Polsce w latach 2015–2019, Studia BAS, Vol. 4, No. 64, pp. 9–27.JaniszewskaM.2020Zmiany w procedurach podatkowych i uprawnieniach organów podatkowych – ich znaczenie w kontekście uszczelniania systemu podatkowego w Polsce w latach 2015–201946492710.31268/StudiaBAS.2020.28Search in Google Scholar
Janiszewska, M., Węgrzyn, M., Kowalski, P. (2019), Critical assessment of the tie-breaker rule using the example of the DTT Germany-Poland, Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Vol. 63 No. 9, pp. 47–57.JaniszewskaM.WęgrzynM.KowalskiP.2019Critical assessment of the tie-breaker rule using the example of the DTT Germany-Poland639475710.15611/pn.2019.9.04Search in Google Scholar
Jiménez, A.J.M. (2016), The Spanish position on the concept of a permanent establishment: anticipating BEPS, beyond BEPS or simply a wrong interpretation of article 5 of the OECD model? Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 70, No. 8, pp. 458–473.JiménezA.J.M.2016The Spanish position on the concept of a permanent establishment: anticipating BEPS, beyond BEPS or simply a wrong interpretation of article 5 of the OECD model?708458473Search in Google Scholar
Koreń, D. (2013), Charakter Konwencji Modelowej OECD o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania, Monitor Podatkowy, Vol. 8, pp. 20–24.KoreńD.2013Charakter Konwencji Modelowej OECD o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania82024Search in Google Scholar
Litwińczuk H. (2020), Międzynarodowe prawo podatkowe, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.LitwińczukH.2020Wolters KluwerWarszawaSearch in Google Scholar
NBP (2018), Zagraniczne inwestycje bezpośrednie w Polsce i polskie inwestycje bezpośrednie za granicą w 2017 roku.NBP2018Search in Google Scholar
OECD (2015), BEPS Action 7 Final Report, Proposed commentary on article 5(6), para 38.8.OECD2015Proposed commentary on article 5(6), para 38.8.Search in Google Scholar
Oguttu W.A. (2018), Should developing countries sign the OECD multilateral instrument to address treaty-related base erosion and profit shifting measures? Center for Global Development, Washington DC.OguttuW.A.2018Center for Global DevelopmentWashington DCSearch in Google Scholar
Peretiatkowicz, L. (2016), Wykorzystanie zagranicznego zakładu w międzynarodowym planowaniu podatkowym, Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, Vol. 5, No. 83, pp. 119–127.PeretiatkowiczL.2016Wykorzystanie zagranicznego zakładu w międzynarodowym planowaniu podatkowym583119127Search in Google Scholar
Pinto, D. (2006) The Need to Reconceptualize the Permanent Establishment Threshold. Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 60, No. 7, pp. 266–279.PintoD.2006The Need to Reconceptualize the Permanent Establishment Threshold607266279Search in Google Scholar
Pleijsier, A. (2015), The Agency permanent establishment in BEPS action 7: treaty abuse or business abuse? Intertax, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 147–154.PleijsierA.2015The Agency permanent establishment in BEPS action 7: treaty abuse or business abuse?43214715410.54648/TAXI2015012Search in Google Scholar
PwC (2013), Permanent establishment 2.0. At the heart of the matter, retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/412394251/Pwc-Permanent-Establishments-at-the-Heart-of-the-Matter-Final [access: 20.01.2021].PwC2013retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/412394251/Pwc-Permanent-Establishments-at-the-Heart-of-the-Matter-Final [access: 20.01.2021].Search in Google Scholar
Quak, E., Timmis, H. (2018), Double taxation agreements and developing countries. K4D Helpdesk Report, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.QuakE.TimmisH.2018K4D Helpdesk Report,Institute of Development StudiesBrighton, UKSearch in Google Scholar
Reimer, E. (2015), Article 5-permanent establishment, in: B. Johannes, et al. (Eds), Klaus Vogel on double taxation conventions, 4th edn, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp. 293–408.ReimerE.2015Article 5-permanent establishmentin:JohannesB.(Eds)4th ednKluwer Law InternationalAlphen aan den Rijn293408Search in Google Scholar
