This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abrams, Z. (2019). The future of remote work. Monitor on Psychology, 50 (9), 54.AbramsZ.2019The future of remote work50954Search in Google Scholar
Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance Management (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.AguinisH.20133rd Ed.Upper Saddle River, NJPearson/Prentice HallSearch in Google Scholar
Anderson, A.J., Kaplan, S.A. & Vega, R.P. (2015). The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 882–897.AndersonA.J.KaplanS.A.VegaR.P.2015The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being?2488289710.1080/1359432X.2014.966086Search in Google Scholar
Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., & Bendoly, E. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: exploring the impact of task interdependence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 193–201.BachrachD. G.PowellB. C.BendolyE.2006Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: exploring the impact of task interdependence9119320110.1037/0021-9010.91.1.193Search in Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. & Waber, B. (2019, November-December). The truth about open offices. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2019/11/the-truth-about-open-offices.BernsteinE.WaberB.2019November-DecemberThe truth about open officeshttps://hbr.org/2019/11/the-truth-about-open-offices.Search in Google Scholar
Borman, W. C., Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt N. and Borman W.C. (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.BormanW. C.MotowidloS. J.1993Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performanceInSchmittN.BormanW.C.(Eds.),7198San FranciscoJossey-BassSearch in Google Scholar
Byrne, S., Coates, D., Keenan, E. & McIndoe-Calder, T. (2020). The initial labour market impact of COVID-19. Economic Letters, Central Bank of Ireland, No. 4ByrneS.CoatesD.KeenanE.McIndoe-CalderT.2020The initial labour market impact of COVID-19Central Bank of IrelandNo. 4Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., & Sager, C.E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.CampbellJ.P.McCloyR.A.OpplerS.H.SagerC.E.1993A theory of performanceInSchmittN.BormanW. C.(Eds.),3570San FranciscoJossey-BassSearch in Google Scholar
Campbell, J.P., & Wiernik, B. (2015). The modeling and assessment of performance at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47–74.CampbellJ.P.WiernikB.2015The modeling and assessment of performance at work2477410.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427Search in Google Scholar
Charalampous, M., Grant, C.A., Tramontano, C. & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28, 51–73.CharalampousM.GrantC.A.TramontanoC.MichailidisE.2019Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach28517310.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886Search in Google Scholar
Courtright, S.H., Thurgood, G.R., Stewart, G.L. & Pierotti, A.J. (2015). Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1825–1846CourtrightS.H.ThurgoodG.R.StewartG.L.PierottiA.J.2015Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis1001825184610.1037/apl0000027Search in Google Scholar
Crosbie, T. & Moore, J. (2004). Work-life balance and working from home, Social Policy and Society, 3, 223–233.CrosbieT.MooreJ.2004Work-life balance and working from home322323310.1017/S1474746404001733Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, D.E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 283–400.BaileyD.E.KurlandN. B.2002A review of telework research: Findings, new directions and lessons for the study of modern work2328340010.1002/job.144Search in Google Scholar
Chong, S., Huang, Y, & Chang, C. (2020). Supporting interdependent telework employees: A Moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal. Journal of Applied Psychology, https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ul.ie/10.1037/apl0000843.suppChongS.HuangYChangC.2020Supporting interdependent telework employees: A Moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawalhttps://doi-org.proxy.lib.ul.ie/10.1037/apl0000843.supp10.1037/apl0000843Search in Google Scholar
Conway, J. M. (1996). Additional construct validity evidence for the task/contextual performance distinction. Human Performance, 9, 309–331.ConwayJ. M.1996Additional construct validity evidence for the task/contextual performance distinction930933110.1207/s15327043hup0904_1Search in Google Scholar
Felstead, A. & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32, 195–212.FelsteadA.HensekeG.2017Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance3219521210.1111/ntwe.12097Search in Google Scholar
Gajendran, R.S., & Harrision, D.A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541.GajendranR.S.HarrisionD.A.2007The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences921524154110.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524Search in Google Scholar
Gera, S. (2013). Virtual teams versus face to face teams: A review of literature. IOSR Journal if Business and Management, 1(2), 1–4.GeraS.2013Virtual teams versus face to face teams: A review of literature121410.9790/487X-1120104Search in Google Scholar
Golden, T.D. (2007). Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations, 60, 1641–1667.GoldenT.D.2007Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions601641166710.1177/0018726707084303Search in Google Scholar
Golden, T.D., & Veiga, J.F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31, 301–318.GoldenT.D.VeigaJ.F.2005The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings3130131810.1177/0149206304271768Search in Google Scholar
Golden, T.D., Veiga, J.F. & Dino, R.N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412–1421.GoldenT.D.VeigaJ.F.DinoR.N.2008The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter?931412142110.1037/a0012722Search in Google Scholar
Ibarra, H., Gillard, J. & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2020, July 16). Why WFH is not necessarily good for women. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2020/07/why-wfh-isnt-necessarily-good-for-women.IbarraH.GillardJ.Chamorro-PremuzicT.2020July16Why WFH is not necessarily good for womenhttps://hbr.org/2020/07/why-wfh-isnt-necessarily-good-for-women.Search in Google Scholar
Kramer, A. & Kramer, K.Z. (2020). The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119.https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ul.ie/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442KramerA.KramerK.Z.2020The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility119https://doi-org.proxy.lib.ul.ie/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.10344210.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442Search in Google Scholar
Landivar, L.C. (2015). The gender gap in employment hours: Do work-hour regulations atter? Work, Employment and Society, 20, 550–570LandivarL.C.2015The gender gap in employment hours: Do work-hour regulations atter?2055057010.1177/0950017014568139Search in Google Scholar
Marsh, K, & Musson, G. (2008). Men at work and at home: Managing emotion in telework. Gender, Work and Organization, 15, 31–48.MarshKMussonG.2008Men at work and at home: Managing emotion in telework15314810.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00353.xSearch in Google Scholar
Morganson, V.J., Major, D.A., Oborn, K.L., Verive, J.M., & Heelan, M.P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 578–595.MorgansonV.J.MajorD.A.ObornK.L.VeriveJ.M.HeelanM.P.2010Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion2557859510.1108/02683941011056941Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, K.R., Cleveland, J.N., & Hanscom, M. (2018). Performance Appraisal and Management: Why does it Fail and how can it be Fixed? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.MurphyK.R.ClevelandJ.N.HanscomM.2018Thousand Oaks, CASage10.4135/9781506352886Search in Google Scholar
Organ D.W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington, Books.OrganD.W.1988Lexington, MALexington, BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Purvanova, R.K. (2014). Face-to-face versus virtual teams: What have we really learned? The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 17, 2–29PurvanovaR.K.2014Face-to-face versus virtual teams: What have we really learned?1722910.1037/mgr0000009Search in Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D. (2009). Performance management: A new approach for driving business results. Maiden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.PulakosE. D.2009Maiden, MAWiley-Blackwell10.1002/9781444308747Search in Google Scholar
Salas, E., Goodwin, G.F. & Burke, S. (2009). Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches. New York: Routledge.SalasE.GoodwinG.F.BurkeS.2009New YorkRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Smith C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.SmithC. A.OrganD. W.NearJ. P.1983Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents6865366310.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653Search in Google Scholar
Sumita, R., Hill, S.N., Gibbs, J.L. & Likoebe, M. (2019). Virtual work: Bridging research clusters. The Academy of Management Annals, 13, 308–341SumitaR.HillS.N.GibbsJ.L.LikoebeM.2019Virtual work: Bridging research clusters1330834110.5465/annals.2017.0020Search in Google Scholar
Waber, B., Magnolfi, J. & Lindsay, G. (2014, October). Workplaces that move people. Harvard Business Review, 92(10), 68–77.WaberB.MagnolfiJ.LindsayG.2014OctoberWorkplaces that move people92106877Search in Google Scholar
Werner, J. M. (1994). Dimensions that make a difference: examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 98–107.WernerJ. M.1994Dimensions that make a difference: examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings799810710.1037/0021-9010.79.1.98Search in Google Scholar
Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 125–139.WhitingS. W.PodsakoffP. M.PierceJ. R.2008Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings9312513910.1037/0021-9010.93.1.125Search in Google Scholar