Ringe, W.G. (2013), Corporate mobility in the European Union – A flash in the pan? An empirical study of the success of lawmaking and regulatory competition, European Company and Financial Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 230–267.RingeW.G.2013Corporate mobility in the European Union – A flash in the pan? An empirical study of the success of lawmaking and regulatory competition10223026710.1017/9781780687223.005Search in Google Scholar
Rixen, T., Schwarz, P. (2009), Bargaining over the avoidance of double taxation: evidence from German tax treaties, FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 442–471.RixenT.SchwarzP.2009Bargaining over the avoidance of double taxation: evidence from German tax treaties65444247110.2139/ssrn.2502529Search in Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, P. (2015), General anti-avoidance rules for major developing countries, Series on International Taxation, Vol. 49, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.RosenblattP.201549Kluwer Law InternationalAlphen aan den RijnSearch in Google Scholar
Schindel, A., Atchabahian, A. (2005), General Report, in: Source and residence: a new configuration of their principles, IFA Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International, Vol. 90a, pp. 21–31.SchindelA.AtchabahianA.2005General Reportin:90a2131Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, P.K. (2019), Permanent establishment for investors in private equity funds – A legal analysis in light of the changes to the OECD model (2017), Nordic Tax Journal, Vol. 2019, No. 1, pp. 16–40.SchmidtP.K.2019Permanent establishment for investors in private equity funds – A legal analysis in light of the changes to the OECD model (2017)20191164010.1515/ntaxj-2019-0002Search in Google Scholar
Skaar, A.A. (1991), Permanent establishment: erosion of a tax treaty principle, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Boston.SkaarA.A.1991Kluwer Law and Taxation PublishersBostonSearch in Google Scholar
Skaar, A.A. (2020), Permanent establishment: erosion of a tax treaty principle, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.SkaarA.A.2020Kluwer Law InternationalAlphen aan den RijnSearch in Google Scholar
Uslu, Y. (2018), An analysis of ‘Google Taxes’ in the context of action 7 of the OECD/G20 base erosion and profit shifting initiative, Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 72, No. 4a/Special Issue.UsluY.2018An analysis of ‘Google Taxes’ in the context of action 7 of the OECD/G20 base erosion and profit shifting initiative72No. 4a/Special Issue.Search in Google Scholar
Vogel, K. (1997), Klaus vogel on double taxation conventions, 3th edn. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.VogelK.19973th edn.Kluwer Law InternationalAlphen aan den RijnSearch in Google Scholar
Vogel, K. (1988), Worldwide vs. source taxation of income – A review and re-evaluation of arguments (Part 3), Intertax, Vol. 11, pp. 393–402.VogelK.1988Worldwide vs. source taxation of income – A review and re-evaluation of arguments (Part 3)1139340210.54648/TAXI1988068Search in Google Scholar
Warnieło, J. (2016), Międzynarodowe aspekty opodatkowania gospodarki cyfrowej, in: M. Jamroży (Ed.), Opodatkowanie dochodów transgranicznych, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.WarniełoJ.2016Międzynarodowe aspekty opodatkowania gospodarki cyfrowejin:JamrożyM.(Ed.),Wolters KluwerWarszawaSearch in Google Scholar
Wettersten, M. (2016), How can the proposed changes to the OECD tax model convention in action 1 and action 7 counter the issue of an artificial avoidance of a PE status? Lunds Universitet, Lunds.WetterstenM.2016Lunds UniversitetLundsSearch in Google Scholar
Zimmer, F. (2002), Form and substance in tax law – General report, IFA Cahiers, Vol. 87a, International Fiscal Association.ZimmerF.200287aInternational Fiscal AssociationSearch in Google Scholar